offering ofthis course on campus in fall 2019. In the table, Exam 1 covered the materials in Modules 1 and2. Exam 2 covered the materials in Modules 3 and 4. Exam 3 covered the materials in Modules 5and 6. The level of the exams in those two offerings were about the same. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Annual Conference Fig. 7: a sample of weekly announcementsThe demographics for the fall 2019 offering was that 88% of the 44 students were seniors and12% were postbac students. The GPA of 82% of students were greater than 3.0 and 17% between2.0 and 2.99. The gender distribution was that 88% male and 12% female.The demographics for the
is to spur interest Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019, American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 415for other institutions that may find value in retrofitting outdated robots to newer technologies aspart of their robotics/mechatronics curriculum.Bibliography[1] N. K. D. F.-S. Maja J Mataric, "Materials for Enabling Hands-On Robotics and STEM Education," in AAAI Spring Symposia, Palo Alto, CA, 2007.[2] M. T. L. H. a. P. O. John Attia, "Hands-on Learning in Multiple Courses in Electrical and Computer Engineering," in ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section
of computer science capstone course literature," Computer Science Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 201-267, 2011.[7] S. Howe and J. Goldberg, "Engineering capstone design education: Current practice, emerging trends, and successful strategies," in Design Education Today: Technical Contexts, Programs, and Best Practices, D. Schaefer, G. Coates and C. Eckert, Eds., Switzerland: Springer, 2019, pp. 115-148.[8] S. Howe, S. L. Poulos, and L. M. Rosenbauer, "The 2015 capstone design survey: Observations from the front lines," in Proceedings of 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26-29, 2016.[9] R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorensen, B. R. Swan, and D. K. Anthony
Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A comparison of the renewable energy and energy storage sectors in Germany and the United States, with recommendations for engineering teaching practices. L.B. Bosman, J. Brinker, and K.A. WalzAbstract: The German Energiewende is the planned transition by Germany to a low carbon,environmentally sound, reliable, and affordable energy supply. This paper reports on a U.S.faculty international study program, which took place in May 2019, to explore the intersection ofthe German renewable energy and energy storage sectors. The international program includedeleven instructional faculty from throughout the United States on a two
Design Series," 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[7] J. A. Mynderse, L. Liu, A. Gerhart, X. Xie, W. Jing and K. Yee, "Assessment of a Three- Semester Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design Sequence Based on the SAE Collegiate Design Series," WCX SAE World Congress Experience, 2019.[8] J. A. Mynderse, L. Liu, A. L. Gerhart, R. W. Fletcher, H. Vejdani, W. Jing and K. E. Yee, "Development of an Entrepreneurial Mindset within a Three-Semester Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design Sequence Based on the SAE Collegiate Design Series," 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[9] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021 – 2022," [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation
paperswill be generated that focus on identified issues that provide a basis for recommendations andsupport future work to move us forward in our understanding of these students. Efforts arecurrently taking place that include obtaining support for interviews of these students followed byan expansion of the project to a more complete national scope. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019, American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 335AcknowledgementsSupport for this work was partially provided by ASEE -ETD Mini-Grant Program. Theysupported the cost of
saw more growth in the CS and Cybersecuritycourses and classes offered when compared to non-Title I schools, indicating that the Project hadmore of an impact on Title I schools (Table 2). When we examined AP CSP courses in particular,the evidence indicates that Title I schools had a much greater increase in the total number ofMcGill, Thompson, et al ASEE 2022Figure 4: Changes prior to and after the JROTC-CS intervention, asked as a separate question(n=14) independent of questions aksing actual enrollment numbers, which leads to a slight differ-ence in evidence reported by the schools. Table 1: Changes in courses, classes, extracurricular activities between 2019-20 and 2020-21
has workedextensively in ASEE, currently she is the Past Chair of ETC. She is an ASEE Fellow.CHARLES MCINTYRE, Ph.D. is a Professor and Director of the Construction Engineering ManagementTechnology Program at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). He received his Ph.D. fromPenn State in 1996. Dr. McIntyre’s scholarly work includes sustainable practices and enhancing industrycollaboration with academia. He is a member of the Executive Committee of ACCE and is a “Fellow” of ASEE. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019, American Society for Engineering Education
Mentoring, the Award for Leadership, and a 2019 award from the College of Engineer- ing as an Outstanding Faculty Mentor of Engineering Graduate Students. In 2020 she won the Sterling Olmsted Award from the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society Division of ASEE. She is president of Purdue’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors (2020-22). She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and recently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Matthew W. Ohland is
distribution.Bibliography[1] Li, H., & Jin, K. (2021). An innovation framework to integrate engineering standards into industrial engineeringgraduate curriculum [Article]. Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems, 5(2), Article 707.https://doi.org/10.1520/SSMS20200012[2] LaMack, J. A., Fennigkoh, L., & Licato, P. (2019). Work in progress: Improving student views of medicaldevice standards through implementation in a first-term biomedical engineering course. 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition[3] Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology. (2021). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,2021 – 2022. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2021-2022/#GC5[4] Phillips, M
Missouri. His research interests include resilient infrastructure, protective structures, and engineering education.Prof. Joseph P. Hanus, United States Military Academy Colonel Joseph Hanus is the Civil Engineering Program Director at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from the University of Wisconsin, Platteville; M.S. from the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; and Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. He is an active member of ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in Wisconsin. His research interests include fiber reinforced polymer materials, accelerated bridge construction, and engineering education.Lt. Col. Kevin P. Arnett P.E., United States Military Academy
2021 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 35159Integration of materials visualization with a materials database in a MaterialsScience and Engineering freshman course Kisung Kang Matthew D Goodman Jessica A Krogstad Cecilia Leal University of Illinois University of Illinois University of Illinois University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign at Urbana-Champaign at Urbana-Champaign at Urbana-Champaign kkang14@illinois.edu mgoodman@illinois.edu jakrogst@illinois.edu cecilial@illinois.edu Dalla R Trinkle Pinshane Y Huang André Schleife University of Illinois University of Illinois University of Illinois at Urbana
Division’ssecond year [13]. In addition, one member of our team participated in a panel for this division[32]. One of our 2019 ASEE papers “Institutional Agents' Roles in Serving Student Veterans andImplications for Student Veterans in Engineering" was selected as the Best Diversity Paper in theASEE Military and Veterans Division and a finalist for the 2019 Best Diversity Paper at theconference by the ASEE Committee on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI) [22]. We have aworkshop accepted for presentation at the 2020 CoNECD conference [33] and a paper acceptedfor the ASEE conference in June 2020 [34]. We are currently working on several manuscriptsfor journals.FindingsThroughout this project, we have focused our analysis on several areas including
State University in Huntsville, Texas. Dr. Pecen was formerly a professor and program chairs of Electrical Engineering Technology and Graduate (MS and Doctoral) Programs in the Depart- ment of Technology at the University of Northern Iowa (UNI). Dr. Pecen served as 2nd President and Professor at North American University in Houston, TX from July 2012 through December 2016. He also served as a Chair of Energy Conservation and Conversion Division at American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). Dr. Pecen holds a B.S in EE and an M.S. in Controls and Computer Engineering from the Istanbul Technical University, an M.S. in EE from the University of Colorado at Boulder, and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the
. Nature Communications, 10(4470), 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12154-0.[10] Bin Zhou, Yan Li, Rebecca Halpin, Erin Hine, David J. Spiro, and David E. Wentworth. PB2 residue 158 is a pathogenic determinant of pandemic H1N1 and H5 influenza a viruses in mice. Journal of Virology, 85(1): 357–365, January 2011. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01694-10.[11] Sushil K. Chaturvedi, Jaewan Yoon, Rick McKenzie, Petros J. Katsioloudis, Hector M. Garcia, and Shuo Ren. Implementation and assessment of virtual reality experiment in the undergraduate thermo-fluids laboratory. In Proceedings of the 119th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, number AC 2012-3412, San Antonio, TX, USA, June 2012.[12] Jeremy F
challenge and developed a curriculum that provides amultitude of projects for which students must utilize technical standards. The followingdiscussion highlights two such experiences, as well as, methods for incorporating standards intothe classroom. Additionally, the authors share examples of products that students develop todemonstrate their standards competence, resources that are available to other educators andindustry members to teach students or new hires about technical standards, and make a call toindustry to support the standards education efforts of local educators to ensure students areadequately prepared prior to entering the workforce. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration
2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright 2020, American Society for Engineering Education 3 Figure 1: Problem from Thermodynamics Exam in Fall 2019 uploaded to Chegg.After searching through the exams, a match was found and is shown in Figure 2. It is uncertain howlong it takes before a solution in Chegg is available to other Chegg subscribers. It appears therequestor gets a solution within minutes with notification on the phone as advertised on the Cheggwebpage. If an instructor is searching for evidence of cheating, it may take a few days before asolution pops-up in the Chegg database. Hence
, the ability of students to interact with eachother and with the course materials online and at a distance from the campus will becomeincreasingly important to student success. This consideration will be reflected in future researchinto implementation of OER into Construction Management Technology courses. It is felt by theauthor that the ability of OER to address these considerations, as well as the other benefits ofOER implementation, will lead to its wider use in this field and other Engineering andTechnology disciplines in the future.References[1] Shenoda, Michael. Applicability of Open Educational Resources (OER) in Construction Engineering. Presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/32319[2
though the importance of total hours was reduced insubsequent instructor evaluation grades, the 2017-2018 cohort had was generally lessenthusiastic about the TimeCard system than the 2016-2017 students. Of the 17 surveycomments at the end of the year, six were generally positive (“It was a good way to hold peopleaccountable”, etc.), four were generally negative (“filling in time cards was a pain…”; “…peoplewill cheat”, etc.), and six suggested that the weighting on hours should be reduced and some wayshould be found to measure quality over quantity of effort.Year 3: Updated TimeCard Weighting and Expanded Student Surveys (2018-2019Capstone Cohort)For the 2018-2019 cohort, the calculations used to determine the first draft of instructorevaluation
solving, and 3) to provide students with a strongerbackground in dynamics for follow-on courses.Course CohortsAs part of a California State University graduation rate initiative, in the past we were able tooffer the special section of the course three different times. Because of the lower number ofstudents enrolled in these sections, it takes additional resources and we are considering if weshould offer it again. All offerings were presented in a flipped format, with numerous exampleproblems and lecture material offered in short videos for students to watch before class. The firstoffering was in Spring of 2019 – the winter quarter provides our largest number of students,typically 13-15 sections of approximately 32 students each. This first
. Butler, C. Bodnar, M. Cooper, D. Burkey, and D. Anastasio, “Understanding the Moral Reasoning Process of Senior Chemical Engineering Students in Process Safety Contexts,” Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 28, pp. 1-12, Jul. 2019.12. D. Anastasio, B. Butler, D. Burkey, M. Cooper, and C. Bodnar, “Collaborative Research: Experiential Process Safety Training for Chemical Engineers,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., Tampa, FL, USA, Jun. 16-19, 2019.13. B.L. Butler, D.D. Anastasio, D.D. Burkey, M. Cooper, and C.A. Bodnar, “Work in progress: content validation of an engineering process safety decision-making instrument (EPSRI),” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, Jun
, teaching professional skills in the engineering classroom, and engineering outreach at the K-12 level.Dr. Julie M. Hasenwinkel, Syracuse University Professor and Chair, Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering College of Engineering and Computer Science Syracuse University Syracuse, NY 13244 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Model for a Faculty Development Course Redesign Summer Working GroupAbstractOverview: This Evidence-Based Practice Paper describes a professional developmentopportunity offered to engineering and computer science faculty at Syracuse University in thesummer of 2019 that focused on improving delivery and assessment at all
mobile robots, including an UAS introduction module.• The UAS module in the Robotics Lab class is introduced in Spring 2020. Therefore, most of the students enrolled in the Spring 2020 Robotics Lab course have introductory knowledge about the UAS system when taking the Fall 2020 Flight Control course. In addition, Spring 2020 Robotics Lab was affected due to COVID-19.• The UAS module was not introduced in 2019 Spring Robotics lab. Thus, the students enrolled in Fall 2019 Flight Controls course did not have prior knowledge on the UAS system.• We thus present the implementation of UAS module in a junior level robotics lab which preceded the senior level Flight Controls course in following Fall semester, when the same
, American Society for Engineering Education.14. Valenti, M., Teaching tomorrow's engineers. Mechanical Engineering, 1996. 118(7): p. 64-69.15. Whitcomb, C., R. Khan, and C. White, Development of a System Engineering Competency Career Development Model: an analytical approach using Bloom’s Taxonomy. 2014, Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School.16. Whitcomb, C.A., et al., The Department of the Navy Systems Engineering Career Competency Model. 2015, Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School.17. Muci-Kuchler, K.H., et al., Extending Systems Thinking Skills to an Introductory Mechanical Engineering Course, in ASEE Annual Conference,. 2019: Tampa, Florida.18. Muci-Kuchler, K.H.B., Cassandra M.; Bedillion, Mark D., Lovett
, A. Gupta, S. Hasanov, A. Nasirov, A. Elliott, F. Alifui-Segbaya, and N.Nanami, “The Trends and Challenges of Fiber Reinforced Additive Manufacturing,” TheInternational Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, pp. 1-18, 2019,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-03269-7.[7] A. Imeri, N. Russell, J. Rust, S. Sahin, and I. Fidan, “MAKER: 3D Pen Utilization in 3DPrinting Practices,” Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE 2017, Columbus,OH, USA, June 24-28, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/27723, [Accessed March12, 2019].[8] A. Imeri, N. Russell, J. Rust, S. Sahin, and I. Fidan, “MAKER: 3D Printing as an Alternativeto Fabricate the Motorsports Parts,” Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE2017
,www.usability.gov/what-and-why/user-centered-design.html.[3] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction —Part 210: Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems. ISO 9241-210:2019, ISO, 2019,www.iso.org/standard/77520.html.[4] Allen, T. E., & Chen, D. (2018, June), Patient Centered Design in Undergraduate BiomedicalEngineering Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah.10.18260/1-2--30860[5] Guilford, W. H., & Keeley, M., & Helmke, B. P., & Allen, T. E. (2019, June), Work in Progress: AClinical Immersion Program for Broad Curricular Impact Paper presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—33581[6] Kadlowec
present their work andsubmit a written report. This supported the assessment of outcome “3” (communication skills) aswell.ABET Student Outcome “3” assessment – effective communication:The EMAU vector was constructed from student performance in the mini impact lab projectpresentations and written reports. Average score of 2.93 is above the threshold of 2.67 andsatisfactory. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 35748AcknowledgementsThe author wishes to thank his former students at Mount Vernon Nazarene University for theircontribution to the success of this lab in Spring of 2019 in the Machine Component Designcourse. Some of the lab setups as
experience. LaMeres is also researching strategies to improve student engagement and how they can be used to improve diversity within engineering. LaMeres received his Ph.D. from the University of Col- orado, Boulder. He has published over 90 manuscripts and 5 textbooks in the area of digital systems and engineering education. LaMeres has also been granted 13 US patents in the area of digital signal propa- gation. LaMeres is a member of ASEE, a Senior Member of IEEE, and a registered Professional Engineer in the States of Montana and Colorado. Prior to joining the MSU faculty, LaMeres worked as an R&D engineer for Agilent Technologies in Colorado Springs, CO where he designed electronic test equipment.Barrett Frank
2019 ASEE Midwest Section Conference (Wichita State University-Wichita, KS) Integrating 4D Printing Processes into STEM Education Yeshaswini Baddam, Md. Nizam Uddin, Thisath Nisitha Dasal Attampola Arachchi Attampola Arachchige Don, and Eylem Asmatulu* Department of Mechanical Engineering Wichita State University, 1845 Fairmount Street, Wichita, Kansas 67260-0133 *Email: e.asmatulu@wichita.eduAbstract The combination of three-dimensional (3D) printing and smart materials into printablematerial has led to the development of
1.0 – 2.59ResultsDemographics of the LDP students as listed in Table 2. Students’ success in the LDP wasassessed each year using three constructs: 1) Leadership Self-efficacy, 2) Motivation to Lead,and 3) Grit. Student scores and results for each construct are presented by academic year. Inaddition, survey responses and focus group data gathered from students, mentors and communityleaders to provide insight on the value and quality of the program are presented.Table 2. Demographics of LPD Completers in Academic Years 2018-2021 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 Female 8 9 6 Male 19 16 10 STEM 15 14