Conference Session

Energy Conversion, Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert J. Kerestes, University of Pittsburgh; Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE), Energy Conversion

teach global software engineering.Proceedings of EDULEARN17 International Conference on Education and New LearningTechnologies, Barcelona, Spain.Darban, M. (2021). Learning in virtual student teams: an examination of sharedleadership. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1-18.https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1916800Edstrom, W., Soderholm, D., Wedel, M. (2007). Teaching and learning. In E. Crawley, J.Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, & D. Brodeur (Eds.), Rethinking engineering education. The CDIOApproach (pp. 130-151). New York: Springer.Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in highereducation: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102,1-13

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 6: Curriculum Development and Pedagogical Strategies

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver; Lurana Crowley, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

[Online]. Available: http://irpe-reports.colostate.edu/pdf/ResearchBriefs/FA16_Obs_vs_Pred_Report.pdf[4] Innovation and Incubator Grants from the University System of Georgia, Kennesaw StateUniversity, (2015) Increasing Retention Rates of Mechanical Engineering Students Through anIntegrated, Collaborative First-Year Course [Online]. Available:https://completega.org/content/increasing-retention-rates-mechanical-engineering-students-through-integrated-collaborative[5] R. W. Freeman, R. S. Adrezin, A. Foley, “Bilge Pumps as Introductory MechanicalEngineering Design Projects.” the Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 2019.[6] J. D. Smith, A.B. Johnson, A. B. “Revitalization of an Intro to ME Course Using an

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew L Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, Merrimack College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

. Pimmel, “EvaluatingVirtual Communities of Practice for Faculty Development,” J. Fac. Dev., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 31–40, Jan. 2016.[4] G. Light, S. Calkins, M. Luna, and D. Drane, “Assessing the Impact of a Year-Long FacultyDevelopment Program on Faculty Approaches to Teaching,” Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ.,vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 168–181, 2009.[5] D. Carpenter, K. Hayes, C. Ward, and A. Gerhart, “Assessment and Evaluation of aComprehensive Course Modification Process,” The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship,vol. 2, no. 2, 2011.[6] A.L. Gerhart and D.D. Carpenter, “Campus-wide Course Modification Program to ImplementActive & Collaborative Learning and Problem-based Learning to Address the EntrepreneurialMindset,” Proceedings of the 2013

Conference Session

Refining Manufacturing Education Practices

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christoph Johannes Sielmann P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Casey James Keulen, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Abbas Hosseini, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

great as the campuses involved in this study are closely connected with manyoverlapping administrative services.Theme 5: A pure ICT solution is not best for supporting equity and encouraging engagement.Whereas multi-campus teaching is traditionally seen as an instructor in a teleconferencing-enabled classroom with a local cohort, teaching to both local and remote cohort(s), theparticipants interviewed for this study stressed that they have worked with a combination ofremote/distance teaching technologies such as Zoom alongside traditional teleconferencedclassroom solutions.The need for creative solutions is connected to Theme 6 and the desire to provide a high quality,positive experience for the students. One participant claimed, “… if you have

Conference Session

Aerospace Division (AERO) Technical Session 4

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tim Drake, Saint Louis University; Srikanth Gururajan, Saint Louis University

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace Division (AERO)

: 𝑺𝒓𝒆𝒇 = 𝝅𝒓𝟐𝑩𝑻 + 𝒘𝑨𝑩 𝒍𝑨𝑩 𝐬𝐢𝐧 (𝜽°) Eq. 2Using OpenFOAM, we wrote a script that iterates through each rocket model and simulates thedrag coefficients and forces at varying airbrake deflection angles. These values will then be storedin a lookup table, which the algorithm will reference during flight. The cluster drastically decreasedthe time since multiple simulations were run simultaneously on different nodes. Figure 5 illustratesthe velocity values on a 60° airbrake deflection model at 205 m/sec (671 ft/s or 457.5 mph). Figure 5: Paraview Post-Processing of Model with 60° Deflection of the Airbrakes (m/s)My team manufactured most of the rocket’s structures, such as the lower airframe, fins

Conference Session

Assessing Conceptual Thinking about Engineering Mechanics

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amie Baisley, University of Florida; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics Division (MECHS)

,” IEEE Glob. Eng. Educ. Conf. EDUCON,vol. 2018-April, pp. 364–368, 2018.[2] J. L. Docktor and J. P. Mestre, “Synthesis of discipline-based education research inphysics,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–58, 2014.[3] B. Bridgeman, “A Comparison of Quantitative Questions in Open-Ended and Multiple-Choice Formats Author ( s ): Brent Bridgeman Published by : National Council on Measurementin Education Stable URL : http://www.jstor.com/stable/1435138 REFERENCES Linkedreferences are av,” vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 253–271, 1992.[4] P. S. Steif and J. A. Dantzler, “A statics concept inventory: Development and psychometricanalysis,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 363–371, 2005.[5] G. L. Gray, F. Costanzo, D. Evans, P

Conference Session

Problem- and Project-based Learning in Engineering Mechanics

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seyed Mohammad Seyed Ardakani, Ohio Northern University; Josh Wiseman, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics Division (MECHS)

of the Statics Modeling Kit developed by S. Ardakani and Ellis [11]. It wasdesigned to resemble a model of the equilibrium of a rigid body in 3D. It is very simple and easyto set up yet maintains sufficient stability to remain stable throughout the students’ completion ofthe activity. The labeled points A, B, C, and D, shown in Figure 1, are needed when studentscreate force vectors to solve the problem, which will be outlined in the following sections. Thevertical beam is placed at the origin (0,0) on the table by a ball and socket joint. Surrounding itare three pulleys, A, B, and C, with coordinates of (-3, 1, 2.5), (1, -3, 3.5), and (3, 2, 3.5),respectively. Strings are fastened to the top of the beam and rested over the three pulleys

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON) Technical Session 3 - Innovative Pedagogy

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brooke Lahneman, Montana State University ; Susan Gallagher, Montana State University; Catherine M. Kirkland, Montana State University; Kathryn Plymesser, Montana State University; Ellen Lauchnor, Montana State University; Amanda Hohner, Montana State University; Adrienne Phillips, Montana State University; Craig R. Woolard, Montana State University; Otto R. Stein, Montana State University

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON)

collaboration inengineering education reform.References[1] C. Woolard, C. Kirkland, K. Plymesser, A. Phillips, Lauchnor, E., O. Stein, W. Schell, S. Gallagher, M. Miley, P. Gannon, E. Austin, K. Intemann. “Developing an Integrated Environmental Engineering Curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, July 2022.[2] S. Gallagher, A. Phillips, E. Lauchnor, A. Hohner, O.R. Stein, C.R. Woolard, C.M. Kirkland, and K. Plymesser, “Implementing Integrated Project-Based Learning Outcomes in a 21st Century Environmental Engineering Curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD, June 2023.[3] E.K. Talley and R.B. Hull

Conference Session

Experiential Learning in ET Programs I

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Billy Gray, Tarleton State University; Gloria M. Fragoso-Diaz, Tarleton State University; Olugbenro Ogunrinde, Tarleton State University; Tyler Rider, Tarleton State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology Division (ETD)

should also ease apprehension thatstudents have with interacting with the professor outside of class times.Lastly, the faculty are looking at methods for students to provide feedback on their projectsduring the semester, whether this is through discussion boards, sticky notes, or surveys. Thiswould help provide students with different mechanisms to reach out for help during the projectand during the semester.References[1] J. E. Mills and D. Treagust, "Engineering Education: is problem-based or project-based learning the answer?," Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. ISSN 1324-5821, 2003.[2] K. H. Tseng, C. C. Chang, S. J. Lou and W. P. Chen, "Attitudes towards science, technology, engineeirng and mathematics (STEM) in

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5: Identity & Belonging

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Sparks, Miami University; Katherine M. Ehlert, Miami University; Karen C. Davis, Miami University; Justin Michael Saul, Miami University; Brian P. Kirkmeyer, Miami University; David Joseph Fox, Miami University; Thao Nguyen, Miami University; Michael Hughes, Miami University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

4.221 0.701 Traditional S 23 189 3.889 0.835 4.268 0.853 3.949 0.753 4.060 0.828 Pilot F 22 84 3.889 0.851 4.433 0.666 3.964 0.649 4.247 0.623 Pilot S 23 44 4.030 0.715 4.530 0.539 4.150 0.566 4.385 0.592There are no significant differences in mean Recognition change between Traditional and Pilotsequences from Sep 2022 to May 2023 (F=1.5358, df1=1, df2=185.9, p=0.2168), and post-hoccomparisons revealed no significant Recognition change within either course sequence(Traditional p-value = 0.5551; Pilot p-value = 0.2785) (Figure 1). Similar results were found forPerformance/Competence (F=1.5911, df1=1, df2=213.2, p=0.2085) with insignificant

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 12: Promoting Student Success and Motivation

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elisabeth Smela, University of Maryland, College Park; Vincent Nguyen, University of Maryland, College Park; Natasha Andrade, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

AnnualConference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. https://peer.asee.org/42457[3] Andrade, N., & Smela, E., & Nguyen, V., & Bigio, D., & Egyen-Davis, A., & Nganjo,D. (2022, August), Environmentally and Socially Responsible Engineering - AssessingStudent Empowerment Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/41569[4] S. Hoffmann, I. Hua, E. Blatchley, and L. Nies, "Integrating sustainability into coursesacross the engineering curriculum: a faculty workshop model," in ASEE Ann. Conf.Expo, Louisville, KY, Jun 20-23 2010, pp. AC 2010-1802, 15.773.1, doi:DOI:10.18260/1-2--16732. https://peer.asee.org/16732[5] A. L. Welker, V. Smith, S. Shrestha, and K. M. Sample-Lord

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sharifa Alghowinem, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Aikaterini Bagiati, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Andrés F. Salazar-Gómez, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Cynthia Breazeal, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

asrepresenting the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Department of the Air Forceor the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprintsfor Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation hereinReferences[1] A. Bagiati, A. F. Salazar G´omez, J. Radovan, K. Kennedy, and C. Breazeal, “Learning journeys for scalable ai education: an mit-usaf collaboration,” in Towards a new future in engineering education, new scenarios that european alliances of tech universities open up. Universitat Polit`ecnica de Catalunya, 2022, pp. 1529–1537.[2] X. Du, S. Alghowinem, M. Taylor, K. Darling, and C. Breazeal, “Innovating ai leadership education,” in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference

Conference Session

Hands-On Learning in ET I

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gang Sun, Northern Kentucky University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology Division (ETD)

, 2024. https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/electronic-designer-jobs/?currentJobId=37350063015. Choi, C. 2008. A microcontroller applications course and freescale’s microcontroller student learning kit. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburg, PA, June 22-25.6. Farook, O., C. Sekhar, and E. Bouktache. 2008. Embedded System Design with Microchip’s 16F88 Microcontroller. In Proceedings of 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 22 - 25.7. Hsiung, S., Ritz, J., and Eiland, J. 2008. Design and develop a cost effective microcontroller training system for distance learning engineering students. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Research Investigations in the Context of Design Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark J. Povinelli, Syracuse University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 3: Advising in Graduate Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian M. Chan, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Mark Vincent Huerta, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

. 2217640 through a wider initiative and acenter for transforming graduate engineering education. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.REFERENCESArtiles, M. S., Knight, D. B., & Matusovich, H. M. (2023). Doctoral advisor selection processes in science, math, and engineering programs in the United States. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 1-16.Boyce, A. S. (2021). Strategies for mentoring and advising evaluation graduate students of color. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 35(3), 350-362.Bryson, T., Kowalske, M., Wilkins-Yel, K., & Housh, K. (2023). The

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 3: Teamwork

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rui Li, New York University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

-year instructors could apply more specific instructions orintervention to ensure student projects are completed on time.References[1] A. C. Edmondson and I. M. Nembhard, "Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits," Journal of product innovation management, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 123- 138, 2009.[2] R. R. Reilly, G. S. Lynn, and Z. H. Aronson, "The role of personality in new product development team performance," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 39- 58, 2002.[3] N. Sivasubramaniam, S. J. Liebowitz, and C. L. Lackman, "Determinants of new product development team performance: A meta‐analytic review," Journal of Product Innovation

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emad A Mansour, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

,” Educational Administration and Supervision, vol. 13, pp. 399–406, 1927.[3] S. A. Basow and J. L. Martin, “Bias in Student Evaluations,” in M. E. Kite (Ed.), Effective Evaluation of Teaching: A Guide for Faculty and Administrators, pp. 40–49, Society for the Teaching of Psychology, 2012.[4] W. J. McKeachie, “Student Ratings: The Validity of Use,” American Psychologist, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1218–1225, Nov. 1997. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1218.[5] A. G. Greenwald and G. M. Gillmore, “Grading Leniency Is a Removable Contaminant of Student Ratings,” American Psychologist, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1209–1217, Nov.1997. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.52.11.1209.[6] J. Esarey and N. Valdes, “Unbiased, Reliable, and Valid Student Evaluations Can Still

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cyrus Habibi, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Adama Sawadogo, University of Wisconsin, Platteville

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

, economic, environmental, and societal contexts Unsatisfactory (1) Developing (2) Satisfactory (3) Exemplary (4) (4.1) Identify Student is not able Student can identify Student can identify Student can identify ethical dilemma(s) to identify ethical basic and obvious major ethical issues several and complex or issue(s) within issues (dilemmas) ethical issues (dilemmas) in a issues (dilemmas) in an engineering in cases in a given (dilemmas) in a given scenario and a given scenario and context. scenario. given scenario but clearly

Collection

2007 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

John T. Tester

remained fairly constant,1 though differentdepartments have increased steadily (such as Mechanical Engineering) while others have varied.The “Design4Practice,” or “D4P,” curriculum is a series of innovative undergraduate classes whichinvolve active learning laboratories for the students in each of their freshman, sophomore, junior andsenior years. The program objectives were developed in response to the call by industry forbaccalaureate engineers to possess a broader set of skills beyond their analytical and computer skills.This call was strengthened by the Engineering faculty’s observation of the students’ experiences insenior capstone design during the late 1980’s and 1990’s. These students, who had had no priorexperience with a design process

Collection

2008 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Christos Valiotis

requireproportional reasoning. In one of the items of the test students are asked to write an equation thatdescribes the following statement: There are six times as many students as they are instructors in this campus. Use S for students and P for professors. About 40% of the students write the equation in its incorrect form: 6S=P. When probed further,almost all of them admit that they used a straight equation using the words of the statementinstead of a proportion. Another major problem for students is their inability to assign propernames to variables7. Their confusion is compounded by the fact that the same variable sometimeshad a different meaning in mathematics than in physics. Yet another possible reason for students’poor performance in

Collection

2013 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Foaad Khosmood; Phillip Nico

Table 1. PolyFS basic featurescategory Feature / API specification status notesemulator using emulator or direct instructor decides this if emulator, specify Unix file(s) OS installation? to use as emulated diskemulator using storage driver or instructor decides this emulating disk operations?storage basic device interface Student design additional ioctl() function call toemulator exercise be called inside disk emulator functionsemulator openDisk(), specified

Collection

2013 GSW

Authors

Christina K. White; Richard H. Crawford

/Events/ICEE2002/Proceedings/Papers/Index/O065- O070/O069.pdf.(4) Eccles, J.S.(1994).  Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices — Applying the Eccles et-al model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.(5) Eccles, J.S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 199-212). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.(6) Eccles, J.S., Adler, T., Futterman, R., Goff, S., Kaczala, C., Meece, J., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement

Collection

2016 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Dixon Y. Nielson

awarded in 2014 2.In contrast, the other direction of thought suggests there is no real shortage. A study published inThe Atlantic in 2014 states: “No one has been able to find any evidence indicating current widespread labor market shortages or hiring difficulties in science and engineering occupations that require bachelors degrees or higher, although some are forecasting high growth in occupations that require post-high school training but not a bachelors degree. All have concluded that U.S. higher education produces far more science and engineering graduates annually than there are S&E job openings—the only disagreement is whether it is 100 percent or 200 percent more.” 3This study further

Collection

2016 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Susan M. Reynolds

-PLUS (3 points): homework surpasses the assignment requirements and is exceptionally well-presented and professional. The average of the scores (n) will be converted into percentage points per this function: average in percentage points Thus, scoring all 3’s is equivalent to a 100%; scoring all 2’s is equivalent to an 85%; and scoring all 1’s is equivalent to a 65%.From the instructor’s point of view, this was a liberating grading system that allowed relativelyefficient grading by partitioning the student responses into three bins: a minority of students thatsubmitted impressive work, the majority of the students that satisfactorily completed theassignment, and a minority of students (if any) that

Collection

2005 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

R. L. Kolar; K. M. Dresback; E. M. Tromble

, Division of Undergraduate Education, Arlington, VA, DUE Staff Report NLF940621, 1994.8. Fink, L. D., Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., San Francisco, 2003. Proceedings of the 2005 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 109. Galvin, M., “Communication Skills Become Ace in the Hole,” NSPE Engineering Times, pp. 1,10, Feb. 1996.10. Hauser, D. L, E. S. Halsey, J. M. Weinfield, and J. C. Fox, “What Works and What Doesn’t in Undergraduate Teaching,” ASEE Prism, pp. 21-24, Nov. 199511. Heinz, H. John

Collection

2009 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

George E. Meyer

Off Off Fan Off Fan Off Fan On Fan On Slow Decrease I-100 or I-50 or I-50 or N_C or R-50 or (S-D) High Heat Low Heat Low Heat Low Heat Heat Off Fan Off Fan Off Fan On Fan Off Fan On No Change (NC) I-50 or I-50 or N_C or R-50 or R-50 or Medium Heat Low Heat Heat Off Heat Off Heat Off Fan Off Fan On Fan Off Fan On Fan On Slow Increase

Collection

2009 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Ray A. Luechtefeld; Steve E. Watkins

subsequent intrinsic motivation. Unpublished dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.11. McGraw, K.O., & McCullers, J.C., (1979). Evidence of a detrimental effect of extrinsic incentives on breaking a mental set. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 15, 285-294.12. McGraw, K.O. (1978). The detrimental effects of reward on performance: A literature review and a prediction model. In M.R. Lepper & D. Greene (Eds.), The hidden costs of reward (pp. 33-60) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.13. Kellaghan, T., Madaus, G.F., & Raczek, A. (1996). The use of external examinations to improve student motivation. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.14. Grolnick, W. S. & Ryan, R. M. (1987

Collection

2011 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

James L. Huff; Todd A. Patten; Richard L. Wells; Monte Cox

. 2. National Academy of Engineering (2008). Grand Challenges for Engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. 3. Krippendorff, K. (2006). The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group. 4. Zoltowski, C., Oakes, W., and Chenoweth, S. ―Teaching Human-Centered Design with Service-Learning‖, Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Conference. 5. Jiusto, S. and DiBiasio, D., ―Experiential Learning Environments: Do They Prepare Our Students to be Self-Directed, Life-Long Learners?‖, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 95, No. 3, 2006, pp. 195 – 204. 6. Oakes, W. ―Creating Effective and Efficient

Collection

2018 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Emmanuel U. Enemuoh; José Carrillo; Jong Beom Lee; Scott Norr

preliminary analysis of the system is detailed below.Based on the competition information, it is assumed that the retrieval device will separate from amain parent satellite close to a piece of target debris and complete small maneuvering actions toachieve the best possible engagement position. Thruster nozzles using CO2 as a medium were goingbe used to demonstrate this motion. The concept is similar to the Manned Maneuvering Unit (MMU)developed by NASA for untethered extravehicular activity (EVA) activities. The design goal for thepayload was a simpler version incorporating only four thrusters. Two thrusters would be placed onthe outer edges of the main body and two on the rear in the same relative position.Calculations show that at 60 deg/s rotation

Collection

2008 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

W. Roy Penney; Kendal J. Brown; Joel D. Vincent; Edgar C. Clausen

DiscussionFigure 4 shows a plot of temperature (K) as a function of time (s) for the black (painted) surfaceplaced normal to the sun (θ = 0°). Both the experimental data from Table 1 and the predictedtemperatures from the model development and the solar flux which causes the model to best fitthe experimental data (750 W/m2) are presented. Similar plots were obtained for the blacksurface placed at angles of 45° and 60°, and for the unpainted aluminum surface placed normalto the sun. This good correlation between experimental data and the model correlation indicatesthat the assumptions made about convection leaving the plate were valid. Comparing Experimental Temperature with Calculated Temperature over Time