Conference Session

Design and Research in BME

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Breanne Przestrzelski, Clemson University; John D. DesJardins, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

for the team’s innovation: Assurefit- a chest tube stabilization device. Breanne found her drive for innovation and fascination with design during the development of this technology and seeks to equip students with this same drive through experiential learning.Dr. John D DesJardins, Clemson University Dr. John DesJardins is the Robert B. and Susan B. Hambright Leadership Associate professor in Bioengi- neering at Clemson University and the director of the Frank H. Stelling and C. Dayton Riddle Orthopaedic Education and Research Laboratory at CUBEInC. He received his BS in Mechanical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University, his MS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, and his Ph.D. in

Conference Session

Assessing Social Responsibility & Sustainability

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark H Minster, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Richard A House, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Patricia Brackin P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Corey M. Taylor, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

“knowledge is a gift bestowed by those who consider themselvesknowledgeable upon those whom they consider to know nothing” 34: Page 26.1696.3 a) the teacher teaches and the students are taught; b) the teacher knows everything and the students know nothing; c) the teacher thinks and the students are thought about; d) the teacher talks and the students listen—meekly; e) the teacher disciplines and the students are disciplined; f) the teacher chooses and enforces his choice, and the students comply; g) the teacher acts and the students have the illusion of acting through the action of the teacher; h) the teacher chooses

Conference Session

Flipped Classrooms in Mechanics

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luke S. Lee P.E., University of the Pacific; Rachelle Kisst Hackett, University of the Pacific; Hector Estrada, University of the Pacific

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

(Eal = Determine the displacement of end C with 70 GPa) each having a diameter of 12 mm. respect to the fixed support at A. If the rod is subjected to the axial loadings at A and at B, determine the displacement of end A with respect to the fixed support at C. Neglect the size of connections at B and C, and assume that they are rigid. If the beam is subjected to a shear force of V If the beam is subjected to a shear force of V = 100 kN, determine the maximum shear

Conference Session

Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Taylor Sharpe, Portland State University; Geng Qin, Portland State University; Gerald W. Recktenwald, Portland State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

curriculum.III. Resultsa. Student Response Following the device’s deployment, a short supplemental questionnaire was added to theexisting Physics with Calculus Workshop evaluation sheet. It was comprised of two questions:“Did working with the device change your experience in the workshop? Please explain.” and“Did the device help you understand where the physics formulas come from? Did the devicehelp you understand how physics formulas interact together?” The survey is available inAppendix B. Because the workshop allows students to be absent during one of the nine meeting times,and because the final meeting during which the evaluation sheet was administered occurredduring the week before final exams, attendance in both PIM workshop sessions

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tobias Rossmann, Lafayette College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

factors elements of the catastrophes. Sincethis was only a one-unit course for first-year students (where typical first-year courses are threeor four units), in-class participation, outside reading, and short writing assignments were the onlyrequirements. Typically, two or three writing prompts were given for each topic. Writing promptstypically focused the students on the both the societal implications of catastrophes [A-typequestions] as well as the personal ethical issues [B-type questions] that a practicing engineermight face. Examples include: • [A] When US companies work in a global marketplace, whose laws prevail? Who takes Page

Conference Session

Fundamental: Tools and Content for K-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jale F. Akyurtlu, Hampton University; Otsebele E Nare, Hampton University; Lumumba Harnett, University of Kansas

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

: Figure 3: Truss Free Body Diagram The overall force balance is: Based on the symmetry of the truss:An independent equation for the determinate truss structure example is given by: 2j = n + 3 [13]. FAB A Joint A: ƩFX=0 FAD+FABcosƟ=0 FAD ƩFY=0 RA+FABsinƟ=0 F/2 Joint B: ƩFX=0 -FABcosƟ + FBCcosƟ=0 RA ƩFY=0 -F/2-FABsinƟ-FBCsinƟ-FBD=0 B Joint C: ƩFX=0 -FCD-FBCcosƟ=0 FBC

Conference Session

Aerospace Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Antonette T. Cummings P.E., Purdue University; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

configuration of a helicopter for a given mission. 12. The student shall plan for flight test of total performance of a helicopter. 13. The student shall measure performance of a helicopter in a flight test. Page 26.840.10 B. Tool - Mapping the Learning Objectives to Bloom’s TaxonomyThe front cover of the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy provides a table in which to map the learningobjectives of a course so as to assist in crafting appropriate teaching and assessment strategies.The numbers in Section III.A and the abbreviations EU, IMP, and FAM to represent EnduringUnderstanding, Important-to-Know, and Good-to-be-Familiar-With concepts

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Priscilla J Hill, Mississippi State University; Yaroslav Koshka, Mississippi State University; Tonya W. Stone, Mississippi State University; Brenda Lee Kirkland; Rani W. Sullivan, Mississippi State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

determine the level ofknowledge and interest regarding CNTs and their nanocomposites. In the fall 2014 semester, atotal of 39 students participated in this exercise. After reading the excerpts from the journalarticle, preliminary results indicate that (a) 60% of the students reported an increase in their knowledge level regarding nanoparticles and their composites. (b) 22% of the students reported an increase in interest regarding nanotechnology.Outreach ActivitiesFrom support of the NUE grant, new nanotechnology-related activities are being developed andintegrated into the previously formed NanoClub outreach program as part of an NSF BRIGEGrant (NSF-CMMI 1032637). In 2011 the NanoClub was developed as a weekly afterschooloutreach

Conference Session

Concurrent Paper Tracks - Session II

Collection

2015 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Russell D Jamison, Virginia Commonwealth University

Tagged Topics

International Forum

students a global framework for design thinking – a potentially useful skill as preparationfor professional practice in the global economy of the 21st century.Pilot StudyIn the summer of 2014, three undergraduate biomedical engineering students from VirginiaCommonwealth University (VCU) spent two months at u r b a n a n d provincial clinics andhospitals in Nicaragua (two students) and Tanzania (one student). They were part of a co-hort of students selected by Engineering World Health (EWH), an international NGO head-quartered in Washington, DC, to participate in their Summer Institute Program.The students spent their first month in an orientation program, conducted by EWH staff. Thisin-country program provided language and culture immersion, along

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qichao Wang, Virginia Tech; Montasir Abbas P.E., Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

the correlation between each factor. Avisual display of the number of times a student played (surrogate for engagement), student’s finalscore in the class (surrogate for their learning capacity), and game level (surrogate forinformation intensity) is shown in Figure 6. It can be observed in the figure that the engagementof students with a final score of less than 80 (C students) had a different pattern from studentswho have a final score that surpassed 80 (A and B students). This is one preliminary finding ofthis research and could be interpreted as that less prepared students (e.g., C students) foundequivalent stimulation in all levels of the game, whereas better prepared students could only bestimulated by levels of the game that provided

Conference Session

Delivering Value in Publishing and Scholarship

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David E Hubbard, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

engineering faculty attitudes and practices. Journal of Library Administration, 51(5-6), 432-454.4. Laakso, M., & Bjork, B.-C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10(1), 124. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741- 7015/10/1245. Bhat, M. H. (2009). Open access publishing in Indian premier research institutions. Information Research, 14(3). Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/14-3/paper409.html6. Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Goerner, B., Darby, R., Hyppoelae, J., Igo-Kemenes, P., Kahn, D., Lambert, S., Lengenfelder, A., Leonard, C., Mele, S., Polydoratou, P., Ross, D., Ruiz-Perez, S., Schimmer, R., Swaisland, M

Conference Session

Circuits and Systems Education 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Braun, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

-Bass, 1996.8. C. Bazerman, J. Little, et al., Reference guide to writing across the curriculum. West Lafayette: Parlor Press, 2005.9. J. Froyd, A. Watt, & J.M. Williams, “Writing to Design/Designing to Write: Using the Correlations between Communication and Engineering to Improve Student Reflection,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Paper AC 2002-692.10. J. C. Anderson, D. W. Gatchell, B. Shwom, S. Benjamin, J. A. Lake, “Embedding communication in an interdisciplinary project-based upper-level engineering design course,” Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper 7845, Available: www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/7845

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Elizabeth Bumbaco, University of Florida; Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

them to think? New Dir. Teach. Learn. 1980, 11–31 (1980).14. Paul, R. W. Critical Thinking: Fundamental to Education for a Free Society. Educ. Leadersh. 42, 4 (1984).15. Walsh, D. & Paul, R. W. The Goal of Critical Thinking: from Educational Ideal to Educational Reality. (1986).16. Mason, M. Critical thinking and learning. Educ. Philos. Theory 39, 339–349 (2007).17. Ennis, R. H. A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. (1987).18. Watson, G. B. & Glaser, E. M. Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal: Manual. (Psychological Corporation, 1980).19. Beyer, B. K. Practical strategies for the teaching of thinking. (Allyn and Bacon, 1987).20. Paul, R., Niewoehner, R. & Elder, L. The thinker’s guide

Conference Session

Continuing Professional Development Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gustavo Lopez, Universidad de Costa Rica; Francisco Cocozza, CITIC; Alexandra Martinez, Universidad de Costa Rica; Marcelo Jenkins, University of Costa Rica

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

first part of the questionnaire was “Do you feel able to...? (a) Give atalk on the topic, (b) Explain the topic to a teammate, (c) Correctly apply the topic in your work,(d) Understand literature or talks on the topic.” This question measured the trainee’s perceptionof his ability to apply the new knowledge studied in the course (i.e., mastery of the topics). Wehad to convert the answers to this multiple-choice question into a 5-point numeric scale in orderto be able to compare them with the answers to the first question. For this, we assigned a value of5 to the “Give a talk on the topic” choice (meaning greater ability), a value of 1 to the “Under-stand literature or talks on the topic” choice (meaning lowest ability), and for the two

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Curricular Programs

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenahvive K. Morgan, Rowan University; Mario J. Leone, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

serves as a basefor learning how to build a circuit where errors in creating the circuit can be easily corrected. Page 26.605.5 F E C B A DFigure 1: An LED Circuit with (A) LM555 Timer Integrated Circuit, (B) 1.8MΩ Resistor,(C) 270Ω Resistor, (D) 22KΩ Resistor, (E) LED, (F) 10nF capacitor, with wires connectingthe electrical components on the breadboard.The 555 IC was placed between the bottom and top half of the breadboard, and the capacitor wasplaced towards the top of

Conference Session

Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert A. Ross, University of Detroit Mercy

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

operational procedure and base the assessment on an explanation of what onewould expect to happen if the experiment were performed or why the apparatus acts the way itdoes. For simplicity we only show 5 learning outcomes that are operationally based and brieflydiscuss the assessment of the first two. Many of the assessments used in this work are taken oradapted from Ref 1. The student will: (a) develop operational definitions of electrical charge; (b) explain the evidence for the existence of only two types of charge; (c) determine if a material is a conductor, a dielectric, or a photoconductor; (d) apply Coulomb’s law to systems of charged objects; (e) identify charge transfer mechanisms;...Examples of the

Conference Session

Focus on the Classroom: Novel Approaches to Course Delivery

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Peter Vogt, Salt Lake Community College

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

P 4 4 AXC = 28.3in2 Ip = 127.2in TFigure 2: Example clip from a pre-lecture video showing how students can identify stress elements andsolve for the stress elements. Step 3: Construct Mohr’s Circle Step 1: Draw Axes A Step 2: Find Center Step 3: ID Point A Step 4: ID Point B x1 Step 5: Draw Circle Step 6: Use Circle Geometry to Solve B

Conference Session

Construction Education Topics

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saeed Rokooei, University of Nebraska, Lincoln ; James D. Goedert, University of Nebraska

Tagged Divisions

Construction

to an online survey after completion of the mainsimulation. They answer a set of questions and rate their perception of parameters before andafter intervention for different construction subjects including construction process, materialsand equipment methods, estimating, planning and scheduling, cost analysis and control, andsafety on a five-point Likert scale.RESULTS Ninety-nine students, including 73 high school and 26 college students, participated inthe test during 2013-2014. Seventy three percent had no previous experience with virtuallearning. While previous publications (Goedert et al., 2012; Goedert et al., 2013 a & b; Rokooeiet al., 2014) showed the effectiveness of VICE using the actual performance of VICEparticipants

Conference Session

Technical Session: Student Experience & Perspectives

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

the community of DBER.” (participant B)Some members have a community within their own major, “We tend to interact fairly frequently,in lab groups,” (participant F), “A lot of it is informal, like talking in the hallways, or stoppingby someone else’s office, it’s not always formal,” (participant B) while others do not have thatluxury, “there’s no one else who does [redacted] education and that’s partially why we startedthe group” (participant A). For many members, the DBER meetings are their main source ofcommunity with other educational researchers. Page 26.298.4PracticesMeetings include sharing educational research practices and critiquing

Collection

2015 ASEE Zone 3 Conference

Authors

Ali Salehnia

Data were presented. Also, thetypes of data each approach has to deal which were discussed. The security issues in each model werepresented. The operational issues such as scale, performance, and availability of data by utilizing these databasesystems were also compared.References[1] “Big Data: Volume, Velocity, Variability, Variety”,http://nosql.mypopescu.com/post/6361838342/bigdata-volume-velocity-variability-variety, AccessedApril 2015.[2]. B. Wiederhold, ”18 essential Hadoop tools for crunching big data”, Network World,www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html. Accessed April, 2015.[3]. A. K. Zaki, “NoSQL Database: New Millennium Database for Big Data , Big Users, CoudComputing and Its Security Challenges,”http://esatjournals.org/Volumes/IJRET

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 8: Project-based Learning and Cornerstone Courses

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University; Justin J Henriques; Sancho Sequeira

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

transitioning from high school to college and into the engineering community.   b) Understanding the efficacy of a high impact intervention within the redesign of this cornerstone course for the purpose of aiding students in their academic careers and enhancing student learning.       Page 26.509.3    Engineering Opportunities Course Structure    The structure of the Engineering Opportunities course draws inspiration from the modelof seminars, colloquium, and tutorials. Like a seminar, during class students often prepareand present their original work for discussion and critique. In the style of a colloquium,the

Conference Session

Computer-Based Tests, Problems, and Other Instructional Materials

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dongdong Zhang, Prairie View A&M University; Xiaobo Peng, Prairie View A&M University; Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University; Deniz Eseryel, North Carolina State University; Uzair Nadeem, Prairie View A&M University; Atiq Islam, Prairie View A&M University; Deron Arceneaux, Prairie View A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

models shown inFigure 1(b) and 1(c) were designed for students to work in groups. (a) (b) (c) Figure 1. Screencast homework models In Fall 2014, students in the experimental section were divided into nine groups. Each groupincluded about six students. Among these six students, each were assigned with one of the twotags: "tag A" for generating a screencast and "tag B" for providing comments. Students withdifferent tags took turns in the activities they completed. For example, in the second screencasthomework, students with tag A generated and posted their screencasts, while students with tag Bviewed the screencasts and provided feedback to the

Conference Session

Circuits and Systems Education 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University; Stephen Keith Holland, James Madison University; Brian Groener, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

benefitsand opportunities to students, and allow students the chance to better prepare themselves for theworkforce.Circuits and Instrumentation CourseThe ENGR 313 – Circuits and Instrumentation course at James Madison University introduces studentsto the fundamentals of circuit analysis and instrumentation topics. The course covers fundamental DCand AC circuits and analysis techniques and instrumentation while providing exposure to commonelectronics equipment and laboratory tools through laboratory investigations. Specific course outcomesand the relation to ABET criteria (a, b, e, and k) are detailed below. Upon successful completion of thiscourse, students will be able to: 1. Develop and solve mathematical models of multi-component circuits using

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 12: Teaching and Advising Students in that Critical First Year

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jess W. Everett, Rowan University; Maria Perez-Colon, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Page 26.693.2information about courses and registration procedures, and ensuring that students enroll in thecorrect courses. Developmental advising encourages a two-way relationship with the advisor andstudent working together to help the student make his or her own decisions. Praxis is a hybrid ofprescriptive and developmental advising. Based on their study of millennials, the authorsrecommended dual advising where a professional advisor provides prescriptive advice and amentor, such as a faculty member, provides developmental support. According to Wiseman andMessitt, institutions using faculty advisors should provide specialized support.7 Faculty report (a)advising training helps them use their teaching skills in an advising setting and (b

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ravi P. Ramachandran, Rowan University; Liang Hong, Tennessee State University; Sachin Shetty, Tennessee State University; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Richard J. Kozick, Bucknell University; Robert M Nickel, Bucknell University; Robi Polikar, Rowan University; Ying Tang, Rowan University; Steven H Chin, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #11459DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A BIOMETRIC IRISVERIFICATION SYSTEMDr. Ravi P. Ramachandran, Rowan University Ravi P. Ramachandran received the B. Eng degree (with great distinction) from Concordia University in 1984, the M. Eng degree from McGill University in 1986 and the Ph.D. degree from McGill University in 1990. From October 1990 to December 1992, he worked at the Speech Research Department at AT&T Bell Laboratories. From January 1993 to August 1997, he was a Research Assistant Professor at Rutgers University. He was also a Senior Speech Scientist at T-Netix from July 1996 to August 1997

Conference Session

Community Engagement in Engineering Education Projects

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University; Guanghsu A. Chang, Western Carolina University; Paul M. Yanik, Western Carolina University; Chip W. Ferguson, Western Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

monitoring the performance of thestudents participating in the mentorship program. This will be done in the future tocomprehensively assess the efficacy of all the different components of the overall mentorshipprogram proposed in this paper. Outcomes of the mentorship program will be assessed over thenext two years. Furthermore, benefits of the program to senior and junior students (studentmentors) who may be mentoring the sophomore or freshmen students will also be evaluated inthe future in order to seek possible means of improving the model proposed in this paper.References1. DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., Cooper, H., 2002, “Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs forYouth: A Meta-Analytic Review,” American Journal of Community

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Tactical Approaches to Entrepreneurship Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Gettens, Western New England University; Harlan E Spotts Jr., Western New England University; José Antonio Riofrío, Western New England University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

? b. Is your position supported by a. What is your team's angle? findings from users? b. What is your team's framework in c. Is it a distillation of the findings? stating a POV? c. Is it user-centered, need-based and d. Is this applicable outside of one colorful interview? Page 26.1208.16 insightful? 2. Who says? a. How valid is your team's POV? 3. What's new? 4. Who cares

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David O. Olowokere, Texas Southern University; Abayomi Ajofoyinbo Ph.D., Texas Southern University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

.5. The teaching style presented in this framework is significant in engineering education as it may create a practice-oriented learning environment.6. This framework may be implemented in engineering departments of colleges/universities.(ii) Self-compensation of sensor measurementsTo ensure that data used for classroom demonstration of engineering concepts (or principles)realistically represent measured phenomenon, there is a need to deploy sensors that havecapability for self-compensation of measurement data. In this paper for example, wired/wirelesssensor that incorporates (a) one energy storage component (e.g., temperature/pressure sensors),and (b) two energy storage components (e.g., accelerometers) are considered. To improve the

Conference Session

Best Paper Presentations

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gwen Elizabeth Ellis; Cecilia Dianne Richards, Washington State University; Brad R. Thompson, Washington State University; Robert F. Richards, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

lab.Comparison of lab reports produced by students who performed the virtual lab to those producedby students performing the experiment physically in the lab showed few discernable differences.References1. V. J. Nickerson, J.E. Corder and J. Chassapis, “A Model for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Engineering Laboratories and Simulations in Education,” Elsevier Ltd., 2005.2. B. Balamuralithara and P.C. Woods, “Virtual Laboratories in Engineering Education: The Simulation Lab and Remote Lab,” Wiley Periodicals Inc., 2007.3. M. Ogot, G. Elliot and N. Glumac, “An Assessment of In-Person and Remotely Operated Laboratories,” Journal of Engineering, pp. 57-65, 2003.4. J. Trevelyan, “Lessons Learned from 10 Years Experience with

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tanmay Gurjar, The University of Texas, Austin; Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Richard H. Crawford, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

. Iterate Iteratea The difficulty of meeting the requirements will necessitate iteration.b The difficulty of manufacturing will necessitate iterative prototyping.c My team has minimal prototyping experience.3 For a high avg, use a virtual prototype; else, use physical models. Physical Virtuala Virtual prototype(s) will require less time than a physical one(s).b Virtual modeling will validate: physics, interfaces and/or requirements.c A CAD model is needed for analysis (FEA, CFD, etc.) or manufacture.d Time & budget allow pursuit of both virtual and physical prototypes