) e Problems engineering problems 6. Professional/ an understanding of professional and ethical Understanding f Ethical responsibility (2) 7. Communication an ability to communicate effectively Ability (3) g 8. Engineering the broad education necessary to understand Understanding h Impact the impact of engineering solutions in a global (2) and societal context 9. Life-long a recognition of the need for, and an ability to Ability (3) i Learning engage in life-long learning 10. Contemporary a knowledge of contemporary issues Recognition j Issues
Paper ID #21480Representations of ’The Public’ in Learning Through Service (LTS) Versus’Mainstream’ Engineering Foundational Professional DocumentsDr. Nathan E. Canney, Dr. Canney’s research focuses on engineering education, specifically the development of social responsi- bility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seat- tle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering
the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering culture, engineering careers in the public sector, and ethics and equity in STEM. Dimpho has several years of experience in thDr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto. Emily spent 20 years as a professional engineer, first as an R&D engineer in a Fortune 500 company, and then leadingDr. Andrea Chan, University of Toronto Andrea Chan is a Senior Research Associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering | University of TorontoMs. Emily Macdonald-Roach, University of Toronto
attributes of engineering design,such as planning and gaining clarity on approach, acquiring the technical skills, and knowledge tosolve problems through research and background development. The key findings from this researchpoint to opportunities for further emphasis in the early Cornerstone offering in the areas of planningand project management as well as the need to conduct research and obtain data and backgroundinformation as a priority. Likewise, the seniors in Capstone Design can learn from the first-yearstudents who identify the need to understand and empathize with end users and target beneficiaries,which also includes maintaining an ethical compass. This outward-facing perspective is found muchlower on the seniors’ list. Similarly, the
overhaul.During the summer of 2004, the authors rewrote the course, creating a new course that focuseson technology’s impact on society. By removing circuits and machines, the course now covers abroader range of electrical engineering fields such as image and signal processing, datacompression, electronic navigation, communications, and computer networks and security. Thecourse examines current trends; with a focus on how the Coast Guard and Homeland Securityuse technology and discusses the ethical issues that arise with the potential misuse of technology.The authors developed several innovative lesson plans, laboratories and even a series of debatesto improve the students’ understanding of technological trade-offs, while developing their
assignments. Good luck on midterms! 6 Applying the Disciplines Students will be able to choose at least one supercurricular opportunity of interest in engineering 7 Considering Careers Students will be able to associate overcoming challenge with the path toward professional success 8 Integrity in Engineering Students will be able to apply ethics to the field of engineering as a student and will understand the importance of ethics in professional engineering 9 Midterm Week No assignments. Good luck on midterms! 10
limited understanding of or with misconceptions about software development.Students may have worked in pairs, but most of their experience is individual programmingprojects that solve narrowly defined problems. Features of a wide view of softwaredevelopment are experiencing software development as a social, rather than a solitary, activity[3], experiencing maintenance of legacy code [3,8], experiencing working on a non-trivial sizedsystem, and developing awareness of the social, cultural, and ethical responsibilities of softwaredevelopers. These features are motivated by the nature of software engineering work.The "wide view" principle has guided the course since its first offering. We wanted studentswith experience limited to programming to
solutions. This process ensures that students take ownership of their project as anengaged team. It allows students to strengthen their problem-solving and collaboration skills.The interdisciplinary teaching team models the teamwork skills the students are learning. Theaim is to promote interdisciplinary learning, foster teamwork, and improve student engagement.Other course objectives are to develop students’ creative problem solving, empathetic designpractices, communication skills, prototyping skills, and ethical reasoning. Students are expectedto become proficient at the empathetic design process as well as interdisciplinary communicationand teamwork. Creative problem solving, ethical reasoning, and realization of a product throughprototyping
course objectives were asfollows: a. Understand the Co-op program, policies and expectations. b. Understand how to use the university website in order to access on-line information used in their job search process. c. Identify and describe their skills and work values and how they relate to their career choices. d. Learn how to write and critique a resume. e. Learn and practice proper interviewing skills and techniques. f. Communicate their interests, skills, needs and future plans to their Co-op Coordinator and future employers.The primary focus of this course was on finding a co-op job. Lessons included topics such as“ethics,” which featured case
based on the need of the program constituencies. The current PEOs for the MEprogram at UTSA states that the within a few years after graduation, the graduates will: (1) haveengineering careers in industry, government, and/or will pursue advanced graduate orprofessional degrees, (2) apply their engineering skills to their careers, (3) continue to advancetheir knowledge, communication and leadership skills by using technology, continuingeducation, solving problems, and serving in technical or professional societies, and (4) applytheir understanding of societal, environmental, and ethical issues to their professional activities.These PEOs are consistent with the institutional mission, and the program’s constituents’ needs.ABET EAC used to require
. Discussion.The field of engineering education has long focused on instilling a set of core ethicalprinciples in developing engineers28, 29, 30. Guided by the U.S. Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET), undergraduate engineering programs aim to helpstudents develop “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility”31. Ingeneral, however, engineering ethics have emphasized principles such as accountabilityto the client—defined as the people or organizations who have retained the engineer’sservices, not as the broader public for whom a given product or innovation will result ineither benefit or harm30. Some have critiqued this approach as insufficient for producingengineers who think critically about the social implications of
” [1].It is up to individual programs how they implement and assess ABET criteria, and manyprograms meet the non-technical criteria through service courses taught by other departments,such as a technical communication course taught by the English department or by specialized butseparate courses such as an engineering-oriented ethics class. However, there has also beenextensive work on integrating communication skills throughout the engineering curriculum andcourses, and that is the focus of this work [6]–[8]. Engineering faculty generally value written communication skills and recognize that theyhave a role in helping students to develop those skills. Many see their role as that of providingopportunities for students to write in their
ethical questions that arise from those effects. Design and Systems covers the nature of technology, the engineering design process by which technologies are developed, and basic principles of dealing with everyday technologies, including maintenance and troubleshooting. Information and Communication Technology includes computers and software learning tools, networking systems and protocols, hand-held digital devices, and other technologies for accessing, creating, and communicating information and for facilitating creative expression.”and three practices: “Understanding Technological Principles focuses on how well students are able to
ways, which supports the idea that there is not just one use forAI in the classroom. Based on the results of both surveys, AI could improve many parts of theeducational learning and teaching process. Addressing ethical considerations in the creation andapplication of AI tools in education is, of course, crucial. The findings of the Chegg pollhighlight the necessity for universities/colleges to have open policies that instruct students on theresponsible and productive use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the classroom.A study by MIT researchers examined the productivity effects of generative AI technology in thecontext of mid-level professional writing tasks [3]. In their experiment, they assigned writingtasks to college-educated
effectively with a range of audiences 4. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts 5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives 6. an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions 7. an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategiesTable 2: ASCE’s Civil Engineering
, despite the potential, civilengineering as a profession, and more importantly as a field of engineering education, still hasmuch room for improvement in training students on the long-term social implications of civilengineering works, particularly how engineering can shape distributional outcomes and socialjustice under climate change, natural disasters and aging infrastructure [2].Current civil engineering curricula at most universities in the U.S. are centered on science andengineering problem solving and include exposure to topics such as engineering economics andengineering ethics. This is critical for building the core competencies needed for the civilengineering profession. However, there are also concerns that this core competency is
University Channel Islands and Virginia tech he explores community empowerment for environmental justice, global engineering ethics, critical pedagogy coupled to STS, He specializes in sustainable technology, social movements, and community engagement stemming from a background in Science and Technology Studies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Cultivating “global competency” in a divided world Cultivating “global competency” in a divided world: A collaborative autoethnography of the cross-border, dialogue-based curriculum designINTRODUCTIONBACKGROUNDAmid the pandemic and geopolitical conflicts, the world and local communities are facingsupply chain
problem-solving around technology infrastructure. This tension shapesmembers’ expectations of each other and creates ethical dilemmas where they have to choosebetween pursuing collective collaborative goals versus niche innovative goals. We conclude witha discussion on how the sociomaterial outcomes of technology infrastructure are driven by itsunpredictable complexity rather than specific functionality. 2COLLABORATION PRACTICES AROUND TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE IntroductionResearch on collaboration technologies often focuses on the design and use of technologiescreated specifically for purposes of
ANT is a greattool to help students consider the importance of non-human actors because modelling and visualrepresentations, which lend themselves to ANT, are “natural for engineering students” (Irish & Romkey,2021, p. 3). Additionally, the authors noticed that ANT creates a roadmap for identifying and addressingquestions about environmental ethics, and how morality should be assigned to non-human actors.Berne (2018) purposefully applied the lenses and language of ANT to teach engineering ethics andelucidate the complexity of inter-relationships between actors inherent in all engineering practice. In acourse on reproductive technology, the author took students to an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic andused ANT to help students notice
the EOP framework, a summary of the approach takento rapidly integrate the EOP framework throughout the curriculum, a description of how the EOPoutcomes were included in and assessed in several civil engineering courses, and the next stepsin EOP implementation in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department. The goal is toprovide a snapshot of where this program is in the implementation of the EOP as well as theapproach taken to rapidly implement the EOP.IntroductionThe incorporation of sustainability concepts into Civil Engineering curricula has been a topic ofdiscussion for nearly two decades, e.g., [1], [2], [3]. The importance of sustainability to CivilEngineering is recognized by its incorporation in the Code of Ethics [4], the
intelligence, ethics and moral autonomy. ● Continuous Development of Personal, Business, and Management Capacities and Competencies: including skills such as "Lifelong learning in engineering", "Creativity", "Leadership", "Management Skills", and "Development of New Products and Entrepreneurship”.Given international trends in program accreditation, it is imperative to establish qualitystandards aligned with areas of knowledge, particularly in regards to academic processes.Having specific standards such as these would allow for a more flexible and precise model inlight of the diversity of programs [9]. Additionally, curriculum standards and academiccredits that support student mobility both domestically and internationally must be taken
Infrastructure Inequities: A Pilot StudyAbstractAs social justice issues facing our nation continue to be placed in the foreground of everydaylife, it is important to understand how undergraduate civil engineering students perceive andunderstand relations between social justice and our infrastructure systems. Additionally, as morecivil engineering undergraduate programs increase the emphasis on ethics and equity issues intheir curricula, we must also seek to understand students’ awareness of their influence, as civilengineering professionals, to improve infrastructure systems that contribute to injustice andinequity.This paper presents findings from a pilot study conducted as part of an NSF-funded grantimplementing cultural and curricular changes in a
: 1) Self, 2) Interpersonal, 3) Team, and 4) Organizational/Societal. • Common themes in curriculum consisted of leadership theory, practice and reflection, team building exercises, seminars by industry leaders, leadership capability assessments, and student leader coaching, all with continuous improvement of curricular components. • Leadership learning outcomes were measured by: 1) Effective leadership, 2) Synthesis and problem solving, 3) Practical competence and 4) Change agility. • Consistent with the trends in industry, topics such as Ethics [16], Systems Thinking [17,18,19], Innovation [20] and Peer Coaching [21] have gained emphasis in the leadership curricula
they believe each engineering undergraduate degreeprogram should be able to cultivate in their students, including: (a) an ability to apply knowledgeof mathematics, science and engineering, (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, aswell as to analyze and interpret data, (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process tomeet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political,ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability, (e) an ability to identify,formulate, and solve engineering problems, and (g) an ability to communicate effectively (ABETCriterion 3. Student Outcomes (a-k)). We argue that all of these skills are essential componentsof the argumentation process
. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, non- verbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics.Stephanie Slocum, Engineers Rising LLC Stephanie Slocum is the founder of Engineers Rising LLC, where she helps engineers learn the leadership and people skills they need to let their technical abilities shine. Prior to founding Engineers Rising in 2018, she worked as a structural engineer for 15 years. She has extensive experience
takingresponsibility for a mistake requires internal fortitude – it takes guts! Robert Furey sees humilityand pride not as much as opposites, but as necessary complements to each other: “Humility andpride compose a dialectic; each concept gives the other meaning. Without humility, pridebecomes arrogance and conceit. Without pride, humility becomes passivity and complacency.”21Personal humility is important for an engineering professional. We can find expectations forpersonal behavior related to humility in many engineering codes of ethics. For example, mostengineering codes of ethics indicate that engineers must act within their area of competence andhonestly indicate any limitations in their expertise. The Institute of Electrical and ElectronicsEngineers
engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Dr. Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Andrew O. Brightman serves as Assistant Head for Academic Affairs and Associate Professor of Engi- neering Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering. His research background is in cellular biochemistry, tissue engineering, and engineering ethics. He is committed to developing effective ped- agogies for ethical reasoning and engineering design and for increasing the diversity and inclusion of engineering education.Mr. Sean Eddington, Purdue University
realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g) an ability to communicate effectively h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j) a knowledge of contemporary issues k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for
design thinking is founded on developing empathy is critical: empathy requires a fullunderstanding of the societal context in which all stakeholders operate; empathy is distinctfrom “sympathy” which could yield the problematic “need my help” framing; and empathyhas been shown to be enhanced through the humanities and social sciences [17]. Designprojects in the first year have been shown to develop empathy and to help students developan emotional understanding of stakeholders’ interests [18]. In our view, empathy requires anddictates an ethical approach to design, as the potential risks and rewards for all conceivablestakeholders must be considered. During a class period early in the semester, we involvestudents in a 75-minute design thinking
hour experience inwhich they assume roles of leadership in a community, business or an organization. There areseveral major learning objectives of this simulation: i) students are introduced to differentleadership styles and forced to discover that many of the leadership assumptions that hold true inbusiness-as-usual situations are violated in a crisis; ii) students learn how to utilize and allocatelimited resources and make necessary trade-offs; iii) students are exposed to situations in whichthey have to question the ethical implications of their decisions and determine what risks areacceptable and tolerable. Through a post-simulation reflection activity led by volunteer facultyand staff, as well as the local Emergency Services personnel