Physics. Dr. Suter received a Bachelor of Science degree in physics from the Free University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, a Master of Science degree in physics from Michigan State University, a Master of Science degree in electrical engineering from the University of Maryland, and a PhD degree in materials science and engineering from The Johns Hopkins University.Mr. Stanislaw Tarchalski, Johns Hopkins University Sta´s Tarchalski is a retired senior executive with more than 30 years of progressive responsibility and experience in leading strategic business planning and execution, large/complex program development and management, technical leadership and systems engineering, and organizational development in various
), 535-556.3. Byrne. D. B. & Fraser, B. J. (1986). Student Perceptions of Preferred Classroom Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Research, 80 (1), 10-18.4. Church, M. A., Elliott, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of Classroom Environment, Achievement Goals, and Achievement Outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (1), 43-545. Cole, D. G., Sugioka, H. L., & Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (1999). Supportive Classroom Environments for Creativity in Higher Education. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33 (4), 277-293.6. Findley, B. & Varble, D. (2006). Creating a Conducive Classroom Environment: Classroom Management is the Key. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 2 (3), 1-5.7. Holley
overall outcome in student motivation andlearning.6 AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No1245657. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foun-dation.References 1. Brereton, M., Sheppard, S. & Leifer, L. “Students connecting engineering fundamentals and hardware design: Observations and implications for the design of curriculum and assessment methods,” in 1995 Frontiers in Education Conference. 2. Wittemyer, R., McAllister, B., Faulkner, S., McClard, A. & Gill, K. “MakeHers: Engag- ing Girls and Women in Technology
/Homework ParadigmUsing eTEACH Web-based Streaming Video Software”, Journal of Engineering Education, July (2002).5 C. Demetry, Work in Progress – “An Innovation Merging Classroom Flip and Team-Based Learning”, Proceedings,the 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 27 - 30, Washington, DC. (2010).6 S. Zappe, R. Leicht, J.Messner, T. Litzinger, and H.W. Lee, “Flipping the Classroom to Explore Active Learning ina Large Undergraduate Course”, Proceedings, the 116th American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exhibition (2009).7 Jeremy Strayer, The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: a comparison of learning activity in
education: Learning anywhere, anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 131-146.[2]. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950.[3]. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7 – 23.[4]. Ickenberry, S. (2001). Forward. In Latchem, C. and Hanna, D., (Eds.), Leadership for 21st century learning: Global perspectives from educational perspectives. Sterling, VA.: Stylus Publishing.[5]. Keller, G. (2008). Higher education and the new society
, “Feeding Our Profession”, IEEE Power & Energy Vol. 1(1), 2003.4. U.S Energy Information Administration, Renewable Energy Annual 2002.5. L. B. V. D. C. Haba, "e-Learning System for temperature and Humidity Sensors and Distributed Measurement," Iasi, Romania , 2007.6. F. L. R. D. L. W. E. H. C. Arlett, "Meeting the needs of industry: the drivers for change in engineering education," vol. 5, no. 2, 2010.7. F. R. Brushett, R. S. Jayashree, W.-P. Zhou and P. J. Kenis, "Investigation of fuel and media flexible laminar flow-based fuel cells," Electrochimica Acta, vol. 54, p. 7, May 2009. Page 26.803.148. E. Kjeang
combination of BayesianKnowledge Tracking and Performance Factor Analyses approaches, are also briefly described.IntroductionGames can be effective learning tools in classroom settings. This fact has been demonstrated ina wide variety of disciplines, across a large range of ages, and over a long period of time. Indeed,successful examples of ‘computerized’ games used in university settings may be identified as farback as the 1960’s when computers were still in their infant stages. For example, Raia1 describesthe effective utilization of a computerized game to teach business management skills at theUniversity of Maryland in 1966.A consistent plea from industries over decades has been the need for universities to train studentsto handle the complexities
develop number sense, makesense of the number line, and learn to use measurement devices and deal withmeasurement error. Simply asking students to collect and interpret data, however, doesnot guarantee that students will connect the data and measurements to the science andengineering concepts, even when the data support and demonstrate those concepts.References1. Wilkins, J. L. M. Preparing for the 21st century: The status of quantitative literacy in the United States. Sch. Sci. Math. 100, 405–418 (2000).2. Lohr, S. The Age of Big Data. New York Times (2012).3. Committee on Integrated STEM Education, National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council. STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects
you tell me how you got interested in engineering?3. How did you decide on GT?4. Describe your transition to GT from high school.5. Can you tell me about how you decided on your major?6. Has that major turned out to be a good choice for you?7. Have you ever changed your major or thought about changing your major?8. What is the climate like for women in your major?9. What is the ratio of men to women in your major and can you share your thoughts on why you have this ratio?10. As a woman/African American engineering student, do you face any challenges in your major? What are the unique challenges to being a minority student in engineering?11. If s/he identifies as an African American or Hispanic/Latina woman: do you face any challenges
lighting, are rich in data that students can harvest using basic image analysis techniquesprovided by software such as MATLAB or ImageJ.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by "Solar Cell Imaging: A Gateway for Visualization and Learning inSTEM Disciplines” NSF TUES Award DUE-1245872 (June 2013 to May 2015).Bibliography 1. J. HAUNSCHILD, M. GLATTHAAR, M. DEMANT, J. NIEVENDICK, M. MOTZKO, S. REIN, and E.R. WEBER, “Quality control of as-cut multicrystalline silicon wafers using photoluminescence imaging for solar cell production” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 94, 12 2007-2012 (2010). 2. MICHAEL G. MAUK, “Image Processing for Solar Cell Analysis, Diagnostics and Quality Assurance Inspection” Ch 14 in Handbook
syllabus fall 2012,http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/engineering-systems-division/esd-36-system-project-management-fall-2012/syllabus/,Aug 2012.[7] P. H. Feiler, J. B. Goodenough, A. Gurfinkel, C. B. Weinstock, and L. Wrage. Reliability validation andimprovement framework, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/12sr013.pdf, Nov 2012. Page 26.912.11[8] R. Giralt-Mas, P. Pala-Schonwalder, F. del Aguila-Lopez, and J. Bonet-Dalmau. Teaching project managementin telecommunications engineering - introducing role-plays. In Frontiers in Education, 2005. FIE ’05. Proceedings35th Annual Conference, pages F4C–20, Oct 2005.[9] S. Goldin and K. Rudahl. Software
to support a diverse group of engineers who are better prepared as professionals todesign products that are accessible and usable to a broad range of individuals.1 Lent, R. W., Sheu, H., Singley, D., Schmidt, J. A., Schmidt, L. C., & Gloster, C. S. (2008). Longitudinal relationsof self-efficacy to outcome expectations, interests, and major choice goals in engineering students. Journal ofVocational Behavior, 73(2), 328 – 335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.07.0052 Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P.D. (2006). College major choice: An analysis of person-environment fit. Research inHigher Education, 47(4). 429 – 449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9002-33 Grandy, J. (1994) Gender and ethnic differences among science and
engineering education.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, June 28 - July 1, 1998, Seattle, WA.4 Robinson, M. and Sutterer, K. (2003). “Integrating sustainability into civil engineering curricula.” Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Conference, June 22-25, 2003, Nashville, TN.5 Hansen, K. and Vanegas, J. (2006). “A guiding vision, road map, and principles for researching and teaching sustainable design and construction.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 18-21, 2006, Chicago, IL.6 Freyne, S., Hale, M., and Durham, S. (2007). “Incorporating “green” ideas into civil engineering materials courses.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 24-27, 2007, Honolulu, HI.7
(g = 32.2 ft/s, etc.) made the material a lot more informative and easier to grasp … The use of different colors is great, but should be limited to around 2 to 3 or 4. Any more than that and it may seem to jumbled and could be harder for the student to grasp the concept fully.” • “Given that the narrator goes over the problem statement and addresses each aspect of the problem in turn (e.g. assumptions, given, goal, and etc.), it helped that he color-coded each term based on its category.”What we take away from these comments is that while one student said a systematic approach tocolor usage may not be necessary, others claim that the video content could be improved byutilizing some consistent approach, e.g
loading.sections. During the 2011-2012 and the 2012-2013 Bike Photo Source:school years, five additional sections of Mechanics of http://autoanything.wordpress.com/category/product- 3 review/jeep-accessories/Materials were taught that all incorporated E s: two inWinter 2012 (W2012-1 & W2012-2), one in Table 1: Total course enrollments for the eight sectionsSpring 2012 (Spring 2012), one in Winter taught. The 2011 sections were not taught with E3s.2013 (W2013) and one in Spring 2013(S2013). Total course enrollments and Count ofenrollments by gender are
” Confrontation Participants “are brought to realize possible inadequacies in their existing conceptions and/or teaching practices and thus create an awareness for the need to change” Exposure Workshop facilitator “provide[s] a direction and a model for improvement” Commitment Workshop facilitator “encourage[s] teachers building to engage in changes and development” In the following sections, we describe a professional development program that implements Ho’sconcept in order to foster a constructivist framework and student-centered
and Technology (DET) survey. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 800-818.3. Crede, E., & Borrego, M. (2013). From ethnography to items: A mixed methods approach to developing a survey to examine graduate engineering student retention. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(1), 62- 80.4. Daigneault, P.-M., & Jacob, S. (2014). Unexpected but most welcome mixed methods for the validation and revision of the participatory evaluation measurement instrument. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(1), 6-24. Page 26.35.175. Ungar, M., & Liebenberg, L. (2011). Assessing resilience across
also planned to develop in-class laboratorydemonstration activities for further understanding and analysis of the subject matter.Bibliography1. Barbara Mean, Yukie Toyama, Robert Murphy, Marianne Bakia and Karla Jones "Evaluation of Evidence-BasedPractices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies," U.S. Department ofEducation Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service. RevisedSeptember 2010.2. U.S. NRC, “Combined License Applications for New Reactors,” Sep 22, 2010, available online athttp://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html.3. U. S. Energy Information Administration, “Electric Power Annual 2010 Data Tables,” Nov 09, 2011, availableonline at http
. 99, no. 2, pp. 159–168, 2010.[5] S. P. Brophy, P. Norris, M. Nichols, and E. D. Jansen, “Development and initial experience with a laptop-based student assessment system to enhance classroom instruction,” in American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Nashville, TN, 2003.[6] S. W. Draper and M. I. Brown, “Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 81–94, 2004.[7] L. Malmi and A. Korhonen, “Automatic feedback and resubmissions as learning aid,” in IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings, 2004, pp. 186–190.[8] A. Mitrovic, “An intelligent SQL tutor on the web,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ
constituencies while assuring a uniformity of outcomes acrossprojects and programs. The scale up has brought new challenges, especially ones unsurprisinglyassociated with needing to coordinate many design advisers and entrepreneurship instructors inthe two integrated course sequences. It has also not yet met expectations for the true integrationthat is desired. A comprehensive review following assessment of the current first implementationof the Phase 2 scale up will determine if the program is ready for full scale up and the furtherchanges needed to make it happen. Bibliography 1. Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S., and Weilerstein , P., “Entrepreneurship: Its Role in Engineering Education”, The Bridge, Vol. 43, No. 2, Summer 2013, National
thevolume and complexity of cybersecurity problems facing today’s workforce. This is what wewould like for our survey to help educators identify in their classrooms. A more detaileddescription and further analysis of this portion of our study can be found in our previous work. 5The information gained from this investigation was used to develop the statements used in ourcurrent assessment tool. Table 1: Statements included in survey 1 Pursue an advanced degree(s) focused on cybersecurity 2 Find ways to exploit vulnerabilities in existing software 3 Perform research focused on cybersecurity 4 Learn how to crack users’ passwords 5 Take additional
Page 26.508.5published within engineering education scholarly literature. We borrowed and adapted itemsfrom a number of existing measures, which included the following (for an item-by-itemdescription, see Appendix A): Zhai and Scheer’s (2004) Global Perspective Scale12 Downey et al.’s (2006) global competency questions13 Braskamp, Braskamp, & Merrill’s (2008) Global Perspective Inventory, and in particular their Interpersonal Social Responsibility Scale14 Hilpert, Stump, Husman, and Kim’s (2008) Engineering Attitudes Survey15Throughout the survey development process, the authors were in dialogue with one another,providing feedback for item clarity, framing, and refinement. Along with evaluating the fitbetween
. Satisfactory performance was evaluated by various milestoneassignments, projects, presentation and other activities. Generally, on-going multi-project-basededucation combined effective classroom lectures, student active learning, innovative pedagogies,project management, and team work, benefits for both student research involvement, andengineering curriculum.References 1. Subbian, V., Purdy, C. C., and Beyette, F. R., UnLecture: A Novel Active Learning Based Pedagogical Strategy for Engineering Courses, Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, ASEE 2014. 2. Rios, E. F., Khan, A. S., and Padgett, D. V., A Senior Design Project: Heating and Cooling System for Car’s Interior
., Ohland, M. W., & Cardella, M. E. (2014b). Work In Progress-A Qualitative Study of the Effects of Participation in Pre-College Engineering Programs on First-Year Engineering Students. Presented at the 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Madrid.• Salzman, N., Ricco, G. D., & Ohland, M. W. (2014). Pre-College Engineering Participation Among First-Year Engineering Students. Presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN. Acknowledgement Support for this work comes from the National Science Foundation, Award No. REE 1265216. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not
, Fort Worth, Texas, AIAA 2010-90166. Blanchard, B. S. and Fabrycky, W. J., Systems Engineering and Analysis, Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall, 20067. Richard Curran, Michel van Tooren, Liza van Dijk, Systems Engineering as an Effective Educational Framework for Active Aerospace Design Learning, 9th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 21 - 23 September 2009, Hilton Head, South Carolina, AIAA 2009-69048. Paul S. Gill and Danny Garcia, William W. Vaughan, Engineering Lessons Learned and Systems Engineering Applications, 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 10 - 13 January 2005, Reno, Nevada, AIAA 2005-13259. John C. Hsu, S. Raghunathan, Systems Engineering for CDIO -Conceive, Design, Implement
Comparison of Features in teaching digital/embedded systems design course Use of FPGAs in Use of FPGAs to Use of FPGAs for Use of HDL as lab assignments inspire students advanced designs: programming and/or lab exercises for their projects wireless network language to solve to accelerate communications design problems student learning curve Tyson S. Hall, et al [8] Maybe No No No José N. A. [9
when structuring a faculty training program. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 53–63.6. Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134–140.7. Baltaci-Goktalay, S. s., & Ocak, M. m. (2006). FACULTY ADOPTION OF ONLINE TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 37-43.8. Löfström, E., & Nevgi, A. (2008). University teaching staffs’ pedagogical awareness displayed through ICT- facilitated teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(2), 101e116.9
://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer102/gaytan102.htm8. Hannafin, M. J. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Instructional Development 7(3): 6–10.9. Heinich, R., M. Molenda, J. D. Russell and S. E. Smaldino. (2003). Instructional media and technologies for learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.10. Hijazi, S., Crowley, M., Smith, M. L., & Shaffer, C. (2006). Maximizing learning by teaching blended courses. Proceedings of the ASCUE Conference, 2006.11. Holmberg, B (1987) Growth and structure of distance education. Routledge.12. Johnson, J. L. (2003) Distance education: the complete guide to design, delivery and improvement. NY
hed by the texxt author(s).. In the exam mple shown inFigure 1,, there are foour streams (M=4), ( threee componentts (N=3, air, water and thhe substancee ofthe materrial to be dried on a dry basis, b e.g. wood, w clay brrick, etc.). T The degrees oof freedomanalysis for f this exam mple followss: GDF = M×N M + MFlowws + NRates = 4×3 + 4 + 0 = 16 GC