other AHS courses atOlin because it is not primarily focused on text-based analysis. However, the course meets thestandards for writing commonality in the number and type of writing assignments that arerequired. In addition to intense concentration on the communication competency, developmentof life-long learning skills is emphasized and context is provided by readings, lectures, andanalysis of non-fiction films. The course, which has been offered regularly since 2002,culminates with an exhibition of visual work and a screening of video projects. In this paper Idescribe the elements of the course, its implementation at our College with examples of studentwork, assessment tools, course evaluations, and plans for dissemination of the course
learning-language disorders.Gary Bertoline, Purdue University Gary R. Bertoline Associate Vice President for Discovery Resources at Purdue University where he plays a significant role in the strategic planning, development, and support of high performance computing, visualization, and research collaboration between Purdue’s IT staff and faculty. Recent projects include the reorganization and expansion of the high performance computing area and led the creation of the NSF funded Envision Center for Data Perceptualization and the Rosen Center for Advanced Computing. Prior to his current position he served as department head for seven years of Computer Graphics Technology at Purdue University
willdiscuss the structure of this course, the successes that must be encouraged and the pit fallsthat must be avoided if this unique integration of engineering technology students is to beimplemented in an ET curriculum.Background and IntroductionNortheastern University is completing its third year in implementing a change from theQuarter to the Semester academic plan. The decision to change from a Quarter system toa Semester plan was driven, in a strong way, by the cooperative education division of theUniversity who responded to their cooperative education employers who had requestedthat the students spend more time-at least six months-in a full time, engineering workenvironment. The School of Engineering Technology took full advantage of
this and realize they are not designed for ocean use. Severalof the newer houseboats being constructed use a semi-catamaran hull to increase stability and seakeeping. V Hulls are also being placed at the front of houseboats to make them moremaneuverable and allow them better control in rougher conditions. The latter two improvementsdrastically increase the survivability of a houseboat in rough conditions, making them a moresuitable design for someone planning on using a houseboat on the ocean.Many Houseboat communities are taking steps to help ensure the safety of their occupants. Thecity of Sausalito, CA, has set up a strict set of guidelines houseboat owners must comply with inorder to live there. Rules are designed to: ‚ Ensure
camp. He came home talking about his college plans, with confidence that hecould manage it. DO-IT has also helped my son get a part-time job for his first year of college.He has achieved a level of independence we never thought possible.” 272.4.3 Mentors’ PerspectivesSurvey: Results from a survey distributed to DO-IT mentors indicate that mentors discussed awide variety of topics with Scholars, including academic and career fields in scienceengineering, mathematics and technology; college issues; disability-related issues; careers;computers; adaptive technology; and the Internet. Mentors reported that they felt satisfiedknowing they could be of assistance to Scholars and enjoyed the mentoring relationship.23. DO-IT Summer Study and the Game of
provide their opinions and thoughts regarding both the effectivenessand usefulness of the instruction they received, as well as the reasons why.CLEAR and Mechanical EngineeringWe chose to examine course evaluations in Mechanical Engineering because it is currently oneof the most advanced CLEAR departments and the communication integration in is solidifiedand endorsed by the undergraduate curriculum committee, as well as the faculty members. Thefour-year plan is summarized in Table 1. Communication instruction takes place in threerequired, core Mechanical Engineering courses, as well as throughout the junior level labsequence. The oral and written communication and teamwork instruction varies from course tocourse and builds on the professional
were not wellenough defined, and that some very good projects received a lower grade than poorer projectsthat were selected for exhibition by the client.These student criticisms are not easily addressed since no single client can provide a project ofsufficient breadth to support all engineering majors and interests. In the future, we plan to solvethese problems by agreeing that the theme would be “inventions of historical significance” andtraining our judges to accept and exhibit the best explanatory/demonstration exhibits regardlessof whether they addressed the client’s themes and teaching objectives. Alternatively, or inaddition, we are considering adding the College of Engineering itself as an SL client for studentsto develop exhibits that
an effective study environment (time and location), seeking helpfrom peers and teachers and engagement in planning and monitoring activities, to name a few5.Because SRL is so complex, there is not a single SRL approach or strategy that students can betaught that will be applicable in all situations. In fact, situation, or context, dependence is one ofthe areas in need of further research so we can better understand the contextual factors thatimpact engagement in SRL6. Research in SRL has already suggested that contextual factors suchas degree of instructor scaffolding7, pedagogical approach used in the classroom8, genderbalance9, learner’s interpersonal relationships as well as school policy or structure10, impactengagement in self-regulated
section of the survey and the initial validity tests. Though, more validity of the instrumentincluding psychometric statistical analyses, correlation matrices of theoretically related items forconstruct validity, and empirically testing the factor structure using maximum likelihood exploratoryfactor analysis are planned in the coming months. The paper ends with future research steps includingvalidation and distribution across universities in the United States. As mentioned earlier, the hope is thatothers are able to use and adapt the survey instrument and its supportive literature. While, our goal isspecific to measure senior engineer students, the survey could be adapted for recently graduated studentsearly in their professional
selection, human resources planning and placements [6]. Various competency models exists in the field of SE. Most of them have been developedfor specific contexts, since the required competencies can differ between organizations andprojects, and they can typically be tailored to the organization or project particularities. Themost well-known competency models in the field of SE are: • INCOSE UK Working Group Competency Model: identifies the competencies required to conduct good SE projects[8]. • Defense Acquisition University (DAU) ENG Competency Model: identifies the compe- tencies required for Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition engineering professionals [9]. • NASA Academy of Program/Project and Engineering
contributing to the overall achievements of the institutional goals.Programmatic accreditation, on the other hand, can apply to schools, departments, or programsthat are part of a larger educational institution.According to the US Department of Education, there are specific roles that accreditation isexpected to play within the educational system:7 1. Assess the quality of academic programs at institutions of higher education 2. Create a culture of continuous improvement of academic quality at colleges and universities and stimulate a general raising of standards among educational institutions 3. Involve faculty and staff comprehensively in institutional evaluation and planning 4. Establish criteria for professional certification and
students earning grades of C, D, and F or choosing to withdraw (W) from the classrather than take a hit to their grade point averages. This data illustrates an institutional andprogrammatic contradiction: despite the intention to better prepare students for the follow-onCalculus I course, fewer and fewer GS students were achieving high enough grades in Pre-Calcto be granted the status of being “calculus-ready.” Previously, the Pre-Calc course was lauded forsuccessfully preparing students along the undergraduate mathematics pathway [17] and wasconsidered crucial to the college’s strategic plan to broaden participation in engineering. Thischange motivated the research team to investigate what was happening to students within thiscourse.Qualitative
singled out for being virtually absent from all statistical measures in relation toMāori and Pasifika diversity, and the first objective of the Equal Educational OpportunitiesAction Plan was to develop standardized performance indicators for the postsecondary sectorthat all Faculties and Departments would be measured against.5 Government funding support hassince been introduced in 2003. The support is designed to enhance Māori and Pasifika studentparticipation in all postsecondary programs and is weighted specifically towards STEM-basedacademic disciplines.Literature on underrepresented minorities in engineering education has also noted persistentchallenges to increasing diversity. In the U.S. context, for instance, the aforementionedNAE/ASEE
ranging from classroom utilization to student success. Dr. Rincon received her B.S. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, an MBA and an M.S. in Information Management from Arizona State University, and a Ph.D. in Educational Policy and Planning from The University of Texas at Austin. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Minority women in the workplace: Aspirations, roadblocks and success strategiesAbstractApproximately one in four women leave the engineering profession within the first five years, arate much higher than their male counterparts[7]. Studies of STEM professionals have found thatwomen encounter numerous challenges
. Students are introduced to electrical drawings andobserve how information is communicated graphically. A greater connection is made bycomparing the drawings to what is actually in the laboratory building. The concept of branchcircuits and a main panel box is reinforced.The contractor teams for the K’nexercise are presented with the approved drawings for the K’nexpedestrian bridge. Based on the plans, each contractor has a week to submit requests forinformation (RFI) and prepare a bid based on labor, materials, overhead and profit.Week #10Lecture: Mechanical and Plumbing SystemsActivity: The K’nexercise is completed. A bid opening ceremony identifies the lowest bidder.A substantial bonus is given for the low bid, but all contractor teams build the
thestructural reinforced concrete members (Slabs, beams, columns and footings) for the structuralsystem by classifying the panel types of slabs” is assessed using Mid Term-1 Q3 abbreviated asMT1 Q3 and corresponds to SO_11 or SO ‘k’: “an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modernengineering tools necessary for engineering practice”; The performances in this assessment havefailed and therefore, the failing CO, PI and ABET SO are headlined for reflections and actionitems. The reason for failure is documented in the reflections section. In this case, the reason wasobserved as, 30% students had difficulty in locating the position of columns on architecturalbuilding plans. It was noted, that a course offered earlier, Civil Engineering Drawing
focus on boards featuring products fromthese two vendors. While Actel and Lattice are alternate options, there are more resourcesavailable for Xilinx and Intel PSG for faculty members. Some key aspects of PLD development board selection covered in this paper include thefollowing. • Contribution to student learning outcomes – Does the board contain all the components needed to complete the laboratory assignments? • PLD vendor – Does one want to use Xilinx with ISE/Vivado, or Intel PSG with Quartus? • Existing materials available – Are there existing lesson plans or laboratory assignments available? • Cost – How cost sensitive? Is this something purchased by the department or students? • Time – How much time is traded
themethodology behind the method in hopes to gain perspective and feedback from the engineeringeducation community. We describe details of this iterative method and present preliminaryfindings from two case study facilitations from an introductory anthropology course and a seniorcapstone engineering course. We end with our plans for improvements and future work with thismethod and the Advancing Cultural Change initiative at large.Background LiteratureWomen and people of color remain significantly underrepresented in engineering2. Thechallenge of recruiting and retaining women and people of color in engineering is due, in part, tothe exclusionary culture of the field. Engineering culture is perceived as being very competitiveand unwelcoming which prevent
awareness of each other’s thinking and shareddecision making associated with their design process and final reporting. What an effective teamneeds are executive skills for managing a design process that transitions their ideas into a plan,research, build, test and refine cycle. Project management tools can support the processes ifteam leaders know how to track and facilitate the process. One of the goals of this first yearengineering course is to develop these skills in the team members so they can effectively usethem for future design activities like senior design and multidisciplinary projects in industry. In this paper, we present results from a qualitative analysis of student responses to open-ended questions designed to elicit their
Academic faculty members in your department on research/programmatic experiences projects that align you’re your research/career interests. They should participate in professional activities that are common for people who have completed their doctorate. - For example, do some peer reviewing, give conference talks, contribute chapters to books, demos, write or assist your advisor in writing grant proposals; take charge in planning a seminar, meeting, workshop within the department or outside; teach some classes in a course.3) Access to Mentors Some graduate
suggested a move from“messing around” to “geeking out,” or from transitional to personal interest. John Cena began bytalking with other boys about weekend plans interspersed with questions about the lesson, thenmoving away from those boys to work on his design with another boy. Both boys focused ontheir work and designed and tested their products. John Cena’s behavior suggested a move from“hanging out”/situational to “messing around”/transitional interest. John had no interest in otherdesigns or taking his work home. The participation genres suggest a move from “hanging out,”to “messing around,” to “geeking out” and reflect an evolving interest for these students.55,56Below are Fig. 2, a photograph of John Cena and Fig. 3, a photograph of Caroline
Assessment of Learning Gains survey (SALG), anend-of-course focus group, and a pre/post open prompt survey. For the first offering ofthe course (spring, 2016) we used the SALG survey and the focus group as primaryindirect assessments. Direct methods included student course work samples (a variety ofwritten work, posters, presentations and final projects), a pre/post analysis of a scenarioinvolving hazardous chemicals, and a video-recorded session of teams analyzing anambiguous scenario indirectly related to course content. We used several of theseinstruments more than once in the two course offerings and we have an extensivecollection of student artifacts. Only a sample of the total assessment plan is reported here,and we emphasize that these are
the guidelines of the directions or approaches directions or follows through on assignment without going beyond approaches to the untested and potentially the guidelines of the assignment in the risky approaches to the assignment final product assignment in final product Solving Only a single Considers and rejects Having selected Develops logical consistent problems approach considered less acceptable among alternatives, plan to solve problem, and used to solve the approaches to solving develops a logical recognizing
previous student team members were analyzed to determine the extent to whichmultidisciplinary composition of the student teams impacted student perceptions of projectsuccess, skills acquired, and overall team environment.To complement the student perspectives, faculty perspectives regarding supportingmultidisciplinary teams in the EPICS program were also collected through a roundtablediscussion. Results of a roundtable and SWOT (Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, Threats)analysis are included and discussed. This paper reports the results of the student-focused andfaculty-focused analysis of multidisciplinary EPICS teams and plans for further work.1. IntroductionThe Engineering Projects in Community Service Program was started at Purdue University
that Q, and for all we know Q is the case”. Theopponent can respond to either with a cautious denial († ∼ P ) for “∼ P is the case for all thatyou have shown”, or a provisoed denial (∼ P/Q&†Q) for “∼ P obtains in all (or most) ordinarycircumstances when Q does and for all we know Q is the case”.Note that when a provisoed assertion is countered by a provisoed denial, symbol P representsthe same statement for both parties, while Q indeed can not be the same. Consider the followingexcerpt form a group of mechanical engineering students at the earliest stage of planning for thedesign of a mechanism to handle hazardous explosive material. This data belongs to the DesignThinking Research Symposium 24,25 (DTRS 2013) which deposits design review
couldargue – Eastern philosophical traditions, as well as the work of early moral psychologists such as1 This is not to claim that the education of engineers would be the most important factor involvedin or main reason for such disasters. The decisions and actions of non-engineers also matter, aswell as policies by governments and industries. This research and paper contribute to a betterunderstanding of these as well, a point further explained below.Laurence Kohlberg, as well as more recent neo-Kohlbergians such as James Rest andcolleagues.[29]–[32] Although recent work in engineering ethics has identified problems with anexclusive focus on ethical reasoning – pulling on insights from theories of “planned behavior” [33]and positive psychology [34
see the work that everyone else did. I like that there were a lot of resources already available in the Team Drive. I like the diversity of projects done throughout the semester.” “I like the team communication that was necessary to complete the projects throughout the semester.” “The extremely fast pace of the class forced me to dedicate a lot of my effort into organizing the project, and setting realistic, yet ambitious goals. This also included delegating tasks between group members.” “I think I learned the most about how much work it takes to make a good project vs.a mediocre project. Planning a project takes a decent
scientific community.Best Practices in Writing Instruction Developing students’ competence as writers within the discourse communities of theirdisciplines requires acknowledging the differences between school writing and professionalwriting practices [13]. In contrast to school writing that emphasizes knowledge telling and on-demand writing, best practices consistent with professional and disciplinary writing includeopportunities to communicate meaningful content to real audiences, extended writing processesthat allow time for planning, revision, and editing, and opportunities to act upon detailedfeedback [13, 14, 15]. Modern psychological theory conceptualizes writing as a social activity [16]. In thisview, writing is shaped by the
be anaid or detract from their agency to implement. These findings informed subsequent faculty andadministrative change plans. The change plans were ultimately implemented at the local level, andstudent and faculty data were collected to evaluate effectiveness, attitudes, and behaviors. As aresult, the authors were able to accelerate the adoption of RBIS at their institution.Other authors like Cruz et al. [43] built upon the work of Matusovich et al. [50] and Finelli et al.[49]. Cruz et al. [43] also incorporated additional elements of the system (e.g., cultural factors,change management processes, pedagogical knowledge, and student experiences to understandfaculty motivation to implement effective teaching strategies. This study explored