students see themselves as engineers af-ter graduation [5]. Critically, studies have shown students transition from interest in engi-neering, to seeing engineering as an option, and finally choosing to become an engineer in avery short period of time [6]. Additionally, short interventions (like a one-day versus multi-day experience) have been shown to have similar outcomes for attracting diverse students totechnology careers [7]. We envision our intervention operating as a vicarious experience [8],which enhances self-efficacy.In robotics, research from educators indicates that robotics education has a unique opportu-nity to promote diverse participation, including meaningful applications, tactile robotic sys-tems, and well scaled projects. Still
Hydropower Col- legiate Competition. I am also the president of NAU Skate Club, which I founded this semester in order to provide enriching opportunities for community members, and share the benefits of skateboarding with others. I enjoy holding leadership roles, and apply myself entirely to the projects I am involved in.Dr. Joshua T. Hewes P.E., Northern Arizona UniversityDr. John Tingerthal P.E., Northern Arizona University John Tingerthal joined the Construction Management faculty at Northern Arizona University in 2007 and was appointed as a Distinguished Teaching Fellow in 2015. His engineering career spans a variety of design and forensic engineering experiences. He spent eight years practicing structural engineering in
development in STEM education to provide evidence-based models that promote engagement, development of cognitive competency sets, and performance-based application abilities of students at-risk.Brenda R. Brand (Professor)Xiao Zhu PhD candidate for Educational Research and Evaluation in the School of Education at Virginia Tech. Graduate research assistant and Project coordinator of HI Bridge to Academia Fellowship Program. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Professional Socialization to Enhance Research and Faculty ReadinessAbstractThe AGEP Alliance Model for Advancing the Faculty Careers of Underrepresented MinoritySTEM
Paper ID #38007Board 392: Supporting Low-Income Engineering Transfer Students’Transition from Community College to a 4-Year University through aComprehensive Scholarship ProgramDr. Anna-Lena Dicke, University of California, Irvine Dr. Dicke is an Associate Project Scientist within the School of Education at the University of California, Irvine. In her research, she aims to understand how students’ motivation and interest in the STEM fields can be fostered to secure their educational persistence and long-term career success. Trying to bridge the gap between theory and practice, she is currently involved in an NSF-funded
Paper ID #35578Supporting lecturers by building community, promoting agency, andincreasing leadership opportunitiesDr. Pauline Khan, University of Michigan Pauline Bary Khan has been serving as the Director of Lecturer Development since 2020 where she has led efforts to support teaching faculty at the College of Engineering. This work includes advising, mentoring, professional career coaching, and facilitating workshops to serve the teaching faculty population. Her research interests include the topics of teaching faculty development, organizational culture, educational leadership, and workplace communication. Prior to
centers on effective faculty mentoring practices, broadening participation in higher education, and the educational attainment and schooling experiences of Mexican descent youth in the mid-20th century.Dr. Sarah Elizabeth Cooksey, University of Colorado Colorado Springs Sarah Cooksey is a Ph.D. graduate from the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She currently works at UCCS as a Research Assistant and Lecturer in the department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations and on a grant with the National Science Foundation trying to understand the career decision making process of underrepresented minorities in STEM fields. Sarah is a special education teacher in the state of Colorado, whose specific research
programs to encourage girls to pursue their interests in computing and engineering and some of the pre-professional programs to help students prepare for their careers. Her previous experience includes work in student leadership development, campus programming, student organization manage- ment, and alumni relations. Greenwood holds a master’s degree in Higher Education Administration from Washington State University, a B.A. in Advertising/Public Relations from Grand Valley State University, and is currently pursuing a graduate certificate in Community Leadership at UMBC.Ms. Erica L D’Eramo, University of Maryland, Baltimore County: CWIT Erica D’Eramo is the Assistant Director of the Center for Women in Technology (CWIT) at
-studentrelationships, benefits of underrepresented student organizations, problems with advising, lackof communication of School of Engineering policies, procedures, and initiatives, and finally,excessive expectations of student organizations to improve the student experience.The six recommendations of the report highlighted concrete steps the school could enact toimprove the environment for all students. 1. Create a Center for Engineering Diversity – dedicated to working with minority engineering students. The goals of the center would include: a. Increase the diversity of students who apply, enroll, and graduate from the School of Engineering, b. Increase awareness of engineering careers by underrepresented groups
in the process of training entrepreneurs, andincorporation of an enterprise is the result of the training. Entrepreneurship skills aredeveloped in the course of immersion in real problems of the business. Successfulbusinessmen as mentors will lead each of the students to the final goal, which is opening oftheir own business. Due to the fact that the idea of becoming a businessman is gaining more attractionamong may students, we ran a research for the purpose of identifying of motives affecting thestudents’ choice of the entrepreneurship career, as well as for using the results of the researchfor a further shaping of business-like thinking in the society and for support of theentrepreneurship in general. The research methodology built
providing guest speakers for introductory classes or society meetings. The final areais the donation of new or used equipment common to a particular field, or general test equipmentthat may be used in multiple lab exercises. These particular areas will be discussed in greaterdetail in the body of this paper.Introduction – The greater the interaction between Industry and Academia in curriculumdevelopment and course review, the greater the opportunity for engineering students to beprepared for careers in industry [7, 8]. This is especially true when the academic program isslanted to local industry needs. There are five general areas that can be emphasized that will bestbenefit the student: Advisory Board
more effective, efficient, and inclusive.Dr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of
teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Com- puter Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?” He has also been part of the teaching team for NSF’s Innovation Corps for Learning, and was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014. Dr. Jordan also
engineering that students must navigate. Since most un-matriculated first-yearstudents will not have taken the nuclear engineering survey course (Introduction toNuclear Engineering), it is imperative that there be opportunities for students to engagewith the department.Engagement with Un-matriculated Students Student success literature points to the need for content specific material and itsrelevance to real-world applications as one of the key steps in forging alliances to what astudent studies.4,5 In the case of the un-matriculated student, this takes the form of anintroductory course in engineering and problem solving. Within this course studentsengage engineering through discipline exploration, career development, and a freshmandesign
overall1. Thus, as a whole, environmental engineer has room forimprovement with regards to diversity of student body.A growing body of research is recognizing the role that culture plays in the appealof careers to individuals. For example, gender roles and expectations, which varybetween cultures, can influence what women will view as appropriate careers.Studies have shown that women are represented in much higher numbers in Page 13.640.2engineering and computing sciences in Puerto Rico and China than within themainland US2-3. Thus, as cultural expectations of for females can affect careerchoice, it follows that the same would be true for males as well.Studies
AC 2008-1082: THE ACADEMIC JOB MARKET AS AN ARGUMENT FOR ANDAGAINST INTERDISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING GRADUATE TRAININGMaura Borrego, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University MAURA BORREGO is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Dr. Borrego holds an M.S. and Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Stanford University. Her current research interests center around interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering and engineering education, including studies of the collaborative relationships between engineers and education researchers. Investigations of interdisciplinary graduate programs nationwide are funded through her NSF CAREER award.Lynita Newswander
Engineering Department at Prairie View A&M University. Her interests include: bioseparations, design of biosensors, transport in cardiovascular system, women issues in engineering, gifted and talented African-Americans pursuing STEM careers, and engineering education. She has received over $1.5M in research funding for both her technical and education related research agenda. Page 13.83.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 A Preliminary Analysis of Factors Affecting the Persistence of African-American Females in Engineering Degree ProgramsAbstractThis paper describes a mixed
value of outcomesproduced by their programs to the benefit of their organizations.In 2008, the Undergraduate Student Research Project, NASA’s largest agency-wide internshipprogram, revised its student and mentor evaluations, gathering new data on outcomes whosevalue had not previously been captured. This paper presents a preliminary discussion of the datacollected through these new survey instruments. It includes data connecting the learningproduced to many of the ABET a-k demonstrated abilities criteria as well as data on the changesin professional self-image, confidence, and commitment to career path. In addition, implicationsof the metrics which can be calculated from the raw data are discussed in regards to the valueplaced on that learning
AC 2009-114: ASSESSING RESEARCH ON SELF-EFFICACY AMONGECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS OFCOLOR IN MENTORING PROGRAMS AT PREDOMINANTLY WHITEINSTITUTIONSTerrell Strayhorn, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Dr. Terrell Strayhorn is Associate Professor of Higher Education, Special Assistant to the Provost, and Director of the Center for Higher Education Research and Policy (CHERP) at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Recipient of a 2008 NSF CAREER Award (EHR #0747304) for his research on minorities in STEM, Strayhorn is author of several books and over 50 chapters, refereed articles, reports, and analyses
of Massachusetts, the U.S. Department of Educa- tion, Houghton Mifflin, Verizon, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.Mr. Luis Rafael Frias II ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Mitigating Transfer Shock for Undergraduates in Engineering to Increase Diversity (Work in Progress)Background As part of its response to the anticipated workforce needs in STEM fields, the National Science Foundation S-STEM (Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) initiative provides essential scholarship support to academically talented and diverse students with interests in STEM careers. The success for this initiative is essential to broadening
high skill; high wage jobs (National Association of Manufacturers).Manufacturing is severely challenged by old negative images about the factory floor andan education and training system that does not promote engineering and technologycareers. New strategic alliances between education and industry will be required to bothmarket manufacturing careers and prepare youth and adults for the highly skilled teamstructure in today’s manufacturing sites.Next Generation Manufacturing: The transformation of global manufacturing was clarified in a 1995 to 1997 studyco-sponsored by NSF and other federal agencies. The culminating report “NextGeneration Manufacturing” concluded that manufacturing companies must transform
that is readily accessible in more urbanareas of the state. However, with recent growth in the aviation and aerospace industry in theregion, there now exists the potential to link K-12 education to the aerospace industry. Thisinitiative adopts Roadshow-in-a-Box model, extends laboratory resources and is an importantstep towards expanding STEM literacy and career exposure for students from the mosteconomically distressed region in the State. The initiative is expected to serve over 200 schools,located within the twenty-one (21) counties surrounding ECSU, over a period of three years.This highly interactive learning lab on wheels provides students with hands-on activities,laboratory equipment, simulations, information, and rich digital media
activities were of importance to them in theircareer. A total of 86 students responded to the survey. Approximately 45% agreed this activitywill be useful in their future career and 30% responded that this activity helped them increasetheir interest in the topic. This project is investigating how creating active learning tasks in fluidpower classes allowed students to direct their learning and apply energy concept and theorybased on actual experience working on focused problems. This work in progress articledocuments preliminary results from the first implementation of the activity and survey in a class.Data from later implementations into this and other courses will be reported in future articles.IntroductionOne significant learning objective for
category represents students with both a well-defined ideal and matchingrealistic future career. Sugar students are able to connect the future to present tasks and presenttasks back to their future. Waffle students had conflicting ideal and realistic future careers. TheWaffle FTP differs from the Sugar FTP in that the Waffle FTP does not have expressedoutcomes from these desired future careers. Cake students had limited expressions of the future,either lacking a well-defined desired future career or with ideas about possible future careers butlacking a sense of which one they desire.Analysis of the three case study students was conducted in Spring 2016. This included a prioricoding of the journals from the Fall using an SRL framework8 and a priori
interventions to create change.Background – Utility Value Theory Research in social psychology has continually shown that students’ expectancies for success(e.g., self-efficacy) and the perceived value of a particular career predicts motivation to pursuethat career. Classic work within this Expectancy-Value framework (e.g., Eccles et al., 1983) hasexamined this relationship for decades on primarily non-engineering students (e.g., math andbiology, Eccles, 1984; Wigfield & Eccles, 1992; Sullins, Hernandez, Fuller, & Tashiro, 1995).Until relatively recently, the focus of expectancy-value research has centered predominately onthe “expectancy” side of the theory (and has extended into other theories such as social-cognitivecareer theory, Lent
education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, tends to be data-driven by leveraging large-scale institutional, state, or national data sets, and considers the inter- section between policy and organizational contexts. He has B.S., M.S., and M.U.E.P. degrees from the University of Virginia and a Ph.D. in Higher Education from Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant
., and M.U.E.P. degrees from the University of Virginia and a Ph.D. in Higher Education from Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering fos- ter or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her
, effects of future on the present, and characteristics of future careers. These FTPcharacteristic differences can be used to distinguish between students in terms of their temporalmotivations, particularly when conducting qualitative analysis of interview data.Students who practice SRL use metacognition, motivation, and behaviors to regulate their ownlearning and utilize methods, such as evaluating (metacognitive) and organizing (behavioral), toreach their learning goals19,20. Additionally, students who are self-regulated “perceive themselvesas self-efficacious, autonomous, and intrinsically motivated” (motivational)19. While theliterature defines SRL in many ways, one underlying theme connects all SRL research: studentsachieve at a higher level
envision the potential that these skillshave in their future careers. This study spotlights how the engineering experience is markedlydifferent for these young women when empathy is the unifying cornerstone from whichengineering design experiences flow.Recent research findings on empathy and engineering points to the necessity of pairing empathywith engineering, including empathy needed for emotional intelligence in engineering design, thenecessity of empathy for product design and the need for empathy as an essential skill inengineering project management. Additionally, the use of empathy in the school years is wellestablished for success in multiple modes, including in an inclusive learning culture and as abasis for teamwork. Yet under explored
University of Rabat in Morocco, engineering students have beencompleting their masters of science degrees in aerospace or mechanical engineering. Welaunched our study to determine the impact of culture on career choice when we noted thatalmost equal numbers of Moroccan men and women arrived at our university each year since2015. This work is an exploratory qualitative case study that uses the combined frameworks ofHofstede’s Cultural Dimension Theory and Eccles’ Expectancy-Value Theory.According to a report entitled "Is U.S. Science and Technology Adrift?" released by theCommission on Professionals in Science and Technology (CPST), the United States’ engineeringworkforce is growing but still lagging behind the overall growth of the country [1]. The
has developed an annual outreach event to bolster the number of women in the cen-tral upstate NY area interested in STEM careers. Our signature outreach event, the WOMEN(Women’s Outreach in Materials, Energy, and Nanobiotechnology) Event, introduces female highschool students and their parents to what scientists and engineers do and how they benefit society.While many outreach programs focus on urban communities, our program targets rural areas wherewomen are particularly at risk for not attending or completing college [3]. During the WOMEN Event, our group hosts 20 to 40 tenth grade females and their parents fromrural areas to further their interest in STEM fields and provide an early start on college planning.Now in its sixth year, the