AC 2009-1032: THE IMPACT OF REFLECTIONS IN SERVICE LEARNING ANDOTHER UNDERGRADUATE TEAM PROJECT LEARNINGMargaret Huyck, Illinois Institute of Technology Margaret Huyck is Professor in the Institute of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology. Her areas of expertise include adult development and program evaluation. She has been working with the IPRO Program at IIT for many years. She was a co-PI on an NSF CCLI-1 grant for adapting an EPICS Service Learning Pathway at IIT; and is the PI for a collaborative project funded with an NSF CCLI-2 grant to measure and identify best practices in multidisciplinary teamwork and awareness of ethical issues.Kristin Bryant, Illinois Institute of Technology
programsoffering themTopic %Written Communication 87Oral communication 83Engineering Ethics 76Project Planning and Scheduling 72Decision making 68Teambuilding 66Team Dynamics
communication as well as a good knowledge of information technology isneeded for preparing students to write reports and explain them in team meetings. These softskills are important to provide students with adequate knowledge in using and displaying anefficient and informed use of information technology. Others, part of the requirements forNo. 10, are intended for the professional skills of the student. These are necessary but are notlimited to project management, ethics, and leadership skills for engineers.2. Program Evaluation and AssessmentA solid assessment and evaluation should be included as part of any program. Currently,engineering programs are being assessed every six years by ABET. Criterion No. 3, which isspecific for engineering programs
if they choose to changedisciplines on their own before experiencing hardship in major-specific upper-division classes. Wecall this academic self-selection process “soft weeding.” Page 14.503.3MethodsThe MEE Department offers a first-year experience course sequence taught over two consecutivesemesters called MEE Practice I & II, which is offered in a series of 1-hour seminars. Enteringfreshmen generally enrolled in MEE Practice I in Fall 2007, and 88% subsequently returned inSpring 2008 for MEE Practice II. The semesters began with interactive ethics seminars taught bythe instructor of record for the first 4 weeks to illuminate the
real-world problem satisfies all specified project requirements, such as marketing, engineering, and constraints. 4. Evaluate the effectiveness of one's own team and other teams' designs. 5. Effectively contribute one's own disciplinary knowledge on a team as well as locate and evaluate new information. 6. Contribute to effective project management (e.g., through the use of Gantt charts). 7. Effectively communicate with others in a team, fulfilling one's individual role in the project and in interfacing with customers. 8. Employ principles of effective communication. 9. Employ ethical practices in all aspects of the design process. 10. Reflect on aspects of design and the design process.Content and experiences
: Define the problem to be solved; Step 2: Determine the design requirements; Step 3: Generate alternative design concepts. Generation of alternative designs for complex systems: design philosophy and 2 functional decomposition. Introduction to teaming - ‘Waste Ball’ (hands-on exercise). Design process Step 4: Evaluating alternative concepts Characteristics of good teams - ‘Survival’ exercise. The role of ethics - definition, case 3 studies, and professional code of ethics. Keeping a Design Notebook Major design project introduced. Design Notebook review by instructor. Design 4 competition rules and list of parts and materials presented. Design process Step 5: Detailed
perspectives and factoring in the ethical,environmental, and social aspects when delivering this content in the engineering curriculum.12Various models exist for the integration of these topics into the curriculum such as generaleducation courses, specific engineering ethics courses, and various forms of service learningopportunities.13 It is likely that a combination of these approaches will be necessary to reallydrive change in the engineering profession that starts within the university.14 Additionally,however, it is also necessary to integrate these topics directly into the core technical content ofan engineering program.15 The challenge with this approach is to find the most effectivepedagogical approaches to integrate these skills and produce a
continued to learnabout cardiovascular tissue engineering challenges by first learning how blood flows through thebody. The lesson then shifted to action potentials within the heart and how the heart contracts.Blood vessel formation and valves were then covered and how tissue engineering can positivelyaffect the cardiac field. The lecture ended with the difficulties in tissue engineering heart muscleto repair damage.Biomedical Engineering Ethics WorkshopIn the biomedical engineering ethics workshop (Figure 1F Biomedical Engineering EthicsWorkshop), students focused on understanding ethical dilemmas faced by biomedical and tissueengineers. Current questions in the field were presented, and students were asked to argue bothsides of problems such as
required to submit a written outline oftheir planned arguments and a short video introducing their topic before the in-class debates nearthe end of the semester. This activity is meant to emphasize that there are always both positiveand negative consequences of technology, an important theme particularly of the second course.Throughout the course, the instructors tried to use historical content to develop studentspreparing to enter technical professions. For example, during one class period, students workedin small groups to investigate an engineering disaster and write a short essay addressing whatwent wrong, what ethical issues surrounded the disaster, and what the effects of the disaster werein terms of changes to government oversight, societal
address uncertainty Probability and statistics At least 4 technical areas appropriate to CE Proficiency in at least 4 CE areas Experiments in at least 2 CE areas Experiments in more than 1 CE area Design in at least 2 CE contexts Design throughout CE curriculum Sustainability in design Basic Concepts: project management, business, Professional Practice Issues: Procurement of public policy, leadership work, bidding vs QBS, design/construct interaction Professional ethics Professional
experience through supplementalworkshops and seminars. Considering previous research, the Translational Application ofNanoscale Multiferroic Systems (TANMS) research center designed, implemented and assesseda comprehensive REU program to engage students in research during both the academic year andsummer months. TANMS’s REU is an eight-week research experience for undergraduates frommultiple 4-year universities and community colleges. The program components include researchin one of TANMS laboratories, seminars on ethics and diversity, workshops on entrepreneurship,and social events. These activities are woven into an experience to instill sixteen specific skillsthat were grouped into five core categories: I) communication (2 skills); II
ENGINEERING (FE) EXAMAbstractMany engineering technology students find the electrical and computer engineering sections ofthe general Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam to be the most challenging. This paperattempts to present the development and application of a practical teaching module to assiststudents with the first step of the process that leads to the P.E. license. This module is aimed tofurnish the extra review and practice which technology students need to meet this challengethrough a concise review of the electrical and computer topics covered on the FE exams.The knowledge base comprises of eighteen subject areas: namely Mathematics, Probability andStatistics, Ethics and Professional Practice, Engineering Economics, Properties of
information to solve problems, life-long learning, communication, and ethical behavior. At IRE, and its sister program Twin CitiesEngineering (TCE), incoming students are presented with the outcomes during orientation. Asnew, innovative programs recruiting students before being accredited, discussion of theoutcomes and aligning program activities with the outcomes provided external credibility. Thissupported change and student buy-in to program activities that were designed to move themtowards better meeting the outcomes, but that would not be familiar to students in traditionalprograms, such as a professional development plan or metacognitive reflection activities.The IRE and TCE programs were developed as outcomes-based programs. Beginning with
overcomein integrating into this new environment. Student veterans bring an enormous amount ofmaturity and life perspective with them. Most are mature beyond their years. They have arespect for authority that has been borne of necessity and an understanding of delayedgratification. They are focused and goal-oriented and possess a tremendous work ethic. Mosthave experiences in working with broad and diverse groups of individuals and bring with themexperience and skills in leading small teams. They come from very diverse backgrounds andhave life experiences unlike any traditional student on campus. Student veterans are older,typically commute to campus, work part or fulltime, often have a spouse and children, and make-up roughly four percent of the
come from avariety of backgrounds, the range of students and abilities is advantageous to all concerned. Theengineering principles allow the instructors to make connections and draw analogies anddemonstrations across different areas. A course schedule is in the Appendix.Course Description: Introduction to Mechanical Engineering.The engineering design process is demonstrated through use of practical problem-solvingmethods for mechanical projects. Course subjects include mechanical engineering career paths,ethical canons of the engineering profession, and requirements for professional licensure. Courseassignments, conducted within a collaborative learning environment, focus on creativeengineering solutions through technical analysis, teamwork
. Improved learning will occur by designing activities that focus onaddressing misconceptions and helping students construct new knowledge. The need foridentifying preconceptions is particularly true when the intended learning outcomes includedeveloping a deeper understanding of the big issues related to AI, such as its theoreticallimitations (if any), the relationship between AI and human intelligence, its ethical application,and so on. This is because students may already have strongly held beliefs about these topicsthat are not easily changed without full engagement.To begin addressing this need for identifying student knowledge about the field of AI and thefuture of technology, this paper presents two data sets that provide insight into
– planning, engi- neering, financing, politics, procurement, education of public, etc. Ability to evaluate projects from a holistic perspective – environmental, ethical, aes- thetic, political, historical, social impact, technical needs, costs. Page 12.213.5 Awareness of sustainability issues of projects. Ability to use engineering judgment - evaluation of reasonableness of answers, sense of proportion, common sense. Ability to make decisions based on an ethical framework. Recognition of the need for innovation and an increased willingness to take calculated risks.Infrastructure throughout the
savvy, and deep-seatedcommitments to ethical practice. The visibility and positive reception of the National Academyof Engineering’s The Engineer of 2020: Visions of a New Century1 attests to the increasingimportance of this commitment. The purpose of this article is to examine the extent to whichsuch well-roundedness is reflected in the actual work that engages graduates of U.S. engineeringprograms.In undertaking this study, the authors expected to find evidence of graduates applying theirproblem-solving skills to non-technical arenas such as policy work, public service, or legislation.This hypothesis was introduced by The Engineer of 2020, and serves as an axiom within theASEE community. The authors ventured beyond The Engineer of 2020’s
AC 2007-2245: ENGINEERS AND TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACYByron Newberry, Baylor University Byron Newberry is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University, where he teaches courses in engineering design, engineering materials and mechanics, and engineering ethics. In addition, he teaches courses in the history and philosophy of science, ancient and modern, as an affiliate faculty member of the Baylor Great Texts Program. Dr. Newberry’s current research is primarily on the topics of engineering ethics, the philosophy of engineering, and social issues in engineering and technology. He has published numerous articles on these topics and has given numerous presentations at
’ attitudes and knowledge about sustainable engineering, engineering ethics, and attracting and retaining women in engineering. Page 23.724.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 In their own words: Engineering students’ views on the relationship between the engineering profession and societyAbstractAs the engineering profession advances, there is a recognition that engineers must interact acrossdisciplinary and cultural boundaries to successfully address complex problems. Directly orindirectly, an engineer’s work affects society and therefore it is critical that
in operations research and supply chain management. Prior to transitioning into the Construction Engineering Program at UA, he was a professor of Industrial Engineering 1984-2007. From 1979-84, he was a systems engineer with Lockheed Corpora- tion. Dr. Batson is a long-time member of ASEE and is past-president of the Southeastern Section. Page 23.145.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Alternative Approaches to Incorporate Design for Safety into Construction Engineering CurriculaIntroductionFrom both an ethical and practical viewpoint
Page 15.1041.3accreditation is input-based and rigidly relied on the contents. The Council of Engineers has alsoparticipated in the APEC engineer discussions [15] and set up a steering committee on thepossible adoption of Washington Accord [16]In 2009, MoE also announces a Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (TQF:HEd) [10] which further restricts the standard imposed from the Commission on HigherEducation [11]. They specify graduate attributes; ethical & moral responsibilities, knowledge,cognitive skills, interpersonal skills & responsibility, and numerical analysis, communication &IT skills. In addition, standards for different disciplines and continuous quality development arealso included. This framework has to be
. ≠ 80% of the students who earned a grade of A in GNEG 1111 (which we believe indicates a reasonable work ethic) and attempted a MATH class in the Fall Semester of 2007 earned a passing grade in that MATH class. 52% of the students who earned a grade of B in GNEG 1111 (which we believe indicates a mediocre work ethic) and attempted a MATH class in the Fall Semester of 2007 earned a passing grade in that MATH class. 22% of the students who earned a grade of C or worse in or withdrew from GNEG 1111 (which we believe indicates a poor work ethic) and attempted a MATH class in the Fall Semester of 2007 earned a passing grade in that MATH class. ≠ 75% of students who attempted CHEM 1103 in the Fall
interests include engineering as a socially just profession in service to humanity and holistic ap- proaches to engineering education such as ethics of care, humanistic education, and spirituality. He holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering and a M.Ed. specializing in math education and has worked as an engi- neer, a pastor, and a high school math teacher. Page 24.491.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Engineering Education as a Spiritual VocationAbstractSpirituality and engineering education are often kept in separate compartments of our lives. Theymay slip
–2002 period to 27 papers in 2009 to 36 in 2012 and 52 in 2013.Additionally, the Code of Ethics for the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE)states that engineers have an ethical obligation to hold paramount the health, safety and welfareof the public in the performance of their professional duties (NSPE website at www.http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.html visited on January 3, 2014). The Code alsoaddresses sustainability: “Engineers shall strive to adhere to the principles of sustainabledevelopment in order to protect the environment for future generations” in the section aboutProfessional Obligations (NSPE website at http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.htmlvisited on January 3, 2014). But how do we include
Paper ID #10076Immersive Community Engagement ExperienceDr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Ms. Antonette T
realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for
from the Manufacturing Engineering Technology Program will demonstrate: • A professional work ethic, a commitment to lifelong learning, quality and continuous improvement through the clear ability to assume increasing levels of technical and/or management responsibility. • Leadership and participation in teams that act as change agents and innovators in product design and manufacturing related organizations. • The ability to drive the design of manufacturable products, design effective and efficient new production processes and improve the performance of existing operations. • Effective communication with all levels of the organization.Developing the Original Program Outcomes:The original set of PO’s for the
design andrealization of such systems. In addition, the program must demonstrate the ability of graduates toapply multivariate calculus, statistics, differential equations, and linear algebra to the solution ofmechanical engineering problems. Graduates must be prepared for entry into the engineeringprofession through a major design experience based on the knowledge and skills acquired in earliercoursework. This experience should incorporate engineering standards and realistic constraints thatinclude most of the following considerations: economic, sustainability, manufacturability, healthand safety, social, ethical, and environmental.In summary the program must integrate knowledge and skills acquired in a diverse set of courses toachieve the
x principles. Ability to design and conduct experiments, analyze andb x interpret data Ability to design a system, component, or process to c x Project meet desired needsd Ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. x Project Ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineeringe x problems. Understanding of professional and ethical f