AC 2011-1160: VIRTUAL WORLD TECHNOLOGIES PROVIDE PLAT-FORM FOR INTERACTION BETWEEN ON-CAMPUS AND ONLINE STU-DENTS: A CASE STUDYCharles J. Lesko, Jr. Ph.D., PMP, East Carolina University Dr. Charles Lesko is currently serving as Assistant Professor in the College of Technology & Computer Science at East Carolina University. His career focus is on managing and leading technological innovation in the workplace; his past experiences bring to the table a heavy technical background with a strong management and technical leadership base. Dr. Lesko has over (15) years of experience in the systems integration and project management fields; his experience base also includes military service and (8) years in academia. He
carrying out design project work.There is nothing novel about portfolios, or the student use of them; they have been usedextensively in evaluating teaching17, student learning1,24, and for professional development7,14,15.The novelty here is in the purpose for which I require students to use portfolios in an InteractionDesign course: to tell the backstory of their design projects. Kees Dorst9, the design educator,researcher, and practitioner, emphasizes how this backstory characterizes expert design work:“When you design, you are actually creating two things in parallel: the design itself and the storybehind it. This story consists of all the choices you have made during your design project and thearguments that you used in making them. It is the
the Space Coast of Florida (National Center,aerospace) will capitalize upon that growth. The state currently needs 2,000 to 5,000 automotivetechnicians; this number is expected to grow annually as the number of vehicles and theircomplexity increase5-8. Projected growth for automotive technician occupations in SC isexpected to be 8% for the period 2008-2012.1.1.1 Automotive Industry Page 22.1418.3The current automotive industry in South Carolina is strong and thriving with more than 275automotive-related companies located in the state, from Original Equipment Manufacturers(OEM) to an expansive Tier One and Tier Two network of suppliers. This
Secondary Level Engineering Education Numerous K-12 engineering initiatives have emerged across the U.S.1 These initiativeshave generated considerable interest within the science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) education community and beyond. Potential positive outcomes includeenhanced student achievement, increased awareness of engineering, and increased levels oftechnological literacy.2 However, a recent study of engineering-oriented teacher professionaldevelopment projects detected some significant concerns.3 One disturbing finding was the lackof a well-defined concept base. In the absence of a conceptual foundation, pre-collegeengineering tends to focus on engaging design-based activities without an appropriate
“Fundamentals of Electrical Energy Systems Engineering” is envisioned to − Equip graduating engineers for day-to-day life relating to energy − Stress basic energy fundamentals, generation, utilization, environment − Be tailored to local needs and placed in the program according to local requirements • There should be mechanisms such as project courses for students to develop a system of systems approach – for example, projects involving power, power electronics, communication and computation. • Incorporation of a system of systems approach should be encouraged in capstone design courses. • A second course in “Energy System Design” is envisioned to − Provide the ability to understand and design
‟ recollection on this general level are exhausted, a more specific manifestationof the emotional indicator could be useful, such as: “Thinking back to your project team meetings, was there a particular time when you felt overwhelmed by the design task?”In both cases, the triggers would need to be developed from the context and the teacher‟sexperience of the course to target aspects that were likely to have constituted a significantlearning moment. The pathways indicated by the arrows in Figure 1 illustrate furtherexplorations of the space with resulting triggers on various levels of specificity. As describedabove, the triggers can be used in any of the existing formats for structured reflection, rangingfrom on-line portfolios to in-person
Naval Ship and Development Center, Eglin Air Force Base, Bell Aerospace Textron, and EDS, among others. She served as the principal investigator and test director for infrared detectability assessments for the U. S. Navy’s Amphibious Assault Landing Craft Program, as editor for operations manuals for the Navy’s Special Warfare submarine delivery vehicles, and as associate program director for projects in electronic countermeasures and radar detection of submarine towed arrays. Her graduate studies in the area of high-resolution spectral analyses of Jovian decametric radiation, leading to a Ph.D. from the University of Florida, also included extensive field work in the installation and operation of observing stations
purchasing the computer board andsoftware that accompanies the lumped mass apparatuses (which in this case was primarilydeveloped for controls laboratory experiments), a world-class analyzer (that also requires a PCand includes computer software for instrumentation) was purchased so that the sensors andanalyzer can be used by students and faculty for research projects. This created hybrid vibrationmeasurement apparatuses that combine the best combination of turnkey and custom systems.Another advantage with the hybrid approach is that the analyzer can also be used for acousticalmeasurements. A disadvantage is that the PC software that controls the analyzer is not userfriendly, and requires substantial setup time by the instructor. The laboratory
AC 2011-1863: BIG: UNITING THE UNIVERSITY INNOVATION ECOSYS-TEMDouglas E. Allen, Bucknell UniversitySteven B. Shooter, Bucknell University Steve Shooter, Ph.D., P.E. is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Bucknell University where he has taught for design, innovation and robotics for 16 years. He has published over 90 peer-reviewed papers and been PI or Co-PI on grants from NSF, ONR, NIST, ARDEC in addition to industry. As a registered professional engineer he also consults extensively with industry on design projects and formulation of innovation strategies. Page 22.287.1 c
that an average of 300 seatsare filled in geotechnical analysis and design courses each year.The geotechnical engineering program within the CEEN Department is directed by two full-timefaculty and by one part-time lecturer who practices geotechnical engineering in the San LuisObispo area. Each of the geotechnical courses are well supported by members of theprofessional community who serve as guest lecturers and participate in the development andevaluation of student design projects.2.2 Undergraduate InstructionThe faculty of the geotechnical engineering program believe that laboratory-based instruction isessential for aspiring civil and environmental engineers. Therefore, five of the ten geotechnicalengineering courses offered by the CEEN
schools with co-opprograms), industry supported capstone projects, employment following graduation, andfinancial support for industry related projects and research to name a few.This paper establishes some strategies for gaining access to industry and developing relationshipswith industry representatives. It is these relationships that will prove to be most valuable.II. Some Ground RulesBefore establishing a relationship with a potential industrial partner, it is most important that afew necessary rules be understood. Once you have worked with your industrial partners andestablished an unwritten mutual benefit agreement, which will be discussed later in this paper
as the “equipment mini-grant” to spend on resources and equipment for their classrooms to aid in the delivery andimplementation of their learning modules. The proven model for this learning module is the Legacy Cycle Module11 based on theresearch findings of the VaNTH project group. The Legacy Cycle lesson format consists of sixstages 1) a challenge question, 2) generate ideas, 3) multiple perspectives, 4) research and revise,5) test your mettle, and 6) go public. The cycle is based on current learning theory presented inHow People Learn: Mind, Brain, Experience, and School6. During the summer research institute,a one-day Legacy Cycle workshop was provided to the teachers. The workshop provided theframework for the teachers to develop
AC 2010-361: A CASE STUDY OF A THERMODYNAMICS COURSE:INFORMING ONLINE COURSE DESIGNSimin Hall, College of Engineering at Virginia Tech Dr. Simin Hall is a Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech and Polytechnic Institute. Her applied research in education is focused on cognitive processes and motivational factors in problem solving in computationally intensive courses such as engineering using online technology. Prior to joining ME at Virginia Tech, she completed a collaborative research project between the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, College of Engineering at Texas A&M, and Department of Sociology at University
AC 2010-462: LABORATORY INNOVATIONS IN UNDERGRADUATE CONTROLENGINEERING EDUCATIONAhmed Rubaai, Howard University Ahmed Rubaai received the M.S.E.E degree from Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, in 1983, and the Dr. Eng. degree from Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, in 1988. In 1988, he joined Howard University, Washington, D.C., as a faculty member, where he is presently a Professor of Electrical Engineering. He is the Founder and Lead Developer of Howard University Motion Control and Drives Laboratory and is actively involved in many projects with industry, while engaged in teaching, research and consulting in the area of artificial intelligence and motion controls. His
. Theyhave not experienced the laws of probability, because very improbable things havebecome commonplace to them. When I first saw “Mission Impossible”, having beentrained as an engineer, I had to laugh out loud, as a complicated device, built withouthaving been tested, functioned perfectly the first time! My sophomore students have tobe retrained in the way they build projects, so that they test each part of the deviceindividually before incorporating it in the overall project. This is now necessary in orderto overcome their expectation that everything will work perfectly the first time they tryit. In other words, they need to learn, by experience, “Murphy’s Law”. One of theprojects I assign in lab is to build a Rube Goldberg machine, which is a
presents results from apreliminary study conducted to examine the partnership’s effectiveness for preparing teachersand engineering students to interest middle school students in engineering.About TEK8TEK8 attempts to address a projected long-term shortage of talent in the engineering field and animmediate problem of too few women and minorities engineers. These problems have twoassociated challenges: career awareness and preparation. On the career awareness front, studentsin K8 have relatively few opportunities for genuine exposure to engineering that mightencourage them to consider the field as a viable future course of study and career path.Engineering generally does not garner the media attention and television focus commonly givenother
Paper ID #6261Nuclear Workforce Development Scholarships and Enhancements ProgramPhase I: Outreach and RecruitingDr. Hayrettin B Karayaka, Western Carolina University Hayrettin Bora Karayaka, PhD Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering Western Carolina University Department of Engineering and Technology Belk Building 339 Cullowhee, NC 28723 Bora Karayaka is an Electrical Engineering faculty at Kimmel School, Western Carolina University. With his over ten years of industry experience, he has extensive experience in project management, and a clear understanding of deadlines, industry requirements, safety and
(eitherimplicitly or explicitly) that the public does not understand or appreciate engineering becausethey are uninformed or misinformed and that, consequently, the provision of more information(in the form of scientific literacy or the benefits of engineering) will lead to increasedunderstanding and support for engineering. In that way, such initiatives are enactments of thedeficit model. The deficit model (DM) is a term from the field of Science and TechnologyStudies (STS) used to describe initiatives/projects that are based upon a belief in the public’slack of knowledge and scientific literacy and seek to remedy it by providing more, and correct,information. However, a large body of literature has now identified significant problems with thedeficit
Paper ID #6352Three Training Programs for Preparing Undergraduates to Conduct ResearchDr. Susan L. Burkett, University of Alabama Dr. Susan L. Burkett earned the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Univer- sity of Missouri in Columbia, Missouri in 1985, 1987, and 1992, respectively. She joined the University of Alabama in 2008 as the Alabama Power Foundation Endowed Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering. From 2005 to 2007, she served as program director at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education. She has funded research projects with the National
and engage students while bringingreal-world context to the classroom. Students can extend the concepts and theories from class byworking with robots in lab or as part of a project or competition. Robots can be used as ateaching tool across the educational spectrum.Related LiteratureA review of the Engineering Education literature reveals that robots have been and continue tobe used as teaching tools in Kindergarten-12 (K-12) and undergraduate engineering curriculums.In K-12 environments it can be seen that robots are predominantly used to teach concepts andtheories related to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics or STEM as it iscommonly referred to in the literature 2-8. In the realm of undergraduate engineering we find
projects focused on enhancing institutional capacity to foster environments that recruit, retain, develop, and compensate a thriving faculty. Her scholarship focuses on organizational environments and faculty pathway experiences. She serves on the editorial board of the Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Case Study: Impediments to achieving systemic changes to support diversity, equity, and inclusion in the engineering professoriateAbstractCurrent diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in engineering colleges largely focus onsystemic changes to improve the recruitment of women of Black, Hispanic, and Native Americanethnic
, OntarioAbstractSurveys of bioengineering facilities within the bioeconomy highlight a limited diffusion ofsocio-technical knowledge and expertise about new innovations at the pilot and demonstrationscales, compared to technical knowledge. To improve on this, it is critical to develop awarenessamong new technology developers about different stakeholders within the bioeconomy, as wellas about the non-technical impacts of their work within a broader context. This paper describes aworkshop with graduate bioengineering researchers. The use of system mapping tools forimproving socio-technical knowledge diffusion at their bioengineering institute are evaluated.Participants were asked to describe the impacts of their research projects on non-technicalstakeholders using
evaluate the use of AIthroughout the experimentation process, including the literature search, interpretation of pastwork, data analysis, and manuscript review.This project seeks to advance AI literacy across diverse educational contexts and to provide aninstructional opportunity to establish an equitable understanding about the application of AI,regardless of the level of an individual’s prior exposure. The materials will be designed to beapplicable in any course where students pair research with quantitative data analysis. This work-in-progress paper presents the theoretical models and existing research that will inform thecreation of the AI literacy learning outcomes and framework. This paper uses research on AIliteracy and competencies across
Engineering Education, and the Associate Department Head for Inclusive Research and Education in Mechanical Engineering. She is also a co-founder of Black in Engineering. Her research involves the quantification and integration of human-centered considerations in engineering systems and/or the design process. Her research program has received funding from the National Science Foundation, Procter & Gamble, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, and many others. Her projects that involved the intersection of diversity and mechanical engineering have been featured in media sources including National Geographic, NBC’s Today Show, Essence Magazine, Reuters, National Public Radio and many others. A highly sought
PlanningAbstract In the Fall of 2023, a team of STEM Librarians initiated a year-long research project,funded by their library, to examine students’ perceptions of their own information literacy skillsand assess their actual competencies. The study focused on both undergraduate and graduateSTEM students through an online survey designed to capture retrospective and targetedquestions regarding key areas such as information retrieval, evaluating sources, thinkingcritically, and citing accurately. The survey contained forty-three questions and was structuredinto eight sections: demographics, general information literacy perception, information sources,information seeking/retrieval, evaluating sources, critical thinking, citation management
. Engineering design 7. Entrepreneurship 8. Experimenting and testing 9. Individual learning 10. Intercultural understanding 11. Question posing 12. Spoken communication 13. Systems thinking 14. Written communicationIn their work, [10] analyzed survey data from nearly 1,600 alumni of a STEM-centric highereducation institution outside of the US and derived a list of methods of teaching and learning(e.g., lecture or project), matching them to the development of each skill based on surveyresponses. They also matched each method of teaching and learning to forms of teaching andlearning as formulated by [11] (e.g., receiving directions from an instructor or working withothers). This effort allows the matching of a 21st century skill to
. (2020), whichfocused on how emotional awareness and empathy can foster inclusive learning environments. Theauthors argued that developing students' emotional intelligence can improve their collaborative skills ingroup projects and help them navigate diverse teams more effectively. The methodologies employed across the papers varied widely, reflecting the interdisciplinarynature of research on inclusive engineering education. Many studies adopted qualitative approaches toexplore the experiences and perspectives of students and educators. For example, Stansberry et al. (2023)used a systematic mapping study to synthesize existing research on place- and land-based learning. Theirmethodology involved analyzing trends and patterns across a
appropriately challenged and supported in theirjourney to construct meaningful knowledge. This combined approach not only deepensunderstanding but also creates an inclusive, equitable classroom environment where everystudent can thrive. By blending differentiation with inquiry, educators empower students to takeownership of their learning and succeed at their own pace which is an essential skill to teachstudents early on in STEM education, where diverse learners must grasp abstract and complexconcepts. Figure 3 – Clicker projected in class accompanying the simulation shown in Figure 2. Students can use the embedded hyperlink on PhET logo or use their phone camera to scan the QR code to access the simulation and answer the clicker. Simulation by PhET
use of active learning, recognizing “that true learning resultsfrom doing things and reflecting on the outcomes, not from passively receiving information.” [1,p. 111] In design education specifically, Project-Based Learning (PBL) has become the de factostandard approach of active learning across engineering curricula [2]. Its success, however,depends on student motivation - without it, students may struggle to engage fully, potentiallylimiting the positive outcomes of the pedagogy.The key feature of active learning is that it is learner-centred and therefore places moreresponsibility on the student than teacher-centred methods. Past research has described severalbarriers to student engagement with innovative active learning approaches
any negative experiences surrounding group research [8].Hyldegård [8] conducted a study on group experiences during information-seekingand determined that the ISP model applies in several areas in a group setting.When using the ISP model to examine group based research, it is important toconsider group dynamics and behavior.According to Hyldegård [8], interviews, observations, and project analysis, led theresearcher to the conclusion that the “turning point” resulting from grappling withfrustration did not fully evolve in the group setting. A combination of group andindividual learning experiences helps to provide a variety of opportunities forstudents to work through all the stages of the ISP.MethodologyThe current investigation is part of