wewant to increase the diversity of the cybersecurity workforce because one good indicator ofcareer interests for adolescents is their choice of leisure and extra-curricular activity3.Tangentially, we also recognize that while computer-skills are critically important to acybersecurity professional, professionals in cybersecurity also are required to have a widebreadth of skills. This broader set of skills include critical thinking, teamwork, communication aswell as being well versed in privacy, ethics, and legal aspects of cybersecurity.To expand demographic participation in cybersecurity and the diversity of the cybersecurityworkforce, we believe that cybersecurity competitions at the formative ages should focus on abroader set of cybersecurity
communicate effectively in writing, orally, and graphically (ETAC 3g)College Goal(s) Supported:Goal number 1. To foster teaching and learning in a supportive environment6. Intended Outcome:Students will be able to understand professional, ethical, and social responsibilities.(ETAC/ABET criteria 3i)College Goal(s) Supported:Goal number 1. To foster teaching and learning in a supportive environment.Goal number 2. To provide students with a broad academic foundation which includes anappreciation of the interrelationships among the applied sciences, technologies and society.Goal number 3. To enhance students’ appreciation of culture, ethics, esthetics and culturaldiversity fully empowering them to participate in the lives of their communities.7. Intended
students studying the basics of engineering design. The authors inthis paper would discuss the results of the survey and recommended actions based on the survey.IntroductionHigher educational institutions have recognized and acknowledged their responsibility towardsachieving the goals of sustainability as they prepare the future engineers for the global world.Sustainability challenges all schools and universities to rethink their mission and vision torepresent themselves as the new generation school. With this in place most of the accreditingbodies have also included the ethical part of sustainability in the curriculum, which makes mostof the program to restructure and realign the curriculum, develop research programs, andredefine the student life
social responsibility education in first year, including ethicsand societal impact. Ethics education has been correlated with increased measures of socialresponsibility, and greater student ranking of the importance of ethics relative to fundamentaltechnical skills [7]. The case studies allow reflection on and discussion of ethics, economics,stakeholders, and impact of engineering projects; while providing a richer context for learningengineering math and science fundamentals. The term “case study” as used in this paper refersto an exercise that contains elements of “inquiry-based learning”, “guided discovery learning”,“problem-based learning”, and “case-based learning” [5]. Our case studies at this point do nothave the historical, decision
Technology. His research focuses on integrating Makerspaces and Design Thinking with higher education to enhance learning through hands on interdisciplinary practices.Dr. Megan K Halpern, Michigan State UniversityDr. Isaac Record, Michigan State University Isaac Record is an Assistant Professor of Practice at Lyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, where he directs the Collaborative Experiential Learning Laboratory and teaches courses in philosophy of science, science and technology studies, and critical making. His research seeks to situate our epistemic and ethical circumstances within a network of values, capabilities, and material and social technologies. Isaac holds a PhD and MA from the Institute for the
problems g an ability to communicate effectively h a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning i an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities j a respect for diversity and an knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues k a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement Figure 1. ABET Program Outcomes for Engineering Technology Program [1]The outcomes, as per the definition in Figure 1, are frequently referred to as a-k outcomes. Theopening statement in the Figure demands that the outcomes should be assessed on the graduates,not on
required program outcomes that the students must obtain both a“recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning” and “anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility11.” In order to be life-long learners,students must be information literate. The Association for College and Research Libraries Page 14.384.4eloquently states the following which appeared in Information Literacy Competency Standardsfor Higher Education. Information literacy forms the basis for lifelong learning…. It enables learners to master content and extend their investigations, become more self-directed, and assume greater
information management (DB) information systems development intelligent systems (AI) legal/professional/ethics/society networks operating systems programming security software life cycle systems administration
having the expertise to devise improved construction or design alternatives. Page 11.236.3 • Understanding implies a thorough mental grasp and comprehension of a concept or topic. Understanding typically requires more than abstract knowledge. For example, an engineer with an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility should be able to identify and to communicate ethical issues arising from a practical case study. • Ability is a capability to perform with competence. An engineer with the ability to design a particular system can take responsibility for the system, identifying all the necessary
project plan to monitor, control and report task status and completion • assess risk and develop a risk plan with mitigation strategies • create a process for requirements verification and validation • identify and perform tests and methods to evaluate a design to the original specifications • identify and evaluate design shortfalls and improve the design in terms of meeting specification including failure mode analysis • demonstrate effective written and oral communications in project documentation and presentations • demonstrate an understanding of and a commitment to professional and ethical responsibilities, including a respect for diversity • demonstrate an understand of the impact of engineering
was on the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) from 1993-2003 and was chair in 2001- 2002. He is currently a member of the NAE Center for Engineering, Ethics, and Society Advisory Group, the ASCE Committee on Sustainability and the Board of Directors of the Civil Engineering Certification Board. He is a Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers and ABET.Dr. J. P. Mohsen, University of Louisville Dr. Mohsen is Past President of the American Society for Engineering Education. He has served on the ASEE Board of Directors previously as Vice President for Member Affairs and Vice President for Professional Interest Council. J. P. Mohsen is professor and chair of the Civil and Environmental
chosen a different approach to this section,from teaching a broad overview using a seminar approach, to focusing on teachingspecific software necessary for future courses.Introduction to Chemical Engineering The department faculty has adapted a project-based learning approach due to thelarge success shown in many other similar introductory level courses(3-7). The goal was tointroduce different unit operations through a fun process example that was simple enoughfor the students to follow. The process needed to involve simple chemistry and provideopportunities for introducing different unit operations, teamwork, ethics andsustainability. The other challenge, due to lack of laboratory space, the process ideallywould not require the use of a
n % Literature review 7 78% Knowledge of research area 6 67% Independence 5 56% Technical presentation 4 44% Research ethics awareness 4 44% Data analysis and presentation 4 44% Networking 3 33% Scientific method 3 33% Creativity 3 33% Knowledge of bioenergy 3 33
fundamental goal to provide every student with the ability tounderstand the social, political, economic, and ethical implications of new technologicaldevelopments.This paper will present the reasons for creating this kind of course and how it is designed to helpstudents discover how modern technology affects society and how they can use it to improvetheir cognitive skills, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The course was built to provideopportunities for students to explore the positive and negative aspects of modern technology,understand the social, political, economic, and ethical aspects of issues that are impacted byadvancement of technology, and realize how to utilize it for the benefit of humanity. The courseis structured to provide students
ofengineering. In other words, philosophy of engineering is a reflection on the practice ofengineering which through explanatory efforts and critical descriptions provides feedback into thepractice again. Figure 1 represents this reciprocal relationship graphically.On Epistemic Diversity of EngineeringAlthough mathematical and natural sciences are widely known as major constituents ofengineering knowledge, it is not conceivable to overlook the humanistic aspects of engineering,for example, sociological, ethical, aesthetic and economical issues embedded in engineeringproblems. In recent years, a model for holistic engineering 9 has been established andconsiderable research has been done on the pedagogy of holistic engineering 10 . One of theachievements
Paying someone else to take an exam/write a paper for you Storing answers to a test in a calculator or Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) Working in groups on Web-based quizzesOne issue with academic dishonesty is that students and instructors have different definitions ofcheating. Therefore, it is important for institutions to define what constitutes cheating tostudents. In general, it is believed that students who cheat in college are more likely to shoplift,cheat in income taxes, abuse harmful substances, and engage in un-ethical behavior in theworkspace. Students that cheat in high school also do it in college [1].Among the different disciplines, Business and Engineering students are among the most likely
: An occupational science perspective” by Cail Carin-Levy & Derek Jones, Queen Margaret University College“Ethics”8. Ethics Case 1: The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster (Texas A&M)9. Ethics Case 2: Choose different ethical dilemmas from the website: http://ethics.tamu.edu/pritchar/an-intro.htm“Teamwork”10. Team Performance Evaluation (Varney3)11. Team Performance Evaluation (Parker4)12. Final Team Performance“Presentation”13. Presentation Critique (View the DVD, and write a one-page critique.)Pro-Engineer:During the semester, the students have nine weeks of instruction in Pro-Engineer. They have nothad any instruction in a CAD program except AutoCad when they were freshmen, so it is helpfulwhen they interview for a job to
education for over 70 years. Its new criteria for the evaluation of engineeringprograms, Engineering Criteria 2000, require implementation of sustainability concepts inundergraduate education, as reflected in the following areas (criteria 3c and 3h) (1): ‚" “Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability;” ‚" “Broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context.”Limited work has been conducted to address the need, effectiveness, and impact of incorporatingsustainable engineering
Page 11.1372.17 Objective #3: For EET: Uses the principles of science, mathematics, and engineering technology to design, implement, and evaluate hardware and software solutions to complex technical problems.Outcomes Ratings Evidence Weaknesses/Suggestions for (0 - 4) ImprovementSelects and defines a Proposes a problem for investigationmeaningful problem taking Identifies criteria for the proposal (taking safety,safety, ethical, social, ethical, social, economic, and technical
Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Educationc. an ability to conduct, analyze and interpret experiments and apply experimental results to improve processes,d. an ability to apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes appropriate to program objectives,e. an ability to function effectively on teams,f. an ability to identify, analyze and solve technical problems,g. an ability to communicate effectively,h. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning,i. an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities,j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues, andk. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and
Rippon et al. 2012.8The University requirements for this type of introductory class dictated that the curriculuminclude University values, critical thinking, and ethics. One class period and two homeworkassignments were dedicated to University values. The first homework assignment focused on thevalue of citizenship, with the goal of engaging students in the School’s engineering community.This assignment required students to attend a chapter meeting of an engineering studentorganization, then complete an online discussion board post about their experience. As Meyerset al. note, freshman are more apt to listen to the advice of other upperclassmen than facultymembers16 and such engagement could lead to a forum for soliciting this advice. The
development. There are sample program segments to help the students get the robotsinto motion.In order for the students to use the Pocket PCs and robots, there was a check out form thatneeded to be completed and signed by each student. Apparently this check out concept is quitecommon in other academic disciplines, e.g., for music instruments, but not common forengineering students.IV. Computer Basics With a Vision CourseThe course included lectures on software engineering with an overview of software developmentand maintenance through to the topics of detailed design and implementation. Early on in thecourse, there was a discussion on the software code of ethics that was developed by theAssociation for Computing Machinery / IEEE Computer Society
perceived to be enhanced between 35 – 55% in thehigh level category: • Engineering Codes and Standards (36.8%) • Ethical Considerations (42.1%) • Health and Safety Issues (47.4%) • Political Factors (36.8%)The nine areas listed above are perceived by students to be enhanced at a relatively high level.They include the traditional subjects of materials and structural engineering as well as theconcepts of constructability, and engineering codes and standards. These areas are stronglyneeded in project work. Team work, project management/scheduling and estimating, and healthand safety issues are also considered very important. Students appear to recognize thatconsideration of these practical issues are required for a
on the knowledge and skills acquired in earliercourse work and incorporating engineering standards and realistic constraints thatinclude most of the following considerations: economic; environmental; sustainability;manufacturability; ethical; health and safety; social; and political.”In developing the Engineering Handbook, Santa Clara University has added three otherconsiderations: usability, compassion and lifelong learning.Criterion Four also calls for:“a general education component that complements the technical content of thecurriculum and is consistent with the program and institution objectives.”Some of ABET’s eight specific considerations have close ties to the general educationcomponent, most notably: ethical, social, political and
to design systems, devices, components, processes, and experiments with an understanding of manufacturing processes to meet real-world needs for solutions to problems in the biomedical device industries, medicine, and the life sciences.‚ Students are able to communicate effectively as bioengineers in oral, written, computer- based, and graphical forms.‚ Faculty seek to instill students with a sense of commitment to professionalism and ethical responsibility as bioengineers.‚ Students are given opportunities to interact with and gain real-world experience with local and national medical device and technology industries, health-care organizations, educational institutions, and constituent populations.‚ Faculty seek to
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education" Session 3130 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 GRAPHING W/ DATA ANALYSIS COMPUTER PROGRAMMING THEORY + PROBLEMS PROFESSIONAL ETHICS MISCELLANEOUS CLASS TESTS, ETC UNITS, SIG FIGURES, DATA ANALYSIS HANDS ON COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN DESIGNFigure 2: Changes in Freshman Year Engineering CourseIn the past, due to lack of collaboration between faculty members in ENGE and otherengineering departments, the ENGE courses were primarily designed by ENGE faculty
. Therefore,the upper-level physics curriculum was modified and course content was altered in order to addand codify the needed engineering content. This was developed collaboratively by all three EPfaculty, and includes: developing an “Engineering Physics Lab” to introduce concepts inexperimentation, modeling, design and communication; and incorporating engineering intocourses on classical mechanics, optics, and quantum mechanics. Additionally, a course onsensors has been created; engineering ethics appears throughout the curriculum; and the ModernPhysics laboratory has been altered to serve as a better “bridge” to the Engineering Physicsportion of the curriculum. This continuing development has been aided by feedback from ourstudents, graduates and
(c) an ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. (l)Each program
, Page 7.552.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationrather than as separate concerns reserved for environmental engineers. This approach issupported by the study of engineering ethics in EF1015, wherein interpretation of thefundamental cannon to protect the safety, health, and welfare of the public 1 implicitly requiresprotection of the environment. The balance of this communication begins with a briefdescription of the Division of Engineering Fundamentals, the Division's function within VirginiaTech’s College of Engineering, and EF1015. This is followed by an overview of the plan toimplement
environment forengineers. We work with both types of companies at university’s X College of Engineering andeach has their own challenges.We are always doing a balance act and serving two parties: Students (getting students to connect with industry) o Increasing their knowledge of the engineering work world o Introducing global, societal, contemporary topics that affect the business and engineering industries (i.e. ethics, technology, outsourcing, diversity, etc) o Honing their professional development skills and professional behaviors o Expanding/broadening their knowledge of the engineering profession in hopes to create retention both in college and in the industry Industry