school.Getting Started - Planning and PreparationPlanning begins in December when the Graduate Fellow meets with the fourth gradeteacher coordinator. Prior to the meeting, the Graduate Fellow assesses the availability ofUndergraduate Fellows in January and February. Based on this, the fourth grade teacherwill ask each of the other fourth grade teachers to provide the names of 2-4 studentsrequiring assistance. In the past, we have started with the names of three students perteacher for a total of 12 students. What has happened is that sometimes the student(s)cannot stay after school or the teacher decides to assist them instead. In this case, weeither take the names of new students to work with or we move forward with fewer than12 students. Based on our
weekday morning, bothparents have to get to their workplaces. Also, they have to drop off one child at daycare and theother child at school. The family only has one car. Using the map that shows the transportationnetwork, how can the parents get everyone to their destinations?Available Modes: Drive Automobile (Single Occupancy or Carpool), Bus, MARTA Train,TrolleyWhat factors can they use to make the decision?What are their options?Which mode(s) should the family use? Mom: Dad: Child 1 to daycare: Child 2 to school:What route(s) should they follow (i.e. in what order should they make the trips)? Page 15.962.11
a plate in plane stress. The geometry is created in ANSYS (ANSYS 12 (2009)). Aneight node quadrilateral element is used to model the bar quadrant. Isotropic material propertiesfor steel, namely the Young‟s modulus (207 GPa) and the Poisson‟s ratio (0.3) were introducedas inputs. Figure 7: Application of Loads and Boundary Conditions on the Quadrant Model Page 15.1137.7 Figure 8: Stress Profile for the X-StressFigure 7 shows the load applied and the applicable boundary conditions. Tensile load is appliedas a uniform pressure of 100 psi applied on the vertical edge to the right. The bottom edge ofthe quadrant is input
member of Penn State’s Women In Science and Engineering (WISE) executive committee.Javier Gomez-Calderon, Penn State New Kensington Dr. Javier Gomez-Calderon, Professor of Mathematics at Penn State New Kensington, received his Ph.D. from The University of Arizona. From 2002 to 2006, he served as Head of the Mathematics Division of the former Commonwealth College which, at the time, included 14 campuses in the Penn State system. He is currently Co-PI on the NSF-Sponsored Toys’n MORE grant. Dr. Gomez-Calderon is the author, or co-author, of twenty-nine articles, four elementary textbooks, and four in-house publications. In 2007, Dr. Gomez-Calderon received the Milton S. Eisenhower Award for
enrollment and retention in science and engineering. In The Scienceand Engineering Workforce: Realizing America‟s Potential, the NSB strongly recommendsnational-level action to provide an adequate number of science and engineering graduates toensure competitiveness in the ever-changing global economy2. Moreover, there is a critical needfor partnerships between universities and K12 schools to increase the mathematics and scienceabilities of high school graduates – preparing them for any career path, particularly for STEMdisciplines.In addition to the quantity of engineering and science graduates, many studies have focused onthe qualities needed of these graduates by today’s society. Not only do they need technicalfundamentals, but they also need to
professional certifications have beenestablished in ET alumni surveys during the last decade at RIT, the University of Dayton, OldDominion, Northeastern University, and the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown (UPJ).” 1Work completed by Mott,2 Stanley and Verma 3 in the early 1990’s provided an effective meansof gathering relevant information from an alumni pool and data by which other schools, like RIT,could benchmark to demonstrate success of those alumni.In 2004, the Technology Accreditation Commission (TAC) of ABET required the use ofoutcomes assessment as the basis for accreditation assessment for engineering technologyprograms. The current TAC ABET Criteria for accrediting engineering technology programsrequire the following: Criterion 2
Michigan University Engineering Design Center for Service-Learning whichsponsors the project.The Initial Design Page 9.383.1 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright c 2004. American Society for Engineering Education”In the mid-to-late 1990’s when the primary author was an associate professor of mechanicalengineering at University of South Alabama, he adopted the service-learning pedagogy inteaching the first- year “Introduction to Mechanical Engineering”1. In ME 101, students workedin teams to design and build laboratory equipment and
Computer Managed Learning and Assessment Integrated Within a Materials Engineering Program for Non-Majors Aaron S Blicblau Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, AustraliaAbstractThis paper reports on an on-line learning initiative in Engineering Materials for first yearstudents in diverse disciplines of engineering. This initiative was developed for general firstyear engineering students to incorporate an on-line assessment system for the major aspects oflearning and teaching: lectures, tutorials and laboratory work. This teaching approachrequired the availability of a data delivery system (using a proprietary brand of software), forprovision of pedagogical
engineer, a customer, an enthusiast, a biker. I also had managed amotorcycle shop in the early 70’s. It was a good match. Page 9.553.4 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationI left the meeting with a project challenge to think about during my riding for the next month.Later that day, I met with the folks at MSOE and firmed up my assignment for the fall quarterthat would start right after Labor Day. I would teach one section of ME160 – Introduction toMechanical Engineering and deliver two large
Session 2158 Sur vey Builder : A Tool to Suppor t Assessment Mar c Hoit 1, Rick Sayer s2, Bill Lewis2, Akhil Kar ker a 2, Nar en Kamat 2 1 -Associate Dean, College of Engineer ing, Academic Affair s/ 2 -Car eer Resour ce Center Univer sity of Flor ida, Gainesville, FLAssessment is a critical component of all educational programs. The need to develop andadminister surveys to a wide variety of audiences is one of the standard techniques used in allassessment programs. One of the major
Session 1330 Identifying the Components of Modeling Through Protocol Analysis Paul S. Steif, Marina Pantazidou Carnegie Mellon University/National Technical University of AthensIntroductionThe art of engineering involves a variety of skills, and one of them is modeling. While theterms “model” and “modeling” are not simple to define, within engineering, Piel and Truxal1offer a helpful account: “a model is the simplest possible system description that includes allimportant aspects.” One might add to this “at the appropriate level of detail and accuracy”,which helps to capture the significant amount of judgment involved
Session 3232 Softwar e Design of a Digital Filter Using Evolutionar y Methods Dr . Dick Blandfor d Univer sity of EvansvilleIntr oductionEvolutionary computation was conceived and articulated in the 1960's as a method of solvingotherwise intractable problems. Computer programs based on evolutionary techniques typicallyconsume lots of computer resources and until the 1990's the technique was implemented only bythe few who had access to those resources. Over the last ten years, computers have become fastenough and enough memory has become cheaply available that
for Engineering Education Annual Conference &ExpositionCopyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education"second exam by the students that did not obtain that threshold during the first exam. In addition,the results show that the data was not skewed during the second exam occurrence by adisproportionate number of those students that achieved 51% or above on the first examoccurrence (11 or 30%). COMPASS Exam First Time Passing Rates 50 50 45 40 37 N S 35 u t m 30 u b Number of students taking the exam. d e 25 e 20
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright©2004, American Society for Engineering Education Table 2. Comparison between courses at UF and UNAH Number Course UF Credits Equivalent Course UNAH Credits Term 1 Gen Ed -- S Social & Behavioral Science 3 Philosophy 4 Gen Ed- H Humanities 3 Spanish I, Foreign Language I 8 MAC 2311 Analytical Geom. & Calculus I 4 Analytical Geom., Calculus I 8 CHM 2045 General Chemistry I
intended to involve mostly students of the first(undergraduate) study years and of the former project year to have the possibility of letting themwork also in the following project year(s).In addition it was always an aspect of quality and equivalence of the project to have adiversified European composition. But as it happens always in international projects betweeninstitutions of higher education there are more or less active and interested students and more orless active and financially interested and supporting cooperation partners.And thirdly all participating institutions had to verify their interest in this IP in such a way thatthey paid about 50% of the travelling and living costs for their participants, students andteachers. And they had
assigned from among those presented at The Online Ethics Center forEngineering and Science at CASE Western University3. One example case from the OnlineEthics Center involved the use of technical information and data contained in one engineer sproposal by another engineer. The example is based on a case ruled on by the NSPE Board ofEthical Review. A recent newspaper article4 concerning the Justice Department investigation ofcharges that Boeing Co. obtained Lockheed Martin Corp. s proprietary documents and themisuse of proprietary information was the basis of another class discussion.The significant change to this part of the course was the requirement that students submit theiranswers to discussion questions in writing. These papers are then used
Session Number: 2471 Experience with Multidisciplinary Design Projects at the US Military Academy Peter D. Hanlon, Bryan S. Goda, and Lisa A. Shay Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY 10996 {peter.hanlon/bryan.goda/lisa.shay}@usma.eduAbstract - The intent of Senior Design Capstone Projects at the US Military Academy is toprovide cadets with a challenging engineering problem that requires them to integrate keyconcepts from several previous EE courses. Multidisciplinary projects add to that challengebecause the students who
impact of HCI cultural diversity interface design should strengthenour resolve to support education at all levels and through all markets. Concern for translation,filtering, system constrains, and other commonly used system administration techniques wouldbe at a minium.Tsalapatas, S., Stav, J.P., Brna, P., & Kalantziz, S. (2003) referenced the funding of theEuropean Commission’s Minerva-Socrates program (eCMS) that is used to design and developweb-based content for support of asynchronous eLearning, will aid in efforts to publish,discover, retrieve, and integrate educational material. The eCMS system of course organizationpedagogy moves a step further to recognize that the structure of courses often reflects theacademic practices and
details. A screenshot of sucha page is shown in Figure 1. In addition, users via a link can see a roster of students currentlyregistered for any given course. Such a roster includes each student’s full name, major(s), andadvisor(s). The pages are automatically regenerated nightly during registration periods so noroster is more than 24 hours out of date. Page 9.368.2 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 1: Example of a Registrar
tutorials at least once received lower overall grades in the course than those who didwatch all the video tutorials at least once.It is possible that the video tutorials could be used in a more effective manner to increase studentperformance. Further work should be conducted on the best way to use the videos to enhanceexisting Vector Dynamics courses. In the meantime, the videos have been uploaded to theauthors’ department’s YouTube channel to so that instructors across the world can access to thecontent.45. AcknowledgmentsThe development of the video tutorials and simulations was funded by Cal Poly Pomona’sGraduation Initiative Program.6. References1. A. Kaw and S. Garapati. Development of Digital Audiovisual Lectures for an Engineering Course: A
24.409.6After the microcontroller decides which of the operating source(s) to activate, the “cruisecontrol” system is effected by using a PID controller for each motor.Setpoint: Air Engine and Electric MotorThe Setpoint of the HPT is the speed that the user wants to reach and maintain with the CruiseControl System. The equation governing the speed relations in a differential gearset was used todevelop the relationship between individual setpoints: ܵா + ܵாெ ܵ = (1) 2where SC is the desired wheel speed (user input), SAE is the setpoint of the air engine and SEM
Education annual conference 2011. [13]. Bret Bosma and Gregory Kallio, “Renewable-energy labs for an undergraduate energy-systems course”, ASEE annual conference 2009, paper AC 2009-1621. [14]. Bosco Mansel Oliver, John R. Wagner, Elham B. Makram, and Rajendra Singh, “Renewable energy education at Clemson University-A certification program with solar, wind & electrical grid classes” ASEE 2013, M526 [15]. Tan Ma, Osama A. Mohammed, and Ahmed Taha Elsayed, “educational experiments in renewable energy analysis, forecasting, and management in hybrid power system”. ASEE 2013, T526 [16]. Oxana S. Pantchenko, Tiffany Wise, Michael S. Issacson, and Ali Shakouri, “enhancing student
Asynchronous, Collaborative Learning Environment.” ETR&D, v. 54, no. 4, p. 331- 354.9. Wan, J., et. al. (2008). “A Study on the Use of Cooperative Learning Strategies in a Computer Literacy Course” College & University Media Review, v. 14, p. 21-6310. Morgan, B. M. (2003). “Cooperative Learning in Higher Education: Undergraduate Student Reflections on Group Examinations for Group Grades.” College Student Journal, v. 37, no. 1, p. 40-4911. Terenzini, P., Cabrera, A., Colbeck, C., Parente, J., Bjorklund, S. (2001) “Collaborative Learning vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students’ Reported Learning Gains,” Journal of Engineering Education, p. 123-13012. Micheal Prince, R. F. (2007). “The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning
Paper ID #8920Effects of Two Experientially-Correct Introduction To Engineering Moduleson Prospective Female Engineering StudentsDr. Jerry Volcy, Spelman College Jerry Volcy is President of JVLabs, LLC, COO or SoftWear Automation and a part-time member of the faculty at Spelman College. JVLabs is an engineering consultancy specializing in the advanced devel- opment of FPGA designs, microprocessor microcode and O/S device drivers. SoftWear Automation is a DARPA funded startup chartered to automate the manufacture of sewn goods through robotic automation. Dr. Volcy is a graduate of the Georgia Institute of Technology and
EducationConference, 1998.[6] Donna S. Reese, Robert Green, and Martha Smith, “A Pre-Engineering class to Help Transition Students Into anEngineering Major”, ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Blacksburg, Virginia, April 2010.[7] Donna S. Reese, “Assessing the Effect on Retention of an Engineering Living/Learning Community”, ASEESoutheast Section Conference, Charleston, South Carolina, April 2011.[8] Pablo Biswas and Runchang Lin, “Improve Retention Rate and Performance of Students in STEM Field Using aVirtual Teaching Assistant System”, ASEE Annual Conference, 2013[9] Patricia R.Backer, Emily L. Allen, and Janet Sundrud, “Assessment of First-Year Experiences at SJSU”, ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2011.[10] Pablo Arenaz, Walter Fisher, Benjamin
-determination approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology, 49, 186-193. 5. Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A Self-Determination Theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756. 6. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research, chap. Competing paradigms in qualitative research, (pp. 105-117). London: Sage. 7. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. 8. Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of
Page 24.603.6 have been analyzed.AcknowledgementsThe authors are grateful for support provided by the National Science Foundation grant EEC-1160353. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. Koretsky, M.D., D. Amatore, C. Barnes and S. Kimura. (2008). Enhancement of student learning in experimental design using a virtual laboratory, IEEE Transactions on Education, 51(1), 76-85.2. Koretsky, M.D., Kelly, C. & Gummer, E. (2011). Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially-situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories. Journal
activities for undergraduate engineering students.IntroductionIn the late 1990’s and early 2000’s, scholarship in American engineering education underwent afundamental shift as a result of two distinct events: restructuring of the accreditationrequirements of ABET, Inc. (previously known as the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology) in 1997 and the publication of the National Academy of Engineering “Engineer of2020” reports in 2004 and 20051. These reform efforts stemmed from calls from the Americanprofessional engineering community citing a consistent need for professional, communicative,and innovative engineers in the workplace2, and led to the creation of numerous experimentalpedagogies, programs, and other initiatives to encourage
changing the design objective, goal, and constraints between years, all teamswill compete on a level playing field.A short activity has been developed to present and reinforce the concepts of design formanufacturability. The activity is highly reusable; for example, by simply adjusting thedesignated costs or earning per widget each year, a previous year’s winning design can berendered ineffective given the new constraints. Further, this activity is not discipline-specific;we expect that it is well suited for students in all engineering fields.6. References[1] K. T. Ulrich and S. D. Eppinger, “Design for Manufacturability” in Product Design and Development, 5th ed., ISBN 978-007340477, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 253-287, (2012).[2