the college environment. Her research interest focuses on higher education policy, access, and representation of marginalized groups in STEM disciplines.Dr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Dr. Roberta Rincon is the Associate Director of Research with the Society of Women Engineers, where she oversees the organizationˆa C™s research activities around issues impacting girls and women from elementary through college and into the engineering workDaniel E. Chand, Kent State University Daniel E. Chand is an associate professor of political science and public administration at Kent State University. He earned his Ph.D. in Public Policy from the University of Arkansas in 2013. His research applies policy and
: 10.18260/1-2--5750.[5] L. Berland, W. McKenna, and S.B. Peacock. "Understanding Students' Perceptions On The Utility Of Engineering Notebooks,” in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 26-29, 2011, pp 22.1573.1 - 22.1573.17, doi: 10.18260/1-2--18474.[6] R. Moore, et al., “The engineering design log: A digital design journal facilitating learning and assessment,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26 - August 28, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.26153.[7] S. Kerka, “Journal Writing and Adult Learning,” EPIC Digest No. EDO-CE-96-174, 1996.[8] J. D. Hertel, C. M. Cunningham, and G. J. Kelly, “The roles of engineering notebooks in
. We applied a mixed methods designto not only establish a baseline of PCP tools used by faculty and the student perception ofprofessor-student rapport, but also to understand the reasoning behind the PCP choices made byvarious faculty. In the process of this initial study, however, we began to notice rapport was notcorrelated to the PCPs used but rather to the reasons faculty used certain communication tools.We pivoted our work to examine how faculty mindsets, which became evident in theirexplanations for how and why PCPs were used, correlated to professor-student rapport.Drawing on Wilson et al.'s work [7] using student perceptions to understand professor-studentrapport and more recent work on the impact of faculty mindset on student
collaborating on start-up projects and grant writing with the Colleges of Science, Nursing, Arts & Letters, Engineering and Computer Science and Medicine. 1992-Present: Professor, Science/Literacy Education, College of Education, Florida Atlantic University. Currently PI: USDOE Hispanic Serving Institution with College of Engineering; Co-PI: NSF S STEM; Completed Grant Activity– PI on NSF DR K-12: Early Science Learning and Literacy Development (2013-2018); Co-PI: NSF GK12 and NSF RIGEE; Advisory Member on NSF STEM-C, NSF ChemBOND, and NSF Statewide Systemic Initiative. Previous grants: PI USDOE/IES Vocabulary Development (2004-08), NSF/REC/IERI Science and Literacy (2002-09), USDOE/IES Reading Comprehension (2004-09
. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass, 2010.[4] S. A. and H. K. CNN, “Everyday words and phrases that have racist connotations,” CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/06/us/racism-words-phrases-slavery-trnd/index.html (accessed Feb. 28, 2022).[5] “12 Common Words And Phrases With Racist Origins Or Connotations,” HuffPost, Jul. 07, 2020. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/common-words-phrases-racist-origins-connotations_l_5efcf b63c5b6ca9709188c83 (accessed Feb. 28, 2022).[6] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.[7] J. Fiske, Introduction to Communication Studies, 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2010. doi: 10.4324
andproportions create great tasting dishes, the same attributes and proportions may not be needed foreach class period to be engaging.While in-person instruction is preferred, there are many benefits to engaging studentssynchronously when we are forced to move instruction online.AcknowledgementsThe author thanks Dr. Doug Dunston for his assistance in data collection for this study.References[1] J. Bourne, D. Harris, F Mayadas, "Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, pp. 131-146, 2005.[2] I.E. Allen & J. Seaman, Staying the Course: Online Education in the United States, Needham. MA: Sloan-C, 2008.[3] M. Shuey, A Akera, S. Appelhans, A. Cheville, T. De Pree, & S
ecosystem model. She is also a Co-PI on an NSF S-STEM grant called ENGAGE which is working to make a more robust transfer pathway for local Community college students. Dr. Thompson is a Co-PI on an NSF ADVANCE grant called KIND with other universities within the CSU. She is a co-advisor to Engineers without Borders, Critical Global Engagement, and oSTEM at Cal Poly.Andrew Thomas ChanJulia CannonJane L. Lehr (Professor) Dr. Jane L. Lehr is the Director of the Office of Student Research and Professor in Ethnic Studies and Women’s, Gender & Queer Studies at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She is also Director of the CSU Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Student Participation (LSAMP) in STEM
asignificant effect on aerospace student persistence past their first year nor students’ academic at-risk status. There were small inverse effects, suggesting that decreased financial means led togreater academic at-risk status but also higher persistence. However, once again, these resultswere not statistically significant.All of these studies have looked at student outcomes at one point in time, such as graduationrates, persistence into the engineering profession, or academic at-risk status after their first year.While these are important metrics, only looking at one point in students’ undergraduateeducation cannot shed insight into the place(s) in the curriculum that are causing inequitableoutcomes. To begin to answer this question, researchers
experiments we can see the results of the integrationand derivation functions”.The same two laboratory experiments were assembled and tested, by the same students,using the real components. The comments from most of the students again were “theselaboratory experiments make the connection of the calculus concepts, with the real world.We learn by doing.” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education References 1. Mel S. Sabela, E.F. Redish (2005) “Student Understanding of Topics in Calculus” 2. Lightbourne James “Crossing the
photovoltaic soiling losses through optical characterization,” Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 58, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56868-z[2] V. Rajasekar, 2015, “Indoor Soiling Method and Outdoor Statistical Risk Analysis of Photovoltaic Power Plants,” Master’s Thesis, Arizona State University, publication number: 1588273[3] S. Mantha, 2016, “Development of Uniform Artificial Soil Deposition Techniques on Glass and Photovoltaic Coupons,” Master’s Thesis, Arizona State University, publication number: 10144651 https://www.proquest.com/pagepdf/1826872881?accountid=8363 (accessed Jul. 08, 2022).[4] N. Hussain et al., 2021, “Designing of homemade soiling station to explore soiling loss effects on PV modules,” Sol. Energy, vol. 225, pp. 624–633
factorsaffect the accuracy in a classroom setting. This experiment was for demonstration purposes onlyand not for scientific discovery. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceReferences[1] Gregory S. Marlow, Mukunda B. Das, The effects of contact size and non-zero metal resistance on thedetermination of specific contact resistance, Solid-State Electronics, Volume 25, Issue 2, 1982, Pages 91-94,[2] C.Y. Chang, Y.K. Fang, S.M. Sze, Specific contact resistance of metal-semiconductor barriers, Solid-StateElectronics, Volume 14, Issue 7, 1971, Pages 541-550,[3] Sarah E. Bonner (1999) Choosing Teaching Methods Based on Learning Objectives: An
individuals in the Center. This means that inclusion, however it is measured, has to beconsidered as a function of a host of demographic variables (race/ethnicity, gender, etc.) toaddress, as much as Center numbers allow, the intersectional nature of individuals with the endgoal of showing that inclusion is a shared, consensual experience, and not just reflective of thosein the numerical majority.Devising a Culture of Inclusion survey instrument for ERCs. ERCs can choose, or create, theassessment(s) or survey instrument(s) appropriate to best meet the needs of their Center. Giventhe unique characteristics of an ERC, as just described, it was difficult to find an appropriatesurvey instrument already in the literature. Some ERCs have chosen to assess
, Japan is constantly improving itshigh-level talent training programs and innovative initiatives.Cultivating interdisciplinary skills among high-level talents in the U.S.As universities are considered a source of advanced knowledge in science and technology(S&T), innovation initiatives in the U.S. have emphasized technology transfer. Beginning withthe Bayh-Dole Act, intellectual property (IP) rights were transferred to universities. Thisgradually diversified the role of universities from doing research only to commercializing theresearch results [23]. R&D activities and patent applications have increased due to UIC [24],which also stimulates regional R&D activities [25]-[26].For training talent in the U.S., Wang [27] addressed two
Organization, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://covid19.who.int/region/amro/country/us.[2] M. P. A. Murphy, “COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy,” Contemp. Secur. Policy, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 492–505, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749.[3] A. M. Stern, M. S. Cetron, and H. Markel, “Closing The Schools: Lessons From The 1918–19 U.S. Influenza Pandemic,” Health Aff., vol. 28, no. Supplement 1, pp. w1066– w1078, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.w1066.[4] D. A. Gill, A. Ladd, and J. Marszalek, “College students experiences with Hurricane Katrina: a comparison between students from Mississippi State University and three New
.[7] J. D. Bransford and D. L. Schwartz, “Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications,” Rev. Res. Educ., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 61–100, 1999.[8] J. Lobato, “How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer and vice versa,” Educ. Res., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 17–20, 2003.[9] J. Lobato, “The actor-oriented transfer perspective and its contributions to educational research and practice,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 232–247, 2012.[10] L. C. Hadfield and C. E. Wieman, “Student interpretations of equations related to the first law of thermodynamics,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 750–755, 2010.[11] K. P. Kohn, S. M. Underwood, and M. M. Cooper, “Energy connections and
University, Syracuse, NY. Registered Professional Engineer (Ohio). Robinson’s teaching approach comes from an amalgam of academic, industrial (Bell Labs), governmental (VA) and clinical experiences, plus an interest in science and ethics from his undergraduate days.Ms. Loretta Driskel, Clarkson University Since the late 1990’s my passion has been to create engaging, diverse teaching and learning experiences for students and faculty. As the senior instructional designer at Clarkson University, I have presented at conferences such as the Online Learning Consortium and I have presented at a wide variety of other venues including ADEIL; Sloan-C International Online Learning; Sloan-C Blending Learning; eLearning Consortium of
. Metacognition is the awareness and regulation of one’s own learning.Metacognition’s origin was in the context of learning in the early 1970’s [10]. In this paper, weare focused on the knowledge and awareness of cognitive activities, though other fields havesuggested metacognition could reasonably encompass all aspects of psychology [11].Metacognition of learning develops naturally as children mature and can also be advancedthrough active instruction and practice, which has been advocated by scholars for decades [11],[12]. In undergraduate contexts, students are likely to have “scripts” for learning that are resistantto change [2]. To address this challenge, Cunningham, Matusovich, Hunter, & McCord createdthe Metacognition Model (Fig. 1) to
. Nesbit and O. O. Adesope, "Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta- analysis," Review of educational research, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 413-448, 2006.[10] E. Gravett and S. SJ, "Concept mapping: a tool for promoting and assessing conceptual change," South African Journal of Higher Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 122-126, 1997.[11] E. Santhanam, C. Leach, and C. Dawson, "Concept mapping: How should it be introduced, and is there evidence for long term benefit?," Higher Education, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 317-328, 1998.[12] H. Barenholz and P. Tamir, "A comprehensive use of concept mapping in design instruction and assessment," Research in Science & Technological Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 37-52
-2019.[7] Cohen, J., Richardson, S., Austin, S., Economos, C., Rimm, E. (2013). School lunch waste among middle school students: nutrients consumed and costs. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 44(2): 114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.060[8] World Wildlife Federation (WWF) (2019). Food Waste Warriors: A deep dive into food waste in U.S. schools. World Wildlife Fund, available at https://www.worldwildlife.org/publications/food-waste- warrior-report-2019.[9] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2018 Fact Sheet. https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/advancing- sustainablematerials-management[10] New York aims to curb food waste
[Accessed January 28, 2021].[6] ABET, “ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020,” URL: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/ [Accessed August 8, 2019][7] B.A. Oakley, D.M. Hanna, Z. Kuzmyn, and R.M. Felder, “Best Practices Involving Teamwork in the Classroom: Results from a Survey of 6435 Engineering Student Respondents,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2007.[8] R. Lingard and S. Barkataki, “Teaching Teamwork in Engineering and Computer Science,” IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, 2011.[9] M.L. Loughry, M.W. Ohland, and D.J. Woehr, “Assessing Teamwork Skills for Assurance of
Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana, Jun. 2016, p. 26206. doi: 10.18260/p.26206.[6] J. D. Burton and D. M. White, “Selecting a Model for Freshman Engineering Design,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 327–332, 1999, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00454.x.[7] L. G. Richards and S. Carlson‐Skalak, “Faculty Reactions to Teaching Engineering Design to First Year Students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 233–240, 1997, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00290.x.[8] K. Sanford Bernhardt and M. Roth, “Using Concept Maps to Assess Student Learning in a Multi-Section Introduction to Engineering Course,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018. Accessed: Jan. 21, 2020. [Online
, 20203. K.P.Brannan and P.C. Wankat, Survey of first-year programs, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Portland Oregon, 2005.4. Orr, M. K., Brawner, C. E., Lord, S. M., Ohland, M. W., Layton, R. A., & Long, R. A. (2012). Engineering matriculation paths: Outcomes of direct matriculation, first-year engineering, and post-general education models. Frontiers in Education Conference, Seattle, WA.5. Clark, A., Desing, R., Wallwey, S.A., Louis Kajfez, R., Mohammadi-Aragh, J., Sassi, S., Tracking first-year engineering students’ identity metrics, International Journal of Engineering Education 36(5), 2020, pp. 1625-16396. Komlos, J, Walkup, S.L., Waters, K.A., Modernizing an introductory civil engineering
) hours of instructionover a two- week period was reduced to four (4) scheduled hours for the same period. The project-based hybrid experience allowed students to participate synchronously during any of the (3) hourstraditionally scheduled for the course, but students were only able to attend face-to-face on oneday each week. Enhancements to the course structure resulted in the opportunity for students toengage with formal course content in (5) hours during a typical week, more than the standard (3)hours offered in traditional, fully face-to-face formats offered in the past.TABLE 2: Anticipated Time Effort Towards Structured Learning Communication Project- s Based
Academy is on efficacy in this area, thenthere is some evidence to suggest the investment in the STEM Academy has paid off.References[1] New American Economy. (2017). Sizing up the gap in our supply of STEM workers: Data & analysis. New American Economy. https://research.newamericaneconomy.org/report/sizing-up-the-gap-in- our-supply-of-stem-workers/[2] Goldman, A., Schweig, J., Buenaventura, M., & Wright, C. (2017). Geographic and demographic representativeness of junior reserve officer training corps. Santa Monica, CA; Rand Corporation[3] Kamarck, K. N. (2020). Defense Primer: Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC). In Focus. Congressional Research Service. December 2, 2020.[4] Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D
–679, 2011, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00031.x.[8] J. A. Smith, M. Jarman, and M. Osborn, “Chapter 14: Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods,” in Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis., Sage Publications, 1999.[9] N. A. Mamaril, E. L. Usher, C. R. Li, D. R. Economy, and M. S. Kennedy, “Measuring Undergraduate Students’ Engineering Self-Efficacy: A Validation Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 366–395, 2016.[10] T. Zorn, J. Roper, K. Broadfoot, and C. Weaver, “Focus Groups as Sites of Influential Interaction: Building Communicative Self-Efficacy and Effecting Attitudinal Change in Discussing Controversial Topics,” Journal of Applied Communication Research, vol. 34
): 1447-1451[12] Yeager, David S., Carissa Romero, Dave Paunesku, Christopher S. Hulleman, Barbara Schneider, Cintia Hinojosa, Hae Yeon Lee et al. "Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school." Journal of educational psychology 108, no. 3 (2016): 374.[13] Brady, Shannon T., Geoffrey L. Cohen, Shoshana N. Jarvis, and Gregory M. Walton. "A brief social-belonging intervention in college improves adult outcomes for black Americans." Science Advances 6, no. 18 (2020): eaay3689.[14] Silva, Mariana, Matthew West, and Craig Zilles. "Measuring the Score Advantage on Asynchronous Exams in an Undergraduate CS Course." Proceedings of the 51st ACM
learning: Cognition in design education, vol. 5, C. M. Eastman, W. M. McCracken, and W. C. Newstetter, Eds. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science, 2001, pp. 79-103.[4] D. Narayan and P. Petesch, "Agency, opportunity structure, and poverty escapes," in Moving out of poverty: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on mobility, D. Narayan and P. Petesch, Eds. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007, pp. 1-44.[5] A. Hutchinson and M. W. Tracey, "Design ideas, reflection, and professional identity: How graduate students explore the idea generation process," Instructional Science, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 527-544, 2015.[6] D. VandeWalle, S. P. Brown, W. L. Cron, and J. W. Slocum Jr, "The influence of goal orientation and self
ID: 186; Line: 12) 1 Read the poem line as is I say it’s important to focus on what people want the most 2 Highlight words within the line that reference I say it’s important to focus on what people want the most supply chain key terms 3 Extract the phrases that reference supply focus on what people want the most chain key term(s) 4 Relate it back to the general supply chain Item Classification concept(s) referenced. In this case there are Different Level of Importance two. These now become the condensed codes Table 2. Identification and extraction of supply
, T.A. Lenox, K.J. Fridley, and R.O Anderson, “Accreditation Insights and the Next Body of Knowledge,” Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE, 2016.[10] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020-2021,” https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2020- 2021/ [Accessed February 21, 2021].[11] S. J. Ressler and D. Lynch, “The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge and Accreditation Criteria: A Plan for Long-Term Management of Change,” Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference, 2011.[12] Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: Preparing the Future Civil Engineer, 3rd Edition. Reston, VA
] National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2004.[2] National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005.[3] E. F. Redish and K. A. Smith, “Looking Beyond Content: Skill Development for Engineers,” J. Eng. Educ., no. July, pp. 295–307, 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2008.tb00980.x.[4] I. B. Mena, S. E. Zappe, and T. A. Litzinger, “Preparing the Engineer of 2020: Analysis of Alumni Data,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://cms.jee.org/21819%0A%0A.[5] S. R. Daly, E. A. Mosyjowski, and C. M. Seifert, “Teaching creativity in