Molecular, Cellular and TissueEngineering. These tracks are led by a gateway area core class with an identical (or nearlyidentical) title, apart from the MCTE track—this track is led by BMEXXX: Transport Phenomenain Biological Systems. We reflect in the next section why this core class alone is insufficient toprepare our students for depth in the MCTE track. In their final year of study, students must complete two advanced electives in their chosenarea of focus and one capstone design course. Advancedelectives within the MCTE track (listed in Appendix B)offered in the past five years have skewed as much as 4 to 1in favor of molecular/cellular-focused content over transportphenomena (Fig. 1), with few pre
teaching simulations for many clients in several industries.Dr. Erica Gralla Erica Gralla is an Assistant Professor at George Washington University in the Department of Engineer- ing Management and Systems Engineering. She completed her Ph.D. at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the Engineering Systems Division, and her B ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Experiential Learning in Virtual Realities Hugh L. McManus, Northeastern University, and Erica Gralla, George Washington UniversityAbstractImmersive simulations are powerful teaching tools, particularly useful for subjects where aholistic understanding of a complex
Paper ID #39564How Canadian Universities Align Their Curricular and Co-curricularPrograms with Institutional Culture and Entrepreneurial AmbitionsProf. Tate Cao, University of SaskatchewanDr. Shaobo Huang, University of Saskatchewan Dr. Shaobo Huang received a Ph.D. degree in Engineering Education from Utah State University. She has over eight years of teaching and/or research experience in engineering education. She is currently an Assistant Professor in the Ron and Jane Graham School of Professional Development with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada
technology students.This paper presents a student senior design project, which developed the virtual lab material formaterial characterization, and includes the following topics: a) Tensile tester with remote teaching/learning capability b) Data collecting software with function of broadcasting the lab process for the interaction between students and instructor. c) Testing results and their analysis for commonly used engineering materials including brass, steel, aluminum, polyethylene, which is a commonly used material for 3D printer filament. d) Survey results for the senior design projects, and class survey for a machine design course utilizing the remote teaching system.2. Machine SpecificationsThe main components of
that includes the following steps: (1) identifyingresearch questions, (2) conducting literature review, and (3) conducting research. Each learningmodule was based on a generic template that includes the following sections: (1) selected andannotated learning materials using a diverse set of pre-selected materials including textbookchapters, research papers, white papers, videos, blogs, and discussions. All materials are groupedinto three categories, (a) required to build a strong foundation in scientific knowledge andunderstanding, (b) recommended to provide additional examples and illustrations to the topicscovered in the required section, and (c) optional to support students who are interested in goingbeyond the required level, (2) knowledge
Paper ID #36889Student Perceptions of Online Learning Effectiveness during the COVID-19QuarantineDr. Shannon L. Isovitsch Parks, P.E., University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown Dr. Shannon Parks is a registered Professional Engineer with 20 years of broad-based experience in the water resources and environmental engineering fields. She holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Civil Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University and a Masters of Science and doctoral degree in Civil & Environmental Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. She has been teaching water resources and environmental engineering at University of
styles," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 19, no. 1, Feb. 2018.[3] R. E. Mayer, "Evidence-based principles for how to design effective instructional videos," J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 229–240, Jun. 2021.[4] K. Suriyawansa, N. Kodagoda, L. Ranathunga, and N. A. B. Abdullah, "An approach to measure the pedagogy in slides with voice-over type instructional videos," Electron. J. E- Learn., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 483–497, Nov. 2022.[5] M. Soliman, D. Dalaymani-Zad, M. Gronfula, and M. Kourmpetis, "The Application of Virtual Reality in Engineering Education," NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. E Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 6, p. 2879, Mar. 2021.[6] D. Vlah, V. Čok, and U. Urbas, "VR as a 3D Modelling Tool in
Paper ID #39682Artificial Intelligence (AI) Art Generators in the Architectural DesignCurriculaProf. Keith E. Hedges, Drury University Keith Hedges is a registered architect and professor of architecture that teaches the architectural structures sequence at Drury University. Keith’s teaching repertoire includes 20 different courses of engineering topics at NAAB (architecture) and architecture topics at ABET (engineering) accredited institutions. His interests involve the disciplinary knowledge gap between architecture and engineering students in higher education. Keith is the editor of the Architectural Graphic
specifically examinethe connections within the interdisciplinary teaching system, including comprehensivecurriculum emphasis, student-centered instructional practices, and interdisciplinarycompetence. Also, we explore the internal effect mechanisms by introducing the theory ofidentity to discuss the mediating effects of interdisciplinary identity and try to figure out howstudents describe themselves and are positioned by others in the role of being aninterdisciplinary learner. And we further explore the mediating effects of the threedimensions of interdisciplinary identity: interest, recognition, and performance.Design/Method This study uses a survey sample of 310 engineering graduate students in 3High-level Research Universities in China. Using
courses/topics that wereidentified by the NCSEA BEC [9] to be the core of a structural engineering curriculum: 1. Structural analysis I: determinate analysis 2. Structural analysis II: indeterminate analysis 3. Structural analysis III: matrix analysis 4. Steel design I 5. Steel design II 6. Concrete design I: reinforced concrete 7. Concrete design II: a. Advanced reinforced concrete or b. Prestressed concrete 8. Wood design 9. Masonry design 10. Foundation design/soil mechanics 11. Structural dynamics 12. Technical communicationBEC Practitioner SurveysThe BEC practitioner surveys broadly addressed the question, “What type of education doengineering firms desire and require of their new employees
specifically referencing sub-stressors within larger themes of stress.Appendix B lists the top 30 stressors reported by participants, their superordinate theme, and thetotal number of instances those stressors were coded in the initial and follow-up interviews. Wereport on the top ten stressors below: a descriptive title and superordinate category of stressors,with a brief description. Table 3 provides an example quote, definition, and total reportedinstances of the top 10 stressors.Table 3. Definitions and Examples of Top 10 Codes Times Code Name Example Quote Definition
cultural needs of students.Future work regarding the emphasis on science teachers as agents for change will focus on thein-school context of the action research projects. In this regard, qualitative and quantitative datawill be reported on novice teachers' engineering and cultural self-efficacy for teachingengineering processes.16 References[1] T. R. Guskey, "Professional development and teacher change," Teachers and Teaching, vol.8, (3), pp. 381-391, 2002.[2] B. Huang, M. S. Jong, Y. Tu, G. Hwang, C. S. Chai, and M. Y. Jiang, "Trends and exemplarypractices of STEM teacher professional development programs in K-12 contexts: A systematicreview of empirical studies," Comput. Educ., pp. 104577, 2022.[3] J. A
background information related to laboratory report questions. At the end of each labactivity, students prepared and submitted laboratory report. Each individual student was requiredto submit his/her own report via ReggieNet by due date.Concrete Bowling Ball ProjectThis study’s concrete bowling ball project is very similar to Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (FRC)Bowling Ball student competition offered by American Concrete Institute (ACI), except fewchanges. A brief explanation of the guidelines of this project is following:(a) The whole class was divided into four groups and a maximum of 6 students were allowed ineach group.(b) Each group was asked to prepare two concrete bowling balls which should measure 200 ± 15mm diameter, weigh no more than 5.5 kg
manufacturing program,” The Tuscaloosa News. https://www.tuscaloosanews.com/story/news/education/2021/10/01/university-alabama- engineering-school-opens-manufacturing-program/5934091001/ (accessed Jan. 23, 2023).[6] S. Mittal, M. A. Khan, D. Romero, and T. Wuest, “Smart manufacturing: Characteristics, technologies and enabling factors,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 233, no. 5, pp. 1342–1361, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0954405417736547.[7] P. Zheng et al., “Smart manufacturing systems for Industry 4.0: Conceptual framework, scenarios, and future perspectives,” Front. Mech. Eng., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 137–150, Jun. 2018, doi
Engineering Education (ASEE) [1]. World War II curtailed the activities of bothgroups. After the war, however, the engineering librarian communities in ACRL and ASEE grewquickly, offering new opportunities for professional development, networking, informationsharing, research, and advocacy.This paper seeks a deeper understanding of the academic engineering librarian community in the1940s and early 1950s through the analysis of data compiled from the Directory of CollegeEngineering Library Personnel [2], published in 1949 by the Engineering School LibrariesSection of ACRL and supplemented by data from other sources such as Who’s Who in LibraryService [3]. The Directory is a rich source of data that includes details such as position titles,degrees
. an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze, and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions. • 3.7. an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies.Also, as determined by the program criteria for Mechanical and Similarly Named EngineeringPrograms these courses will address the following criteria (criterion 1 – curriculum): 1.a. principles of engineering, basic science, and mathematics (including multivariate calculus and differential equations) 1.b. applications of these topics to modeling, analysis, design, and realization of physical systems, components, or processesThe curriculum is
process.Two layers of member-checking were conducted amongst the last two authors as well asadditional Latiné/x faculty in engineering who were adjacent to this work and acknowledged atthe end of the paper. From the analysis, four themes were identified: (a) Counter-storytelling, (b)Structural Determinism (c) Language Origins, and (d) Community Cultural- Navigational,Aspirational, Social, and Familial Capital. Two emerging themes identified were Arrebatos andNepantla; and Hidden Curriculum. From the findings, a collective narrative was generated byweaving the stories and experiences of the authors. From the narrative, we conclude withrecommendations for future faculty development programs as they consider faculties’ non-Monolithic backgrounds
combinationand observed together by students while they work on programming assignments. This providesvaluable insight into the problem-solving strategies of groups and can potentially help teachersand researchers understand how students approach database programming tasks.Figure 2: Matrix of the Correlation Transition Probabilities of SQL, MongoDB, and Neo4j; sizesof the squares represent the absolute value of the correlation coefficient; ? represents missing data (a) SQL (b) MongoDB (c) Neo4jSQLThe correlation matrix is presented in Figure 2a. The Pearson correlation analysis of the SQLdataset indicated a significant positive correlation between the
: 10.21153/jtlge2019vol10no1art792.[5] E. M. Aucejo, J. French, M. P. Ugalde Araya, and B. Zafar, "The impact of COVID- 19 on student experiences and expectations: Evidence from a survey," Journal of Public Economics, vol. 191, p. 104271, 2020/11/01/ 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104271.[6] F. Wu and T. S. Teets, "Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Student Engagement in a General Chemistry Course," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 3633-3642, 2021/12/14 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00665.[7] S. M. King, "Approaches to Promoting Student Engagement in Organic Chemistry Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights and Reflections," Journal of Chemical Education
S. Sontgerath, "Does a Middle School Intervention for Girls Have Long- Lasting Differential Effects on Their Perceptions of and Participation in Engineering?(research to practice)," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013, pp. 23.441. 1-23.441. 13.[8] K. M. Brevik, B. D. Bowen, F. M. Bowman, and K. Jean, "You're Hired! Changing Students' Attitudes Towards Engineering," Indianapolis, IN, 2014: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[9] M. Denton, B. Chambers, N. Saleh, and M. Kirisits, "Extended Engagement in an Engineering Outreach Program at a Predominately Latinx High School (RTP, Diversity)," in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, 2022
Paper ID #37011Dissecting 3D Printing for Engineering Design Process Education of HighSchool Preservice TeachersProf. Weihang Zhu, University of Houston Dr. Weihang Zhu received his BS and MS in Mechanical and Energy Engineering from Zhejiang Univer- sity and Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from North Carolina State University. Currently he serves as Professor, Program Coordinator, and Graduate Program Coordinator for Mechanical Engineer- ing Technology program in the Department of Engineering Technology, with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
, Consider “HACKS” when designing hackathon challenges: Hook, action,collaborative knowledge sharing, Frontiers in Education, 10.3389/feduc.2022.954044, 7, (2022)[6] Fernanda Gobbi de Boer Garbin, Carla Schwengber ten Caten, Diego Augusto de JesusPacheco, ‘A capability maturity model for assessment of active learning in higher education,’Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 10.1108/JARHE-08-2020-0263, 14, 1, (295-316), (2021)[7] S. Hood, N. Barrickman, N. Djerdjian, M. Farr, S. Magner, H. Roychowdhury, R. Gerrits,H. Lawford, B. Ott, K. Ross, O. Paige, S. Stowe, M. Jensen, K. Hull, “I Like and Prefer to WorkAlone”: Social Anxiety, Academic Self-Efficacy, and Students’ Perceptions of Active Learning,CBE—Life Sciences Education
undergraduate software engineering degree," in Proceedings 16th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, Madrid, 2003.[5] A. Abran, J. Moore , P. Bourque and R. Dupuis , "Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK)," The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Inc., Piscataway, 2004.[6] Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula, "Software Engineering 2004: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering," IEEE Computer Society , 2004.[7] B. Bernal, "Reviews Of Curriculum Guides For Professional Software Engineers," in ASEE Annual Conference, Portland, 2005.[8] S. Conry, "Software Engineering: Where Do Curricula Stand Today?," in 2010 ASEE Annual Conference &
British Columbia in 2011. He also received a minor degree in Engineering Management and Entrepreneurship from the University of British Columbia in 2009. He has over 16 years of industrial experience. Before joining Alfred State, Dr. Rashidi was a Senior Engineer at Siemens, where he worked on research projects from 2011 to 2016. His expertise is in the development of nano, micro and mini sensors and actuators in Biomedical Engineering and Energy applications. Dr. Rashidi was a recipient of several awards including the 2008 British Columbia Innovation award, administered by BC province, Canada. He has written over 30 research articles and is currently a reviewer and technical committee member of several journals and
Paper ID #38769City University of New York Louis Stokes Alliance For MinorityParticipation: Perceptions, Performance and EvaluationsDr. Claude Brathwaite, City University of New York, City College Dr. Claude Brathwaite currently serves as the Director of Student Resources and Services at the City Col- lege Grove School of Engineering, utilizing a model of High Impact Practices and Engagement (HIPE). Dr. Brathwaite previously served as the Project Administrator and later Executive Director of the NYC Louis Stokes Alliance. He has also served as the Deputy Director of the City College Black Studies Pro- gram, the Director of
Paper ID #39628Cornerstone to Capstone Engineering Design: Evolving StudentPerspectives through the Academic Journey with Implementable CurricularImplicationsDr. Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University Professor Beverly Kris Jaeger-Helton (Kris), Ph.D. is on the full-time faculty in the Department of Me- chanical and Industrial Engineering at Northeastern University (NU) teaching Simulation Modeling & Analysis, Human-Machine Systems, Facilities Planning & Material Handling, and Capstone. She has also been a faculty advisor for Capstone design projects in Mechanical Engineering, Industrial Engineer- ing, and
associated with collective change inengineering education. We also intend to build out the descriptions, and examine ingreater depth, the potential impact of culture shifts in key engineering education co-contraries, such as the ones we have put forward in this work.Finally, we are hopeful we can begin a dialog on how we can leverage engineeringleadership education to facilitate our capacity for meaningful change in engineeringeducation.5. References[1] D. E. Goldberg and M. Somerville, “A Field Manual for A Whole New Education: Rebooting Higher Education for Human Connection & Insight in a Digital World.” Threejoy Associates, Incorporated, 2023.[2] B. Johnson, Polarity Management: Identifying and Managing Unsolvable Problems. HRD Press
Engineering Departments (RED) grant. A set of inclusive teaching standards (I-standards) was developed collaboratively within the department, incorporating principles fromthe UDL framework, best practices for inclusive teaching from the literature, and the strengthbased approach on neurodiversity [8]. Peer observers use the I-standards to evaluate the syllabus,course materials and teaching performance and provide a set of recommendations to theinstructors with the goal of enhancing accessibility, flexibility, and engagement of students withdiverse learning preferences. The observation process includes the following aspects: a)students’ interaction; b) use of media/whiteboard; c) student-faculty engagement, d) achievementof learning objectives. The
construction so they can be better prepared toparticipate in building a safe infrastructure.References[1] American Council for Construction Education (ACCE), Standards and Criteria for theAccreditation of Construction Education Programs, Document 103, 2023[2] B. S Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J Furst; W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy ofeducational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Vol. Handbook I: Cognitivedomain. New York: David McKay Company, 1956.[3] Catherine Wetzel, “Integrating Structures and Design in the First-Year Studio,” Journal ofArchitectural Education, 66:1, 107-114, 2012, DOI: 10.1080/10464883.2012.715980[4] AISC (2016a), Code of Standard Practice for Steel Buildings and Bridges, ANSI/AISC 303-16, American
perceive the purpose of self-assessments on assignmentsundertaken in an engineering course?RQ2: How do undergraduate students’ perspectives compare with the intent for giving self-assessments by the instructor?B. ParticipantsThe participants for this study are 121 undergraduate students and an instructor from theElectrical and Computer Engineering program at a R1 public university in Southeastern USA.C. Data CollectionThe design for this study required two strands of data collection, i.e., from the student-participants and instructor-participant (hereafter referred to as the students and instructorrespectively). The data from the student were collected using a qualitative survey that includedquestions that required them to reflect on their