v) an engineering code of ethics to ethical dilemmas b) Solution of complex engineering problems in at least four specialty areas appropriate to civil engineering c) Conduct of experiments in at least two civil engineering contexts and reporting of results d) Explanation of: i) concepts and principles in project management and engineering economics ii) professional attitudes and responsibilities of a civil engineer, including licensure and safety 2) Faculty The program must demonstrate that faculty teaching courses that are primarily design in
– Attitudes 4. 2025 ME PedagogyThese boards were focused on the graduate of 2029 as this would be the first class that would beeducated at our university completely in the semester system. Then, two of the working groupmembers used a qualitative content approach to code these responses [10], [11]. Table 1displays the categories that emerged.Table 1. Results of initial Jamboard ideas about curriculum Page Category Example comments ME Graduate of Ethics Environmental ethics, legal system as related to 2029 – engineering decisions, robotics ethics Knowledge Overarching ways of Sustainable development, sociotechnical thinking
workshops onsuch topics as “developing leadership philosophy,” “cultural competency,” “leading,micromanaging, and mentoring,” and “ethics, pragmatism, and risk-taking,” among others.Members also engage in outreach projects and are provided with individualized assessments 2geared to the career and personal goals of each. Participation in the program provides myriadbenefits to members, including mentoring from industry representatives and UConn Engineeringleaders, resume building, exclusive JLLA-related grants and fellowships, faculty social hours(providing interdisciplinary networking), and a professional community through which memberscan make
—Criminal Justice a. CRIJ 1301: Intro to Crim Justice b. CRIJ 3316: Crime Investigation & Proof 4. Legal and Ethical Principles—Business a. INFS 3308: Bus Info Infra b. BLAW 333:7 Bus Law I c. Corporate and Ethical Principles—Business d. INFS 4312: E-Commerce Design (Elective) e. INFS 4330: Business Intelligence (Elective) f. INFS 4391: Information Security (Elective) g. INFS 4397: Health Computer Information Systems (Elective) Figure 2. Cyber Security Degree/Flow ChartFig. 2 shows the details of the degree. It has a total of 120 hours with 50 advanced hours (core,technical electives, and support courses). As we can see, the degree is a balanced
-based modeling of physical phenomena when the datais a combination of actual field measurements and data that is generated through mathematical equationslike Hybrid Models, and Physics-Informed Neural Network, based on AI-Ethics (Mohaghegh 2021), itbecomes clear that the developed AI-model is not based on reality of AI rather it includes assumptions,interpretations, simplifications, preconceived notions, and biases.In this study, authors do not intend to explain the architecture or mathematics of neural networks as theycan be found in depth in several articles. However, it is intended to show a workflow that honors theoriginal definitions of AI&ML and follows AI-Ethics by not including assumptions, interpretations,simplifications
presentation slides completed bystudent groups within the three eligible chemical engineering sections. We measured studentachievement of three learning outcomes, referred to as Criterion 1, 2, and 3, by customizing arubric previously developed for evaluating undergraduate research assignments [16]. Criterion 1,“Evaluate Information Sources Critically,” measures students’ ability to select a variety ofappropriate information sources as part of their projects. Criterion 2, “Use InformationEffectively,” measures students’ ability to synthesize multiple information sources within theirpresentations, as well as their use of in-text citations to bolster their claims with evidence.Criterion 3, “Use Information Ethically,” measures students’ ability to
education through teaching methods, policies, and culture change.Dr. Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Andrew O. Brightman serves as Assistant Head for Academic Affairs and Associate Professor of Engi- neering Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering. His research background is in cellular biochemistry, tissue engineering, and engineering ethics. He is committed to developing effective ped- agogies for ethical reasoning and engineering design and for increasing the diversity and inclusion of engineering education.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Patrice M. Buzzanell is Professor and Chair of the Department of Communication at the
the course as a technical elective towards my degree, but not seeking a BME minor 4. If your major is NOT Biomedical Engineering, please state your primary major. If your major is Biomedical Engineering, please type “N/A”. (Free response) 5. At the end of this course, how do I rate my ability to: a. Define complex biomedical engineering problems and their critical features. i. Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent, N/A b. Develop and evaluate hypotheses framing complex biomedical engineering problems. i. Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent, N/A c. Identify appropriate safety and ethical issues relevant to biomedical engineering problems
biases, to have accurate understandings of other cultural world views, and to display attitudes of curiosity, openness, and empathy; 6. To recognize ethical issues when presented in a complex, multilayered (grey) context, to analyze cross-relationships among the issues, and to evaluate ethical perspectives and concepts, including his or her own.These six essential learning outcomes and student objectives are a subset from the LEAPInitiative (Liberal Education and America’s Promise) on General Education developed by theAssociation of American Colleges and Universities [2]. The specifics of the entire Strand ModelGeneral Education are beyond the scope of this paper. However, all strands begin with aFreshman Seminar and
public policy and appreciative of the sustainabilityof projects. A summary of the attributes of the ideal engineering that resulted from the brain-storming session follows: Ability to communicate orally and in written form in a manner appropriate for the in- tended audience. Understanding of local government operations and decision making– planning, engi- neering, financing, politics, procurement, education of public, etc. Ability to evaluate projects from a holistic perspective – environmental, ethical, aes- thetic, political, historical, social impact, technical needs, costs. Awareness of sustainability issues of projects. Ability to use engineering judgment - evaluation of reasonableness of answers
wewant to increase the diversity of the cybersecurity workforce because one good indicator ofcareer interests for adolescents is their choice of leisure and extra-curricular activity3.Tangentially, we also recognize that while computer-skills are critically important to acybersecurity professional, professionals in cybersecurity also are required to have a widebreadth of skills. This broader set of skills include critical thinking, teamwork, communication aswell as being well versed in privacy, ethics, and legal aspects of cybersecurity.To expand demographic participation in cybersecurity and the diversity of the cybersecurityworkforce, we believe that cybersecurity competitions at the formative ages should focus on abroader set of cybersecurity
communicate effectively in writing, orally, and graphically (ETAC 3g)College Goal(s) Supported:Goal number 1. To foster teaching and learning in a supportive environment6. Intended Outcome:Students will be able to understand professional, ethical, and social responsibilities.(ETAC/ABET criteria 3i)College Goal(s) Supported:Goal number 1. To foster teaching and learning in a supportive environment.Goal number 2. To provide students with a broad academic foundation which includes anappreciation of the interrelationships among the applied sciences, technologies and society.Goal number 3. To enhance students’ appreciation of culture, ethics, esthetics and culturaldiversity fully empowering them to participate in the lives of their communities.7. Intended
students studying the basics of engineering design. The authors inthis paper would discuss the results of the survey and recommended actions based on the survey.IntroductionHigher educational institutions have recognized and acknowledged their responsibility towardsachieving the goals of sustainability as they prepare the future engineers for the global world.Sustainability challenges all schools and universities to rethink their mission and vision torepresent themselves as the new generation school. With this in place most of the accreditingbodies have also included the ethical part of sustainability in the curriculum, which makes mostof the program to restructure and realign the curriculum, develop research programs, andredefine the student life
social responsibility education in first year, including ethicsand societal impact. Ethics education has been correlated with increased measures of socialresponsibility, and greater student ranking of the importance of ethics relative to fundamentaltechnical skills [7]. The case studies allow reflection on and discussion of ethics, economics,stakeholders, and impact of engineering projects; while providing a richer context for learningengineering math and science fundamentals. The term “case study” as used in this paper refersto an exercise that contains elements of “inquiry-based learning”, “guided discovery learning”,“problem-based learning”, and “case-based learning” [5]. Our case studies at this point do nothave the historical, decision
Technology. His research focuses on integrating Makerspaces and Design Thinking with higher education to enhance learning through hands on interdisciplinary practices.Dr. Megan K Halpern, Michigan State UniversityDr. Isaac Record, Michigan State University Isaac Record is an Assistant Professor of Practice at Lyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, where he directs the Collaborative Experiential Learning Laboratory and teaches courses in philosophy of science, science and technology studies, and critical making. His research seeks to situate our epistemic and ethical circumstances within a network of values, capabilities, and material and social technologies. Isaac holds a PhD and MA from the Institute for the
problems g an ability to communicate effectively h a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning i an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities j a respect for diversity and an knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues k a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement Figure 1. ABET Program Outcomes for Engineering Technology Program [1]The outcomes, as per the definition in Figure 1, are frequently referred to as a-k outcomes. Theopening statement in the Figure demands that the outcomes should be assessed on the graduates,not on
required program outcomes that the students must obtain both a“recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning” and “anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility11.” In order to be life-long learners,students must be information literate. The Association for College and Research Libraries Page 14.384.4eloquently states the following which appeared in Information Literacy Competency Standardsfor Higher Education. Information literacy forms the basis for lifelong learning…. It enables learners to master content and extend their investigations, become more self-directed, and assume greater
information management (DB) information systems development intelligent systems (AI) legal/professional/ethics/society networks operating systems programming security software life cycle systems administration
having the expertise to devise improved construction or design alternatives. Page 11.236.3 • Understanding implies a thorough mental grasp and comprehension of a concept or topic. Understanding typically requires more than abstract knowledge. For example, an engineer with an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility should be able to identify and to communicate ethical issues arising from a practical case study. • Ability is a capability to perform with competence. An engineer with the ability to design a particular system can take responsibility for the system, identifying all the necessary
project plan to monitor, control and report task status and completion • assess risk and develop a risk plan with mitigation strategies • create a process for requirements verification and validation • identify and perform tests and methods to evaluate a design to the original specifications • identify and evaluate design shortfalls and improve the design in terms of meeting specification including failure mode analysis • demonstrate effective written and oral communications in project documentation and presentations • demonstrate an understanding of and a commitment to professional and ethical responsibilities, including a respect for diversity • demonstrate an understand of the impact of engineering
was on the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) from 1993-2003 and was chair in 2001- 2002. He is currently a member of the NAE Center for Engineering, Ethics, and Society Advisory Group, the ASCE Committee on Sustainability and the Board of Directors of the Civil Engineering Certification Board. He is a Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers and ABET.Dr. J. P. Mohsen, University of Louisville Dr. Mohsen is Past President of the American Society for Engineering Education. He has served on the ASEE Board of Directors previously as Vice President for Member Affairs and Vice President for Professional Interest Council. J. P. Mohsen is professor and chair of the Civil and Environmental
chosen a different approach to this section,from teaching a broad overview using a seminar approach, to focusing on teachingspecific software necessary for future courses.Introduction to Chemical Engineering The department faculty has adapted a project-based learning approach due to thelarge success shown in many other similar introductory level courses(3-7). The goal was tointroduce different unit operations through a fun process example that was simple enoughfor the students to follow. The process needed to involve simple chemistry and provideopportunities for introducing different unit operations, teamwork, ethics andsustainability. The other challenge, due to lack of laboratory space, the process ideallywould not require the use of a
n % Literature review 7 78% Knowledge of research area 6 67% Independence 5 56% Technical presentation 4 44% Research ethics awareness 4 44% Data analysis and presentation 4 44% Networking 3 33% Scientific method 3 33% Creativity 3 33% Knowledge of bioenergy 3 33
fundamental goal to provide every student with the ability tounderstand the social, political, economic, and ethical implications of new technologicaldevelopments.This paper will present the reasons for creating this kind of course and how it is designed to helpstudents discover how modern technology affects society and how they can use it to improvetheir cognitive skills, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The course was built to provideopportunities for students to explore the positive and negative aspects of modern technology,understand the social, political, economic, and ethical aspects of issues that are impacted byadvancement of technology, and realize how to utilize it for the benefit of humanity. The courseis structured to provide students
ofengineering. In other words, philosophy of engineering is a reflection on the practice ofengineering which through explanatory efforts and critical descriptions provides feedback into thepractice again. Figure 1 represents this reciprocal relationship graphically.On Epistemic Diversity of EngineeringAlthough mathematical and natural sciences are widely known as major constituents ofengineering knowledge, it is not conceivable to overlook the humanistic aspects of engineering,for example, sociological, ethical, aesthetic and economical issues embedded in engineeringproblems. In recent years, a model for holistic engineering 9 has been established andconsiderable research has been done on the pedagogy of holistic engineering 10 . One of theachievements
Paying someone else to take an exam/write a paper for you Storing answers to a test in a calculator or Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) Working in groups on Web-based quizzesOne issue with academic dishonesty is that students and instructors have different definitions ofcheating. Therefore, it is important for institutions to define what constitutes cheating tostudents. In general, it is believed that students who cheat in college are more likely to shoplift,cheat in income taxes, abuse harmful substances, and engage in un-ethical behavior in theworkspace. Students that cheat in high school also do it in college [1].Among the different disciplines, Business and Engineering students are among the most likely
: An occupational science perspective” by Cail Carin-Levy & Derek Jones, Queen Margaret University College“Ethics”8. Ethics Case 1: The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster (Texas A&M)9. Ethics Case 2: Choose different ethical dilemmas from the website: http://ethics.tamu.edu/pritchar/an-intro.htm“Teamwork”10. Team Performance Evaluation (Varney3)11. Team Performance Evaluation (Parker4)12. Final Team Performance“Presentation”13. Presentation Critique (View the DVD, and write a one-page critique.)Pro-Engineer:During the semester, the students have nine weeks of instruction in Pro-Engineer. They have nothad any instruction in a CAD program except AutoCad when they were freshmen, so it is helpfulwhen they interview for a job to
education for over 70 years. Its new criteria for the evaluation of engineeringprograms, Engineering Criteria 2000, require implementation of sustainability concepts inundergraduate education, as reflected in the following areas (criteria 3c and 3h) (1): ‚" “Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability;” ‚" “Broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context.”Limited work has been conducted to address the need, effectiveness, and impact of incorporatingsustainable engineering
Page 11.1372.17 Objective #3: For EET: Uses the principles of science, mathematics, and engineering technology to design, implement, and evaluate hardware and software solutions to complex technical problems.Outcomes Ratings Evidence Weaknesses/Suggestions for (0 - 4) ImprovementSelects and defines a Proposes a problem for investigationmeaningful problem taking Identifies criteria for the proposal (taking safety,safety, ethical, social, ethical, social, economic, and technical
Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Educationc. an ability to conduct, analyze and interpret experiments and apply experimental results to improve processes,d. an ability to apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes appropriate to program objectives,e. an ability to function effectively on teams,f. an ability to identify, analyze and solve technical problems,g. an ability to communicate effectively,h. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning,i. an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities,j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues, andk. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and