, 2022[3] ASEE Corporate member Council (2020), 2020 Survey of skills caps in recent engineering graduates ASEE report https://www.google.com/url?q=https://workforcesummit.asee.org/wp- content/uploads/2021/10/CMC- ebook.pdf&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1644180043555958&usg=AOvVaw1vrp1s7kv3Cx a8uay2mHnN accessed February 6, 2022[8] Marasco, E. A., & Behjat, L., & Rosehart, W. D. (2015, June), Integration of Gamification and Creativity in Engineering Design Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24334[9] Mahmud, Z., & Weber, P. J., & Moening, J. P. (2017, June), Gamification of Engineering Courses Paper presented at 2017
. (2012). Conducting educational design research. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Springer. http://dspace.ou.nl/handle/1820/4034McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2018). Conducting educational design research. Routledge.Newhouse, W., Keith, S., Scribner, B., & Witte, G. (2017). National initiative for cybersecurity education (NICE) cybersecurity workforce framework. In NIST special publication 800- 181. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19962Paar, C., & Penzl, J. (2010). Understanding cryptography. Springer.Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Distributed scaffolding: Helping students
, J.C., Small, M.J., Shonnard, D.R., Hokanson, D.R., Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Sorby, S.A., James, V.U., Sutherland, J.W. and Schnoor, J.L., “Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline.” Environmental science & technology, 37(23), pp.5314-5324, 2003.3. Brundtland, G.H., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S. and Chidzero, B., “Our common future.” New York, p.8, 1987.4. Haapala, K. R., Zhao, F., Camelio, J., Sutherland, J. W., Skerlos, S. J., Dornfeld, D., Jawahir, I. S., Clarens, A. F., and Rickli, J. L., "A Review of Engineering Research in Sustainable Manufacturing." J. Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 135 (4): 041013, 2013.5. Nidumolu, R., Coimbatore P. K., and
detail byNazempour et al [4]. During the SBP, scholars from cohort I and II were paired withundergraduate ambassadors who guided the cohorts through academic, professional, and socialquestions as they became acquainted with the university and their major.Due to COVID-19 pandemic, Summer Bridge Program for cohort III was held virtually viaZoom, in Spring 2021. During this 2-hour online workshop, cohort III scholars becameacquainted with the program, faculty mentors, and some of the cohort I and II scholars. Therewas also a Q/A session for cohort III scholars to ask their questions to scholars of other cohortsand the program faculty.Faculty Mentorship Program. To ensure all scholars have access to resources and feel supported,each scholar was
for Advanced Self-Powered Systems of Integrated Sensors and Technologies (ASSIST) 2:30 – ERC Directors Panel Q&A John Bischof, Director, Advanced Technologies 3:15 PM for Preservation of Biological Systems (ATP-Bio) Saikat Guha, Director, Center for Quantum Networks (CQN) Cherie Kagan, Director, Internet of Things for Precision Agriculture Regan Zane, Director, Center for Advancing Sustainability through Powered Infrastructure
is being funded by the National Science Foundation, “Collaborative Research:Responsible Engineering Across Cultures: Investigating the Effects of Culture and Education onEthical Reasoning and Dispositions of Engineering Students” (Ethical and Responsible Research(ER2) – 2202691).References[1] Luegenbiehl, H. C., & Clancy, R. F. (2017). Global engineering ethics. New York: Elsevier.[2] Wong, P.-H. (2021). Global Engineering Ethics. In D. Michelfelder & N. Doorn (Eds.),Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Engineering.[3] Zhu, Q., & Jesiek, B. (2017). Engineering Ethics in Global Context: Four FundamentalApproaches. In American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28252[4] Borenstein, J., Drake, M. J
] I. Van de Poel, “Design for value change,” Ethics Inf. Technol., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–5, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10676-018-9461-9.[5] H. C. Luegenbiehl and R. F. Clancy, Global engineering ethics. New York: Elsevier, 2017.[6] Q. Zhu and B. Jesiek, “Engineering Ethics in Global Context: Four Fundamental Approaches,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 28252.[7] P.-H. Wong, “Global Engineering Ethics,” in Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Engineering, D. Michelfelder and N. Doorn, Eds. 2021.[8] G. Hofstede, Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. New York: Sage, 2001.[9] K. Leung, M. H. Bond, and S
a review of checkout procedures, support services,and basic Q & A on the kits.Since the Arduino Library Kits contain many parts and pieces, it would be futile to maintain theentirety of the kit, so the circulation systems manager suggested that only essential or high-costreplacement parts of the kit be counted. Without those essential parts, the Arduino kit would beincomplete, and therefore unusable. A total of 3 parts: breadboard, Arduino board, and LCDwere to be counted by user services staff members whenever a kit is returned to the library. If areturned kit had a missing or damaged essential part, the user would have to pay to replace themissing or damaged part.The circulation systems manager recommended that a loan device agreement
with program coordinators and students. A summary of the LA studentrespondent characteristics is provided in Table 1.Table 1. LA student survey respondents Institution Surveys Surveys % % % % Time as LA with with useful Eng STEM female+ URM^ (S = semester; consent data major* major Q = quarter) PublicVLgR1 155 145 13 81 64 10 46% 1S, 32% 2S, 14% 3S PrivateMedDocHi 23 16 50 100 67 6 31% 2Q, 25% 4Q PublicVLgMasters 55 41
8 20 selected by this projectTotal identified books 73 73 There were no clear patterns within the book distributor profiles of the 28 books selected orreferred to colleagues. Five of the books did not have profile data from our book distributor. The Libraryof Congress subclasses [18] assigned to the books ranged from BF (aesthetics) to U (technology), with thedistribution shown in Figure 2. Five of the books were assigned to subclassification Q (general science)and three to TA (engineering (general); civil engineering). None of the additional descriptors provided bythe book distributor bibliographers provided any clear opportunities to request additional slips
Report, 1987.[9] UNESCO, “What is Education for Sustainable Development?,” United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Sep. 06, 2016. https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development/what-is-esd[10] E. P. Byrne and G. Mullally, “Seeing Beyond Silos: Transdisciplinary Approaches to Education as a Means of Addressing Sustainability Issues,” in New Developments in Engineering Education for Sustainable Development, W. Leal Filho and S. Nesbit, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 23–34. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32933- 8_3.[11] S. C. Rea, K. Shiekh, Q. Zhu, and D. Nieusma, “The Hidden Curriculum and the Professional Formation of Responsible Engineers: A Review of
electronics courses [8]. Sharma et al. established anoperation of the d-q model of the three-phase induction motor in MATLAB/SIMULINK software[9].On the other hand, many universities developed laboratories for powering electronic and electricmachines based on hands-on experience and the availability of equipment to set up a suitableenvironment. Amreiz et al. developed an experimental modern electric machine laboratory basedon Electrical Machine Trainers (EMT) for undergraduate students [10]. Ochs and Miller presenteda successful laboratory course on power electronics and renewable energy. Students use realrenewable energy generation systems with tools such as Simulink and dSPACE DSPs in thiscourse.This paper presents the course design and structure
IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2018, pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8658944.[2] M. S. Kearney and P. B. Levine, “Role Models, Mentors, and Media Influences,” The Future of Children, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 83–106, 2020.[3] A. Abbasianchavari and A. Moritz, “The impact of role models on entrepreneurial intentions and behavior: a review of the literature,” Manag Rev Q, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 1–40, Feb. 2021, DOI: 10.1007/s11301-019-00179-0.[4] S. Zirkel, “Is there a place for me? Role models and academic identity among white students and students of color,” Teachers College Record, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 357–376, 2002.
Schedule | Udemy.” https://www.udemy.com/courses/search/?src=ukw&q=composite+manufactuing (accessed Feb. 05, 2022).
acknowledge thecorresponding author Dr. Bahar Memarian for the analysis and write-up of the research studyand Dr. Andrew Olewnik for providing resources and guidance on this work.References[1] L. Riebe and D. Jackson, “The Use of Rubrics in Benchmarking and Assessing Employability Skills,” J. Manag. Educ., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 319–344, 2014.[2] K. Elias and C. Drea, “The Co-Curricular Record: Enhancing a Postsecondary Education,” Coll. Q., vol. 16, no. 1, 2013.[3] M. Ohland, S. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. Layton, “Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 259–278, 2008.[4] G. Clark, R. Marsden, J. Whyatt, L. Thompson, and M
. Psychol. Rev. 11(4): 291-324, 1999.[5] J. Rest, D. Narvaez, M.J. Bebeau, and S.J. Thoma. Postconventional Moral Thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers, 1999[6] S.J. Thoma. “Research on the defining issues test” in Handbook of moral development, M.Killen, & J. G. Smetana, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers. 2006, pp. 67-91.[7] M.J. Bebeau and S.J. Thoma. Guide for DIT-2. Center for the study of Ethical Development.University of Alabama. 2003.[8] J. Borenstein, M.J. Drake, R. Kirkman, and J.L. Swann. “The Engineering and Science IssuesTest (ESIT): a discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment.” Sci Eng Ethics.16(2):387-407. 2010. doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9148-z[9] Q. Zhu, C.B. Zoltowski, M.K. Feister, P.M
. Zarestky, “A systematic literature review of faculty development for teacher educators,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 373-389, 2018.[10] R. A. Streveler & K. A. Smith, “Opinion: Course design in the time of coronavirus: Put on your designer's CAP,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 8, no.4, 2020.[11] W. H. Jeynes, “A meta-analysis on the relationship between character education and student achievement and behavioral outcomes,” Education and Urban Society, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 33–71, 2019.[12] R. Snieder, C. E. Holles, Q. Zhu, and C. James, “Commentary: Teach with heart!” Physics Today, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 10-11, 2023.[13] S. R. Cavenaugh, “They need us to be well,” Chronicle of
were followed by a Q&A session where fellow students and faculty provided feedback.• The Arduino activities: involved both theoretical instruction and hands-on mini projects taught by the instructor and the teaching assistant. Students were introduced to Arduino's open-source hardware philosophy, basics, and programming language, and they were provided with shared kits containing the necessary components for the mini-projects. Prior to the start of the projects, a mini tutorial was taken in class to ensure that students are able to install the Arduino software (IDE) on their personal laptops, including help with board drivers and library installation. Learning was facilitated through hands-on project work, allowing
, and permanent policies to inspire instructors to improve theirteaching quality and effectiveness. It is also essential to create a shared vision among instructorsand administrators to understand and support NEE initiatives as it makes all stakeholders benefit,which serves as the prerequisite to make excellent teaching part of a sustainable culture in thelong run.References[1] A. Wu, Y. Hou, Q. Yang, and J. Hao, “Accelerating development and construction of emerging engineering, taking initiative to adapt and lead the new economy (in Chinese),” Res. High. Educ. Eng., vol. 1, pp. 1–9, 2017.[2] J. Lin, “The construction of China’s new engineering disciplines for the future,” Tsinghua J. Educ., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 26–35, 2017
created channels,including the Demo channel in which student teams informed when they were ready for assignedproject demonstration. This Demo channel shown in Figure 2 further demonstrates TA/instructorcommunication when they would join that team channel to assess the demonstration. The secondchannel titled Q and A provided an outlet for students to post course-related queries – typicallyutilized once students broke into their team groups. Instructors have enthusiastically noted zerodrop-off in desired team objectives using this interface. Figure 2. MS Teams subchannels utilized for ENGR 111.2.2 Active Experimentation under Remote Instruction ConditionsFor the conventional ENGR 111 iteration, the Cornerstone Project consisted of
theChallenge. These students are trained by CPCP to work with an elementary teacher and a team of third tofifth grade students. Training includes an overview of characteristics of eight- to ten-year-olds, tips onhow to work with students (for example: leading them to discoveries and conclusions without telling them“the answer,”), and suggestions for working with teacher-coaches.Once the Challenge commences, mentors meet weekly both with their assigned team and with CPCP staffand fellow mentors. Sessions include a check-in of team progress, additional tips, and a Q&A to givementors appropriate support. Mentors then complete pre- and post-surveys of the project, which will betterenable us to refine their role and training for subsequent
development,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 469–494, 2012.[18] A. Mazzurco, B. Jesiek, and A. Godwin, “Development of global engineering competency scale: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis,” J. Civ. Eng. Educ., vol. 146, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000006.[19] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. K. Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, and A. D. Mead, “The development of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decisionmaking in project-based design teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods.,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.[20] M. W. Ohland et al., “The comprehensice assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a
Education, 80(3), 571-587.[17] Zhang, Q., & Kozak, K. (2019, June). Quick Understanding Our Engineering Faculty ResearchNeeds Using Topic Modeling. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[18] Rolim, V., de Mello, R. F. L., Ferreira, M., Cavalcanti, A. P., & Lima, R. (2019, July). IdentifyingStudents' Weaknesses and Strengths Based on Online Discussion using Topic Modeling. In 2019 ieee19th international conference on advanced learning technologies (icalt) (Vol. 2161, pp. 63-65). IEEE.[19] Ramesh, A., Goldwasser, D., Huang, B., Daumé III, H., & Getoor, L. (2014, June). UnderstandingMOOC discussion forums using seeded LDA. In Proceedings of the ninth workshop on innovative use ofNLP for building educational applications (pp. 28
sampling techniques," Int. J. Appl. Res., vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 749–752, 2017, Accessed: Jul. 08, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.allresearchjournal.com.[30] R. Winkle-Wagner and D. L. McCoy, "Feeling like an 'Alien' or 'Family'? Comparing students and faculty experiences of diversity in STEM disciplines at a PWI and an HBCU," https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248835, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 593–606, Sep. 2016, DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2016.1248835.[31] M. Q. Patton, "Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry A Personal, Experiential Perspective," Qual. Soc. Work, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 261–283.[32] D. L. Liddell, M. E. Wilson, K. Pasquesi, A. S. Hirschy, and K. M. Boyle, "Development of professional
., Tang, L., Zhong, Z., & Cao, Q. (2020). Transit Traditional Face-to-Face Teaching to Online Teaching during the Outbreak of COVID-2019. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 355–362). 9
, “Comparing first-and third-person perspectives in early elementary learning of honeybee systems,” Instr. Sci., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 291–312, 2020.[17] H. W. Park, M. Gelsomini, J. J. Lee, and C. Breazeal, “Telling stories to robots: The effect of backchanneling on a child’s storytelling,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, 2017, pp. 100–108.[18] J. Martínez-Miranda, H. Pérez-Espinosa, I. Espinosa-Curiel, H. Avila-George, and J. Rodríguez-Jacobo, “Age-based differences in preferences and affective reactions towards a robot’s personality during interaction,” Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 84, pp. 245–257, 2018.[19] Y. Kim, J. Thayne, and Q. Wei, “An embodied agent helps anxious students
their major. Nazempour et al. [4] provide more details regarding the SBP structure,execution, and assessment.Summer Bridge Program for cohort III was held virtually via Zoom in the Spring of 2021 due tothe COVID-19 pandemic. During this 2-hour online workshop, cohort III of scholars becameacquainted with the program, faculty mentors, and some cohorts I and II scholars. There was alsoa Q/A session in that cohort III scholars asked questions from scholars of other cohorts andfaculties.Mentorship Program. To ensure that all scholars have access to resources and feel supported,each scholar was assigned to a faculty mentor from the academic department corresponding tothe scholar's major. Cohort I and II scholars were assigned to their faculty
theory to the analysis of classroom interactions: Mediating micro-identities, macro-kinds, and ideologies of knowing," Linguistics and Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 291-310, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2009.08.001.[28] N. Li, Q. Wang, J. Liu, and V. J. Marsick, "Improving interdisciplinary online course design through action learning: a chinese case study," Action Learning: Research and Practice, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 49-64, 2022.[29] T. Wartenweiler, "Teachers’ experiences of spirituality in Swiss secular high schools – an interpretative phenomenological analysis," Journal of Beliefs & Values, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 414-429, 2022/10/02 2022, doi: 10.1080/13617672.2021.1985901.[30] C. Wood, M. D
students' identification with engineering. Paperpresented at the Frontiers in EducationConference (FIE), 2010 IEEE.[6] Tonso, K. L. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world.Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 273-307.[7] Pierrakos, O., Beam, T. K., Constantz, J., Johri, A., & Anderson, R. (2009). On the development of aprofessional identity: Engineering persisters vs engineering switchers. Paper presented at the Frontiers inEducation Conference, 2009. FIE'09. 39th IEEE [8] Patrick, A., & Borrego, M. (2016, June). A Review of the Literature Relevant to Engineering Identity.In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference,.[9] Li, Q., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J
actively contribute regardless of their academic disciplines or institution, andencouraged new ideas from diverse voices and perspectives outside of previous opportunityspaces9. Participants had significant opportunities to engage with staff members for advice duringthe ideation phase.Throughout the event, interns participated in technical talks from various staff, many of whomwere junior staff that presented their areas of work/research and facilitated a Q&A immediatelyfollowing their presentations. Students were able to then use these topics to inspire their topics,provide students exposure to new technologies, and provide networking opportunities with staff.Technical talks listed below with asterisks were topics that directly helped to