and statistical investigations of the significance of theirresults; 7) expose students to how engineering models can be used to address real-worldproblems; 8) prepare students for careers that cross disciplinary boundaries; 9) help students indeveloping teamwork abilities; and 10) promote students interests in science and engineering 3.Individual experimental active-learning hands-on modules Page 22.103.5 All four modules were composed of two parts. The first part was experimental and thesecond part was theoretical focused mainly on mathematical modeling of experimental datacollected in part 1 of the module. A brief description of these
astudents’ undergraduate career, are not fully realized or utilized until after graduation. In manyways, what educators are tasked with is providing students with models of the skills andcompetencies that will be required to continue self-education beyond the end of formalschooling. As educators, we need to provide the “spark”. However, as Mourtos[in 44] has pointedout, the main component of the ABET criteria 3i “…recognition of the need for… lifelonglearning” is not an aspect of the traditional cognitive domain usually focused on in highereducation. Rather, it belongs to the affective domain, not a skill that can easily be “taught” anddirectly assessed, but still vitally important. The second component of 3i “…an ability to engagein lifelong
AC 2011-1370: ALL INNOVATION IS INNOVATION OF SYSTEMS: ANINTEGRATED 3-D MODEL OF INNOVATION COMPETENCIESWilliam D. Schindel, ICTT System Sciences William D. Schindel is president of ICTT System Sciences, a systems engineering company, and devel- oper of the Systematica Methodology for model and pattern-based systems engineering. His 40-year engineering career began in mil/aero systems with IBM Federal Systems, Owego, NY, included ser- vice as a faculty member of Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and founding of three commercial systems-based enterprises. He has consulted on improvement of engineering processes within automotive, medical/health care, manufacturing, telecommunications, aerospace, and consumer
understanding of subject matter. They found that service-learning is moreeffective over four years and that the messiness inherent in helping solve real community-basedproblems enhances the positive effects (Eyler & Giles, 1999). Astin et al. found with longitudinal data of 22,000 students that service-learning had significantpositive effects on 11 outcome measures: academic performance (GPA, writing skills, criticalthinking skills), values (commitment to activism and to promoting racial understanding), self-efficacy, leadership (leadership activities, self-rated leadership ability, interpersonal skills),choice of a service career, and plans to participate in service after college. In all measures exceptself-efficacy, leadership, and
; Leary7 found that girls liked learning science in a social context where they couldinteract with others and take part in learning experiences that did not isolate them. They alsofound that girls selected science careers because they had a strong desire to help. The AmericanAssociation of University Women Educational Foundation-AAUW8 noted that “Girls and othernontraditional users of computer science – who are not enamored of technology for technology’ssake – may be far more interested in using the technology if they encounter it in the context of adiscipline that interests them” (p. v). In a 20049 report that surveyed Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs which focused on gender equity in thesciences, the AAUW found
program in 2015.Ms. Meghan M. Alexander, Texas A&M University Meghan M. Alexander is the assistant director for Engineering International Programs at Texas A&M University. She has an M.Ed. in Counseling and over 15 years experience in international education and partnerships.Mr. Victor Manuel Camara-Poot, Yucatan Government Ministry of Education A graduate of the Masters in Government and Public Policy by te Universidad Aut´onoma de Yucat´an (UADY) , workink since 2 years ago as Head of the Department of Planning and Strategic Projects at the Department of Higher Education in the Ministry of Education of the Yucatan Government in Mexico . Throughout his career he has worked in entrepreneurial activities
would certainly benefit from formal instructortraining. The granting of a degree (Ph.D. or M.S.) does not automatically bestow teaching skills,especially effective teaching skills. Most professors simply try to emulate observed styleswithout any justification as to the effectiveness of different teaching styles. The lack of formaltraining programs at most universities, and nearly nonexistent programs to provide constructivecriticism from peers relegates most faculty to the very slow process of developing effective (ifthey are lucky and persistent) teaching styles through a long career of trial and error. Add thedemands of research and the priority at many universities of the greater importance of researchover teaching, and it is easy to
build deeper conceptual understanding of disciplinary skills. Theemphasis on building products and implementing processes in real-world contexts gives studentsopportunities to make connections between the technical content they are learning and their professionaland career interests.Standard 6 -- CDIO WorkspacesWorkspaces and laboratories that support and encourage hands-on learning ofproduct and system building, disciplinary knowledge, and social learningDescription: Workspaces and laboratories support the learning of product and system building skillsconcurrently with disciplinary knowledge. They emphasize hands-on learning in which students aredirectly engaged in their own learning, and provide opportunities for social learning, that is
different personnel in the day-to-day research activities, including a number of post-graduate and under-graduate students.This is to be expected given that one of academia’s key aspirations regarding collaborativeventures is the provision of industrially relevant, “real world” research project s for studentsand the exposure of students to industry in preparation for their future careers. A recentreport by the Business-Higher Education Forum (BHEF) 16 in the US has stated that, for thisreason, “graduate students can enhance or impede a collaboration, but they are almostalways used”. However, given that there is considerable evidence in the literature ofsignificant problems arising from fundamental differences between academia and industry, itseems
exposurewill motivate increasingly larger numbers of U.S. students particularly to do an experienceabroad during their undergraduate years. Additionally, as the standards, practices and processes,become more common throughout the world it will make it easier to develop internationalcooperative partnerships, exchange course credits and embark upon distance learning as amodality so as to insure lifelong learning independent of where an individual chooses to pursuetheir career or life. As a result, we see the need for a global experience as early as possible in theeducational program increasing, and the ease with which this can become accomplishedincreasing as well. This hopefully will lead to a time when more then half of the undergraduateengineering
their emerging skill set,resources and schedules, but also one that effectively prepares them for their careers is difficult.Many of the elements of this experiment, as noted in the paper did appear to enhance the learningexperience, whereas some did not. Continued efforts will be made to integrate various disciplineperspectives into the capstone design experience. It is felt that not only will this improve thelearning for the engineering students but also provide the opportunity to introduce the engineer’sviewpoint to students outside the discipline. Some compromise between the two corporatecultures considered herein seems to be best suited for the students at Notre Dame, and this maybe institutionally dependent. Providing freedom that allows
the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”Appendix 1Program Objective #A : " The electrical engineering curriculum will produce graduates who are prepared for continuing education, professional growth and career advancement."Program Objective #B : " The electrical engineering curriculum will produce graduates who have effective analytical and communications skills."Program Objective #C : " The electrical engineering curriculum will produce graduates who are
stakeholdersAnd I think especially the way that this course fits into that junior spring semester where you're really in the meat of starting to get a full understanding of “what does a major in EMSE mean?” and “what do you want to do with it?” puts it in a great spot where your gears are starting to turn about where you want to start your career trajectory and you're able to, if you want, like my group did, which was tailoring our project towards those interests. So I think that was a major avenue for creativity. I think the second part that was also big, especially for us, was when it came to doing the analysis and doing the model building and the MCDA…While “defining what your system is” and “doing the
repair facilities, and as a Six Sigma Black Belt for Global Engine Overhaul Operations. Gerica is a 2008 graduate of UD’s Mechanical Engineering program, received her Master’s in Supply Chain Management from Penn State in 2014, and just recently earned her doctorate in Educational Leadership from the University of Dayton in December 2021. During her time with GE Aviation, Gerica also served as a University Relations lead-recruiter, and led a number of community engagement efforts with the GE Women’s Network and African American Forum. Gerica is passionate about equity and inclusion in STEM as a means to broadening the participation of underrepresented groups in STEM education and careers. Her experiences as the
for thepolicies to work as intended, community college students must choose a major andtransfer institution early in their college careers to mitigate the potential for credit loss.In their analysis of 34 statewide articulation agreements, Taylor and Jain (2017) found thateven though the agreements facilitate the transfer of credits from the associate of science(AS) and associate of arts (AA) degrees to be able to be used for a bachelor’s degree, thefocus tends to be on general education core courses and not the program major-specificcourses. In engineering programs, the major-specific courses are highly sequential, somissing a course or taking a class that does not meet transfer criteria could set transferstudents back in their progress to a
transfer mechanisms involved.Most teams also collected experimental data, although the quality of the experiments wasinconsistent. Students also demonstrated the ability to gather information and functioned well asmembers of a team. However, there were notable areas for improvement among both cohorts. 16 Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering EducationAt this point in their educational careers, students generally have limited engineering designexperience due to the lack of a Design Methodologies course in the SRU ME
School of Computer and Information Sciences KFSCIS) at Florida International University (FIU) since 2014. She is a doctoral student in Adult Education and Human Resource Development (AE/HRD)at FIU. Her research interest is in underrepresented students' access, persistence, and success, including transfer students in STEM and Computer Science education. In addition, she serves as the director of the Academic Success Initiative (ASI), a tutoring service program for computer science students, which also functions as a platform for tutors' professional development and career readiness. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com
education research. He has been involved in faculty development activities since 1998, through the ExCEEd Teaching Workshops of the American Society of Civil Engineers, the Essential Teaching Seminars of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the US National Science Foundation-sponsored SUCCEED Coalition. He has received several awards for his work, including the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers, the Ralph Teetor Education Award from the Society of Automotive Engineers, being named a University of Florida Distinguished Teaching Scholar, and being named the University of Florida Teacher of the Year for 2003-04. He is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education
student not only to develop an understanding ofspecific concepts, but also a way of thinking. In addition, in many learning environments,students are forced to learn a new tool, in the form of the programming environment being used,along with these concepts and patterns of thinking3. Because of this, many students will notdevelop a sufficient level of proficiency in programming, even after progressing through thetraditional two or three course introductory programming sequence4, 5. This is a significantproblem, especially in the engineering disciplines, where many students will be required to usesome form of programming during either their academic and/or professional career, but very fewreceive more than one or two semesters’ worth of
projects in their classes or extra-curriculars, previous experiences in their engineeringcoursework, and current desired career path.To construct a sample for the semi-structured interviews that was representative of eachcombination of gender and disciplinary affiliation examined in this study, students‟ disciplinaryaffiliation and gender were taken into consideration. In addition, all the students invited toparticipate in the final interviews needed to have participated in all of the previous phases of thestudy (including others not presented in this paper). This provided the researcher with theopportunity to explore each phase of the study with each participant. Since none of the studentswho participated in the focus group were classifed as male
AC 2011-1601: STUDENT LIFELONG LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR DIF-FERENT LEARNING ENVIRONMENTSSusan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford Univer- sity. She is currently Professor and Coordinator of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teaching and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engi- neering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, and student autonomy. Dr. Lord served as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education Conference. She has been awarded NSF CAREER and ILI grants. She is currently working on a collaborative NSF-funded Gender in Science and
. Over the course of thesemester, Fellows took on more active roles, slipping back into the Observer role during timeswhen teachers lectured, gave students book work to complete, or—in one case—modeled lessondelivery for her Fellow and later in the day allowed him to lead the lesson. Mentor. Fellows in a Mentor role are actively engaged with students and serve as a rolemodel for them. In the Mentor role, Fellows serve several purposes, including (1) demonstratingthat academic achievement is not bounded by geography or gender, (2) offering career modelingby explaining or demonstrating what it is that engineers do, and/or (3) engaging with studentswho may get little personal attention during a typical class period.We saw several examples of
naturally, this activity shows how engineering flows from the central premise that everyone, everywhere, engineers already. Some post-course comments included: o “I see engineering and opportunities for teaching/talking about it all around us. I can apply the terms and explain it in ‘teachable moments.’” o “[I have a] new passion for what engineering is. It has terrified me since I was in high school and I thought engineering was an unattainable career. Now knowing what engineering is, I may have pursued it – I love problem solving and finding the most efficient way to do something. If I had known that maybe I would have pursued it.” o “I went from
theirprofessional careers. How can we address this gap?One way that not only provides the experience, but also leverages a number of other advantagesfor developing these skills, is experiential learning. If designed well, experiential learning not Page 22.681.9only provides authentic opportunity, but also supports self-determined motivation and regulation. 8 It can be structured to enable adaptive interaction among those with various types of expertise,sharing in a professional community, and building both competence and community.2.4 Need for / Value of Reflection, Self Interrogation, Self RegulationBuilding on ontological positions, the
, “students are forced to reflect . . . on the environment of decision making.”4 Doing soallows students to exercise critical thinking and ethical decision-making abilities. Because smallcases are so limited, instructors can spend more time focusing on these skill sets, as well asethical problem identification and moral deliberation.Finally, a consideration of our students’ career paths indicates that small cases may be morerelevant. Engineers, of course, have been involved in high-profile cases, but chances are that our Page 22.710.2students will probably face ethical challenges of the more mundane, garden variety. Furthermore,engineering ethicist
make them have disciplinarybalance. We created the teams using several quantitative and qualitative metrics. We collectedinformation about GPA, major, number of water-related courses completed, water-related extra-curricular and service activities, educational interests, and career objectives. With thisinformation we formed teams that were as balanced (meaning varied as evenly as possible) bymajor, GPA, background experience with water projects, and gender.AssessmentThe methods employed in the spring 2011 course offering to overcome communication barriersincluded the teaching techniques used in the first offering plus the new or revised methodsdescribed in the previous section. All methods were assessed using a survey of student opinionsof