-medium size companies and multi-national enterprises such as global strategy planning, cross-border business entry, middle manager training, and partner development. These business achievements are reflected in his aca- demic activities through the designing of lectures and mobility programs with practical implementation perspectives. Ishizaki has been actively presenting and publishing his academic achievements at interna- tional conferences in the Asia Pacific region and North America such as APAIE, WERA, and NAFSA. He earned a Master of Business Administration majoring in international business at the University of Southern California in the United States of America, and a Bachelor in Law at Hitotsubashi University
/853: Robotics: Kinematics and design,” https://smr.unl.edu/MECH453-853.[17] R. Likert, “A technique for the measurement of attitudes.” Archives of psychology, 1932.[18] J. Saldaña, “The coding manual for qualitative researchers,” The coding manual for qualitative researchers, pp. 1–440, 2021.[19] B. Miles Matthew, H. A. Michael, and S. Johnny, “Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook,” 2014.[20] A. Carberry, S. Krause, C. Ankeny, and C. Waters, ““unmuddying” course content using muddiest point reflections,” in 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2013, pp. 937–942.
program based on the continuous collection of data from a variety ofsources. These sources included interviews from a mixture of stakeholders (instructors, administrators,students, alumni, and advisors), pre-post-retrospective surveys from students within the program, studentwork, and reflections from an embedded ethnographer. The analyzed data includes interviews from 30students, 20 alumni, and 14 faculty/administrators/advisors as well as over 241 pre/post/retrospectivesurvey responses. The data from these sources were analyzed and reviewed by the cross-college facultyfor refinements to the model at the end of each academic year as well as for identifying institutionalbarriers toward, and strategies for, transdisciplinary programming. As a
thestudy groups, and three of the five achieved the required C to continue on to the next course in the EEsequence. However, for the Scholars who did not achieve a C, the PI ran a mini-course after the semesterended, to raise their skill levels to C level. Out of the two, one was able to continue to the next course,while it was recommended to the other, that he change his major to a two-year electrical technologymajor, which he eventually did. It should be noted that the student who did not achieve the skills neededto continue in the major, also scored very poorly on our department’s math pre-Calculus assessment tests,even though he scored at least a C in Pre-Calculus, Calculus I and Calculus II, which indicates that gradesdo not always reflect
reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Zheng, P., Wang, H., Sang, Z, Zhong, R.Y., Liu, Y, Liu, C., Mubarok, K., Yu, S., and Xu, X., “Smart manufacturing systems for Industry 4.0: Conceptual framework, scenarios, and future perspectives,” Frontier Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 13(2): 137–150[2] Industry 4.0, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industry_4.0, last accessed on 3/1/2020.[3] Manyika, J., Ramaswamy, S., Khanna, S., Sarrazin, H., Pinkus, G., Sethupathy, G. and Yaffe, A. Digital America: A tale of the haves and have-mores, McKinsey Global Institute Report. New York, 2015.[4] McLeman, A. (2014). Manufacturing skills gap: Training is the answer. Control Engineering, 61(10
determine the impact of authoring POGIL activities has on teaching withPOGIL in the classroom.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantDUE-1626765. Any opinions, findings & conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] M. T. H. Chi and R. Wylie, “The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 219–243, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.[2] H. H. Hu, C. Kussmaul, B. Knaeble, C. Mayfield, and A. Yadav, “Results from a survey of faculty adoption of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry
. 16-01). http://cepa.stanford.edu/wp16-01[18] Delgado Gaitan, C. (2013). Creating a college culture for Latino students: Successful programs, practices, and strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.[19] Fine, M. (1993). Apparent involvement: Reflections on parents, power, and urban public schools. Teachers College Record, 94, (4), 682-729.[20] Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132-41.[21] Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8, 69-91.[22] Crisp, G., & Nora, A
. Sci. Educ., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 742–760, 2017.[12] L. Curry and M. Docherty, “Implementing competency-based education.,” Collect. Essays Learn. Teach., vol. 10, pp. 61–73, 2017.[13] R. M. Crespo et al., “Aligning assessment with learning outcomes in outcome-based education,” in IEEE EDUCON 2010 Conference, 2010, pp. 1239–1246.[14] S. Adam, “An introduction to learning outcomes.” article B, 2006.[15] J. M. Williams and others, “The engineering portfolio: Communication, reflection, and student learning outcomes assessment,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 199–207, 2002.[16] G. Lesmond, S. McCahan, and D. Beach, Development of analytic rubrics for competency assessment. Higher Education Quality
method inengineering ethics education.Case-Based Instruction in Engineering Ethics EducationCase studies or case scenarios (we use these phrases interchangeably) present students withethical dilemmas embedded in real-world contexts. These dilemmas generally do not have rightor wrong answers, but rather better or worse decision outcomes for various stakeholders [2].These shades of gray encourage students to think deeply about their values, experiences, andprofessional practice [14], [24]. Students reflect on scenarios with information provided in termsof news media reports, academic publications, regulatory documents, or other materials.Instructors in engineering classes often teach the code of ethics of professional organizationssuch as the
individual’sconnections with others and the level of support they receive from their classmates andcolleagues can be quantified through social capital [15]. In this study, social capital is defined asthe number of friends a student indicated they work with academically—in other words, thenumber of friends a student also uses as an academic resource.The clustering coefficient is a measure of network density, reflecting the interconnectedness ofan individual’s egonet. Figure 2 shows two different students’ social networks. The left socialnetwork has a clustering coefficient of 0.14. This is a low clustering coefficient which indicatesthat the ego’s network of friends are mostly not friends with each other. Each node is connectedto the ego, but there are only a few
inventory. Out of the 28 students who were registered for the course,20 participated in the review process. The high participation rate suggests that the results are areliable reflection of the class’s perspective on the project. Although it may have been informative to collect data from students frequently throughoutthe project, we decided that approach might lead to survey fatigue and encourage students to rushthrough the survey rather than provide thoughtful feedback. Furthermore, taking feedback toofrequently would not provide enough time to review and implement student suggestions. In future iterations of the project, it would be beneficial to distribute surveys at least twice toallow for initial feedback to be incorporated into the
, doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/p.27205.[9] A. Edgcomb and F. Vahid, "How Many Points Should Be Awarded for Interactive Textbook Reading Assignments?," in 45th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), El Paso, TX, 2015, pp. 1-4, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344350.[10] C. M. Burchfield and T. Sappington, "Compliance with required reading assignments," (in English), Teaching of Psychology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 58-60, Win 2000, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-07173-017.[11] R. Wang and A. K. Ribera, "Moving students to read - Unpacking the relationship with reflective and integrative learning," in American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2016, doi: https
work may lead to important insights on how to betterimprove military student support across multiple institutions.This study will continue to generate data from institutional agents working with militarystudents, especially those working within the college of engineering, to better define thedifference in awareness and gaps in support for military students pursuing an undergraduateengineering degree.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2045634. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of National Science foundation
glaze that solely used materials from the Black Hills, as it added additional creative andtechnical challenges to overcome.The scientific and creativity rubric that was used to for the MET 352 competition can be seen inTable 2. The students were evaluated by program faculty and the AIR. The students also receiveddirect feedback (comments) from the evaluators.Spring 2022 MET 352– Results and Lessons LearnedThe A+E team goal for the MET 352 course was to have the student teams design and produce(formulate, fire, glaze) a unique ceramic body. In that regard, the design goal for MET 352 was asuccess as all teams successfully designed and fabricated prototypes. One point of reflection forthe PIs after the term was complete was the reproducibility or
with less difficulty and workload, even though they were told all choiceshad similar workload and difficulty. Understanding what groups of students feel stressed whenchoosing from multiple options can help design strategies to minimize such negative effects ofassignment choice.We hope that the findings presented in this paper help educators with proper implementation ofISBL and decision-making related to offering context choice to their students.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2000599 (ECR program). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
power the four drone arms’ motor/electronic speed controller and three optional outlets3.3 Function Testing of PDBAfter the conceptual design in adopted, the next step towards developing this concept into aworking model is to test the function of PDB. The basic electric connectivity between the mainpower node and the utility (distribution) nodes was tested and verified to reflect the circuitdesign. Another important operational consideration is the heating of the board due the highcurrent it delivers from the battery to the motors- through the electronic speed controllers (ESC)-and other utilities. With guidance from the electrical engineering faculty mentor, student withmechanical engineering background set up a test to monitor the temperature
resisting white supremacy as it is to resisting the patriarchy?” Or, more directly, “What docoalitions of women focused on anti-racism and the support of Black women look like?”Coalitions serve as a foundation for accountability because they are rooted in shared efforts, sharedpower, and shared pursuit of justice, and they function in contradistinction to the politics that undergirdWhite feminism. Chavez [16] describes coalition as a replacement for “normative/inclusionary andutopian politics” (p. 147). According to her, coalition is ● a present and existing vision and practice that reflects an orientation to others and a shared commitment to change; ● ... the ‘horizon’ that can reorganize our possibilities and the conditions of
3 4 5 6 is an important reflection of who I am. I have come to think of myself as an 1 2 3 4 5 6 “Engineer/Scientist/Anthropologist”. I feel like I belong in the field of 1 2 3 4 5 6 engineering/science/anthropology. I am an Engineer/Scientist/Anthropologist. 1 2 3 4 5 6 My ethnic/racial identity is an important part 1 2 3 4 5 6 of who I am. My ethnic/racial identity is an important part 1 2 3 4 5 6 of my being an Engineer/Scientist/Anthropologist. I think of myself as a ______ 1 2 3 4 5 6
National Science Foundation (NSF) Broadening Participation inEngineering Track 3 award (#2217745). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, andrecommendations belong solely to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNSF.ReferencesAmerican Society for Engineering Education. (2022). Engineering and engineering technology by the numbers 2021. https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Engineering-and- Engineering-Technology-by-the-Numbers-2021.pdfBuzzanell, P. M., Long, Z., Anderson, L. B., Kokini, K., & Batra, J. C. (2015). Mentoring in academe: A feminist poststructural lens on stories of women engineering faculty of color. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(3), 440–457. https://doi.org
identifying areas ofimprovement within a given system and suggesting opportunities for innovation. Thepromise of many programs is to use ST to evaluate existing knowledge and resourcesrelevant to a particular health systems issue, plan and execute an innovative solution toaddress the issue at hand, evaluate the outcomes of the implementation, and present thesolution to key stakeholders in the host organization engaged in personal self-evaluationand critical reflection [30]. More importantly, the programs promise to deliver“applications of ethical theory to health reform, systems approach to health programmingplanning and evaluation, international comparison of health systems, and an in-depthinvestigation of health sector subsystems or building blocks
the program names contribute to some of these challenges,leading to questions about whether rebranding to a different name might be beneficial. Otherstudies have explored renaming motivations and results in geography [13], agronomy [14],writing programs [15], vocational education [16], and institutions [17], [18]. There is a generalconsensus that names are powerful, and changes often reveal tensions with the health and/oridentity of programs. Frazier et al. [13, p. 13] notes: “Do name changes reflect an expandedmission… or other goals such as addressing low enrollment, shifting student interests, or thedesire to project a fresh identity or realign with a new academic emphasis?” There may also beconcern about name recognition or conveying the
expressed in this material are those of the author and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] N. Walker, Neuroqueer heresies: Notes on the neurodiversity paradigm, autistic empowerment, and postnormal possibilities. Fort Worth, TX: Autonomous Press, 2021.[2] N. Walker, “Throw Away the Master’s Tools: Liberating Ourselves from the Pathology Paradigm,” in Loud Hands: Autistic People, Speaking, Washington, DC: The Autistic Press, 2012, pp. 225–237.[3] R. Chapman, “Neurodiversity Theory and Its Discontents: Autism, Schizophrenia, and the Social Model of Disability,” in The Bloomsbury companion to philosophy of psychiatry, Ş. Tekin and R. Bluhm, Eds., London, UK ; New York, NY: Bloomsbury
arguments and consumable as capital. This abstraction of life into quantified energy and materialflows, unaccompanied by locally specific social, historical, and geopolitical contexts and understandings,is itself a death-making practice supporting global environmental injustices. The quantifications becomeanalyses of death, holding fixed a background of Global Racial Empire that assures access to land whileseparating land from life to plunder resources. This is reflected in the way that impact categories are allgeared toward understanding damage that would result from product making, forefronting sets ofrelationships in which humans are inherently damaging to the environment. Figure 1: a) Construction of validity for LCA, where increasing the
students.Limitations and Future WorkThe frameworks must be validated through qualitative research, and the work should beexpanded to include integration pathways.AcknowledgementThis work was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) with Grant No DRLGEGI008182. However, the authors alone are responsible for the opinions expressed in thiswork and do not reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] B. Vittrup, S. Snider, K. K. Rose, and J. Rippy, "Parental perceptions of the role of media and technology in their young children’s lives," Journal of Early Childhood Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 43-54, 2016.[2] A. Sullivan, M. Bers, and A. Pugnali, "The impact of user interface on young children’s computational thinking," Journal of Information
that this phenomenon reflected that students involved in project-based learning activities were more inclined to regard themselves as a part of the engineeringcommunity.The students in Motamedi’s study [19] tended to prefer the flipped classroom because of itsflexibility with their schedules, their ability to watch lectures when they felt motivated tolearn and when they knew that they would be able to stay focused, and their increasedengagement with short video content. A significant disadvantage was their inability to askquestions while learning the material; thus, students would go to class feeling confused andill-prepared. Vidic et al.’s [18] study of flipped classrooms addressed this issue by allowingstudents to post their questions about
the resources shared and discussions,video recordings, and slide decks for each event for others to be able to utilize if they wereunable to attend.To assess research question 1, “who participates in virtual collaboration events aimed atfacilitating collaborative learning of various BME education and professional developmenttopics?”, the registrants’ list for all of the events since Jan 2022 were analyzed. Participants’academic rank as well as their institution names were found online (note that the affiliationsfound represent participants’ current positions and do not reflect their status at the time of theevents and are dependent on what was available on their respective institution’s websites orpersonal webpages). The ranks were then
partner actually had poorer outcomes, including lower effort exerted on theassignment, perceptions that their partner gave more effort than they did, less time in the drivingrole (i.e., typing out the assignment), lower understanding of concepts from lab, and less interestin computer science overall" [7]. Another study analyzed a post-course reflection essay forsentiment towards pair programming. In the “social" dimension they found that “students alsoreported that their partner can define the success of the pair programming activity: too muchdifference in knowledge level demotivates high-achieving students by increasing their workload,distracting them from the activity and making them slower, while low-achieving students cannotkeep up with the
individual script reflects the sample number. The cell cycling tests are then started.These test durations vary based on the performance of the cell and the type of test run whichresults in some running for less than 24 hours while others take almost 2 weeks. Once testing iscompleted the data is exported for analysis.7) Summary of Process and Engineering Knowledge Gained Typically engineering students learn broad aspects of general engineering areas inacademic laboratories. Student learning about Li-ion cells or production methods tend to bespecific and rather limited. Rarely do engineering students see the entire process from start tofinish for coin cells [10] - [13]. The students working on this project, however, are researchassistants and
distinct purposes, our research revealed significant interrelatedness andsimilarity between the two types of centers vis-à-vis students’ lived experiences. In this paper, wetherefore discuss them holistically in order to reflect the grounded theory data rather than a prioriprofessional or organizational distinctions.1. Services tied to academic performanceSome students encountered challenges accessing services if their GPA was too high. They reportedthat there is a policy at their university that if a student’s GPA is above a certain threshold, theycannot seek help from the disability services center. This policy prevented them from getting helpthey believed they needed. As one student explained: At the university, I did really well
AmericanSociety for Engineering Education. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.REFERENCES [1] T. Kösa and F. Karakuş, “The Effects of Computer-Aided Design Software on Engineering Students’ Spatial Visualisation Skills,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 296–308, 2018, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1370578. [2] S. P. Dow, K. Heddleston, and S. R. Klemmer, “The Efficacy of Prototyping Under Time Constraints,” in Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition, 2009, pp. 165–174. [3] B. A. Camburn, D. Jensen, R