Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Danielle Nicole Carter; Rafael E. Landaeta, Old Dominion University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

Inclusion in STEMM | The NationalAcademies Press. [Online]. Available: https://www.nap.edu/collection/81/diversity-and-inclusion-in-stemm. [Accessed: 23-Feb-2020].[5] Pietri, E. S., Johnson, I. R., & Ozgumus, E. (2018). One size may not fit all: Exploring how theintersection of race and gender and stigma consciousness predict effective identity-safe cues for Blackwomen. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 291-306.[6] McTaggart, R. (1991). Principles for participatory action research. Adult education quarterly, 41(3),168-187.[7] National Academy of Engineering. Committee on Public Understanding of EngineeringMessages.(2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding ofengineering. National Academies

Conference Session

Engagement In Practice: Integrating Community Engagement into Engineering Curricula

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan E Canney P.E.; Elizabeth O'Brien, Seattle University; Teddi Callahan

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

findingprojects and also in allowing short term project collaborations between the university and thecommunity partners, while retaining longer term relationships through placement-based service-learning used in other classes. Future work will build on this paper, focusing on studentperceptions of the projects, perceptions of learning and performance on assessments related tolearning the software.Bibliography1 M. Prince, "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004.2 S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt and M. P. Wenderoth, "Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics," Proceedings of

Conference Session

Engagement In Practice: Integrating Community Engagement into Engineering Curricula

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria C. Sanchez, University of Maryland College Park; Dylan Anthony Hazelwood, University of Maryland, College Park; Dave K. Anand, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

and was involved in information technology infrastructure development and management, high performance computing cluster development and implementation as well as establish- ing distance learning and other educational technologies. He also worked with the Energetics Technology Center in Southern Maryland in the areas of informatics and IT management. Since joining CECD he has continued to work on energetics informatics, rare earth materials research and STEM program anal- ysis. He co-authored the 2012 book Rare Earth Materials: Insights and Concerns, the 2013 book S&T Revitalization: A New Look and the 2016 book Engineering for Social Change: Engineering is Not Just Engineering. He has been the course manager

Conference Session

Engagement in Practice: Engaging the Community through Educational Outreach

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holly Larson Lesko, Department of Engineering Education, Virginia Tech; Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Gary R. Kirk, School of Public & International Affairs, Virginia Tech; Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech; Veronica van Montfrans; Andrew L. Gillen, Virginia Tech; Tawni Paradise, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Sarah Anne Blackowski, Virginia Tech; Liesl M Baum, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

implementationThe practice run element holds the space in the process where recruited university studentfacilitators receive training in the curriculum(s) for that month so they can be prepared to supportthe in-classroom activities. While student facilitators were not initially included in the NSFITEST proposal, their engagement in the classroom provides extra hands to support the activitieswhile serving as an engineering role model to the 6th grade students and teachers. All of thestudents volunteering for the program are pursuing degrees in engineering or science- andtechnology-related fields. As indicated by Figure 2, there is a loop from observations, reflections,and artifacts back to intervention design indicating a continuous improvement model

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lessons Learned Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angelica Burbano, Universidad Icesi; Gonzalo V. Ulloa, Universidad Icesi; Juliana Jaramillo JJO, Universidad Icesi; Norha M. Villegas, Universidad Icesi; Lina M. Quintero, Universidad Icesi; Alvaro Pachon, Icesi University

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

include specific goals associatedwith the improvement of specific competences (teaching and professional).As part of the reflective memorandum (self-evaluation), each faculty member is invited toidentify weaknesses and opportunities for improvement, which are included in s self-managedimprovement plan. The Department Head uses this input to identify and consolidate trainingopportunities, workshops, communication or seminars; to establish spaces for cooperation andthe presentation of improvement plans; and to assess the faculty member’s level of commitmentto and compliance with her or his proposed improvement plan.Current planning at the departmental level is considering the use of the CDIO twelve standardsframework [8]. This framework takes the

Conference Session

Computing & Information Technology: Curriculum and Assessment

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Masoud Naghedolfeizi, Fort Valley State University; Xiangyan Zeng, Fort Valley State University; Chunhua Dong, Fort Valley State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

/mentoring sessions and regularly communicating with the course professors and project director about their tutoring/mentoring activities. To further enhance the communication between tutors and course instructors as well as to better familiarize the tutors with the students and class activities, the tutors would be required to attend 2 to 3 classes per week (maximum 3 hours/week) for the course(s) they tutor. The attendance in these classes would be considered as part of their tutoring load.  Identify at least 5 qualified students for tutoring/mentoring task. These students have performed at least at a level of B or better in the gate keeping courses, have junior/senior standing, and have a GPA of at

Conference Session

Active learning in BME, Session II

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington; Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington; Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA. (2016) 2. Ambrose, S. A. (2013). Undergraduate engineering curriculum: The ultimate design challenge. The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society, 43(2). 3. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 4. Kaplan, M., Silver, N., LaVaque-Manty, D., & Meizlish, D. (Eds.). (2013). Using Metacognition and Reflection to Improve Student Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing. 5. Seemiller, C. (2014). The Student Leadership Competencies Guidebook: Designing Intentional Leadership Learning and Development. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley &

Conference Session

EDGD: Assessment & Student Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Theodore J. Branoff, Illinois State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

examining students’understanding of a datum reference frame (DRF) specified on a drawing and their ability tomodel a 3D part with a consistent DRF origin. It was clear that students in TEC333 had difficultyrecognizing the DRF when given a drawing with GD&T. This was especially true when holeswere used as datum features. Since one of the main tenants of GD&T is to provide consistencythrough design, manufacturing, and inspection, conducting a closer examination of design intentwithin the drawing, constraint-based model, and the inspection method could provide useful datafor improving instruction.References1. Neumann, S., & Neumann, A. (2009). GeoTol Pro: A practical guide to Geometric Tolerancing. Longboat Key, FL: Technical

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Online Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily Ann Marasco, University of Calgary; Mohammad Moshirpour, University of Calgary; Mahmood Moussavi, University of Calgary; Laleh Behjat P.Eng., University of Calgary; Yasaman Amannejad, University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

space: Enhancing experientiallearning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2):193-212.E. Marasco, M. Moshirpour, L. Behjat, W. Rosehart. (2016). Studios and sustainability: Acreative CDIO approach to computer engineering education. 12th International CDIOConference, Turku, Finland.E. Marasco, M. Moshirpour, M. Moussavi. (2017). Flipping the Foundation: A multi-yearflipped classroom study for a large-scale introductory programming course. 2017 AmericanSociety of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, USA.A. Pears, S. Seidman, L. Malmi, L. Mannila, and E. Adams. (2007). A survey of literature on theteaching of introductory programming. Working Group Report on ITiCSE on Innovation

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Student Success

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lydia Yang Yang, Kansas State University; Bette Grauer P.E., Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

peer-tutoring. Proceedings of the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boston, MA.5. Hendriksen,S. I., Yang, L., Love, B., & Hall, M.C. (2005). Assessing academic support: The effects of tutoring on student learning outcomes. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 35(2), 56-65.6. Malm, J., Bryngfors, L., & Mörner, L. L. (2016). The potential of supplemental instruction in engineering education: creating additional peer-guided learning opportunities in difficult compulsory courses for first-year students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(5), 548-561.7. García, R., Morales, J. C., & Rivera, G. (2014). The use of peer tutoring to improve the passing rates in mathematics placement exams of

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Symone Whipple, Kennesaw State University; Shelbie P. Prater, University of Michigan; Joi-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Opportunity Program (SROP).References[1] L. S. Hirsch, S. J. Gibbons, H. Kimmel, R. Rockland, and J. Bloom, "High school students," 2003, pp. F2A7-12: IEEE.[2] W. Times, "U. of Michigan launches program to boost diversity efforts," October 23, 2015 Accessed on: July 16, 2017. Available: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/23/u-of-michigan-launches-college- prep-scholarship-pr/[3] D. D. Quigley, "The Early Academic Outreach Program (EAOP) and Its Impact on High School Students' Completion of the University of California's Preparatory Coursework. CSE Technical Report," 2002.[4] R. J. Drummond and H. A. Drummond, "Northeast Florida College Reach Out Program: 1995 Evaluation Report," 1995.[5] K

Conference Session

Faculty Development Work-in-Progress Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angeles Dominguez, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico and Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile; Maria Elena Truyol, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile; Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico and Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

and activities.References[1] S. Freeman, S. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt and M. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics” in Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415, 2014, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111, 2014[2] G. Zavala, M. E. Truyol, and A. Dominguez, “Professional development program in active learning for Engineering Faculty in Chile: First stage”, in Proc. of the 2017 ASEE Annu. Conf. and Expo., Columbus, OH June 25-28, 2017, https://peer.asee.org/28761[3] M. Christie and E. de Graaff, “The philosophical and pedagogical underpinnings of Active Learning in

Conference Session

Research in Faculty Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cara Margherio, University of Washington; Kerice Doten-Snitker, University of Washington; Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Ella Lee Ingram, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

, 2007(139), 69-77. 6. Reed, G. G., Cooper, J. E., & Young, L. (2007). A partnership in flux: The demise of a program. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2007(139), 79-90. 7. Case, J. M., & Light, G. (2011). Emerging Methodologies in Engineering Education Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 186–210. 8. Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (2006). Analyzing social settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company. 9. Ansay, S. J., Perkins, D. F., & Nelson, C. J. (2004). Interpreting outcomes: Using focus groups in evaluation research. Family Relations, 53(3), 310-316. 10. Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 129-152. 11

Conference Session

Robotics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S.M. Mizanoor Rahman, New York University; Sonia Mary Chacko, New York University; Sheila Borges Rajguru, New York University; Vikram Kapila, New York University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

Conference Session

ChemE Curriculum: Junior, Senior, and Graduate

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University; David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Laura P. Ford, University of Tulsa; Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University; Lucas James Landherr, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

survey, American Association for Engineering Education,Columbus, OH, 2017.9. Description of Academic Credit Systems,https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/us/credits.doc&usg=AOvVaw1EGAH-eLs0EkSXPqXpcr8j, Accessed 2008.10. Boud, D. J., Dunn, J., Kennedy, T., and Thorley, R., The Aims of Science LaboratoryCourses: A Survey of Students, Graduates, and Practising Scientists, European Journal ofScience Education, 2(4), 1980, 415-428.11. Domin, D. S., A Review of Laboratory Instruction Styles, Journal of chemical education,76(4), 1999, 543.12. Elawady, Y. and Tolba, A. S., Educational Objectives of Different Laboratory Types: AComparative Study, International Journal of Computer Science and Information

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #21305Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical WritingDr. Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University PhD. in Mechanical Engineering, Wash- ington State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018“Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical Writing”. Hani S Saad Associate Professor of ME/MET Eastern Washington UniversityAbstractTeaching technical writing to engineering students is a challenging task

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Buffardi, California State University, Chico; William Zamora, Califonia State University, Chico; Colleen Robb, California State University, Chico; David Rahn, California State University, Chico

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

real software products.Tech Startup Model. The Tech Startup process begins with the onset of the semester, when instructors presenta general overview of semester-long projects and charge students to brainstorm project ideas forsoftware to develop. With the popularity of social media, web services, and prevalence ofsmartphones, most projects proposed involve web and/or mobile applications. In the followinglecture, the project proposals are shared among all students and each student expresses whichproject(s) to which they wish to contribute. Based on their preferences, we form teams of about 5software engineering students with 1-2 entrepreneurship students. Students are expected toarrange times outside of class to meet regularly to work

Collection

2018 ASEE Zone IV Conference

Authors

Nebojsa I Jaksic P.E., Colorado State University, Pueblo; Trung H Duong, Colorado State University, Pueblo

justification for lab equipmentupgrades or new equipment implementations. Future work may explore the relationship betweenthe state of the engineering labs and students’ recruitment and retention in engineering programs.Bibliography1. Kolb, D. A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1984.2. Harb, J. N., Durrant, S. O., and Terry, R. E., ”Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in Engineering in Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, April 1993, pp. 70-77.3. Harb, J. N., Terry, R. E., Hurt, P. K., and Williamson, K. J., Teaching Through the Cycle: Application of Learning Style Theory to Engineering Education at Brigham Young

Collection

2018 ASEE Zone IV Conference

Authors

Abolfazl Amin, Utah Valley University; Kyle Frederick Larsen P.E., Eastern Washington University

-longproject. This paper will provide the results of our efforts and studies to examine the gap betweenenrollments in our Introductory and Statics courses. Also, it will show if using hands-on projectsin our Introduction to Engineering course has helped reduce the gap in enrollment with ourStatics course. This paper will also provide some suggestions for future investigations and foridentifying other factors related to retention in the freshman year of engineering programs.IntroductionThe significant enrollment difference between our Introduction to Engineering, ENGR-1000, andthe next course which is Statics, ENGR-2010, has prompted us to monitor our enrollment and toinvestigate the reason/s for such a difference. The Pre-Engineering program in our

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yufang Jin, University of Texas, San Antonio; Timothy Yuen, University of Texas, San Antonio; Stephanie Ann Garcia, University of Texas, San Antonio; Robin Lynn Nelson, University of Texas, San Antonio; Ruitao Jin, University of Texas, San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

classroom," Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 86, pp. 8-21, 2004.[5] D. Boud and E. Molloy, "Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 38, pp. 698-712, 2013.[6] S. Gielen, E. Peeters, F. Dochy, P. Onghena, and K. Struyven, "Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning," Learning and Instruction, vol. 20, pp. 304- 315, 2010/08/01/ 2010.[7] P. M. Lightbown and N. Spada, "Focus-on-Form and Corrective Feedback in Communicative Language Teaching: Effects on Second Language Learning," Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 12, pp. 429-448, 2008.[8] D. J. Nicol and D. Macfarlane‐Dick, "Formative assessment and self

Conference Session

Electrical/Electronic ET Issues

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jai P. Agrawal, Purdue University Northwest; Omer Farook, Purdue University Northwest; Wangling Yu, Purdue University Northwest

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

) Calculate the apparent power VA, VAR, Real Power and power factor, V and I are voltage and current phasors into an element or a subnetwork 17 Pf(PT, QT) Calculate the power factor in a 1-phase network that consumes real power PT and reactive power QT. 18 power_ph3(V, I) Calculate apparent power S, reactive power Q and the real power P, the power factor Fp in a 3-phase network, V and I are column of phasors in all 3 phases. 19 line2phase( EAB, EBC, Line voltage to phase voltage converter in 3-phase ac circuits ECA) 20 phase2line(Ean, Ebn, Ecn) Phase

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul K. Andersen, New Mexico State University; Patricia A. Sullivan, New Mexico State University; Jalal Rastegary, New Mexico State University; Christopher Campbell, New Mexico State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

the Paseo Del Norte border region.References[1] Environmental Protection Agency, "Pollution Prevention (P2)," 16 November 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/p2. [Accessed 14 December 2017].[2] Environmental Protection Agency, "Grant Programs for Pollution Prevention, Grant Results," 4 August 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/p2/grant-programs- pollution-prevention#result. [Accessed 30 January 2018].[3] Environmental Protection Agency, "Greem Chemistry," 5 December 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/greenchemistry. [Accessed 29 January 2018].[4] S. Dasgupta, H. Hettige and D. Wheeler, "What improves environmental compliance? Evidence from Mexican industry," Journal of Environmental Economics

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oziel Rios, University of Texas, Dallas; Dani Fadda, University of Texas, Dallas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

an everyday application for themechanism as this will give a better sense of purpose to the work the students are asked toperform.6. References[1] Bates, J. S., "A First Year Course Based on Conceptual Design," Proceedings of the ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[2] Ambrose, S. A., Amon, C. H., "Systematic Design of a First-Year Mechanical EngineeringCourse at Carnegie Mellon University," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86(2), 1997.[3] Pendergrass, N. A., Kowalczyk, R. E., Dowd, J. P., Laoulache, R. N., Nelles, W., Golen, J.A., Fowler, E., "Improving First-Year Engineering Education*," Journal of EngineeringEducation, Vol. 90(1), 2001.[4] Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., Leifer, L. J

Conference Session

Manufacturing Curriculum and Course Innovations

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University; George Chitiyo, Tennessee Technological University; Thomas Singer, Sinclair Community College; Jamshid Moradmand, Sinclair Community College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

/additive-manufacturing.html, visited on March 10, 2018.3. AM-WATCH Partners, http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/am-watch/partners/, visited on March 10, 2018.4. AM-WATCH Project Website, am-watch.org, visited on March 10, 2018.5. Train the Trainer Studios, http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/am-watch/train-the-trainer-studios/, visited on March 10, 2018.6. Accreditation Policy and Procedure Manual (APPM), 2017-2018, http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-policy-and-procedure-manual-appm- 2017-2018/, visited on March 10, 2018.7. Iqbal Khan, M., Mourad, S. M., & Zahid, W. M. (2014). Developing and qualifying Civil Engineering Programmes for ABET accreditation. Journal

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farid Farahmand, Sonoma State University; David Andrew Story, Sonoma State University; David Anthony House, Sonoma State University; Robert Evan Rowlands, Gap Wireless

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

stablished eitherusing a Bluetooth wireless or a USB cable.In order to program Aksense the students only have to know the basic commands toactivate various components, such as LED and RGB. For example, using Chrome SerialTerminal if the command “G” is sent to Aksense the RGB will turn Green. Similarly, ifwe press the Push button switch on Aksense, character “S” will be displayed on theterminal. If the user send character “P”, then the current value of the voltage set by thepotentiometer is displayed.Figure 1: Basic communication between Aksense and a PC (or smartphone) usingpre-assigned command lines (e.g., “R” to turn the RGB RED).Figure 2(a) depicts Aksense’s PCB. Should time permits, the device can be used inconjunction with a breadboard and

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division - Visualization and Mathematics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Ashish Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Edwin Hou, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Moshe Kam P.E., New Jersey Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs, Mathematics

further suggestions and recommendations.References[1] Borgaonkar, A., Hou, E., Vandermark, S., Kam, M., 2015, “Engineering Math Summer Boot Camp to help Students Succeed in Remedial Courses,” Proceedings 2015 7th First Year Engineering Experience Conference, Roanoke, VA, August 3-4, 2015.[2] Borgaonkar, A., Sodhi J. S., Hou, E.,Baldwin R,, Kam, M., 2017, “Helping First Year Students Start on Track in the Mathematics Sequence,” Proceedings 2017 9th First Year Engineering Experience Conference, Daytona Beach, FL, August 6-8, 2017.[3] Klingbeil, N., Rattan, K., Raymer, M., Reynolds, D., Mercer, R., Kukreti, A. and Randolph, B., 2008, “The WSU Model for Engineering Mathematics Education: A Multiyear Assessment and Expansion to

Conference Session

Electrical/Electronic ET Issues

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Curtis Cohenour P.E., Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

resultssummarized in Table 1. The lab is primarily designed to ensure that students have a completeunderstanding of the magnetic starter. This item in particular improves by 42% based on the fivequestions given to the students. In addition there is an improvement of 23% in overall PLCknowledge as defined by the combined results. Based on these results the PLC Lab will beadded to the existing course.Bibliography[1] A. Eslami, A. Oxendine and C. Daniels, "A Plc Project In A Control Course Laboratory," in ASEE 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, , 2008.[2] S. Hsieh, "Outcomes and Case Studies of Undergraduate Student Participation," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, 2017.[3] S. Pandian, "Intelligent Mechatronic

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca M. Reck, Kettering University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

setting clear expectations, students feel that this assignment is achievableand therefore increases their sense of competence and expectancy.ConclusionOverall, this assignment helped students make a connection between the highly theoretical topicsof the course to real-world applications. The assignment is low-stakes and is not intended to takemore than an hour to complete. The students in the course have achieved the learning objective ofthe assignment. With the presentation component, they are exposed to their own application aswell as the applications selected by their classmates.References[1] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K. Norman, How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching.[2

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lesley M. Berhan, University of Toledo; Revathy Kumar, University of Toledo; Marjory A. Goodloe, University of Toledo; Jimmie Jones, University of Toledo; Aaron Lee Adams, Alabama A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

they experiencedin the university context. It provided these students the opportunity to explore their professionaloptions and a safe space to consolidate their personal and professional identities and attain asense of coherence.AcknowledgementsSupport for this research by the NSF Division of Engineering Education and Centers awardnumber 1640553 is gratefully acknowledged.[1] H. Tajfel, Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1981.[2] H. Tajfel and J. C. Turner, "The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior," in The psychology of intergroup relations S. Worchel and W. G. Austin, Eds. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, 1986, pp. 7-24.[3] U

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew W. Liberatore, University of Toledo; Uchenna Asogwa; Amanda Portis Malefyt, Trine University; Charlene M. Czerniak, University of Toledo; Gale A. Mentzer, Acumen Research and Evaluation, LLC; T. Ryan Duckett, Acumen Research and Evaluation

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

cataloging YouTube problems is appreciated. This material is based uponwork supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE 1712186. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. This workwas completed within the framework of University of Toledo IRB protocol 202214.Bibliography1. Zax, D., Learning in 140-Characters Bities. ASEE PRISM, 2009: p. 1-3.2. Bullard, L.G., The case against the use of solution manuals. Chemical Engineering Education, 2013. 47: p. 73.3. Lang, J.M., Small Teaching: Everyday Lessons from the Science of Learning. 2016: John Wiley & Sons.4