. “Development of a Concept Inventory for Strength of Materials”, 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2003.28. Richardson, Jim. “Concept Inventories: Tools for Uncovering STEM Students’ Misconceptions”, AAAS, 2005.29. Rosati, Peter. “Mechanics Texts are for Students”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 1996.30. Sjøberg, S. Lie. Technical Report 81-11, University of Oslo, 1981.31. Steif, Paul. “An Articulation of the Concepts and Skills Which Underlie Engineering Statics”, Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2004.32. Steif, Paul S. and John A. Dantzler. “A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis”, Journal of Engineering Education, October
implementation is easier to implement because there is noadditional cabling required beyond power to the access points, but the distribution system mustbe configured manually by the administrator.In order to replicate similar course modules, the instructor(s) must obtain the proper hardwareand make it available for student use. Access points must support some kind of similar meshprotocol, as well as wireless distribution system protocols that can work in conjunction with802.11 standards. Ideally, wireless access points utilized for this course module should supporttwo separate radios. One radio should support 802.11a while the other supports 802.11b/gstandards. In this manner, the distribution system can be separated from the client-accessdomain. A
the Third Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer(AVIRIS) Workshop, JPL Publication 91-28, 2-3, 19914. “Mapping Minerals with Imaging Spectroscopy”, Clark, R.N., G.A. Swayze, and A. Page 14.635.6Gallagher, U.S. Geological Survey, Office of Mineral Resources Bulletin 2039, pp. 141-150, 1993.5. Mairi, S., Haupts, U.&Webb, W. W. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 94, 11753–11757.6. Rigler, R., Mets, U¨., Widengren, J. & Kask, P. (1993) Eur.Biophys. J. 22, 169–175.7. Magde, D., Elson, E. & Webb, W. W. (1972) Phys. Rev. Lett. 29,705–708.8. G.Bonnet, O.Krichevsky, and A.Libchaber. (1998) Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 95, 8602–8606.9. G.Bonnet et al
packetis to make the transition smoother.Bibliography 1. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel. 25. 297-308. 2. Baumeister, R.F., Cambell, J.D., Krueger, J.I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 1-44. 3. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books. 4. Burroughs, S. M., Eby, L. T. (1998). Psychological sense of community at work: A measurement system and explanatory framework. Journal of Community
scientific inquiry afterattending two weeks of summer workshops. Specifically, there was a notable increase intheir identification of scientific practices such as generating models, conducting a seriesof observations or experiments, analyzing data, explaining results based on science,revising models, and presenting models. The unintended results of focusing the summer Page 14.993.15workshops on models as part of scientific inquiry were teachers’ uncertainty of thesource(s) of the inquiry questions and less emphasis on formulating hypothesis.However, we believe that the advances that our teachers made during the workshopoutweighed the unintended results
to put in anextra effort to prove that they are effective in increasing the understanding of the concepts theyare designed to teach. We feel we have a good start toward reaching these goals, but more work Page 14.1058.14needs to be done. 14Acknowledgements This work is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE 0633754. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation
development of a conceptinventory in thermal and transport science. 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings.3. ABET (2001). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Fields, Engineering Accreditation Commission.4. Krause, S. (2003). Assessing conceptual transfer of phase behavior from the domain of chemistry to the domainof materials engineering. 2003 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.5. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3): 141-151.6. Krause, S., Decker, J., Niska, J., & Alford, T. (2002). A Materials Concept Inventory for introductory materialsengineering courses. National Educators Workshop Update 2002, 17, 1-8.7. Krause, S. (2007). Diagnosing students' misconceptions on
(5th ed.): International Distance Education Certification Center.3. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2006). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Page 14.1318.114. Zhang, D. (2005). Interactive multimedia-based e-learning: A study of effectiveness. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 149-162.5. Eom, S., B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation
revitalize our college through the energizing pedagogy of service-learning. The thesis is that service-learning spread throughout the core curriculum is more effective than one intensive course, which is more effective than none at all, that a mixture of required and elective service-learning (s-l) is more effective than either one or the other, and that service-learning will result in less coursework time than traditional programs satisfying ABET 2000 criteria.They define service-learning as a hands-on learning approach in which students achieveacademic objectives in a credit-bearing course by meeting real community needs. Theyhave integrated service-learning into many kinds of courses. They include designcourses
). Page 14.2.9 Figure 1. Design “Tools” Covered in ENGE 1114Table 2. The Phases of the Design Methodology and of the ROXIE Project Design Phase Project Components • Partner with community service group • Serve community group in order to better understand their needsIdentify the problem • Meet with community group leader(s) to identify specific needs and begin project planning • Draft project proposal (must be approved by instructor) Clarify the design • Develop project plan (Gantt chart, Linear Responsibility Chart, Work Breakdown task
70 n s e ne g ig 7. g. l P ip
foundation forfuture coursework. This view of teaching and learning was investigated to see if some facultysee teaching as transmitting information and students' learning as receiving this information[17],without much focus on how the information really functions. Hendersen, et al.'s work used aphysics problem to focus an investigation into faculty perceptions of teaching and learningproblem solving. The problem required an average student to use exploratory decision makingas opposed to an algorithmic or "plug and chug" approach. Many faculty were oriented towardsthe algorithmic approach instead of focusing on problem solving; "Much of the material inprerequisite courses prior to the beginning of core engineering courses is oriented greatlytowards
User Support in Learning Environments for Remote Experimentation”. Third International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA ‘05) 3. Teja, G., Joseph Levine, S., (2005) “The Learner in Distance Education”. Making Distance Education Work: Understanding Learning and Learners At a Distance. Chapter 7. Pp.63 67. ISBN 1411653556 4. Schaefer, D., Panchal, J.H., Choi, S.K and F. Mistree (2008): “Strategic Design of Engineering Education for the Flat World”. International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 274 282 5. Friedman, T. (2008): “The World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty first Century”. Picador, ISBN 0312425074 6
. Conrad received her Ph.D. degree in Physics from the University of Missouri – Columbia in 1990. Page 14.464.1Gary May, Georgia Institute of Technology Gary S. May received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1985 and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering and computer science from the University of California at Berkeley in 1987 and 1991, respectively.© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 He is currently a Professor and the Steve W. Chaddick School Chair of the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the
what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Pellegrino, J., Schakowsky, N. and Glaser, R. (eds.) Washington, DC: National Academy Press.3. National Research Council (2005). How Students Learn. Donovan, M. & Branford, J. (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.4. Aspy, D.N., Aspy, C.B. & Quimby, P.M. (1993). What doctors can teach teachers about problem based learning. Educational Leadership, 50, (7), 22-24.5. Duch, B., Groh, S. & Allen, D. (2001). The Power of Problem-Based Learning: A Practical “How To” For Teaching Undergraduate Courses in Any Discipline. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publication.6. Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston
: ≠ Enhance the professional development of women faculty in STEM fields. ≠ Assist junior faculty in becoming familiar with university/college culture. ≠ Retain faculty by enhancing work-life balance. ≠ Reduce feelings of isolation for women faculty in STEM fields. ≠ Raise the profile of women faculty in STEM fields.With the above over-arching goals and a structure design created by the senior STEM femalefaculty, it is envisioned that the Mentoring Circles is a successful initiative that will help lead thecampus in a positive direction towards achieving institutional transformation.References1 Yen, J. W., K. Quinn, S. E. Lange, E. A. Riskin, and D. D. Denton, “ADVANCE Mentoring Programs for WomenFaculty in SEM at the
will continueto address what we can do to retain students in engineering, and what we can do to retainthe remaining students in technology. We plan on continuing our data collection, and havebegun giving semester-beginning and semester-ending surveys to the EGR120 students. Ifsuccessful, such a model can be extended to programs and departments offering both engi-neering and technology majors.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank Janyce Selesky for collecting the student data.References[1] N. L. Fortenberry, J. F. Sullivan, P. N. Jordan, and D. W. Knight, “Engineering education research aids instruction,” Science, vol. 317, pp. 1175–1176, August 2007.[2] C. Triplett and S. Haag, “Freshman engineering retention,” in ASEE Annual Conference and
Materials, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2002.4. Beer, F. P., Johnston, E. R. and DeWolf, J. T., Mechanics of Materials, Fifth Edition, McGraw Hill, 2008.5. Hibbeler, R.C., Mechanics of Materials, Seventh Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2007.6. Gere, J. M. and Goodno, B. J., Mechanics of Materials, Seventh Edition, CL-Engineering, 2008.7. Bedford, A. and Liechti, K.M., Mechanics of Materials, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000.8. Riley, W.F., Sturges, L.D. and Morris, D.H., Mechanics of Materials, Fifth Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1999.9. Wempner, G., Mechanics of Solids, PWS Publishing Company, Boston, MA, 1995.10. Timoshenko, S. P. and Gere, J. M., Mechanics of Materials, Fourth
how the women fared in this program. Theprogram is being continued with an S-STEM NSF grant.I. BackgroundArizona State University (ASU) is now the largest single university in the United Stateswith over 67,000 students on four campuses and also has the largest single campus, itsTempe campus, with over 53,000 students. Tempe is a neighbor city to Phoenix, thefourth largest city in the United States. The University is set in a valley of high techmanufacturers and over 4 million people. Also set in this valley is one of the nation’s Page 14.172.2largest community college district system, the Maricopa County Community CollegeDistrict (MCCCD) with over
they like the review atthe beginning of class while going over any questions on the material from the preceding class..Sometimes student make a comment about a joke or show a sense of humor which is fun to sharewith the class. In the next sections comments from Minute Managers are given as examples.IV. What is the Most Important Thing That You Learned Today?The first question on the Minute Manager is “What is the most important thing that you learnedtoday?” The answer to this question is usually a very short summary of the main topic(s) of theday. Examples of this include: • Why variance is squared • That we have a table for F, how to use it • That if it’s two-sided you double the p-value • That you can test the significance of
of the final project and feedback for revision and improvement within the design process(Alley, 1961). In an educational setting, models and prototypes have traditionally beenconstructed by hand using a variety of materials in the absence of machining tools and training.This is considered a fundamental aspect of design according to the Standards of TechnologicalLiteracy set by the International Technology Education Association (ITEA, 2002), the NationalAcademy of Engineering (NAE, 2002), and many leading engineering educators (Oaks, 2003). In the 1980’s, the manufacturing industry began developing what has evolved into rapidprototyping and three-dimensional printing technology. This technology has provided the abilityfor designers and
the integrated laboratory resources. We also plan toevaluate how this new integrated laboratory affects teaching and the learning experience. Finally,we will continue to expand the integrated curriculum and laboratory, such as setting up a student-operated Network Operations Center (NOC) for the campus or even the local region and addingwireless cellular communications to the laboratory.Bibliography1. S. Wu, R. Athinarayanan, X. Hou, “Integrated Curriculum and Laboratory Development of an Undergraduate Telecommunications and Computer Networking Program,” Proceeding of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA 2008.2. http://www.tech.uh.edu/WON/index.php3. Falcon Communications Inc., http
senior year.Students that interested in graduate studies will be prepared to study and do research in abroad range of disciplines such as Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering,Nuclear Engineering, and Physics. Several local employers in a recent industrial advisorymeeting expressed a need for computing. During the meeting, Mr. S. Manir Zaman ofIAV, Inc. expressed an interest in offering co-ops to students with training in computing.As a result, students are also expected to obtain knowledge in computing such as C++ Page 14.94.3and MATLAB. To meet this goal, computing tools will be used in most courses.NeedThe Governor of Michigan has been
semester.The identical tests were given to these students as a control group. All of the tests were administeredindividually following the usual procedure. The test averages were essentially identical for this group: test #1 -41.6, test #2 -41.1 and test #3 -41.4. Although the test averages for the four courses being studied were higherthan the averages for the control group, the difference(s) can probably be attributed to factors other than testadministration methodology. However, one factor which should be studied further is the effect of allowing thestudents a short preview period prior to studying for the examinations. The test results in the EET course did show an improvement between the individual test averages andthe average for the
, and received his M. S. E. E. degree fromSyracuse University. His research interests include communications and signal processing.THOMAS RUSSELLReceived his B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Union College, Schenectady, NY, in 1982and 1983, respective y. His industrial experience includes work as an electrical engineer for MechanicalTechnology, Inc., in Latham, NY from 1983 to 1993. Since 1993, he has been with Penn State University atErie, where he is a Lecturer in Engineering in the Electrical Engineering Technology program. Page 1.80.5 $iiii’ } 1996 ASEE Annual Conference
. - REFERENCES [1] L. P. Huelsman, cd., “PC Programs for Engineers,” IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 3–9, May 1994. [2] L. P. Huelsman, cd., “PC Programs for Engineers,” IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 6–7, January 1995, [3] L. P. Huelsman, cd., “PC Programs for Engineers,” IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 4-6, March 1995. [4] L. P. Huelsman, cd., “PC Programs for Engineers,” IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 4-6, May 1995. [5] C. Ouslis, W. M. Snelgrove and A. S. Sedra, “A Filter Designer’s Filter Design Aid: filtorx,” Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. on Circ. and Sys., pp. 376-379, June 1991
136 (204 QHrs) Clemson University Russ Brown (803) 656-3002 139 University of Colorado Stein Sture (303) 492-3276 128 Cornell University Dr. Meyburg (607) 255-3690 133 Georgia Tech Mike Meyer (404) 894-2202 134 (201 QHi-s) University of Illinois Neil Hawkins (217) 333-3815 133 University of Kansas Stan Rolfe (913) 864-3766 132 University of Maryland Jim Colville (301) 405-0380 132 University of Michigan Ben Wylie (3 13) 764-8495
since 1979. After a 16-year industrial career, which included the GE ManufacturingManagement Program, he joined the University of Missouri-Rolls as an associate professor. Seven yearslater, he moved to GWU. He was department chair, 1984 to 1989. Also, he was chairman of ASEEEngineering Economy Division, 1976-1977.1. W. J Bruns, Jr., Diversity in Accounting Principles: A Problem, a Strategic Imperative,or a StrategicOpportunity?, Harvard Business School Publishing Div.: Boston, MA, 9-193-045, Revised May 26, 1993.2. R. S. Kaplan, A. P. Sweeny, and J. Dearden, Peoria Engine Plant (A), Harvard Business SchoolPublishing Div.: Boston, MA, 9-193-082, Revised June 29, 1993.3. J. H. Hertenstein, Wilmington Tap and Die, Harvard Business School