Collection

2006 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Day Radebaugh; Kurt A. Soschinske; Glyn Rimmington; Mara Alagic

the uncertainty, ambiguity and complexity12. Presentationof the question can be unrealistic as well. For example, the options can be stated in a closedfashion, suggesting that there is a single right answer; alternatively, the question can be stated asa dilemma, which would imply there is no good answer. Neither format does justice to thenuanced character of the real situation. A survey of current implementations of case-based onlineethical learning suggest the following set of best-practice approaches: (a) presentation of thecase, followed by a set of alternatives, which explore the options in the form of a decision-tree,(b) detailed discussion and commentary on these options, (c) the ability to comment or vote onthe various alternatives, (d

Collection

2010 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Vijay Kanabar; Robert Schudy

students with online and telephone technicalsupport, and student services support within the classes. Near the end of each course we conduct a formalanonymous student course evaluation. The evaluation results are a primary input into the course updateplanning process, as we begin the next update in the quality cycle of continual course improvement.To summarize, our framework of online education involves three parameters that we seriously invest in a)instructional technology, b) teaching techniques, and c) policy and procedures. Modern, effective, anduser friendly communication and collaboration tools are essential to a successful online class.Models for Online TeachingTraditional Class Room involves “Same Time, Same Place” interactions. We know

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 19

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Pooneh Sabouri, New York University; Shramana Ghosh, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Abhidipta Mallik, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Vikram Kapila, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

, Padova, Italy, p. 27-34.6. Amy, E. (2014) “Educational robotics theories and practice: Tips for how to do it right,” in Robotics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, IGI Global: Hershey, PA, p. 193- 223.7. Mehul, B. (2014) “Reasoning about space, actions, and change: A paradigm for applications of spatial reasoning,” in Robotics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, IGI Global: Hershey, PA, p. 315-349.8. Ortiz, A.M., et al., (2015) “The power of educational robotics as an integrated STEM learning experience in teacher preparation programs,” Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(5): p. 42- 47.9. Bers, M.U. and M. Portsmore, (2005) “Teaching partnerships: Early childhood and

Conference Session

Professional Skills and Teaming in Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tehya Stockman, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Claire Elizabeth Kincaid, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Thomas Andrew Heale, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Steven Eric Meyer, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Alexandra Coso Strong, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Perspectives, 1–50.3 National Academy of Engineering (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. National Academies Press.4 Coso, A. E. (2014). Preparing Students to Incorporate Stakeholder Requirements in Aerospace Vehicle Design. Georgia Institute of Technology.5 Lattuca, L., Trautvetter, L. C., Knight, D., & Cortes, C. M. (2011). Working as a Team: Enhancing Interdisciplinarity for the Engineer of 2020. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Vancouver, BC.6 Anderson, K. J. B., Courter, S. S., McGlamery, T., Nathans-Kelly, T. M., & Nicometo, C. G. (2010). Understanding engineering work and

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Whalen, Northeastern University; Susan F. Freeman, Northeastern University; Jennifer Ocif Love, Northeastern University; Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University; Joshua L. Hertz, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

presents the results of faculty who have been teaching with our first year program forthree years or more and have been involved in cornerstone planning and teaching. The effect ofcontinual course improvement is exemplified in several cases presented here. Looking atindividual instructor scores from the University-administered student perception survey data, wesee the story of how capital improvements and the feedback has aided in teaching effectivenessscore improvement. For instructor A, we see a large jump in teaching score with the completionof the learning center between arrows 1 and 2. Looking at the specific case of Instructor B, wesee that with any first time teaching a course there is a drop in the students’ scoring of teachereffectiveness

Conference Session

FPD 1: Projects and Teamwork in First-Year Courses

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diana G. de la Rosa-Pohl, University of Houston (CoE); Stuart A. Long, University of Houston (CoE); Casey Goodwin, University of Houston Honors Engineering Program

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. Therefore, it appeared that students were able to grasp the basic concept of the two’s complement number representation, but more practice and feedback needed to be provided to ensure that students fully understood the concept. Changes will be made to future offering of the course to address this issue. Two's Complement Exam Items 100% Class A 90% Class B 80% Percentage Correct 70

Conference Session

Assessment Issues II

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Vikas Yellamaraju; Richard Hall; Nancy Hubing; Ralph Flori; Timothy Philpot

offoundational knowledge. In addition, they responded to the following four questions using a 9-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly disagree” and 9 = “strongly agree”). a. I learned a great deal of information from the multimedia tutorials. (learning) b. I found the multimedia tutorials to be very motivational. (motivation) c. The web tutorials were effective in aiding me in recognizing how much I know and don't know about this topic. (metacognition) d. I found the navigational scheme for the web tutorials to be logical and easy to navigate. (usability-navigation)They were also asked to provide open-ended comments to support their responses to each ofthese items and to provide additional comments on the software effectiveness

Conference Session

Global Roles and Societal Responsibilities of Engineers

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

YiXiang Shawn Sun, National Taiwan University; Sharon Tsai-hsuan Ku, University of Virginia; Jongmin Lee, University of Science and Technology; Sean Michael Ferguson, CSUCI

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

Paper ID #38993Cultivating ”global competency” in a divided world: A collaborative autoethnographyof the cross-border curriculum designYiXiang Shawn Sun, National Taiwan UniversityDr. Sharon Tsai-hsuan Ku, University of Virginia Dr. Sharon Ku has dual background in physics and STS, specializing in the sociology of scientific knowledge, standardization, and science policy in the US and China. She works closely with scientists and engineers from academia, government and industry. Dr. Ku received her PhD from History & Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University in 2010, and is currently an assistant professor at Dept. of

Conference Session

Research Methodologies – Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xingchen Xu, Arizona State University ; Li Tan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

generates compare estimates than the Bayesian method for some modeling parameters,the Bayesian approach produces substantially improved results for the standard deviationestimates of the relationship effect (𝜎𝑟 ), the autoregressive coefficient of the relationship effect(𝛽𝑟 ), the correlation between target and perceiver effects (𝜌𝑝𝑡 ), and the correlation betweenreciprocal ratings (𝜌𝑟 ). All our qualitative conclusions from Panel A holds for Panel B as well.Nevertheless, when the overall sample size has increased, the differences between the Bayesianand SR-SEM methods become smaller, due to the impact of the prior distribution beingweakened with a larger sample.Table 3Simulation Results Panel A: 15

Conference Session

Student Approaches to Problem Solving: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacob Preston Moore, Pennsylvania State University, Mont Alto; Joseph Ranalli, Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton Campus

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

eighteen in thethermodynamics class. To have a basis for comparison, data was also collected from two otherengineering science classes (with the same instructor and at the same institution as the masterybased dynamics class). Each of these classes enrolled six students.Table 2: Overview of Research ParticipantsCourse HW Grading Campus Instructor Number of Consenting System ParticipantsThermodynamics Mastery Campus A Instructor A 16Dynamics Mastery Campus B Instructor B 5Thermodynamics Traditional Campus B Instructor B 6Strengths

Conference Session

New Approaches and Applications to Enhance Technological Literacy - Part II

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thalia Anagnos, San Jose State University; Becky Carroll, Inverness Research, Inc.; Shannon Weiss, David Heil & Associates, Inc.; David R. Heil, David Heil & Associates, Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

. a) b)Figure 3. a) A model of the bridge constructed of chain and metal segments exaggerates the motion of thebridge. b) When a visitor twists and pulls down on the center span area, the resulting torsional vibrationmode mimics that caused by the wind. (credit: S. Lani (a) R. Reitherman (b))Tracking the Daily Movement of the Bridge – This exhibit is not currently installed. In 2013 itwill be installed at base of the bridge and at the nearby Exploratorium discovery museum. AGPS device at the center span of the Bridge tracks its movements. This GPS signal is capturedand plotted for visitors. Figure 4a shows the cyclical up and down movement of the bridge eachday as it expands and contracts

Collection

1996 Annual Conference

Authors

Kristin A. Young; Masoud Rais-Rohani

--- $iifii’ > 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘.Sample of Libraries on the Internetdh3>LC4a> - Library of Congress VL4a> - The WWW Virtual Library -di>ASE4a> - Aerospace Engineeringdli>41 >4ul> Figure 2-b. The HTML source code of the document shown in Figure 2-a.Description of the Home Page Complex The home page complex contains five sections with each devoted to a major topic discussed in thecourse as outlined in Figure 1. Directory of the major topics, with information as to which chapters in thetextbooks they correspond to, are shown at the beginning so the student can easily identify and hyperlink to anyparticular topic he or she wishes to study

Conference Session

Girls in Engineering

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Linda S Hirsch, New Jersey Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

further studies in STEM?Eighty-three percent (84%) of the parents whose daughters returned for the summer of 2017reported that their daughters’ grades in mathematics and science had improved since attendingthe FEMME program in 2016. A few of the comments include; • My child's grade in science improved after attending NJIT last summer. She went from a B student to an A+ student. • She had B's last year and now she has all A's • She was placed a grade ahead in 7th grade math even though she is a 6th grader. Her grades did go down first term but are going back up.Seventy-four percent (74%) of the parents reported that their daughters’ attitude towards theirmathematics and science classes improved since attending the FEMME program in 2016. A

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jon Sticklen, Michigan Technological University; Natalie Green, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

degree program as incubators for eventual spin off to a new engineering degree programs in their own right; that is the likely case for our Systems Engineering program. Our program emphasizes (a) systems thinking and (b) low fidelity systems modeling, and developing competencies in (c) communication, (d) problem solving in a collaborative team, (e) professional leadership, and (f) a selection of courses to fulfill college and university requirements that cover a system. This paper also describes the beginning of a community-wide survey of U.S. Systems Engineering programs to test the hypothesis that the systems engineering academic community in the US lies along a linear axis with: (A) one

Conference Session

Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nadia Kellam, University of Georgia; Ashley Babcock, University of Georgia; David Gattie, University of Georgia-Athens

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Without this link topractice, this research will not help move the field forward.Bibliography Page 13.1225.111. Vogt, C. M., Hocevar, D., & Hagedorn, L. S. (2007). A Social Cognitive Construct Validation: DeterminingWomen's and Men's Success in Engineering Programs. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 337-364.2. Hall, R. M. & Sandler, B. R. The classroom climate: a chilly one for women? Project on the status andeducation of women, Association of American Colleges, Washington, DC 1982.3. National Science Board. (2006). Science and Engineering Indicators Volume 1. Washington, D.C.: NationalScience Foundation.4. Byrne, Eileen M

Conference Session

Design Project Based Learning

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Choate, Western Kentucky University; Kevin Schmaltz, Western Kentucky University; Joel Lenoir, Western Kentucky University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

similarity rules for a pump family. For geometrically and dynamically similarpumps operating under different conditions A and B, dimensional analysis and the resulting Rvariables can be used to develop the following ratios or similarity rules for the pump head, H,volume flow rate, V% , and brake horsepower, bhp: 2 2 H B Ã yB Ô Ã DB Ô ?Ä Õ ÄÄ ÕÕ (10) H A ÄÅ y A ÕÖ Å DA Ö Page 13.282.6

Collection

1996 Annual Conference

Authors

Pieter A. Voss; James M. Tien; Anil K. Goyal

recognition that this is a special case. 3. Illustrative Example As an example of employing the risk-analytic approach to Engineering Economy, consider that $9,000can be invested in three mutually exclusive alternatives: A, B and C. We assume that there are three mutuallyindependent variables (namely, the constant annual cash flow over the project life, the length of project life, andthe effective interest rate) associated with each of the three alternatives. We further assume a discreteprobability distribution for each of these variables. The probability distributions of these variables are identifiedin Table 1. Table 2 shows that the present worth of each of these three projects is not a single

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Omar Ashour, The Pennsylvania State University, The Behrend College; Faisal Aqlan, Penn State Behrend; Paul C. Lynch, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

first attempt questions while also testing the same concepts. Figure 2 shows an example oftwo questions from the first and second trial of the second quiz. The quizzes also involvequalitative questions. The student will not receive grade points for these quizzes until he/shesuccessfully solves the quiz questions or finish the trials. Successfully solving a quiz is definedas achieving at least a B grade in any trial. After the initial attempt, students are awarded areduced credit for successive retakes as shown in Table 2. Table 1. Breakdown of Topics in the Engineering Economy Course Topics Teaching

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

David Hailey; Christine Hailey

. Page 6.1054.8 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2001, American Society for Engineering EducationREFERENCES1. Milton-Benoit, J., Grosse, I. R., Poli, C., and B. P. Woolf, “The Multimedia Finite Element Modeling and Analysis Tour,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 87, No. 5, 1998, pp. 511-518.2. Al-Holou, N., “Development and Delivery of an Electroscience Curriculum for the Greenfield Coalition,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 87, No. 5, 1998, pp. 599-604.3. Bailey, J.D., et al., “CBL in Engineerng: Students’ Use of a Learning Resource on Phase Diagrams,” Computers in Education, Vol. 25, No. 1-2, 1995, pp. 75-80.4

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Geoff Swan; S P Maj; D Veal

check these changes against expectations based onbandwidth considerations.This is in line with parts of Constructivist theory that is based upon enabling students tobuild increasingly complex scaffoldings of understanding upon their current scaffolding. TheZone of Proximal Development, (ZPD) which is the phase at which a task can be masteredgiven appropriate support. 24 Benson notes that “Vygotsky 23 claimed that the larger the zonethe better students will learn in school” 2 Matching leaning tasks within student’s ZPD is animportant part of the teaching process from a constructivist viewpoint.3. The B-Node ModelA new pedagogical model has been developed to enable students to compare and contrastPCs with different internal components using

Conference Session

K-12 Robotics

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mercedes M McKay, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Susan Lowes, Teachers College/Columbia University; Devayani Tirthali, Institute for Learning Technologies, Teachers College, Columbia University; Elisabeth W McGrath, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Jason Sayres, Stevens Institute of Technology; Karen A DUPE Peterson, EdLab Group

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

) but low at Formal #1. Table 3: Student ratings for enjoyment (Largest percentages at each site highlighted in green) Formal #2 Formal #1 Informal #2 Informal #1 (n=67) (n=135) (n=165) (n=48) A+ 54% 33% 64% 56% A 18% 19% 18% 17% A- 9% 15% 7% 17% B+ 4% 12% 3% 2% B

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - DEI and Design Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Lucian Alexander P.E., Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Michael Preuss, Exquiri Consulting, LLC; David Hicks; Breanna Michelle Weir Bailey P.E., Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Rajashekar Reddy Mogiligidda, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Lihua Zuo, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Mahesh Hosur

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

),Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (3 teams of 4 or 5 students), and Industrial Technology (3teams of 4 students). Project team distribution in preceding years has been described in previouspublications about this undertaking [16-18].In the 2023 SBP, the engineering design projects that were assigned to the student teamsincluded (a) solar-powered pump system, desalination, and municipal water supply alternatives,for three Chemical and Environmental Engineering groups, (b) computational design of a trussbridge for two Civil and Architectural Engineering groups, (c) building and programming a line-following robot for one Electrical Engineering and Computer Science group, (d) plastic partdesign and 3-D printing for three Mechanical and Industrial

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Assorted Topics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Simin Nasseri, Society of Manufacturing Engineers; Mohammad Jonaidi, Kennesaw State University; Navid Nasajpour Esfahani, Georgia Institute of Technology; Ralph Schultz, Kennesaw State University

Paper ID #36712Lean Practices in Academia; A Comprehensive Review and aNew Provisional ModelSimin Nasseri Dr. Simin Nasseri is a full professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering at Kennesaw State University (Former Southern Polytechnic State University). She obtained her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Sydney University, Australia, where she worked as a senior research associate. She has more than twenty five years of academic/industrial experience and has obtained many patents, and published many book-chapters, journal and conference papers. Her research areas include Rheology and

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nikhith Kalkunte, University of Texas at Austin; Maura Borrego, University of Texas at Austin; Lindsey McGowen, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Madiha Qasim, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

;0.05) differences gender identities was too small to be between paired groups of responses, i.e., undergraduate students answered differently from faculty (a) and graduate students reported independently by gender (e.g., answered differently from staff (d). B) Mean score by role and non-cis men, non-cis women, etc.) without gender. Differences between cisgender male and all else are jeopardizing respondent confidentiality. significantly (p<0.05) different for each role. We did calculate means separately for cis- men, cis-women and individuals who

Conference Session

Continuing Professional Development Division (CPD) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer S Linvill, Purdue University; Eric Holloway, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Emily M. Haluschak, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Evelyn Shana Marx; Breejha Sene Quezada, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Tamara J Moore, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development Division (CPD)

, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 41-55, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00828.x.[9] Å. Cajander, M. Daniels, and B. R. von Konsky, "Development of professional competencies in engineering education," in 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011: IEEE, pp. S1C-1-S1C-5.[10] D. C. Montgomery and W. H. Woodall, "An Overview of Six Sigma," International Statistical Review, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 329-346, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751- 5823.2008.00061.x.[11] R. Bray and S. Boon, "Towards a framework for research career development: An evaluation of the UK's Vitae Researcher Development Framework," International Journal for Researcher Development, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 99-116, 2011, doi

Conference Session

Outreach, recruiting, and retention

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alicia A. Modenbach P.E., University of Kentucky; Sue E. Nokes, University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

Biological & Agricultural

generated (in the space) represents human and animal heat production. Sources of heat Three sources of heat produced by humans and animals: production a) Basal Metabolic Rate: summation of heats from all chemical and mechanical processes that must occur to sustain life at a very low level; b) Food ingestion heat production; and c) Heat produced by movement. Basal Metabolic Rate This relationship has been summarized in an equation: BMR = 3.39m0.75 BMR = basal metabolic rate (W) m = body mass (kg)Design guideline 5

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa L. Larkin, American University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

posed to the students werecollectively worth about 9% of their exam score and were presented to them as follows:Question 1. The force on a dropped apple when hitting the ground depends upon A) whether or not the apple bounces. B) the speed of the apple just before it hits. C) the time of contact with the ground. D) … all of the above. E) … none of the above.Question 2. As was demonstrated in class, if you throw a raw egg onto the floor, it will break. However, if you throw it with the same speed into a soft, sagging sheet, it won’t break. Carefully explain the significance of the sagging sheet in terms of keeping

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan R. Parkinson, Brigham Young University; Spencer P. Magleby, Brigham Young University; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

-15, 200713 Parkinson A. R., Harb J. N., Magleby S.P., Pate C., “Extending our Reach: What We HaveLearned in Two Years of Engineering Study Abroad Programs”, Proceedings of the 2008 ASEEAnnual Meeting, Pittsburg, PA.14 http://www.iie.org/Research-and-Publications/Open-Doors/Data/US-Study-Abroad/Fields-of-Study/2003-1415 Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, 2004 and 2014 Editions,American Society of Engineering Education16 Warnick G. M., Magleby S. P., Nelson B. E., “Developing a Pervasive, College-wideApproach to Integrating Achievement of Global Competence into the Curriculum,” ProceedingsASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Paper AC 2012-4834, San Antonio, TX, June 11-13,2012.17 Jesiek, B. K., Shen, Y

Conference Session

Making, Hacking, and Extracurricular Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ethan Hilton, Georgia Institute of Technology; Megan Tomko, Georgia Institute of Technology; Wendy C. Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology; Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University; Julie S. Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflectthe views of National Science Foundation.References[1] T. Barrett, M. Pizzico, B. Levy, R. L. Nagel, J. S. Linsey, K. G. Talley, et al., "A Review of University Maker Spaces," presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Seattle, WA., 2015.[2] V. Wilczynski, "Academic Maker Spaces and Engineering Design," in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015, pp. 1-19.[3] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, "Leaving Engineering: A Multi‐Year Single Institution Study," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, pp. 6-27, 2012.[4] M. Galaleldin, et al. , "The

Collection

2019 ASEE Zone I Conference & Workshop

Authors

A. Richard Vannozzi; Leonard Anderson

pg. 11 Table 13. Weighted ranking of presentations. Generalize Topic Weighted Score Count Presentation A Civil Design 45 20 B Civil Design 38 18 C Civil Design 25 14 D Civil Design 23 15 E Civil Design 13