potential improvement. This paper introduces the PPIT program and its importanceto student development, to understand the impact of the PPIT program on the professionaldevelopment of the students. Specifically, each student was asked to complete a questionnairebefore and after the PPIT program and we investigate this information for the purposes ofimproving PPIT and similar courses at other institutions. As we develop the course for nextyear, this study provides a framework that can assist in the development and improvement ofsimilar programs in other institutions going forward.INTRODUCTIONThe University of Toronto currently has a program for Ph.D. candidates in engineering to learnabout the transition from doctoral studies to academic careers
a Middle and High School Robotics Curriculum from Formal Classrooms to an Informal Learning Environment: Strategies for Increasing Impact in EachAbstractThis paper will examine a robotics curriculum that is impacting educators and youth in bothformal, middle and high school classrooms as well as in a variety of informal learningenvironments. We have made comparisons between formal and informal learning environmentsin an effort to understand the varying impacts of this novel program on student learning ofscience concepts, their skills and abilities in applying engineering design and problem-solving,and their awareness and interest in engineering careers and the individuals who pursue thesecareers. Data from teachers
Engineering Alumni Student MentoringProgram to provide much-needed help for chemical engineering Ph.D. students in obtainingindustrial employment. As in 2021, the program utilized departmental alumni as mentors andemphasized career path identification and professional development for the students. The 12undergraduate and Ph.D. mentoring circles averaged four mentoring events during the Fallsemester, followed by a Program Review and Celebration over ice cream sundaes in February.The undergraduates received resume feedback and tips on preparation for the Career Fair andlearned about a variety of careers that are available for chemical engineers. They also learnedabout the importance of soft skills on the job and ways to stand out to employers. The
procedure presented byKakaç et al. (2012) in the chapter titled “Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers” [10]. They are thenassigned a project-based learning activity in which they are told to consider themselves asengineers working for a manufacturing company hired to design and build a heat exchanger. Theyare told to be responsible for the design of this heat exchanger and that they will work inpartnership with one of his/her colleagues.The students are partnered in groups of two and they are reminded that working in teams is ahealthy habit for their careers. The off-campus students are told that this might be challenging butthis is how our society works now. They are advised to start adjusting while they are students. Theday the teammates are assigned
standard error of the model is much less than the standard deviation of theobserved engineering salaries. The derived salary profile models are then used to evaluate the net present value(NPV) of engineering graduates from the 150 top-ranked engineering colleges. The NPV and model coefficients arethen regressed against the graduate’s college ranking and entry SAT scores. The results follow expectations, namelythat improved college rankings and SAT scores correlate with higher net present values of career earnings of $1,960per ranking point and $849 per SAT point. The models have also been used to evaluate internal rates of return onengineering educationKeywords: Human capital; internal rate of return; engineering education; college rankings
, and socialization. She is particularly interested in understanding and supporting international and Latinx graduate students’ agency and persistence to navigate higher education in the United States.Samuel Asare DarkoFaika Tahir JanDr. Saundra Johnson Austin, Charis Consulting Group, LLC Dr. Saundra Johnson Austin has dedicated her career to promoting diversity, equity, inclusion, and belong- ing of elementary, middle, and high school students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and careers. Her research is grounded in the effective implementation of STEM cur- ricula in urban middle schools. She has published and presented on STEM education and organizational change. Dr. Johnson Austin
mechanical engineering students to enhance their academic success and transition them into a career in STEM.Subha Kumpaty Dr. Subha Kumpaty is a professor of mechanical engineering and program director of master of science in engineering at the Milwaukee School of engineering. Besides teaching a variety of engineering courses in both undergraduate and graduate programs, he leads the research experiences for undergraduates program sponsored by the National Science Foundation. He has led Engineering Education track of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress for more than a decade. He currently co-leads the S-STEM grant with Dr. Fertig which provides scholarships and activities to 20 diverse mechanical
M.A. in Psychological Measurement from Ewha Womans University. Her scholarly trajectory aims to improve education for underserved and un- derchallenged students with impactful research and evidence-based interventions. Longitudinal research methodology is the main area of her expertise, which has enabled her a) to investigate growth trajecto- ries of motivation and career choices; b) to identify opportunity gaps within underserved groups; and c) to evaluate and improve educational interventions in STEM. With the expertise in quantitative research methodology, she is engaged in collaborative research with entrepreneurship education and other interdis- ciplinary programs. American
course, focusing on how the incorporation of choice supports the courselearning goals. This analysis will provide insight into how choice may be leveraged withinfirst-year engineering courses to foster self-authorship, decision-making, and the development ofa Personal Action Plan.ENGR 110: Design your Engineering Experience is an introductory, two-credit elective coursethat serves the first-year engineering class at the University of Michigan. The design of thisintroductory course helps foster student autonomy as students explore the breadth ofopportunities available to engineers in both their education and careers. Students learn anengineering design process as a mechanism for making personal and academic decisions, andthrough a scaffolded
. Integrates the modern paradigm of the process of engineering for technology innovation with practice that enables the engineer to create, develop, and innovate new technology and improvements specific to his or her sponsoring company as a primary ingredient of the engineer’s advanced studies program. Provides a coherent approach for the lifelong learning of experienced working professionals through the professional master’s and professional doctor of engineering levels that enables career progression and development of leaders at all engineering levels from entry-level through chief engineer / vice Page 14.1075.3 president
engineering education. He is a Research Scientist and Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Stanford University and teaches the course ME310x Product Management and ME305 Statistics for Design Researchers. Mark has extensive background in consumer products management, having managed more than 50 con- sumer driven businesses over a 25-year career with The Procter & Gamble Company. In 2005, he joined Intuit, Inc. as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and initiated a number of consumer package goods marketing best practices, introduced the use of competitive response modeling and ”on- the-fly” A|B testing program to qualify software improvements. Mark is the Co-Founder and Managing Director of One
, educators and policy makers have expressed growing concerns over thelevels of math and science achievement among American students and the gradual decline in thenumbers of young people moving into science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)careers [1], [2], [3]. These concerns have led to the development of new standards for scienceand technology education [4], [5], [6], policy initiatives aimed at promoting science andtechnology education [7], [8],[9], and to a growing body of research on math and sciencelearning and the pathways leading to STEM-related careers [10], [11]. While the picture oflooming shortages of scientists and engineers has been challenged and recent studies haveindicated that American students are taking more science and
educational experience at BYU. Questions Specific to College of Engineering and Technology As a result of participating in this international program: 7. My view of what I might do in my career has expanded. 8. I have a better understanding of globalization. 9. I know better how to communicate across culture. 10. My leadership abilities have been increased.For convenience, questions have been re-numbered for discussion in this article. All questions, except question 6,have a seven-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 4=neither disagree or agree, 7=strongly agree) followed by anopen-ended section for specific examples.The survey was emailed to all student participants near the completion of their program as inprevious years. However
example13. Although the term “confidence” is not synonymous withself-efficacy, it can be understood as a component of it when expressed positively.Since self-efficacy is task-specific, there are many different kinds of self-efficacy. Some morecommonly investigated types of self-efficacy relevant to women in engineering are mathematicsself-efficacy 15, science self-efficacy 16, academic milestones self-efficacy 17, career decision-making self-efficacy 18, career self-efficacy 19 and agentic self-efficacy 20. Page 9.233.3Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Empowering Hispanic Engineering Students for Success in Graduate Education with Hybrid MentorshipAbstractStudents from underrepresented communities in STEM often face challenges of cultural biasesand systemic barriers that can hinder their academic and professional advancement. As thesestudents navigate their academic journey, mentorship is key to providing them with guidance,support, and a sense of belonging to overcome such hurdles. Faculty are often a source ofmentorship for setting academic and career goals, serving as a role model for attaining a career inSTEM, and finding research opportunities. However, they may not always have the bandwidth todirectly mentor
years of occupational experience, with her most recent experience being in teaching, research, and service. Dr. Ofori-Boadu is a dedicated instructor, advisor, mentor, and role model who has served over 1,500 undergraduate and graduate students. Andrea has received almost $2M from funding agencies to include the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Engineering Information Foundation (EIF), the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), the National Housing Endowment (NHE), and East Coast Construction Services (ECCS). In 2019, she received her prestigious NSF CAREER grant to construct substantive theories that explain professional identity development processes in undergraduate architecture, engineering, and
A. Henderson (”Dr. J”) is an Assistant Professor in the William A. Brookshire Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Houston. He has dedicated his career to increasing the number of students who are in the pipeline to pursue STEM careers. He believes that exposing students to STEM early will have a lasting impact upon their lives and academic pursuits. He is a co-founder of the St. Elmo Brady STEM Academy (SEBA). SEBA is an educational intervention aimed at exposing underrepresented fourth and fifth grade students to hands-on, inquiry based STEM experiments and activities. Henderson is also the Director of the Program for Mastery in Engineering Studies (PROMES), a program
25 students where theywork on open-ended problems in small groups. Co-curricular events had in-person and virtualofferings with topics that drew on expertise from alumni in industry and government asprofessional development to advance student career readiness. Table 1. Section Offerings and Enrollment in the Engineering+ Course Series for Academic Year 21-22 (AY22). ENGR 100 ENGR 102 ENGR 103 AY 2022 Sections Students Sections Students Sections Students Fall 2021 21 1520 1 100 0 0 Winter 2022 4 259 18 1536 2 103
outcomes in the context of the NSF Innovation Corps (”I-Corps”) training program. She received her Ph.D. from the Combined Program in Education and Psychology at the University of Michigan, and her Bachelor’s degree in psychology was completed at Oberlin College. Her dissertation work focused on the longitudinal development high school students’ motivational beliefs about math, English, science, and social studies. Other research interests of hers include the formation of career aspirations, the school- to-work transition, and the differential participation in science, technology, engineering, and math fields based on social identity groups such as gender and Racial/Ethnic identity.Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern
experience into the classroom teaching Analysis I, Steel I, Steel II, and the beginning Architecture Design Studios.Prof. John J Phillips P.E., Oklahoma State University JOHN PHILLIPS, a registered engineer and Professor of Architectural Engineering, practiced as a struc- tural engineer for nine years before returning to his alma mater to teach at Oklahoma State University. He teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in building structures. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Including Structural Engineering Faculty in Beginning Design Studios to act as Mentors for Architectural Engineering StudentsAbstractAs students begin their educational career, they are often
well as temporally influenced.Additionally, the concept of future self has been developed specifically in the context of theworkplace as the future work self: this type of future self is “explicitly future focused, positive,and specific to work” [16]. Because it is framed from a positive perspective, a future work selfcan begin a feedback loop of career exploration and adaptation leading to positive reinforcementof the future work self [16], [17]. A salient future work self grows from realism and vividness[16], like the more general future self. The concept of future work selves was initially researchedwithin the workplace, and it was found that observation of role models can help strengthen thesalience of a future work self [16], but the
the Department of Defense, aims to understand how near infrared light can be used to heal wounds. Outside of conducting research, Dr. Oliver is passionate about increasing diversity in STEM. She currently directs several undergraduate research programs which provide collegiate black women with the training and expertise needed to acquire jobs in the field of data science. Her passion resides in mentoring and sustaining minority students in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), by studying and evaluating the best practices for people of color who are interested in pursuing careers in research and medicine. Dr. Oliver presents nationally and internationally to student groups, major scientific
Psychology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and conducts research evaluating education and community intervention programs and investigating social issues, such as career choices related to STEM fields, social-psychological aspects of health behavior and outcomes, and safety and well-being of children and youth. She has contributed to numerous NSF-funded programs, including REU, S- STEM, SFS, LSAMP, and IRES through evaluation and social science research activities.Erika Machan Steele (Research Associate) Erika Steele earned a Ph.D. in Science Education in 2013 from the University of Alabama (UA). She currently works as a research associate at the Institute of Social Science Research at UA
development of faculty in developing and evaluating various engineering curriculum and courses at UPRM, applying the outcome-based educational framework. She has also incorporated theories on social cognitive career choices and student attrition mitigation to investigate the effectiveness of institutional interventions in increasing the retention and academic success of talented engineering students from economically disadvantaged families. She’s also involved in a project that explores the relationship between the institutional policies at UPRM and faculty and graduate students’ motivation to create good relationships between advisors and advisees. American c
Pedagogy Differences for Vocational Education Graduates transitioning to Higher Education Bachelor Degrees.AbstractCurrent research indicates that military veterans, students with a low high school score completion certificate,women and under-represented minorities are grossly disadvantaged in career advancement or career changeprospects using the higher education bachelor degree as an academic transition phase into becoming aprofessional engineer. In Australian education systems, the Vocational education systems have several post-secondary qualifications used as a developmental education to gain access to a higher education degree programfor low-social economic groups or with people that do not meet the direct entry requirements. Research in
elementary schools to promote STEM literacy, and provided in school STEM training for both teachers and students. She began her career at Rice in 2010 as a post-doctoral research fellow and then project manager in the Colvin labs. She joined the Rice Office of STEM engagement at the beginning of 2015 as Director of Programs and Operations. In her role Carolina is responsible for overseeing the program operations and the research efforts for the RSTEM group. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Promoting STEM Education in Community College Students via ResearchAbstractThe REU (research experience for undergraduates) can be a formative and beneficial
have been completed, involving severalcorporate sponsors and encompassing a wide-range of engineering topics.Results from a ninety-question participant survey revealed several perceived program strengthsand areas of possible improvement. Overall, the participants agreed or strongly agreed that theprogram had been a positive experience (4.0/4.0) and had helped them to prepare for a career inengineering (3.8/4.0). Undergraduate research activities conducted through the program havehelped the participants to understand the steps involved in research processes (3.8/4.0), toappreciate the need for a combination of analysis and hands-on skills (4.0/4.0), and to becomemore resilient toward academic challenges and obstacles (3.8/4.0). The program’s
rising high school sophomores and juniors. The focus of MSTI was how science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) are related to transportation and careeropportunities in transportation.The MSTI included hands-on activities, development of communication skills, and utilization oftechnology and skills required in today’s workforce. Field trips to the Nissan plant, MississippiDepartment of Transportation (MDOT), and the Columbus, MS Air Force Base exposed studentsto real-world applications of STEM and introduced them to a wide range of careers intransportation. The curriculum included sessions about structural systems, system illustration(CAD), transportation system layout, hydraulic engineering, environmental and water
working with Dr. Nicholas Peppas to develop carbohydrate-decorated hydrogels for oral protein delivery. She is currently serving a two year term as the National Student President of the Society For Biomaterials. Page 14.685.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Impact of Integration of Undergraduate Students in an Engineering Research Laboratory: A Case StudyAbstractParticipation in undergraduate research projects in engineering can result in lasting benefits forthe education and careers of both the undergraduate students and their graduate student mentorsand supervising professors. This
mindfulness and its impact on gender participation in engineering education. He is a Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Stanford University and teaches the course ME310x Product Management and ME305 Statistics for Design Researchers. Mark has extensive background in consumer products management, having managed more than 50 con- sumer driven businesses over a 25-year career with The Procter & Gamble Company. In 2005, he joined Intuit, Inc. as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and initiated a number of consumer package goods marketing best practices, introduced the use of competitive response modeling and ”on- the-fly” A|B testing program to qualify software improvements. Mark is the Co-Founder