essentially to allintroductory concepts discussed in introductory engineering physics.The first study case is related to the motion of bodies. This is a problem that can be used as anillustrative exercise, homework assignment, or for testing students on important principles,concepts and definitions in the area of kinetics of particles. The statement is as follows:In the system shown cylinders A and B have a mass of 5.00 kgeach while the mass of cylinder C is 10.0 kg. Initially, allblocks are at rest. Now, a constant downward vertical force Fis applied to block B as shown, and the system starts moving.Block B is observed to move vertically through 2.50 m in 2.00s. Find the magnitude of the applied force F, and the tensionin the cord c-d. Consider the
thinking required forproblem-solving.[4] However, empathy can diffuse emotions.[5]Barrett-Lennard describes a cyclical process of how empathy unfolds or builds between twoindividuals, “A” and “B”, that consists of 5 steps and 3 phases.[6] Barret-Lennard’s empathy cycleis summarized in table 1. In the first step, A is actively attending to B’s expression of experience(and hoping/trusting A will be receptive). B’s experience becomes known to A in a second step. Step Description Phase 1 A attends to B’s expression Conditions for of experience empathic process 2 A reads or resonates to B such Phase 1: empathic resonation
machine costs about $16,000, including the motioncontroller, software licenses and a PC. The total cost of the project, including salaries ofresearchers, students, indirect costs, parts, etc. was about $250K. Some of the costs were offset bydonations from industry.Although the lab stations are different machines, they share common features so that generalskills such as jogging axes, I/O mapping, user interface mapping, motion profile programming,etc. are all the same regardless of the machine. Hence, students can use any machine when they (a) Bottle filling (b) Gantry pick-and-place machine(c) Material handling with conveyor (d) Logo stamping on golf balls(e) Winding machine for fishing line
) answered prompts in front of the entire class and were surveyedcomprehensively in the beginning, middle, and end of the semester. This course was held inSpring 2020, where students started the course fully in-person and shifted to synchronous virtualinstruction shortly after the mid-semester survey. The course was at the introductory level, and itwas the first major-specific course in the curriculum. The course is typically taken in the springsemester of the second year, so students may know each other and have some experience withcollege level instruction.The other cohort (Cohort B) started the course in Fall 2020 with synchronous virtual instructionwith plans for partial in-person instruction. Cohort B students completed a one-question
waste casks.The effectiveness of this collaborative module in promoting cross-disciplinary learning wasassessed through an analysis of student responses to an anonymous survey. The results show thatthe module was effective in (a) teaching students the fundamental principles of diffusion, (b)fostering peer-to-peer teaching and learning, and (c) emphasizing the importance of teamworkand problem-solving across disciplines. The results also indicate that students developed abroader view regarding the applicability of their knowledge beyond their own disciplinaryboundaries. Given its universality, this materials-focused teaching module has the potential toserve as an effective model to foster interdisciplinary teaching and learning between
Angle of Twist for Round and Square Torsion Specimen For the round specimen, from any text on Mechanics of Materials, such as, Reference [3] Which gives G = 3.94 x 106 psi For the square cross section, the determination of torsional stiffness requires consideration of warping which is available only in advanced texts on Mechanics of Materials, such as, Reference [4]. Stiffness for the square specimen, (2) This gives α = 0.138 which compares favorably with the analytical value of 0.1406 [4] CONCLUSIONS Warping has been demonstrated using (a) twisting Styrofoam specimens, (b) Membrane Analogy, and (c) Torsion experiments involving shafts of circular and square sections
increasing interest in corrosion engineering, or engineering in general. Once the curriculumhas been implemented in more classrooms, detailed information can be obtained regardingstudent interest and likelihood of students to further study corrosion engineering at the collegelevel. It is our hope that widespread implementation of the CEC will help fix the “rusty”pipeline associate with corrosion education.ReferencesAndrews, E., Bufford, A., Banks, D., Curry, A., & Curry, M. (2014). STEM Modules:Developing Innovative Approaches to Enhance Student Learning. In Proceedings of the 2014ASEE Gulf-Southwest Conference (pp. 1–8). American Society for Engineering Education.Barrett, B., Moran, A., & Woods, J. (2014). Meteorology meets engineering: an
and 0 ftlb at 113 degrees for Nylon rope. The relationship shown inFigure 10 was used to drive the computer model. As may be noted this is almost linear. Figure 10 Moment applied to the arm by a nylon rope bundle as a function of the angle of the throwing arm.Dynamic Analysis Figure 11 The Sling (P) and throwing arm (L).The dynamic components of the Onager as determined by the students are shown in Figure 11.The equations derived by the students, to describe the positions and motion of these components, Page 26.70.11are as follows:Position of center mass of the arm xB = B cos θB
as an interaction mode (TTouch+F), and Touch screen Tabletusing Stylus as an interaction mode (TTouch+S)- (see Figure 1). In addition, the modelingprogram SketchUp was selected as a representative modeling application with a low level ofdifficulty in which user interface does not vary between computing platforms or operatingsystems. The user interface for SketchUp is very consistent between the Windows operatingsystem and the Apple Mac OS X operating system used in the study. (a) DTouch+F (b) TTouch+F (c) TTouch+S Figure 1: The hardware used in the experimentA between-subjects experimental approach was used to investigate the effects of HCI mode andscreen size on student
of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering Education2. To develop competence in an area, students must (a) have a deep foundation of factual knowledge, (b) understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework, and (c) organize knowledge in ways that facilitate retrieval and applications.3. A metacognitive approach to instruction can help students learn to take control of their own learning by defining learning goals and monitoring their progress in achieving them.Anyone who has taught physics will agree that students enter the class with manypreconceptions. For example, students have tremendous
the greater SL community, from the business, education, psychology, law, computerscience, occupational therapy, and sociology faculties.11-16 Projects included (a) event planning,(b) researching, (c) developing programs, (d) mentoring youth to build self-esteem, (e) traininganimals, (f) tutoring, and (g) providing occupational therapy.The following criteria were identified as critical in determining whether a COR developed apositive or negative view of the SL experience11-16: • whether objectives were clearly aligned and defined; • level of communication and preparation between the COR and faculty member; • amount of student motivation and conduct; and • whether the COR’s problem was resolved.Two of the studies that focused on the
Engineering Stress Culture," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[9] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, "An analysis of motivation constructs with first‐year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans," Journal of engineering education, vol. 99, pp. 319-336, 2010.[10] Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane, Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2006. 5(1): p: 80-92.[11] MacQueen, K. M., E. McLellan, K. Kay, and B. Milstein, B, Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cam
context of the conceptWave (B) (B1) an event (B2) a dynamic (B3) part of a larger,dynamic process dynamic processField (C) (C1) a system (C2) a multi- (C3) a system within arelational dimensional system, larger system(views the “whole” as containing multiplethe sum of its “parts”; subsystems andclassifies the type of engaged inorganizational relationships withrelationship the other
project. The students were instructed to do a video recording and upload it to the serverand share it with the class for them to watch the built prototype, and it’s working principle with azoom presentation to follow. B. Hybrid/blended format in Fall 2020/Spring 2021: In Fall 2020, new challenges were introduced. Since the students' survey indicated their in-person instruction preferences, the instruction delivery moved to a blended model of zoom lectureand in-person LABs. The major challenge was to meet the 6-feet requirement for social distancingduring the LAB setup. Our LABS are generally equipped with 24 workstations for each student.During Fall 2020 and continuing in Spring 2021, the class was divided into two groups, and
for the lesson. From the learning goals, a fewlearning objectives (A, B, C), represented as blue squares, are developed. The learning objectivesare mapped to different levels of Bloom’s taxonomy. Depending on the complexity of thesimulation tool, learning objectives up to the “Analyze” and “Synthesize” levels can be achieved.In the figure, the three learning objectives A, B, and C map to the levels “Apply” and“Understand”.Activities are created to help the student achieve each learning objective, and are represented asyellow triangles. Again, the letters A, B, and C are used to show the mapping of specificactivities with their corresponding learning objectives and their levels of Bloom’s taxonomy.These activities can be simulation-based
Engineering Programs,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2004).6. P. Hirsch, J. Anderson, J.E. Colgate, J. Lake, B. Shwom, and C. Yarnoff, “Enriching Freshman Design Through Collaboration with Professional Designers,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2002).7. P. Larochelle, J. Engblom, and H. Gutierrez, “A Cornerstone Freshman Engineering Design Experience,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2004).8. H. K. Qammar, H. M. Cheung, E. A. Evans, S. Prettyman-Spickard, F. S. Broadway, and R. D. Ramsier, “Impact of
), INTERTECH (International Council for Engineering and Technology Education) and RCI (Cartagena Network of Engineering). Dr. Clau- dio da Rocha Brito received the B. Sc. in Electrical Engineering, M. Sc. In Electrical Engineering and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the Polytechnic School of University of So Paulo, B. Sc. in Physics from the Institute of Physics of University of So Paulo, B. Sc. in Mathematics from the In- stitute of Mathematics and Statistics of University of So Paulo, B. Sc. in Mathematics Education and B. Sc. in Physics Education, both from the Faculty of Education of University of So Paulo. He was Director of Enterprise Incubators of University of So Paulo (ENUSP), Coordinator of the Cooperative
35% and 65% chord length at a high angle of attack and compared to the baseline airfoil andpreviously done semi-circular geometry. The results are summarized in Table 3. It appears therectangular geometry placed at 35% chord length outperformed the competing geometriessignificantly; however, when the varying dimple geometries were placed at 65% chord length,the percent increase in L/D did not vary significantly from geometry to geometry. (a) (b) (c) Figure 15: Dimple with (a) rectangular geometry; (b) triangular geometry; (c) trapezoidal geometryTable 3: Percent increase in L/D
. Page 26.1309.12[2] A. M. Paudel, "Fostering Diversity and Educational Learning among Engineering Students through Group- Study: A Case Study," ASEE-RMS, Ogden, UT, 2012.[3] A. M. Paudel and S. A. Kalevela, "Fostering Diversity and Educational Learning among Minority Engineering Students through Group-Study: A Case Study," ASEE Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013.[4] ABET. General Criteria 3. Student Outcomes [Online]. Available: http://abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3149[5] B. A. Camburn, B. U. Dunlap, V. K. Viswanathan, J. S. Linsey, D. D. Jensen, R. H. Crawford, et al., "Connecting Design Problem Characteristics to Prototyping Choices to Form a Prototyping
. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/biomedical-engineers.htm 6. Dana, R. (2006). Chemical engineering Using the Engineering Literature (pp. 120-141): CRC Press.Litzinger, T., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgraft, R. & Newstetter, W. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal Of Engineering Education 100, 123-150. 7. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J. & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lesson for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education 95, 139-151. 8. Jamison, A., Kolmos, A. & Holgaard, J. E. (2014). Hybrid learning: An integrative approach to engineering
successfully balance their hierarchical diagrams. S lid e s B o a rd a t E y e L e v e l (to P o s itio n 3 .0 ) 1 .1 Locks P o s itio n P ro v id e s 1 .3 fo rc e 1 .2 T e ac h e rs
is “a course based, credit-bearing, educationalexperience in which students (a) participate in an organized service activity that meets identifiedcommunity needs and (b) reflect on the service activity in such a way as to gain furtherunderstanding of course content, a broader appreciation of the discipline, and an enhanced senseof civic responsibility" [4]. This type of curricular community engagement has been shown tohave many benefits for undergraduates including: enhanced critical thinking and betterunderstanding of course material, cooperative learning and tolerance for diversity, self-efficacyand leadership, recruitment and retention of students, community-college connections andcitizenship [5, 6]. These community engagement activities
2004 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationTable 1. Module Developmenta. Select an application emphasisb. Develop a description of the applicationc. Prepare data appropriate to the applicationd. Review the underlying physics and equations of the applicatione. Review the applicable background mathematicsf. Apply the mathematics to the physics underlying the application with software tools to model and present the application datag. Compare theory with experiment and analyze the results and implicationsExample 1 a. Electrical Engineering b. Lumped Circuit DC and AC Analysis c. Ohm’ law and results from simple
totackle the manufacturing system problems and how to solve those problems with CollectiveSystem Design.Collective System Design provides clear advantages in defining problems and findingcorresponding solutions in a myriad of design processes. Students learned that it is important toalways consider the objectives (functional requirements) while seeking answers (designparameters) to problems and to select DPs to ensure functional independence. To portray breadthand depth, this paper has illustrated the application of Collective System Design to the system,sub-system, and machine/fixture levels of production systems.References[1] Albers, T., Clampitt, C., Goss, B., and Lulgjuraj, M., “Kinney Vacuum Plant – Linked Cell Manufacturing System,” 2.812
waves. Students are also introduced to the harmonics of a frequency,which are frequencies that are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency of a wave. Thisactivity concludes with students participating in a group activity, where each student is asked touse their individual iPads to generate a sine wave with a frequency of a harmonic they areassigned (i.e., Student A generates a 100 Hz tone, Student B generates a 200 Hz tone, etc.) in anattempt to prove that their individual contributions contribute to the resulting more complex tonegenerated from all of their iPads.Speaker BuildingSpeaker Building is an introductory activity that tasks students with building their own speakerusing household materials. During a short introduction, an
, Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: Ahybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journalof Qualitative Methods, 2006. 5(1): p: 80-92.10. MacQueen, K. M., E. McLellan, K. Kay, and B. Milstein, B, Codebook development forteam-based qualitative analysis. Cam Journal, 1996. 10(2): p. 31-36.11. Lechuga, V.M., A motivation perspective on faculty mentoring: The notion of “non-intrusive” mentoring practices in science and engineering. Higher Education, 2014. 68: p. 909-926.12. Paplepu, A., R. Friedman, and R. Barnett. Junior faculty members’ mentoringrelationships and their professional development in US medical schools. Journal of theAssociation of American Medical Colleges, 1998. 73: p. 318
generation are accompanied by affective states such as irritation, frustration, anger,and sometimes rage when the learner makes mistakes… On the other hand, positive affectivestates such as flow, delight, excitement, and eureka are experienced when tasks are completed,challenges are conquered, insights are unveiled, and major discoveries are made... Emotions aresystematically affected by the knowledge and goals of the learner, as well as vice versa.” Theygo on to explain that a balanced system is important when learning through failure. If this formof learning is uncontrolled, students will either be in states of, “(a) engagement/flow as theypursue the superordinate learning goal of mastering the material in the learning environment or(b
E_PQ 29.0 d_PQ 0.50 a 16.00 E_PR 29.0 d_PR 0.50 b 12.00 E_PS 29.0 d_PS 0.50 c 12.00 k/in deg in k_PQ 284.7 q_PQ 143.1 L_PQ 20.00 k_PR 474.5 q_PR 90.0 L_PR 12.00 k_PS 335.5 q_PS 45.0 L_PS 16.97 Results F_PQ 1.288 Equation Table F_PR 3.197 d _PQ d _PR d _PS d _x d _y load F_PS 1.457 Sum Fx -227.8 0.0
DfS Guidelines15.Alternatives to Incorporate Design for Safety into Engineering CurriculaTo those experienced with the introduction of new topics or courses into established engineeringcurricula, there are five obvious alternatives to increase the DfS knowledge of degreed engineers: A. In all engineering courses, safety hazards could be identified as the subject matter progresses, and could be noted to the students (with options for elimination/reduction) B. In all engineering design courses, only C. In all senior capstone design courses, as a criterion each design team must address in data collection, analysis, creation of alternatives, and evaluation of alternatives D. In a course on safety engineering E. In a course on
the misconceptions. For example, while discussing the concept of “independent” and“dependent” variables in the context of an engineering experiment, following clicker questionwas asked to determine “prior knowledge”: For the following phrase which quantity is the independent variable? Elapsed time for various piston sizes A. Time B. Piston Size Page 11.657.9 Student responses in a class of about 150 students were: A. 40% B. 55% C. Invalid response 5%After reviewing the class response, the instructors gave a brief explanation of the associatedconcepts that an experimenter