, and mustfall on the characteristic curve for the fan. Whenever a fan is attached to a system a certainamount of back pressure on the fan will be created. This backpressure depends on the amount offlow going through the system. In order to determine the actual operating point the engineermust know the characteristic curves for both the fan (fan curve) and the system (impedancecurve). The operating point is the point at which the two curves intersect (Figure 1). Since it islikely that an engineer will have to select a fan at some point in his/her career it is important tounderstand this concept.Learning about how to determine the operating point for a fan in a system is enough to make thisa worthwhile activity. However, there is a broader
project as 3 out of 5. The benefit to the outcomeof the project of the presentation on Cultural Awareness was rated only slightly higher at 3.14out of 5. However, the students felt that the presentation on Cultural Awareness would be usefulin their future career as indicated by their average rating of 4.57 out 5.Technical Subject MatterThe authors in general feel that the students were even more successful in their learning of thetechnical subject matter than they were in learning about inter-cultural collaboration. Thestudents learned many valuable lessons about practical issues with control system design that arenot typically encountered in textbook problems. One example was that the students gained anunderstanding of the inherent nonlinearity
new faculty member, into aclassroom and told to teach a class. The person may or may not have any experience as ateacher, and if they do have experience it may be limited to having Teaching Assistant duties.They may or may not be given a course that is a fundamental aspect of their research, but hasmany details that they have not given much thought to in many years. They may be given some Page 15.609.3assistance by another faculty member when starting to teach a new course, but generally aregiven no formal training unless they had sought such training on their own before beginning theirfaculty career. At the same time, this person is also being
impact of a SL method on student learning and retention. This study investigated students’ motivational attitudes and self-assessment of engineering abilities. It is hypothesized that positive motivational attitudes and self-assessment of abilities would result in deeper understandings of engineering and continuous motivation to pursue engineering as a career. More research should be conducted to test the hypothesis. ≠ Design engineering curricula with instructional strategies such as SL that contribute to meeting ABET program outcomes. As shown in the literature review, engineering educators have successfully designed and implemented SL in their curricula to achieve ABET program outcomes. This study
Systems at Regis University in Denver, Colorado from 1999 to 2008. In this position he led the university's move to online education in graduate and undergraduate programs. Sam also served as co-director of the online joint-degree program with the National University of Ireland in Galway, Director of the Center for Database Research, and Co-Director for the National Security Agency Center of Academic Excellence. Sam has worked in higher education since 1999 after completing a 23 year career in the field of information systems and technology. Sam maintains a publishing track in Information Systems and eLearning research
-graduate plans and shaping the college experience. But confidence relates to the experiences oneseeks out (which may in turn build confidence), and these experiences in turn are likely to affectfuture plans and opportunities. Employers are increasingly calling for well-developedprofessional skills in engineering hires and ABET Inc. has established a set of six professionalskill outcomes that engineering baccalaureate graduates should possessii,iii. Motivation, whatdrives one to pursue something, also influences how one chooses to spend time both in schooland in career planning.In this study, we test the explanatory power of framing undergraduate engineering populationsaccording to measures of their intrinsic psychological motivation and
development of UScitizens in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Consequently, theresearchers addressed this effort by exposing young people to STEM careers while focusing ondesign issues and concepts related to energy conservation and the environment.In this paper, we describe the results of the initial implementation of Studio STEM in aninformal setting for underserved youth: an after-school Boys and Girls Club in a ruralAppalachian community. The curricular package used for this pilot study, called Save thePenguins, has been used in the past in formal, in-school settings with advantaged youth.3,4 Inthis iteration the researchers selected a different population and added an informationcommunication technology (ICT) component
publication/career, political correctness, continuedfunding, or one’s pet theory.5. The general public rather than the scientific community votes on what is worthstudying and funding.6. The public loses trust in scientific research.7. The scientific method is abandoned because the results are “obvious.”8. No one cares how things really work.9. We move to an age of magic and mysticism.Lewis wrote:“Men became scientific because they expected Law in Nature, and they expected Law inNature because they believed in a Legislator. In most modern scientists this belief hasdied: it will be interesting to see how long their confidence in uniformity survives it.Two significant developments have already appeared—the hypothesis of a lawless sub-nature, and the
., interact with a host institution, identify an industrialsponsor and spend six weeks away from home is more than most faculty in the midst of theiracademic careers are likely to undertake. If global interaction experience with other cultures isan opportunity to be provided to US engineering students greater levels of tangible support mustbe made available through university, government and industry leadership. In addition theremust be greater recognition and reward for faculty to take on the sizeable responsibility requiredto conduct such programs. It then becomes a matter of priorities as to where resources will be orshould be allocated in educating our future engineers for US industry to be competitive andsuccessful in what has become a global
sensitiveCapability? 1. RASCL will be neat if all the bugs are figured out in advance. 2. Use of LabVIEW significantly limits the uses of device because of the price, and it can't be used widely without the full license. It cannot be used but in class projects. 3. Need a cover or case to prevent the board being destroyed. 4. The highest frequency the function generator can reach. 5. Higher sampling rate and bandwidth. 6. More functions, such add a digital dial on the function generator. 7. Isolation circuit does not operate properly. What is the most you would pay for a system like this if it were used in several classes over the course of your undergraduate career? (Note: An engineering
are playing an increasingly important role in research and Page 22.98.13design (8, 10, 16 23, 33). Although programming languages will come and go, the ability 12 to think algorithmically is a skill that engineering undergraduates will need, not only infor their first job, but throughout their 40+ year career (9, 10, 30, 32). It is thereforeimportant to teach algorithmic thinking as a critical thinking skill.In this paper we have proposed Coding to Think as an extension of Writing to Think, andIdea to Code as a practical way for students to learn Coding to
example, therace to the moon coincided neatly with the original Star Trek television series. The interchangebetween creative work and technical development is especially fun to examine in the field ofartificial intelligence, where there are many examples ranging from Isaac Asimov stories toWall-E to intelligent artificial agents within many games.The course goals of AI & SciFi include 1) presenting students with a fun opportunity to improvetheir writing, 2) exploring the social impact of the field of AI, 3) preparing students to deal withethical questions that will arise in their professional careers, 4) connecting students to thebroader culture of the technical community, 5) exploring connections between creativity in artsand in computer
promote the development ofcreativity skill in their students. Traditional engineering curricula is focused mostly in technicaldevelopment; 13 this practice has shown a decreasing level of creativity in students rather thanincrease while they are moving forward in their career. The teaching of idea generation(ideation) methods could enhance the student’s designer creative capacity; this has been shownby multiple research studies14,15,12 . Learning about ideation methods can tackle creativedeficiencies. Although various Ideation Methods exist (e.g. brainstorming, mind-mapping,synectics, lateral thinking or morphological analysis16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23 ), engineering educationinstitutions as well as industry tend to prefer quick and simple methods
career choice." 1Two of the (original three) students involved in the design and development of this project havesuccessfully completed their graduate studies. Additional students have continuouslycontributed to the improvement of the project and redesign of several components and aspects ofthe apparatus.IV- Design of the Experiment and the Apparatus1. PedagogyThis project has been designed for sophomore level students. Pedagogical measures have beentaken for its realistic effectiveness (nation-wide). Therefore, the framework of the project hasbeen set at a level that sophomores may: a) succeed in its implementation and b) develop somedegree of understanding and appreciation for the optical measurement processes and potentialapplications.2
ethicalresponsibilities based on economic, environmental, ethical, social, and political constraints.Although ABET criteria provides an extrinsic rationale for addressing ethics issues inengineering education, the most compelling rationale is the omnipresent nature of ethicalissues in engineering practice for which students are preparing. The ethical problems thatengineers encounter throughout their careers influence the businesses they work for, thepublic at large, and the health and safety of society[1]. Engineering ethical problems arise inroutine engineering practice and are often integrated with technical, engineering issues.If ethics instruction is essential to the preparation of engineers, then the engineeringeducation community must determine the goals
-life jobs accuratelyand this perceived relevance of the material to future careers was also a motivator.The tasks followed a logical sequence both in engineering and chronological terms and, infact, may be viewed as one large, single, manufacturing system activity. This characteristicmeets one of the requirements of situated learning theory, i.e. that tasks provide a complex,coherent and sustained learning environment. Barab 27 points out that authenticity is providedby the dynamic interactions amongst all the components [of the virtual enterprise] and that,“authenticity is manifest in the flow itself….and not in any one feature in isolation.”To successfully deal with the indeterminate problems the students were required to frame theproblem
accomplish certain parts on my own.While another student said of Laboratory 7: This Lab applied skills that I can see myself using in my career. And allowed me to relate process control to statistical analysis of the process.There were many responses that connected a real world context to conceptual understanding asthose cited above. However, the following response indicates a student who has more difficultywith this approach: It (Laboratory 9) was the first lab where we already had an opportunity to grasp the concepts we needed to use in the lab before we started. so that instead of struggling to develop an understanding of the concepts while we were working through the lab we were able to preemptively apply our knowledge
AC 2010-1952: A NOVEL APPROACH TO PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENTRobert Reeves, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Robert Reeves graduated Magna Cum Laude in 2009 with a BS degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He will finish his MS in Chemical Engineering also from UMBC in May 2010 and will begin his career with OSIsoft, LLC. He has been working on the INSPIRES program for the last year.Julia Ross, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Julia Ross is Professor and Chair of the Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Department at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. Her technical research interests are in the area of cellular
hastwo foci, student retention and the student’s development of adaptive expertise. Student RetentionResearch points to a need to see the relevance of studies to the real world1 as one of four keyreasons for minority-STEM students’ decision to drop-out or transfer out of STEMundergraduate fields of study. The need to relate their studies to the real world results becauseminority students lack an equitable number of career influencers and role models within theirfamilies and familiar networks. Thus, when minority students select STEM fields of study, they Page 15.397.2experience an immediate need to confirm the relevance and compatibility of
at four important areas: the student’sexposure to engineering design throughout their undergraduate career, the student’s perception ofengineering design in verbal and visual form, the qualities of a good engineering designer, andthe important topics to be covered in an engineering design course.The purpose of the sources identified prior was to generate the overall list of qualities and topicsshown in the tables within the instrument. The first list was created using the interview results.This list was then expanded upon using curricular requirements. The combination of theinterview results and curricular requirements were identified as the most important of the listsince they would reveal that the students were meeting the course
years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 5. Atkinson, M. P. (2001). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Reconceptualizing scholarship and transforming the academy. Social Forces, 79 (4), 1217-1230. 6. Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73 (1), 94-122. 7. Barbe, Walter B. , Milone, Michael N., Jr. (1980). Modality. Instructor, 89, 44-47. 8. Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995, November/December). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Education, 13-24. 9. Barrows, Howard S. (2000). Problem-Based Learning
relevant to engineering educators, and (ii) “hard disciplines [e.g.,engineering] place greater importance [than soft disciplines] on student career preparation andemphasize cognitive goals such as learning facts, principles and concepts [i.e., content]”12. Alarge percentage of engineering faculty members still believes that “subject knowledge” is theonly criteria for becoming an effective teacher in engineering institutions.Emergence of for-profit employers in faculty developmentDuring the last decade in India, major employers of engineering graduates have observed in theirrecruitment drives that while thousands of students graduated with an engineering degree, onlyabout 20% or less, were really “employable” directly. An analysis revealed that the
Page 21.16.7anecdotal notion that Africa is richly endowed with natural resources, many students at this stagein their academic career have little knowledge about their countries’ minerals resources and haveno idea where and how to access such information. In the US we often tell our students that thechallenge today is not lack of information, but how to use the ever-abundant information. For theAUST students, however, access to information was nontrivial. Library resources (physical plusonline) were extremely limited, access to the computer lab was restricted, and the availablebandwidth often made downloading a formidable task. In spite of the challenges above, thestudents’ response to the course was positive overall, as captured in this
in their careers.2-7These and many other reports and studies have also addressed questions about what specifickinds of attributes are important for the so-called “global engineer.” For example, one forward-looking NRC report published in 1999 outlined a “global engineering skill set” with four mainitems: “(1) language and cultural skills, (2) teamwork and group dynamic skills, (3) knowledgeof the business and engineering cultures of counterpart countries, and (4) knowledge ofinternational variations in engineering education and practice.”3 Many other authors and groupshave since compiled or created their own partially unique lists of attributes, and other efforts ofthis type are ongoing.9-22 Accreditation guidelines and curriculum reports
professional registration, and hencenationwide recognition based on common standards.While the UK system mainly targets those teaching at university level, within the EuropeanUnion the focus is on all those involved with teaching technical, engineering-related subjects.The International Society of Engineering Education (IGIP) at their headquarters in Austria hascreated a training program open to all “teaching teachers”. Participation is voluntarily and oftenused as a means of continuous professional development to support career development.Successful completion of their program leads to professional registration as ING-PAED IGIP(International Professional Engineering Educator). IGIP, together with SEFI, the EuropeanSociety of Engineering Education
skill and content knowledge that exists forinstance when you have an elementary teacher, a middle school teacher and a high school teacherbringing their specific expertise and background to a workshop. It was an introduction in manycases to differential instruction.Faculty members have also benefited from their exposure to K-12 outreach activities byintegrating their experiences and lesons learned into their research grants, especially NSF. Forexample, an asst. professor from Mechanical Engineering who has been involved in our roboticsoutreach activities was recently received an NSF CAREER award that integrates K-12 outreach,and another professor has a new NSF CCLI grant that includes a high school component as afollow on to the Finding NANO
generous grant fromHewlett Packard Philanthropy Page 10.773.10 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education"BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION1. ASEE (1995). Educating tomorrow’s engineers. ASEE Prism, 11-15, May/June.2. Dahir, M. (1993). Educating Engineers for the Real World. Technology Review, pp. 14-16, Aug./Sept. 1993.3. Hissey, T. W. (2000) Education and Careers 2000. Proceedings of the IEEE, 88(8), 1367-1370, August.14. Astin, A. W. (1993). Engineering Outcomes. ASEE Prism, 27-30, September.4
ofknowledge as being the primary purpose of lectures: what is now regarded as leading-edgeknowledge will soon become out of date, irrelevant, and perhaps even incorrect. This isparticularly true in technical fields. Even the entire current body of knowledge will not, in itself,be sufficient to see the students of today through careers that may span the next 40 years.Clearly, students will need to keep learning throughout their professional lives. They will alsoneed to be able to solve problems that do not currently exist and may be beyond currentimagination. For these reasons, universities should move towards an emphasis on problem-solving, understanding of fundamental principles, flexibility, adaptability, and lifelong learningand away from an