STEM Education Summit convened a wide range of STEM leaders from all 50 states,five territories, and several tribes. The goal of the summit was to outline and develop a nationalSTEM education plan that “will to help inform the development of the upcoming Federal 5-YearSTEM Education Strategic Plan” (p.3). To help support the initiative to enhance STEM education,the U.S. Department of Education allocated a $279 million dollars in discretionary funds for FiscalYear 2018.While federal, state, and district initiatives have created and implemented policies designed tobolster STEM achievement, there are numerous concerns that prove to be challenging informulating effective solutions. One concern regarding the exponential growth of STEM
togetherprovide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks,and meet objectives (3) ABET Outcome 7: an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge asneeded, using appropriate learning strategies.ABET Outcome 1 - an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineeringproblems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematicsStudent #1 - "Inspired design features and processes has always intrigued my mind tounderstand and also motivated my thinking on how nature can be used to design a well-suitedobject or building for a specific area or item that is needed such as prosthetics"Student #2 - "After the planning process I needed to do my research and see what materials anddesign would be most
five participants can identify up to 85%of issues, but they recommend starting with a small sample, analyzing data as it is collected, andadding more participants and data until saturation is reached. In the near future, plans for thiswork-in-progress study include the addition of another seven to ten participants. Additionally,results from other data collection methods, such as surveys [21], focus groups, and interviews,will be synthesized and reported. As with most UX research, the sample size limits the datageneralizability; therefore, the researchers plan to ultimately extend their research to otherengineering doctoral programs to determine if user responses are replicable across programs.Acknowledgment and disclaimer This material is
Paper ID #39179WIP: Using Human-Centered Design and Data analytics to improve studentaccess and success in an undergraduate pre-engineering programMr. Aishwary Pawar, University of Michigan - Dearborn Aishwary Pawar is a doctoral candidate in industrial & systems engineering at the University of Michi- gan–Dearborn. His research is focused on investigating the factors that influence undergraduate enroll- ment, retention, graduation, and dropout. For his Ph.D., he plans to incorporate human-centered design and data analytics to promote student success in undergraduate engineering programs and to support higher education
workerswere rising. These awards were decided by juries who were very sympathetic to workers. In1915, the workmen’s act was passed by the general assembly in Pennsylvania. The act definedinjury as “violence to the physical structures of the body” and, by doing so, standardizedpayment to workers who had gone through industrial accidents (Slavishak, 2008, p. 246). TheNational Association of Manufacturers approved workers’ compensation programs because “ofits central concept of liability without fault” (Ibid, p. 242). The plan “acknowledged the damagedbody of work but did not dwell upon it or ask it to prove itself as the result of individual orcorporate culpability” (Ibid). Ultimately, through such legislature, municipalities were able toremove the
towards students not in the specialization. It seems manystudents were keen for hands-on engineering design experience and often concurrently enrolledin other clinic subjects.Assessment for the subject is in line with the PBL pedagogy employed with most majorassessment closely tied to the design project. The first major project milestone is submission of aproject plan that breaks down anticipated tasks, determines a provisional timeline for workcompletion, and outlines team protocols and procedures. A mid-project design review isconducted as an oral presentation and enables instructors to give important formative feedbackon a team’s technical approach and engineering analysis. The main assessment instrument for theproject is a written report
address theimportance of effective communication in a hybrid learning context can greatly strengthen facultymembers’ ability to realize instructional and program goals. One recommendation is to develop astrategic plan that responds to the needs of engineering faculty. This plan can encompassprofessional development sessions, the creation of asynchronous learning modules, guest lecturesby leading experts in the field, and other online resources. Moreover, College of Engineeringleadership can embrace an interdisciplinary approach by collaborating with personnel fromdifferent colleges such as those from education, communications, and technology to developrobust learning experiences for engineering faculty.At a microlevel, the data revealed certain
strategies to overcome them. The study is overall encouraging forengineering instructors to integrate the concepts of intercultural learning into their curriculum, butthe study does have some limitations: 1) the results of the study are based on the student reflections,and no student interviews were conducted to gain a deeper understanding of the studentintercultural competence. 2) the data was collected through written reflections; validated surveyswere not used to assess the intercultural competence development of the students. As a part offuture work, we plan to conduct in-depth interviews to understand the intercultural competencedevelopment of the students and use validated instruments such as Intercultural DevelopmentInventory (IDI) to assess
, and welfare, aswell as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors, (#3) an ability tocommunicate effectively with a range of audiences, and (#5) an ability to function effectively ona team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusiveenvironment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives [7].Having standard qualifications for engineering programs is a wonderful concept, however,ABET requires programs to meet the learning outcomes only once throughout the bachelor’sdegree program. This is a major gap as many programs will stick to the bare minimum asresources continue to be limited for engineering programs.The experiential learning approach is a pedagogical method to create value in
improvements in economic institutions, which contradicts the belief that unrestrictedmigration produces institutional deterioration [24].MethodologyFollowing the methodology of [25], a systematic literature review was conducted in 3 phases:planning, development, and reporting (see Table 1). Phases Activities Planning Identify the needs of the review Formulate the research question. Define the review protocol. Development Identify relevant research. Extract and synthesize relevant data. Report
implementation and real impact. Topics include design thinking, product and service design, rapidprototype engineering and testing, business modelling, social entrepreneurship, team dynamics, impactmeasurement, operations planning and ethics. Possibility to travel overseas during spring break. Previous projectsinclude [example companies and products]. Periodic design reviews; Final course presentation and expo; industryand adviser interaction. Limited enrollment via application. Must sign up for [Course 402 A] and [Course 402 B].[Course 3 B].: Design for Extreme AffordabilitySame course descriptionEngineering [10]: Intro to Solid MechanicsIntroduction to engineering analysis using the principles of engineering solid mechanics. Builds on the math
, refining both the shared language around and approach toteaching sociotechnical integration using design tools as the object lesson.We have come to describe this collective effort as “learning the tool, contextualizing the tool,and teaching the tool as sociotechnical practice.” This planned department-wide effortimplements and theorizes sociotechnical integration from the ground up, via repeated modulesaddressing specific engineering design tools. Candidate tools include those our faculty arealready responsible for teaching, such as SolidWorks CAD modeling and decision matrices, aswell as those we aspire to extend coverage of, such as Arduino microcontrollers and 3-Dprinting. For each tool, our ultimate goal is to collectively co-construct
collaborations for different engineering disciplines canbe fostered.This study is considered relevant to better understand the role of the Covid-19 pandemicin the perception of civil engineering cultures. It is planned to continue with theresearch and collect data from other engineering fields that will allow us to identify theperceptions in their areas and look for differences between them, in addition, it isaspired to collect information in different countries to report on the main differencesand similarities between countries based on the theory of Hofstede's dimensions.References[1] J. Namenwirth y R. Weber, «Ph (1987) Dynamics of Culture», Boston MA AllenUnwin.[2] G. Hofstede, «Cultural dimensions», Www Geert-Hofstede Com, 2003.[3] H
, that is, not just selected topics as in manyof the previous studies. This study had several objectives: 1. Determine which of the activities in a flipped Dynamics class are most effective, in the students’ opinions, in helping them master the course material. 2. Identify practices that help new instructors who are planning on flipping a Dynamics course, especially those who are planning on using materials developed by somebody else. 3. Identify factors and practices that lead some students to prefer a flipped structure in Dynamics and other students to prefer a traditional structure.Description of the coursesBrief descriptions of how the flipped course has evolved from being in a 100% remoteenvironment to a face-to
attend and participate.Aerospace engineering faculty experts. The planned transition to a PBL environment beingimplemented by the authors occurred within an introductory aerospace engineering course.Instructors of a similar class at ABET-accredited universities were identified from class offeringslisted online. Aerospace faculty within the authors’ networks who had demonstrated interest inpedagogical practice in aerospace engineering were also identified. Like the PBL experts, thesefaculty were contacted by email and asked (1) to participate in the study, and (2) to recommendany other faculty they think would add value to the study. Seven experts agreed to participate inthe study, and after a date was set, two participants were unable to attend
, names wereremoved, and then the comments were analyzed en masse. This study of student artifacts isapproved by Texas A&M IRB #IRB2023-047.Following is a week-by-week flow of the lesson activities, and the related deliverables. Morelesson detail and associated artifacts may be explored at Engineering Unleashed (registrationrequired). https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/3168 Week 4 1. The photovoice assessment tool is new to the students, so this activity is introduced early in the semester in order to address challenges with the activity before being used in the bio-inspired design plan reflection in week 13. Week 8 2. Students are grouped in teams of four per
launched somenew engineering learning programs. In China, similar reforms and transformations have also been* Correspondence E-mail: wangliang9170@zju.edu.cn 1implemented by governments in the field of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM),like New Engineering Education Plan implemented by the MOE of China [11], [12]. Almost all reform andtransformation of engineering education mentioned above has shown common characteristics: shorten thedistance between professional engineering knowledge and the real-world by emphasizing the important roleof authentic engineering environments in engineers’ training process, which can be generalized as“authentic engineering learning”.In
with any element of attention focusing) SSAC Learning analysis and Self-monitoring, self- Self-reflection phase self-evaluation judgment Motivation No similarity of thematic Forethought phase (comprising area with any element of self-motivation/beliefs and SSAC values) Autonomy Self-judgment, learning Forethought phase targets (comprising goal setting, strategic planning)Table 1: Similarity of thematic areas with student self-assessment cycle by McMillan and Hearn[8], and self-regulation
which wecan examine the ways in which design shapes our built environment, the systems thatgovern it, and how those systems in turn shape our communities and individuals. Thisapproach to design focuses on creating equitable outcomes for marginalized communitiesand centers the voices and perspectives of those who have been traditionallyunderrepresented in design decision-making. Design Justice practitioners work to ensurethat design is accessible, inclusive, and equitable for all.“Design mediates so much of our realities and has tremendous impact on our lives, yet very fewof us participate in design processes. In particular, the people who are most adversely affected bydesign decisions — about visual culture, new technologies, the planning of
of separation. In theseinstances, she cannot make space for her identities as an international aerospace engineer, norcan she authentically make space for her disability identities as an engineering college student.While Srihari often describes instances that contribute to a narrative of separation among herdisability and international identities, she also experiences instances that contribute to a narrativeof coherence based on her involvement with extra-curricular activities. I'm one of the directors for the [event planning team at my school]. So we do the concerts and like the large scale events. And my professors always ask me, “How does that relate? How is that related to programming? It just doesn't add up.” But
, et al. [2]. The study examined models ofexperiential learning from six pioneering experiential engineering programs including theUniversity of Cincinnati Professional Practice Program; the Harvey Mudd College Clinic; theKansas State University Mechanical Engineering Design Laboratory; the Worcester PolytechnicInstitute PLAN; the West Virginia University PRIDE (Professional Reasoning Integrated withDesign Experience); and the University of Massachusetts ESIC (Engineering Services forIndustry and Community). Over the last forty years, the use of experiential learning inundergraduate engineering education has increased exponentially; concurrently a significantbody of pedagogical research has been presented in the literature. The present article
). Each team presented their cumulative Engineering Notebook slides to their peers andprovided constructive feedback to each other.2.5.2 Sketching and CADAll students started with individual hand-sketching and brainstorming prior to sharing their ideaswith their teammates (Fig. 5). Teams were also required to designate roles such as ProjectManager, CAD Manager, Manufacturing Lead, and Drawings Coordinator to ensure that allstudents held leadership responsibilities in at least one aspect of the project. They were alsorequired to create a detailed schedule of their project plan and modify it weekly as needed toadjust for unforeseen circumstances. Fig. 5 Sample Conceptual SketchesAfter deciding on an initial design
out of the 75 surveyed students, which is around 33percent, do not expect to graduate on time, as depicted in Figure 6. Only considering local FTICstudents, the results indicate that 18 out of 48 students do not expect to graduate on time. Theseresults are presented in Figure 7. However, according to Accountability [8], less than 50 percentof students graduate within 4 years. This illustrates that many students are planning to graduateon time but are not achieving their graduation goals due to several factors which may includeacademic, financial, and social factors. 25 students Anticipate to 33.33% complete their
, AR, and IoT Systems. His most recent work involves designing an AR framework that provides just-in-time informatics for training, education and maintenance activities. This system design was the basis for a Future of Work planning grant from NSF in 2021. He has been leading the team at the University of Akron for the NASA SUITS competition from 2018 to 2020. He currently works as a software developer.Nathan Esosa Uhunsere, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Member of the Centers for Advanced Computational and Telecommunications ResearchDr. Susan Thomson Tripathy, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Dr. Susan Thomson Tripathy is a Research Associate at UMass Lowell who specializes in qualitative research methods
time, including (1) how basic academic and careerinterests develop; (2) how educational and career choices are made; and (3) how academic andcareer success is achieved. This involves self-efficacy beliefs (Bandura 1986) - people’s beliefsabout their own capabilities and plans to attain personal goals; outcome expectations - the degreeto which they perceive positive or negative outcomes of certain behaviors; and goals - how muchand how well a person wants to do something. SCCT examines links between individuals andtheir career-related contexts to account for the entire environment in which they make career-related decisions. It posits that individuals are products of their surroundings, and thesesurroundings are the result of individuals
modeling and simulation of emergent behavior in air transportation,” Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1186/2194-3206-1-15/FIGURES/10.[7] E. Z. Berglund and M. Asce, “Using Agent-Based Modeling for Water Resources Planning and Management,” J Water Resour Plan Manag, vol. 141, no. 11, p. 04015025, May 2015, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000544.[8] Q. Huang, D. C. Parker, T. Filatova, and S. Sun, “A review of urban residential choice models using agent-based modeling,” vol. 41, pp. 661–689, 2014, doi: 10.1068/b120043p.[9] M. W. Macy and R. Willer, “FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling,” Annu. Rev. Sociol, vol. 28, pp. 143–66, 2002
Committee (NAC), that advises the Administrator of the EPA on environmental policy issues related to the implementation of the former North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation and was a member of the Good Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB) that advises the President and Congress of the United States on good neighbor practices along the U.S. border with Mexico. Dr. Santiago’s history of service started in Puerto Rico as Director of the Water Quality Area of the PR Environmental Quality Board, in charge of Compliance, Permit, and Planning Bureau, that included Industrial and Non-Industrial permits, Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs), and watershed restoration activities. As Director, she implemented
, etc.) that were a part of theexhibit but felt that building is something that different engineering fields have in common.Another parent explained that engineers build but follow a process similar to their child'sexperience in the engineering activities and the curriculum in their respective classrooms. Theparent asserts, “Engineers try to build something. What we learned here (exhibit) and through thecurriculum is that you go through different phases of planning and designing. Then you go backto the drawing board and test until you come up with the right answer to whatever it is you aretrying to build or design'' (P11). As noted earlier, connecting engineering and/or engineeringactivities to building was a common phenomenon that parents
of these objectives often focuses on the students’ ability to communicate thetechnical outcomes (e.g., written reports or technical presentations) and may overlook evidencefor holistic development in areas such as troubleshooting abilities. Troubleshooting is afundamental skill that instructors would like their students to gain from experience in alaboratory course, but assessing this skill can be challenging.In this study, we tested a method to holistically test students’ ability to troubleshoot a chemicalengineering problem in a laboratory course. Our research goal is to develop a baselineunderstanding of how to measure students’ experimental self-efficacy and theirtroubleshooting performance. Planned future research may then consider how