walking tour of key areas where specific operations and/or functions canbe viewed. The last part of each tour is a ‘Q & A’ where students are encouraged to posequestions to managers, engineers, and/or technical specialists. In addition to the plant visits, oneor two guest speakers are scheduled for in-class presentations on topics related to CIM. Page 2.1.4III. Lecture TopicsLecture topics in the CIM course are structured along functional area views of CIM. After a ‘bigpicture’ overview of a manufacturing environment is presented, including global considerations,lectures begin with an engineering perspective of CIM, followed by an IS
AC 2009-441: CULTIVATING AUTHENTIC ENGINEERING DISCOURSE:RESULTS OF FACULTY DEVELOPMENT EFFORTSKerrie Kephart, University of Texas, El Paso Kerrie L. Kephart is Assistant Professor of Bilingual/ESL Education at the University of Texas at El Paso. Her research interests include academic literacy development, second language learning, and the connections between language and learning. She provides faculty development workshops on classroom practice, learning theories, and supporting students’ development of communication skills.Elsa Villa, University of Texas, El Paso Elsa Q. Villa is a lecturer in the Department of Teacher Education, Division of Mathematics, Science, and Technology
besimulated. The principle advantage to a DFIG is independent control of active and reactive power.The laboratory illustrates how the d and q components of the rotor current affect the P and Qcomponents of the complex power.5 Integration into curriculumA basic knowledge of electric power topics, including voltage, current, active and reactive power,three-phases systems, and one-line diagrams, is required for all experiments. Students will benefitfrom previous work with electric machines, especially induction machines. It is, however, Page 14.461.7possible to compensate for a lack of study in this area with sufficient instruction, and the
− − − IL VPV Cp − Q Vb Ib Vu / Vo Co Vc LOAD / Q4 Q2
Page 14.1285.6of multiple teams for 2008:Q: How did having multiple Baja teams this year help or hurt your success? 1. It helped inspire an internal competition. 2. It helped by creating internal competition. It hurt by dividing people and assets. 3. Helped- competition kept us driven and let us see other alternatives to problems. Hurt- split up the members that really wanted to work on the vehicle and not choosing members hurt team dynamics. 4. Helped- teams were able to show the other difficulties and problems that would be applicable to both. Required increased insight to produce two separate products. 5. I think it helped because we fed ideas off one another, but a consolidated team with those that worked
interactivesimulations. Survey items relating to student interest and engagement are promising.Fig. 6 lists a typical test log file. The first four lines comprise the file header. This headerrecords the student name, time and date, test name, and test scoring. The test scoring line liststhe percentage correct answers, the response percentage, and the number of correct answers. Theresponse percentage measures the number of times a student responded to questions during John Doe 1/16/2009 9:52:33 PM Test ID: Practice 80.00 28.75 16.00 Q# COC POC R# ETQ Cor
1000 Minimum -1744.28 1st Quartile -534.17 Median -116.19 3rd Q uartile 314.78 -1500 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 Maximum 1758.99 95% Confidence I nterv al for Mean
communicationrather than only wireless sensor networks.Most students felt that providing a hands-on project based aspect to the course would greatlyincrease their engagement in the content. Several students signed up for the course not realizingthat it was an inverted format and had expected the course to be a more traditional lecture formatwith laboratory experiences embedded throughout the semester. Many felt that the hybrid natureof the class would have worked better if hands-on opportunities were provided during class time.Student enthusiasm during the pilot was strongly positive overall. Most students were verypositive about the inverted classroom format, where they could watch the lecture videos at theirown convenience, followed by free-wheeling Q&
/academics/grad/industrial[6] Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry (10/14/2003). Workers’ CompensationCompliance. Retrieved January 19, 2006, fromhttp://www.dli.state.pa.us/landi/cwp/view.asp?a=138&Q=65908&landiPNavCtr=|1065|1306|#2641[7] Asfahl, C. R., Industrial Safety and Health Management (5th Edition), Prentice Hall, 2003.[8] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0101590/[9] www.hayesassoc.com Page 14.1138.10
styles Unanticipated Outcomes - Observation, informal Q&A 1,2,3,4 Figure 1. Relational Structure of CLABSIn this model, CLABS components impart knowledge, skills, and guidance to the student that inturn lead to positive outcomes as delineated by the program objectives. In addition, the projectmonitors the role of external factors and unanticipated outcomes through observation andinquiry. While the CLABS project team has continually assessed and evaluated the program inthe past, the addition of concept mapping and
outcomes, which is a subset of thedepartmental outcome list, outcomes (a) through (q).Table 1 Course Outcomes of MEEN 3210 Measurements LabOutcome Description(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering(b) ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(d) an ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems(f) an ability to communicate effectively(i) A knowledge of contemporary issues(j) an ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice(m) an ability to use statistics and linear algebra(o) an ability to work
ip in c r e a s e y o u r u n d e r s ta n d in g o f th e o p e r a tio n s , e q u ip m e n t, a n d fa c ilitie s o f in d u s tr ia l fa c ilitie s ? ___Y ES ___NO 4. O v e ra ll, th is to u r w a s _ _ _ E x c e lle n t _ _ _ G o o d _ _ _ F a ir _ _ _ P o o r 5. O th e r c o m m e n ts . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Fig. 1 Field Trip Evaluation Form Overall Field Trip Evaluation Campus Tours
pluggedinto the power inverter (instead of the wall of the garage). A small Q hydrogen cylinder(with an internal volume of 14.7 L filled with compressed hydrogen at 2000 psi) wasused to power the fuel cell for slightly less than one hour. This power was adequate topower the e-Gator and prevent the batteries from losing charge. Pictures of the vehicleare shown in figure 3 below. Figure 3. John Deere e-Gator with fuel cell power unit as the payload.At this point the TACOM funding period expired and the students began to seekadditional funding. With the guidance of the faculty advisor, students contactedcompanies to initiate discussion. The majority of the minor project teams were paperstudies of alternative energy areas. If the contact seemed
.” www.iienet.org/public/articles/index.cfm?Cat=1492, 2005. Page 11.267.109. Kiattikomol, Kraiwood. “South-East Asia Centre for Engineering and Technology Education (SEACETE).” Global J. of Engineering Education. 8(1), 2004.10. Leinonen, Tatu, Esa Jutila, and Ismo Tenhunen. “On the Requirements of Industry in Mechanical Engineering Education.” Global J. of Engineering Education. 1(1), 1997.11. Nguyen, Duyen Q., and Zenon J. Pudlowski. “Should standardization or diversity be embraced in the development of future engineering education curricula?” World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education 2(1), 2003.12. Noor
theoretically calculate the p-njunction depth “xj” from the diffusion equation based on Fick’s Laws Q xj2 C( x ,t ) = exp − πDt 4 Dt but measure the p-n junction depth experimentally with the help of Philtec’s sectioner. They notonly calculate the oxidation thickness‘d’ theoretically based on Deal-Groove Model. d 2 + Ad = B(t + τ )but measure it experimentally with the help of ellipsometer. In addition, devices are emphasizedin several other courses, such as, Electronics I and II and Semiconductor
., G. Scheuermann, J. Frey, Z. Yang, B. Hamann, K. Joy, and H. Hagen, “Tensor visualizations in computational geomechanics,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Page 11.502.10 Geomechanics, 2002; 26: 925-944.[7] Zhou, Y. Q.-L. Li, and S.-D. Ma, “Visualization of Geostress Tensor Along Oil Well Trajectory,” Proceedings of Computer Graphics International 2001, 3-6 July 2001, Hong Kong.[8] Zheng, X. and A. Pang, “Volume Deformation for Tensor Visualization,” IEEE Visualization 2002, Oct. 27 – Nov. 1, 2002, Boston, MA.[9] Almusallam, A. and S. E.-D. Taher, “Three-Dimensional Mohr’s Circle for Shear
, Colorado.8. Ogot, M., Elliot, G., & Glumac, N. (2003). An Assessment of In-Person and Remotely Operated Laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 57-64.9. Lindsay, E. D., & Good, M. C. (2005). Effects of Laboratory Access Modes Upon Learning Outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 619-631.10. McNemar, Q. (1969). Psychological Statistics (4th ed.): John Wiley & Sons.11. Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge : a cognitive view. Dordrect ; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Page 11.1431.9
Q = (1) h th 2 α2 Z= (2) kρThe most important measure of success for a material in thermoelectric technology is the Figure ofMerit [3][5][6] and specifically the Seebeck Coefficient, α , used in its computation. In equationsone the K is actually defined a conducting mass in which the entirety of a system is nested. Thisfurther suggest that within the
communicate their status with the instructors.This form of feedback can make the students play a significant role in their classroom educationand enhance the course outcomes.The student’s Autonomy: Student as an agent of changeThe instructor’s goal should be facilitating students’ learning, providing a creative space forencouraging engagement, discussions, and moving towards more in-depth and advanced learning,problem finding, and problem-solving. At the same time, students need to be more than just passiveparticipants, expecting to have a one-directional pathway to knowledge. Students and faculty needto have reflections, discussions, open Q/A, and examination of the expectations several timesduring the process. Students need to be honest
, results, and conclusion) are highlighted to provide students with a framework fortheir final reports. Guidelines for the research paper (Appendix C) and examples of past researchreports (from the previous FIRE course) are made available to the students for reference.Additionally, a list of online resources offering tips for creating attractive and effective researchposters and academic writing guides are distributed to further aid in preparing the finaldeliverables. The research poster session is held during the last lecture session. Teams present theirsemester’s work in a 7 minute presentation, followed by 3 minutes of Q&A with the audience.Team research reports are also collected at this last meeting. In 2015, the poster session was
-based learning on metacognitive strategies during an engineering design task. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 1-18.17. Livingston, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: An overview. State University of New York at Buffalo [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/Metacog.htm.18. Mazumder, Q. H. (2010). Metacognition approaches to enhance student learning in mechanical engineering classroom. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2).19. Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C., & Baxter, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self- regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues
important in their work?." Journal of Engineering Education 101.1 (2012): 95-118.[11] Nguyen, Duyen Q. "The essential skills and attributes of an engineer: A comparative study of academics, industry personnel and engineering students." Global J. of Engng. Educ 2.1 (1998): 65-75.
personality and social psychology, 77(6), 1121. 7[3] Piech, C.; Huang, J; Chen, Z.; Do, C., Ng, A., Koller, D. "Tuned models of peer assessment in MOOCs,” Proc. 6th International Conf. on Educational Data Mining, Memphis, TN, July 2013.[4] Boud, D. and Falchikov, N., “What does research tell us about self-assessment?” Chapter 12 of Boud [1].[5] González, J.C. and Murthy, A., “Including peer and self-assessment in a continuous assessment scheme in electrical and electronics engineering courses,” Frontiers in Education 2014, Madrid, Spain, Oct. 2014.[6] Liang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Lu, Y.; Qian, R.; and Yiqing, Y., “Using a web-based system to explore peer, self, and tutor assessment in
Design Engineering Division and Lockheed Martin.Bibliography[1] C. Corbett and C. Hill, "Solving the equation: the variables for women’s success in engineering and computing," The American Association of University Women, Washington, D.C.2015.[2] U.S. Census Bureau. (2014, February 5, 2017). American Community Survey 1-year Estimates: Tables B24125 and B24126. Available: http://www.factfinder.census.gov[3] R. H. Tai, C. Q. Liu, A. V. Maltese, and X. Fan, "Planning early for careers in science," Science, vol. 312, 2006.[4] C. S. Hulleman and J. M. Harackiewicz, "Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes," Science, vol. 326, pp. 1410-1412, 2009.[5] A. Krishnamurthi, M. Ballard, and G. G. Noam, "Examining
handbook for visual designersand artists (No. 6812). Mit Press.Shiffman, D., Garner, S., Chorng, J., Mooney, G., Murray, S., & Reas, C., (2013).Processing Hour of Code. Retrieved from http://hello.processing.org/editor.Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers inscience. Life sci, 1, 0-2.Tsukamoto, H., Takemura, Y., Nagumo, H., Ikeda, I., Monden, A., & Matsumoto, K. I.(2015, October). Programming education for primary school children using a textualprogramming language. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. 32614 2015.IEEE (pp. 1-7). IEEE.Urness, T., & Manley, E. D. (2013). Generating interest in computer science throughmiddle-school Android summer camps. Journal of Computing
Retrieved from http://cns.utexas.edu/fri. 11. Wurdinger, D. D., & Carlson, J. A. (2010). Teaching for experiential learning: Five approaches that work. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education. 12. https://facultyinnovate.utexas.edu/teaching/engagement/experiential-learning/defined 13. Lewis, L.(2011) - Report and Recommendations on experiential learning https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=experiential+learning+report
Assessing Students' Entrepreneurial Skills and Mind‐Set." Journal of Engineering Education 94.2 (2005): 233-243. 2. Ochs, John B., Todd A. Watkins, and Berrisford W. Boothe. "Creating a truly multidisciplinary entrepreneurial educational environment." Journal of Engineering Education 90.4 (2001): 577-583. 3. Vickers, Ken, et al. "Creation of an entrepreneurial university culture, the University of Arkansas as a case study." Journal of Engineering Education 90.4 (2001): 617. 4. Erdil, N. O., & Harichandran, R. S., & Nocito-Gobel, J., & Carnasciali, M., & Li, C. Q. (2016, June), Integrating e-Learning Modules into Engineering Courses to Develop an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Students Paper presented
Antoine coefficient AB Antoine coefficient BC Antoine coefficient CArea Cross-sectional area of cylinder in vaporizer (cm2)h Height of fluid in vaporizer reservoir (cm)∆h Change in height of fluid in vaporizer reservoir (cm)∆t Observation time (s)𝑉𝑉̇ Volumetric flow rate (cm3/s)𝑚𝑚̇ Mass flow rate (g/s)𝜌𝜌𝐴𝐴 , 𝜌𝜌𝐵𝐵 Density of components A and B (g/cm3)𝜌𝜌̅ Average density of mixture (g/cm3)Q Heat (W) �𝐻𝐻 Specific enthalpy (W)∆H Enthalpy change (W)∆HvapA, ∆HvapB Heat of vaporization for components A and B (W)
competitions. It hasreviewed relevant literature and discussed the work of several robotics teams at the North DakotaState University. Future work will involve conducting a more in-depth analysis of participationdata and collecting data from additional participants over time to assess the long-term benefits ofrobotic program participation.References[1] J. Dias, K. Althoefer, and P. U. Lima, “Robot Competitions: What Did We Learn?,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 16–18, 2016.[2] A.-B. Hunter, T. J. Weston, S. L. Laursen, and H. Thiry, “URSSA: Evaluating Student Gains from Undergraduate Research in the Sciences,” CUR Q., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 15–19, 2009.[3] A. Zdešar, S. Blažic, and G. Klančar, “Engineering Education in Wheeled
graph for I2 as a function of time for 𝑡 ≥ 0. Show clearly the value at 𝑡 = 0 and for 𝑡 → ∞. Explain your reasoning. c) Sketch a qualitative graph for the capacitor’s voltage VC as a function of time for 𝑡 ≥ 0. Show clearly the value at 𝑡 = 0 and for 𝑡 → ∞. Explain your reasoning.2. Quantitative Analysis.a) For all times 𝑡 ≥ 0 and using the concept of the sum of voltage, relate the voltage in the battery with the resistances R and the currents I1 and I2.b) For all times 𝑡 ≥ 0 and using the concept of potential difference, find a relation among current I2, resistance R, the charge stored in the capacitor Q, and its capacitance C. Take the derivative of this equation with respect to time to find a relation between the derivative of