Manufacturing. "Economic Census Manufacturing Industry Series (1999): n. pag. Census. U.S. Census Bureau. Web. 18 May 2016.15. Giovinazzo, Paul. "The Fatal Current." Bulletin 2.13 (1987): n. pag. Electrical Safety. New Jersey State Council of Electrical Contractors Associations, Inc. Web. 18 May 2016.16. Kuphaldt, Tony R. "Electrical Safety." Lessons In Electric Circuits. Vol. 1. N.p.: Design Science, n.d. N. pag. Electrical Safety. Design Science, 2001. Web. 18 May 2016.17. eGRID2012 GHG Annual Output Emission Rates (n.d.): n. pag. 2012. Web. 1 June 2016.18. "PolyLearn - Server Information." Private communication from Michael Haskell. 2 May 2016. E-mail.19. "Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2680 (20M Cache, 2.70 GHz, 8.00 GT/s Intel
Scientific Field trips”. Sci. Educ., 75(5), pp 513-523. 7. Rebar, B. M. (2009). “Evidence, explainations, and recommendations for teachers’ field trip strategies”. Doctoral disseratation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 8. Smith, G. A. (2008). “First-Day Questions for the Leraner-Centered Classroom “. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, Vol. 17, Nos. 5,. 9. Gunhan, S. (2014). “Collaborative Learning Experience in a Construction Project Site Trip. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and practice, Vol. 141, Nos. 1 pp. 1-5. 10. Ghanat, S. T., Kaklamanos, J. K., Ziotopoulou, K. Z., Selvaraj, S. I, and Fallon, D. J. (2016). “A Multi- Institutional Study of Pre-and Post
ilit liliving, and social participation including on s ib He ving sp althresponsibility and practical innovation. Re yFrom the viewpoints of Fig. 1 Core competencies and values for Chinesemulti-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary students’ developmentintegration, the idea of iSTREAM is proposed as an extension of STEAM with consideringthe characteristics of Chinese K-12 students, such as the deficiency of training aboutleadership, critical thinking
. Harvard Business Review, 79 (1), p. 106‐116.11. Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2008). Barriers and promises in STEM reform. Presented at National Academies of Science Promising Practices Workshop, Washington DC, 2008.12. Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S., and Weilerstein, P. (2013). “Entrepreneurship: Its Role in Engineering Education,” Bridge Link. Eng. Soc., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 35–40.13. Giersch, S., & McMartin, F. P., & Nilsen, E., & Sheppard, S., & Weilerstein, P. (2014). Supporting Change in Entrepreneurship Education: Creating a Faculty Development Program Grounded in Results from a Literature Review. Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana. https://peer.asee.org
Entrepreneurship, 222–239.2 Dzombak, R., and Mehta, K. (2014). Scholarly Advances in Humanitarian Engineering and SocialEntrepreneurship: A Typology of Research Publications. International Journal for Service Learning inEngineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, 98–116.3 Passino, K. M. (2009). Educating the Humanitarian Engineer. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(4), 577–600.4 Hill, S., and Miles, E. (2012). What do Students understand by the term ‘Humanitarian Engineering’?Innovation, Practice and Research in Engineering Education, September 2012.5 UC Engineering (n.d.) Diploma in Global Humanitarian Engineering,http://www.engf.canterbury.ac.nz/humanitarian/ last accessed January 1, 20166 Bielefeldt, A., Paterson, K., and Swan, C
students in higher education: A perilous passage? Ashe-eric higher education report, volume 28, number 3. Jossey-bass higher and adult education series: ERIC, 2001.9 A. Suzuki, A. Amrein-Beardsley, and N. Perry, "A summer bridge program for underprepared first-year students: Confidence, community, and re-enrollment," Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, vol. 24, pp. 85-106, 2012.10 M. Walpole, H. Simmerman, C. Mack, J. Mills, M. Scales, and D. Albano, "Bridge to success: Insight into summer bridge program students' college transition," Journal of the first-year experience & students in transition, vol. 20, pp. 11-30, 2008.11 C. E. Hmelo-Silver and H. S. Barrows, "Goals and
longitudinal administration of the persistence in engineering survey. J Eng Educ. 2010;99(4):371-395.8. Seymour E, Hewitt NM. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduate Leave the Sciences. 12th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 2000.9. Huang PM, Brainard SG. Identifying determinants of academic self-confidence among science, math, engineering and technology students. J Women Minor Sci Eng. 2008;7:315- 337.10. Zeldin AL, Pajares F. Against the Odds: Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Women in Mathematical, Scientific, and Technological Careers. Am Educ Res J. 2000;37(1):215-246.11. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman; 1997.12. Yasar S, Baker D, Krause S, Roberts C. In her shoes: how team
a specialized curriculumthat makes program graduates skilled and competent in their field upon graduation. The VicePresident of Human Resources for one large manufacturing company provided the followingstatement regarding leadership development program graduates they have hired. “(Institution’s name omitted)’s engineering leadership development program does an outstanding job of preparing the students to enter the workforce with the readiness to assume leadership positions quickly. (Manufacturing companies name omitted) utilizes this program as one of our key talent pools for leadership roles. Through the program’s rigorous academic and extracurricular requirements, I have found that these graduates have an exceptional work ethic
- On Creativity, www.chebucto.ns.ca/Philosophy/Sui- Generis/Berdyaev/qc.htm.[3] Barron, F., and D.M. Harrington. “Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality,” Ann. Rev. Psych., 32, 439 (1981).[4] Guilford, J.P., The Nature of Human Intelligence, New York, McGraw-Hill (1967).[5] Guilford, J.P., Way Beyond the IQ: Guide to Improving Intelligence and Creativity, Buffalo, Creative Education Foundation (1977).[6] Rogers, C.R., “Toward a Theory of Creativity,” in S. J. Parnes and H. F. Harding, eds., A Source Bookfor Creative Thinking, New York, Charles Scribner's Sons (1962).[7] Stein, M.I., “Creativity as an Intra- and Inter-personal Process,” in S. J. Parnes and H. F. Harding, eds., A Source Book for Creative Thinking. New York
straightforward process. Table 1. Time Card Template: Weekly entry by each individualTEAM NAME: Team Awesome: WEEK 1- Jan 9th-15th WEEKLY STATUS FOR: Your Name Here (JOHN DOE) Day Location(s) & Time Activities, Contributions Time (hours) Class Lecture (3-4); Team meeting- Lecture. Team Meeting: agreed to get drawing feedback from Mon Mon TOTAL 2.5 Library (4-5); At home (9-9:30pm) Mr Jones & look at CDR. At home incorporated CDR feedback Machine shop(2-230); Mr Jones drawing feedback. Fixed dimensions on page
I canfix it because it is my idea, no one else.” She further explained the excitement associated with“real challenges” and “real applications”: “Different from other project teams, we work ondifferent problems each year, so we can’t carry over from year to year. …. All these things arechallenges that NASA hasn’t figured out. What we do actually contributes to something.”Likewise, Annie found her ESPT experience directly shaped “how [she] view[s] environmentalengineering;” she commented, “Water problems are really not very simple and they don’t oftencome just with one problem and solution.”Furthermore, ESPTs offered community. Nickie very much respected the other students that sheworked with, “the people that I have been able to work with
, Dittrich Y, Gorschek T, Grahn H. “The success factors powering industry-academiacollaboration.” IEEE Software. 2011 Jul 22(2):67-73[6] Pertuze, J. A., Calder, E. S., Greitzer, E. M. & Lucas, W. A. “Best practices for industry-university collaboration.” MIT Sloan Management Review. (2010) Vol. 51 No. 4[7] ELI Report, “7 things you should know about cross-institutional collaboration.” EduCause,ELI Report, July 2015[8] Beckman, et al. “Closing the Industry-Academic Gap.” IEEE Software. 1997 Nov/Dec: 49-57[9] Jones S, Clulow S. “How to foster a culture of collaboration between universities andindustry.” Higher Education Network, The Guardian, 2012(https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2012/aug/02/the-value-of-research
answers.Students who viewed video content were asked to answer multiple choice survey questions,including: “How much time did you spend watching the videos,” “How many different videosdid you watch,” “Which video topics were the most valuable to you,” and we asked for the gradereceived in the prerequisite course. Only students who did watch videos were asked furthersurvey questions which were Likert-scale questions asking about their level of agreement withthe following statements: “The videos helped me to better understand the topic(s) in the videos,”and “The videos created were relevant to me.” They were also asked to rate video quality asExcellent, Satisfactory, or Poor. Figure 1. Feedback on effectiveness of short video projects from students who
Towards Community Integration and Academic AtmosphereStudents were asked to reflect on several statements related to their attitudes towards communityintegration and academic atmosphere. Overwhelmingly, 74.1% of students strongly agreed that“[their] interaction[s] with [their] professors were positive and beneficial, thus helping [them]succeed during [their] first semester” (Figure 7A). In contrast 37.0% of students strongly agreedand 51.9% agreed that “…[they knew] other students in [their] classes and [felt] part of anacademic learning community” (Figure 7B). While students certainly cited satisfaction withtheir professor and peer relationships, they were most satisfied with their professorialrelationships.Student responses were generally
evaluationof new learning spaces”. The PST model facilitates the design of an ALC by structuring theprocess into distinct dimensions and stages, and offering guiding questions for each stage. Thedimensions are pedagogy, space, and technology, and the relevant stages are design andoperation. For instance, a guiding question for the classroom design stage is "what is the overallfocus (of the space) and what type(s) of learning and teaching are we trying to foster (in thisspace)?"3 ContextThis pilot study was conducted at a large teaching-focused tertiary institution in Norway, whichhas a long history of engineering education. The institution currently offers eight differentbachelor’s level programs in engineering and four master’s level programs in
even less on engineering technology students. Since we found Page 26.1777.14that students writing skills do improve throughout the semester, research in this area must focuson engineering technology students and the development of their writing skills throughout thecurriculum.Bibliography1 Lester, N. et al. Writing Across The Curriculum: A College Snapshot. Urban Education 38, 5-34, doi:10.1177/0042085902238684 (2003).2 Hart Research Associates. Falling Short? College Learning and Career Success. (2015).3 Fraiberg, S. & Adam, M. in Professional Communication Conference, 2002. IPCC 2002. Proceedings. IEEE
, Humans, and Society – Toward a Sustainable World, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2001. ISBN 0-12-221090-5.19. Hjorth, Linda S., Barbara A. Eichler, Ahmed S. Khan, and John A. Morello, Technology and Society – A Bridge to the 21st Century, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, 2003. ISBN 0-13-092475-X. Note: the 3rd edition is now on the market.20. Johnston, Stephen F., J. Paul Gostelow, and W. Joseph King, Engineering and Society, Prentice Hall, 2000. ISBN 0-201-36141-8.21. Adams, J.L., Flying Buttresses, Entropy, and O-Rings: the World of an Engineer, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991. ISBN 0-674-30689-9.22. Billington, David P., The Innovators: the Engineering Pioneers Who Made America Modern, John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1996
provided bytwo scientists 6 [Hughes-Jones and Wickramasinghe] from England. The problems of dealingwith hemorrhagic fevers [arbovirus infections] and HIV/AIDS are no more challenging than inAfrica. The fatality rate is extremely high among those contracting hemorrhagic fevers.Diseases are decimating the gorilla populations in Africa. HIV/AIDS has almost halved the lifeexpectancy in many African countries.Classical biology, prior to the 1950’s required only a scant knowledge of chemistry, mathematicsand physics. With the discovery of the structure of DNA which some claim is the mostimportant molecule of life, research in biology started to undergo a transformation in Australia,Canada, Europe, India, Japan, the USA and in other countries.With the
-On, Simulated, and Remote Laboratories: A ComparativeLiterature Review, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 38, No. 3, Article 7, Publication date:September 2006.[3] T. A. Fjeldly, M. S. Shur, H. Shen, and T. Ytterdal. AIM-Lab: A system for remotecharacterization of electronic devices and circuits over the internet 7803-5766-3 / 00 IEEE[4] S. Engum, A. Jeffries, L. Fisher. 2003. Intravenous catheter training system: Computer-Basededucation versus traditional learning methods. American J. Surgery 186, 1, 67–74.[5] S. Zimmerli., M.-A Steinemann, T. Braun. 2003. Educational environments: Resourcemanagement portal for laboratories using real devices on the Internet. ACM SIGCOMMComput. Commun. Review 53, 3, 145–151.[6] P. Hernandez-Ramos, D. Alexander, A
, the students must make an assumption of concentration, with input from the instructor, todetermine the sample sizes for analysis. A microbial seed solution is added to all samples toinsure sufficient biological activity. Blank solutions of seed solution and nutrient water are alsoprepared. The students share data and determine which samples are within the acceptable range(minimum DO or minimum change in DO) to be considered valid. Corrections are made basedon change in DO of blank solutions. In addition to determining the BOD of the sample(s), thestudents conduct a kinetic study and determine the kinetic parameters.This BOD experiment forces students to consider:1) The validity of individual samples2) The need to correct measured DO
, hasconvinced us that it is quite feasible to offer laboratory experiences to on-line students. Bycombining podcast lectures with small group projects and remote laboratories, our students willstill be able to meet and work together to discuss and apply the concepts they have learned.REFERENCES1 S. Viswanathan, “On-line Instruction of Technology Courses – Do’s and Don’ts”, Proceedings of theInternational Conference on Information and Communications Technologies in Education, Badajoz, Spain, 2002 Page 12.579.122 Whitehouse, T., Choy, B., Romagnoli, J.A. and Barton, G.W., “Global chemical engineering education:paradigms for on-line technology
simplified into approachablemathematical terminology while still capturing essential system behavior.The methods outlined in the second case study extend the original aim presented to thestudents into discussions and considerations of multiple drug doses, complications ofmodeling of the human body, the issue of complex system modeling, and the concernsand factors involved in determining “how” to modeling severely complex systems.Through use of the first case study the students have been facing both mathematical andexperimental complications in the project and with the addition of the second case studythe overall project goal(s) are reinforced. The simulations students construct provideadditional paths for examination of behaviors in a very complex
Programming CourseBackgroundIn the fall of 2003, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University formed separate colleges andthe College of Engineering was born. One of the first initiatives of the college was tostrive to have a common first year among all its engineering programs (Aeronautical,Civil, Computer, Electrical, Mechanical, and Software Engineering). Having a commonyear would allow first year engineering students to switch degrees with no impact to theirschedule.One course used by most engineering majors was “CS223 Computer Programming forEngineers” which was originally taught in FORTRAN then migrated to C in the mid90’s. The course taught up to structures in C and was basically a C programming coursetaught by predominantly adjunct professors. The
industry-based or industry-sponsored projects 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 . The capstone design course is an integral part of the approach ofmany undergraduate CE programs. CE programs typically use their Capstone or Senior-DesignCourse(s) is to demonstrate compliance with several of ABET’s required accreditation criteria10.Various styles can be used to for the capstone design courses 11, 12. The Civil Engineeringprogram at utilizes its Senior Design courses to help address several programspecific accreditation criteria and objectives. This paper summarizes the Senior Design Coursecontents, administration, management, and evaluation of student performance
with solving problemsPerceived Engagement…the section was engaging…I got to practice solving problems…I was focused on solving problems Page 12.884.16…I solved problems instead of being shown or told the answerPerceived Learning…I learned to solve different types of problems…I learned the material thoroughly…I learned useful techniques for solving problems…I was able to see where I went wrong with my problem solving procedures…the discussion helped uncover what I didn’t knowBibliography1. C.P. Fulford and S. Zhang, “Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education”, American Journal of Distance Education
belowsummarizes a few of the other programs or events mentioned in interviews with participants.Table 2. Programs in NSBE also contributing to its members’ ability to generate social capital. Type(s) of SocialNSBE Program/Event Contributions Capital Involved The outcomes will varyChapter Level Programming - depending on the program aAny program that support the particular student chapter decidesideals of NSBE that is conceived Bridging or
- 105.4 Douglas, J., Iverson, E. & Kalyandurg, C. (2004). Engineering in the K-12 classroom: An analysis of currentpractices & guidelines for the future. American Society for Engineering Education: Washington, DC.5 Iversen, E., Kalyandurg, C., & de Lapeyrouse, S. (2004). Why k-12 engineering? Available online;http://www.engineeringk12.org/. Retrieved December 2006.6 Foley, E. T., & Hersam, M. C. (2006). Assessing the need for nanotechnology education reform in the unitedstates. Nanotechnology Law & Business, 3(4), 467-484.7 Coll, R. (2005). The role of models/and analogies in science education: implications from research. InternationalJournal of Science Education, 27(2), 183-198.8 National Center for Learning and Teaching
/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (2001).7. Bjorklund, S. and Fortenberry, N., “Measuring Student and Faculty Engagement in Engineering Education,” CASEE REPORT 5902001-20050705, Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE), National Academy of Engineering (2005)8. Mwavita, M., “Self-Regulated Learning and Classroom Engagement in Calculus Achievement Among Freshmen Engineering Student,” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2006). Page 12.280.8 Table 2: Comparison of concept inventory results for subsequent course offerings
semester throughthe digital dropbox.The final assignment associated with ASCE and the civil engineering profession is anassignment on political advocacy. The students are introduced to ASCE statements onprofessional hot topics through the ASCE Advocacy website18 and are asked to write a letter toan elected government official(s) regarding a civil engineering issue of their choice. Tocomplete the assignment, the students must mail, email or fax a copy of the letter to their electedofficial and submit a copy in class. The students are also introduced to the “Six Clicks to Writeyour Legislator” through ASCE website. They are instructed that they may choose to use thetemplate provided by the ASCE advocacy website as a starting point, but they are
labincludes a 50-minute lecture (attended by all students in the class) and a four-hour lab session(held three times a week to reduce the number of students in lab at any one time).Lab lecture: At the beginning of each week throughout both semesters of the IDEAS coursesequence, students attend a 50-minute lecture in which the following three pieces of informationare presented: 1) The motivation and BME context for the particular lab technique(s) and/oranalysis method(s) the students will experience later in the week; 2) A detailed review of thecore concepts relating to the week’s lab; and 3) A brief preview of what is expected in the labthat week. These lectures are critically important not only for providing students with theknowledge base necessary