Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kaylee Andree Wersant, University of Texas at El Paso; Diane Elisa Golding, University of Texas at El Paso; Irma Y. Torres-Catanach, University of Texas at El Paso; Karla Alejandra Ayala, University of Texas at El Paso; Nora Cuvelier, University of Texas at El Paso; Ivonne Santiago P.E., University of Texas at El Paso; Victor Manuel Garcia Jr., University of Texas at El Paso

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

technical presentations. The educational activities and technical presentation weredeveloped to cover several topics such as financial literacy, standardized testing, resume writing,and time management. Pre-college students also participated in individual mentoring sessions toallow for a one-on-one learning environment. Online surveys were formulated and distributed tothe participants at different stages of the STEM Education Workshop during the summer of 2020.The information collected was preliminarily analyzed to generate conclusions about the STEMEducation Workshop and draw recommendations to improve the material content, presentationmethods and communication technology for use in upcoming STEM Education Workshops.IntroductionSchools and

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Teams and Teamwork

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mirna Mattjik, Colorado School of Mines; Megan Sanders, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

SummariesModule 1 - research web jigsawBy the end of module 1, students should be able to examine and qualify facets of the designproblem through independent and collaborative research as well as explore and discussdissenting views.TeamingMaximum 25 students in the classTeams are formed in the beginning of class, through Purdue’s CATME tool4 to 5 students in the team, stays in the same team the whole semesterDeliverables and student assessmentTeams will write a Problem Definition Statement together, assessed through the class’ peerfeedback (formative)Final problem definitions will later have a summative grade in a deliverable separate to thesemodules, but related to the course, i.e. instructor check-inDeployment/resourcesJigsaw: students will be divided

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donald Visco, Tennessee Technological University; Saravanan Swaminathan, Tennessee Technological University; Lisa Zagumny, Tennessee Technological Univesity; Holly Anthony, Tennessee Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

participants. Results indicate that many strategies exist and “goodness” ofstudy guides does not necessarily map onto successful exam performance. Also, students mayneed detailed training on how to develop a useful study guide. Finally, we have found that theremay be a benefit to peer-sharing of study guides.IntroductionCourse examinations are ubiquitous throughout highereducation, regardless of the subject area.When an instructor announces an exam, one question is sure to follow: “Can we use our bookand/or notes on the exam?” [That this is asked, and not some default assumed, speaks to thevarious answers that students often receive to the question above.—this sentence is awkward]One approach used across fields is to disallow students access to their

Conference Session

Improving the Teaching Skills of Graduate Students

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna Fox, Drexel University; David Delaine, Drexel University; Adam Fontecchio, Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

satisfying the department that oversees the course. This type of nontraditionalgraduate education has the potential to strongly improve graduate student communication andleadership skills while teaching important educational development tactics and can contribute inthe decision to pursue an academic career. Implementing a Ph.D. student teaching program is animprovement to the traditional doctoral curriculum and will strongly enhance studentcommunication and mentoring skills.Past approaches to educating graduate students in undergraduate engineering curriculum designand instruction have been offered in the form of classes focusing on this topic1. Anotherapproach uses teaching assistant peer mentors for helping in the growth and development of the

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 3: Diversity and Multicultural Influences in the First Year

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth A Adams, Chandler Gilbert Community College; Claire Louise Antaya Dancz, Arizona State University; Amy E. Landis, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

sustainable systems with over 60 peer-reviewed publications. Dr. Landis is dedicated to sustainability engineering education and outreach; she works with local high schools, after school pro- grams, local nonprofit organizations, and museums to integrate sustainability and engineering into K-12 and undergraduate curricula. Page 26.915.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Improving engineering student persistence and diversity through conative understandingAbstractEngineering teaching strategies that engage students are desperately needed to recruit

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Tuesday Potpourri

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Tony Andrew Lowe, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. Finally C is introduced to complement the basic programming skills developed with Python andMATLAB. C offers insights into more advanced computer science concepts such as explicit data typing,pointers and memory allocation. Further, it provides more control of hardware like obtaining data fromsensors and regulating motors connected to embedded control systems. Teams also use RobotC withMindstorm mechatronic systems during their second semester term projects. Introducing first year engineering students to multiple programming languages may seemdaunting. To meet this challenge the instructional model for this course leveraged the benefits ofproblem based learning, peer instruction and studio learning to provide students with an effective

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University; Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

askedto reflect about what they know. Then, the students are asked to explain how they could use theidea to explain something of their interest or apply the knowledge to a specific task. When thestudents write and attempt to connect their knowledge/learning to their own interests, their storiesand experiences had far greater value than the instructor’s initial intent. Finally, with the studentsat the center and possessing an awareness of the differences in an instructor’s instruction andstudent’s retention, classes can be designed to make learning an enjoyable experience for bothstudents and instructors.IntroductionIn the present-day classrooms, students have access to multiple sources of information such as webcontent, videos, instructional

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Maker Spaces in the First Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville; James E. Lewis, University of Louisville; Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

an introductory course in engineering fundamentals atthe J. B. Speed School of Engineering (SSoE) at the University of Louisville (UofL). The course,titled Engineering Methods, Tools, and Practice II (ENGR 111), is the second component of atwo-course sequence and is primarily focused on application and integration of fundamentalengineering skills introduced and practiced in the first component of the sequence (ENGR 110).Fundamental skills integrated within ENGR 111 include 3D printing, basic research fundamentals,circuitry, communication, critical thinking, design, engineering ethics, hand tool usage, problemsolving, programming, project management, teamwork, and technical writing. The course isrequired for all first-year SSoE students (no

Collection

2020 St.Lawrence Section Meeting

Authors

Kyle Trenshaw; Emily Weber; Rachel Monfredo

classroom. • Strongly agree • Agree • Neutral • Disagree • Strongly disagree 2. I make effective use of my peers by regularly engaging in group study and collaborative learning. 3. I schedule my time, utilizing time and priority management principles. 4. I would give myself an A+ on the amount of time and energy I devote to my studies. 5. I prepare for each lecture by reviewing my notes, reading ahead in the text, attempting some problems, and writing down questions. 6. I keep up in my classes by mastering the material presented in the last class meeting before the next class meeting. 7. I am aware of the importance of being immersed in the academic environment of the

Conference Session

Teaching Ethics II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mysore Narayanan, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

interaction per scenario. 5 more minutes to gather your final thoughts and write them down.Submission: Submit electronically a written report. Your responses should include: (a) A summary that indicates that you have captured the spirit of classroom, peer- group discussions. (b) Your own point of view as to how you would handle the Ethics Scenario presented.Requirements: Approximately 100 words per scenario. 4 scenarios, 400 words total.Commentary: Reflect on this classroom exercise and comment on the way it was organized and conducted. (No lectures, but peer-group discussions.) Indicate the importance of Ethics in Engineering Profession. What are your

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jianghong (Esther) Tian, Eastern Mennonite University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Project #1, Turn in the lab notebook and work on14 10/10 and peer evaluation the final report of project #1 Turn in career topics, final report, and15 10/15 Presentation of Project #1 an electronic copy of the presentation16 10/17 Assign and discuss Project #2 Form teams and read Chapter 4 Mid-semester recess17 10/24 Introduction to Arduino Read about Arduino Turn in writing assignment and read18 10/29 Arduino programming Chapter 5

Conference Session

Knowing Students: Diversity & Retention

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Joanne Hood; Elizabeth Bahe; Fonda Swimmer; Ingrid St. Omer

• What kept you in engineering? What makes it possible for you to stay? Page 8.1040.3 • What difficulties have you or your peers encountered? Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Session 1430 • How would you describe you faculty/student interactions? • What would you tell a freshman? • What would you say has been a positive experience in the College? • What might/could have made your

Conference Session

The Climate for Women in Engineering

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Mara Wasburn

also to retain women andgirls in these disciplines. Young women entering colleges and universities in the areas ofscience, engineering, and technology are disadvantaged by their lack of computer experienceand, we hypothesize, other technology experience as well.4 They appear to have career goals thatare not as well defined as those of their male counterparts, and often lack confidence in theirabilities.5,6 They may also encounter college and university classes that are unfriendly to them,impeding their learning. The absence of women faculty and mentors both within the classroomand outside of it, few women peers in their classes, and the lack of supportive networks cancreate a “chilly climate” for women in non-traditional fields. It is during

Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Stefani A. Bjorklund; Patrick T. Terenzini; John M. Parente; Alberto F. Cabrera

students reported somewhat stronger pre-college academic credentials than didthe ECSEL-course students. Compared to their ECSEL-peers, non-ECSEL students reportedhigher SAT scores (by 30 and 35 points on the verbal and math portions of the SATs,respectively) and high school grade-point averages. Each of these differences werestatistically significant. No statistically significant differences were identified, however,between the two groups with respect to current engineering GPA or overall GPA.Course CharacteristicsStudents were asked to indicate how often they (or the instructor) engaged in each of 24instruction-related activities. The scale ranged from 1 to 4, where 1 = “never,” 2 =“occasionally,” 3 = “often,” and 4 = “very often/almost always

Conference Session

Trends in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Sudhir Mehta

improves important skills such as analyzing and solving open -ended, real-world problems; finding, evaluating, and using appropriate learning resources;working cooperatively in teams; and communicating effectively, verbally and in writing. Ourstudy, like many other studies, also indicates that there was no gain in students’ performance onstandard tests and exams, and more research is needed. However, it is important to note thatstudents’ performance on the standard tests and exams did not decline either. Based on theabove results, we are planning to increase the number of PBL exercises in the measurementscourse with the support from the NSF and industry.IntroductionThe Boyer Commission’s report from the Carnegie Foundation, “Reinventing

Conference Session

Innovation for ChE Student Learning

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

David Silverstein

their company’s proposed focus. Students not attending theconference collected information from library, vendor, and internet sources. Each studentwas responsible for topics relevant to their role in the company as defined by thechemical engineering courses in which they were enrolled. Upon their return, the teamsprepared reports summarizing their proposal and findings. The graded reports counted ashomework assignments in each participating course, and the team report writing time wascredited to all students to make up for one of the class periods missed during theconference.Assessment data collected to date indicates students developed a familiarity withemerging areas in chemical engineering (biotechnology and nanotechnology) wellbeyond what

Conference Session

Approaches to Teaching Ethics

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yilmaz Hatipkarasulu, University of Texas, San Antonio; Suat Gunhan, University of Texas, San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

depending on the level of discussion between the questions and during the final analysis.The discussion starts with preparation questions including the following fundamental definitions: 1. Define ethics. 2. Define applied ethics. 3. What is the difference between legality and ethics? 4. Can you think of an example that is legal but unethical? 5. Can you think of an example that is illegal but ethical?The preparation questions serve as a warm-up discussion for the students with their peers and theinstructor. The impact of the questions increases when the students are asked to write theiranswers before the discussion and reflect on their responses afterwards. The list of questions andexamples can be expanded to

Conference Session

Professional Aspects of Graduate Engineering Programs

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jiabin Zhu, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jeremi S. London, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Benjamin Ahn, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ana T. Torres-Ayala, University of South Florida; Kavitha D. Ramane, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

agencies  Promote interdisciplinary, collaborative work  Align their programs to be more relevant to societyIndustry-to-Academia ResponsesAligned with the key points presented in the above-mentioned three groups, the participants inthis group also highlighted the importance of developing industrial experiences among students, Page 25.1101.6students writing peer-reviewed high quality publications, the establishment of a workingrelationship between mentors and students, and encourage students to work with each other.Besides these major points, the participants in this group also brought in additional insights fromworking in both industrial

Conference Session

Engineering Professional Development and Distance Learning Programs

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony P. Dalessio, Erie Community College; Elena V. Brewer, Erie Community College

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

archived so faculty can watch them at their convenience. One such project we have Page 25.1139.3found useful is the Maricopa Advanced Technology Education Center5, run by the MaricopaCommunity Colleges in Arizona. A clearinghouse for many of the on-site and online events ishosted online by the South Carolina Advanced Technological Education Center of Excellence, atTeachingTechnicians.org6. This site is worth checking on a regular basis to keep abreast of newNSF funded opportunities.Another benefit of joining listservs such as the ETD listserv, in addition to interacting with peers,is to get ideas for your own projects. After responding to a survey

Conference Session

Assessing Literacies in Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan McGrade, Indiana Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

students read the texts and write a number of literary analyses throughout the semester. In thelast phase of the process, each student creates an argument to justify his/her selection of the bestwork of the year. While this may seem a risky endeavor, the risk is minimized by establishingappropriate parameters and standards by the “Project Director” (aka the English faculty member)in order to produce a course that is both academically rigorous and engaging to students. This paper provides a brief literature review of current trends in first year composition(FYC) programs and situates this approach within these trends; describes the context of thecourse delivery, including school demographics and curriculum requirements; explains thecourse

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 4: Mentoring Programs in Graduate Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Arnold Christian; Dayna L. Martínez, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc.; Esther Gonzalez; Andrea D. Beattie; Ashleigh Tierney; Kimberly D. Douglas, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

passion for increasing Hispanic representation in STEM. She currently lives with her husband Andr´es, their two sons David and Sebasti´an, and their minia- ture schnauzer Lucca in Winter Garden, Florida.Esther Gonzalez Esther Gonz´alez, MPA, MBA, ABD is a PhD Candidate at University of Southern California’s Price School of Public Policy with subject matter expertise in organization behavior and diversity management. Her research is multidisciplinary and applies methods and fields in public policy and management. She is a published author in several peer reviewed journals with media mentions in Forbes. Previously, she served as Director on the Research and Innovation team at the Society of Hispanic Professional

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - NAE Grand Challenges, Graduate Students, Sustainability, and Makerspaces

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Trina Kershaw, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth; Susan Tripathy, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Max Denis, University of the District of Columbia; Jorge Allen, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Hong Liu, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth; Tzuyang Yu, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Charles Thompson, University of Massachusetts Lowell

) Hong Liu is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. She received B.S. degree with Honors in Computer Science and Mathematics dual-major and M.S. degree in Computer Science from Hefei Polytechnic University in 1982 and 1984, respectively. She received Ph.D. degree in Computer Science from New York University in 1990; her dissertation in the Internet Design won Brownstein Doctoral Research Award. Dr. Liu integrates research, education, and application in computer networks, cyber-physical systems, and network security. She published numerous papers with her students and collaborators on refereed journals and peer-reviewed conference proceedings. Dr. Liu, jointly with

Conference Session

Integrating Liberal Education and Engineering

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel B. Oerther, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

strong data that could indicate best practices, and which do not? Format of Final Product: The team would spend one (or if desired, two) semester(s) developing a set of critical areas for further investigation, culminating in an article suitable for a peer-reviewed journal.additional references, each, to clarify their portion of the outline. To share his or herfindings, each student used a 5-slide PowerPoint presentation to explain what he or shehad learned. The DoS participated via teleconference in the instructor-facilitateddiscussion. Then, for four weeks, each student worked independently to write a five-page, singled-spaced, draft document with a minimum of fifteen references, each, thatclarified his or her

Conference Session

Design and Implementation of Graduate Education

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ben D. Radhakrishnan, National University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

(includes Peer teamwork and leadership (includes teamwork and leadership (includes Feedback form data) Peer Feedback form data) Peer Feedback form data) Appendix 2 Capstone Writing Quality Rubrics

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Retention and Bridge Programs #1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Marina Miletic, University of New Mexico; Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Eva Chi, University of New Mexico; Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico; Pil Kang, University of New Mexico; Sang M. Han, University of New Mexico; Yan Chen, University of New Mexico; Catherine Anne Hubka, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

nanoscale surface corrugation for enhanced light trapping for pho- tovoltaic devices; and (4) microsphere-based manufacturable coatings for radiative cooling. He has close to 70 publications in peer-reviewed journals and over 200 invited/contributed papers at academic insti- tutions, national laboratories, and conferences. He received a UNM Junior Faculty Research Excellence Award in 2005 and an NSF Career Award in 2001. He is a recipient of STC.UNM Innovation Award consecutively from 2009 to 2018, and he was elected as the 2018 STC.UNM Innovation Fellow. Dr. Han holds 17 UNM-affiliated U.S. patents and 6 pending U.S. and PCT patent applications. He currently serves as the Chief Technical Officer of Osazda Energy LLC, a

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Scott Danielson; Sudhir I. Mehta

, writing assignments,technology, high standards of learning and teaching, and a learning support system for students.These principles are being used as a basis for teaching two sections of statics at North DakotaState University (50 and 100 student enrollments) and one section of 22 students at Arizona StateUniversity East during the fall semester of 1999. This paper describes the NG principles, theirimplementation in these statics sections, and initial results. The fundamental intent in using NGprinciples is to enable high-performance student learning and encourage faculty and students tobe active partners in acquiring, constructing, and transforming knowledge.I. IntroductionPatricia Cross, a leading educator, recently indicated in her keynote

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 3: Mentorship and Communication in Engineering Graduate Programs

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abimelec Mercado Rivera, Arizona State University; Mayra S. Artiles, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

ourinstrument was guided by the research question: What influence does the instrumental andpsychosocial support that engineering graduate students perceive from their advisor haveon their thesis self-efficacy? Using SCCT as our theoretical foundation, this work focuseson the development and validation of the Advisor Support and Self-efficacy for Thesiscompletion (ASSET) instrument with graduate students pursuing master’s and doctoraldegrees in engineering disciplines.Our resultant construct of Thesis Self-efficacy measures the confidence that a student has in theirabilities to complete specific tasks that are key to the writing of their dissertation, thesis, orapplied project report, while our Advisor Support construct measures a student’s perception

Conference Session

Assessing, Expanding, and Innovating Information Literacy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

S. Norma Godavari, University of Manitoba; Anne E. Parker, University of Manitoba

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

. The goal is to encourage students to step back, as it were, and reflect on things thatwent well and things that didn’t go so well; we also encourage them to consider ways to avoidsuch pitfalls in the future and build on what they’ve learned. For example, the portfolioassignment asks students (as part of the assignment) to provide thoughtful responses to whateach of them has learned about their strengths and weaknesses as a writer (such as their use oflanguage, organizing their writing effectively, and developing clarity in their writing), and whatareas each of them will continue to work on as they move forward. We also ask them to considerthe value of the two peer reviews we have conducted during two writing labs, where studentsboth give and

Conference Session

Off the Beaten Path

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University; Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

and Creativity into standard ECS courses o The Importance of Innovation and Creativity in the Way we TeachOther o Role of technology o Mechanics of teaching (administrivia) o Testing o Grading o Writing o Assessment o Peer evaluation o Business o Compensation Page 25.602.6ECS Teaching Seminar SurveyBefore the seminars and Mini-Conferences can be implemented, it was necessary to surveythe faculty to determine interest and get feedback on the basic concept to improve teachingexcellence. The first item to determine was, “what time would be the best time to hold theseminars to maximize availability?” We didn’t want

Conference Session

FPD II: Increasing Engagement and Motivation of First-Year Students

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George Roesch Johnson, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Engineering Professional Development

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

technicalwriting by providing various models and templates. The students were first introduced to articlesin the Science Section of the New York Times as an example of writing that exemplifies theclarity and conciseness needed to explain technology and science to the average reader. Inaddition, the international template known as IMRaD, (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Page 22.5.8Discussion) was explained and modeled from articles found in peer-reviewed publications. Thiswas done in preparation for the students’ own technical report on research topics that representedcurrent challenge in technology and science. Many students choose to report on