–. =-... $iii’ ) 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘S,,,yylj . 1 - 7) Cyrrent. . Status ..-. As of the writing of this paper, the committee’s proposal has been approved in principle by the GraduateStud~ Gxnrnittee. We plan to run a pilot program next ML 8) MTA Program Program Overview This program is designed to allow graduate students in the College of Engineering to expand theirteaching experience by formalizing a mentoring relationship between themselves and professors of their
‘@llRc.: . Iwher~j~ the failure rate per unit time.The cd~for Y is given by R~(l) = P(TM > 1) = exp(–1 / 24) = 0.9592The TIS is composed of two subsystems, the Power Supply (PS) and the Sight (S). The PS is an activeredundant system in which at least one of the three battery-converter-distributor series must work to ensurepower. Let TP~ be the time until failure of the PS and X be the number of battery-converter-distributor seriesfunctioning at time t. We have RP~(l)= P(TP~ >1)= P(X>l)= 1-P(X <1)where X is
of Engineering Education, 83, 311-316 (1 994).Peters, M. S., and Timmerhaus, K. D. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.Woods, D.R. Process Design and Engineering Practice. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1995. ***** Page 1.477.4 ?@xb’; 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘.,,,pylj . 4
Session 2309 TEACHING HANDS-ON BIOMEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION David J. Beebe Department of Biomedical Engineering Louisiana Tech University 711 S. Vienna Street Ruston, LA 71270INTRODUCTION Hands-on laboratory experience is an essential component of an engineer’s undergraduate training.In this paper the above hypothesis will be supported via personal experience and results of a survey ofprograms offering biomedical
. . 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings . . Figure 5. Tim~Survey Graph for EM-364A, Fall Semester, Academic Year 95-96 LIEUTENANT COLONEL STEPHEN J. RESSLER LTC Stephen J. Ressler is an Associate Professor in the Dept. of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U. S. Military Academy, West Point, and is a registered professional engineer in Virginia. He graduated from USMA in 1979 and received his Ph.D. from Lehigh University in 1991. He has taught courses in statics and dynamics, mechanics of materials, steel design, reinforced concrete design, and design of structural systems. COLONEL THOMAS A. LENOX COL Thomas A. Lenox is a Professor of Civil Engineering at the
http://www.vt.edu/. AcknowledgmentsThe program described in this paper was the result of a team effort by the Practice-oriented Master’s DegreeWorking Group. All the members are responsible for this program and we acknowledge their contributions. Theworking group members are, in Engineering Science & Mechanics: R. W. Landgraf, in Industrial and SystemsEngineering: W. G. Sullivan, in Materials Science & Engineering: R. W. Hendricks, in Mechanical Engineering:M. Ahmadian, J. H. Bohn, E. F. Brown, H.H. Cudney, and N. S. Eiss, and, finally, in Aerospace and OceanEngineering: B. Grossman and W. H. Mason. The effort to improve the design program in the AOE Departmenthas included all the faculty
Engineering Education. (1994). A SEE Membership Handbook. Washington, DC:Author.2. American Society for Engineering Education. (1995). Engineering Technology Council OperatingProcedures Manual. Washington, DC: Author.3. Frank, R. R., & Zeigler, T. W. (1984). Registration of Engineering Technology Graduates. Journal ofEngineering Technology, 1(2), 41-42.4. Cheshier, S. R. (1985, May). A Modest Proposal Regarding the Future of Engineering TechnologyEducation in America. Engineering Education, pp. 706-712.WALTER W. BUCHANANDr. Buchanan is Industrial Studies Department Chair at Middle Tennessee State University. He received hisBSE and MSE from Purdue University, and his Ph.D. and J.D. from Indiana University. Walt is a P.E. and isSecretary
Model Stone Properties toFragmentation Mechanisms during Lithotripsy.” J. Lithotripsy & Stone Disease 3(4):1-8, 1991.3Coleman, A.J., and Saunders, J.E., “A survey of the acoustic output of commercial extracorporeal shockwave lithotripters.” Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 15(3):213-227, 1989.4 DeReggi, A.S., Roth, S.C., Kenney, J.M., Edelman, S., and Harris, G.R., “Piezoelectric polymer probe forultrasonic applications.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69(3):853-859, 1981.5 Harris, G.R., “Sensitivity considerations for PVDF hydrophones using the spot-poled membrane design.”IEEE Trans. Sonics and Ultrason. SU-29(6):370-377, 1982.6 Preston, R.C., Bacon, D.R., Livett, A.J., and Rajendran, K., “PVdF membrane hydrophone performanceproperties and their
Session 1692Analysis of Men and Women Engineering Students at Ohio State J a n e M . F r a s e r , Dina R. Ismail Ohio State UniversityIntroductionEngineering mythology describes the dean who greets the entering engineering class bysaying: “look to your left and look to your right; only one of the three of you will make itthrough this program.” Whatever the truth of the mythology or whatever the motivationthis mythical dean might have in so greeting the class, the story highlights the enormousattrition that engineering programs have.Another part of the mythology has been, however, that some part of that
, respectively. In doing the work, the student learned about crosssection libraries, cross section multigroup structure, general principles of the S Nmethod, and phantom modeling for a deterministic transport code. The results ofthis project were not impressive, but the student learned a lot and continued tograduate school.Project 3: “ A study of the semiempirical equations for the dose rate outside ashielded cylindrical volumetric gamma source”. The student used the code QAD as the basis of checking the accuracy of Page 2.403.4the semiempirical equations given in the Engineering Compendium for RadiationShielding [4] . He also checked the various formulae
the Dept. of Civil and MechanicalEngineering at the U. S. Military Academy, West Point, and is a registered professional engineer in Virginia. Hegraduated from USMA in 1979 and received his Ph.D. from Lehigh University in 1991. He has taught courses instatics and dynamics, mechanics of materials, steel design, reinforced concrete design, and structural systems.COLONEL KIP P. NYGREN is Professor and Head of the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at theUnited States Military Academy. He graduated from the United States Military Academy in 1969. He holds aDoctor of Philosophy in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology.CHRISTOPHER H. CONLEY completed his Ph.D. degree at Cornell University in
the overhead. This phase of reviewing the analytical solution can include the following: • Determine if the problem requires a particle or rigid body solution. (i.e., Is the body rotating? Is the body’s size of consequence? Make a clear distinction between rotation and curvilinear motion.) • Determine if the problem requires a kinematic or kinetic solution or both. (i.e., Does this problem involve a force analysis or just motion geometry?) • If the solution requires a kinetic solution determine which procedure is best. • Establish the proper diagrams. • Set up the basic governing equation(s).• Obtain one or two volunteers to assist with demonstrating the model. Make the
use intermediate results in further calculations.In example, the initial carbon concentration is Co = 0.2 % and the boundary condition at the surface of thespecimen is Cs = 1.0 %: Defining Cs, type Cs and then, press the colon key (:). Mathcad shows the colonas the definition symbol ":=." Then type 1 (%) as the carbon concentration at the surface. And define Co":=" 0.2 (%) as the initial carbon concentration. Cs 1 Co 0.2Using Equation (6), we can compute the diffusivity (D) of carbon atoms (cm2/s) at 1223 K: 142000 D 0.2. exp
students identify their own misconceptions.* Acknowledgement and Disclaimer: Page 14.1103.2“This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0525484. Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the viewsof the National Science Foundation.”The pedagogical challenge for physics instructors is clear. Students come with pervasive deep-rooted misconceptions about how the most foundational physics principles work. Traditionalapproaches to moving students beyond these misconceptions
Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, June 20065. Lin, A.N., “System Identification for Determination of Dynamic Properties from Forced-Vibration Page 14.417.14 Testing,” Experimental Techniques, 1997, pp.34-37.6. Denton, L., Glover, D, Rodman, F, Chapman, J, “Senior Design Final Report: Bridge Safety Monitoring System,” Virginia State University, 2008.7. Sazonov, Edward S. Ph.D. “New Wireless Bridge Sensors Powered By Passing Traffic,” ScienceDaily, October 20078. Uppal, A.S., et al, “Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Fatigue Cracks in Bridge Components,” Technology Digest 99-008, Transportation Technology Center, Inc., Association
twosemesters. The course integrated a number of lectures on specific nanoscale and biotechnologyconcepts, included fairly inexpensive “NanoLab” modules that required limited resources withadditional reading and homework material. The students also worked in teams to address someof engineering and/or design challenges facing bionanotechnology in the areas of nanomedicine,diagnostics, and other areas of their interest. The course with its flexible structure can be easilyadopted by other biomedical or bioengineering programs.AcknowledgementsWe are grateful to the National Science Foundation though the Nanotechnology UndergraduateEducation Award (award # EEC-0634230) for the support.References1. Irvine DJ, Stachowiak A, Jain S. “Engineering biomaterials
AC 2009-505: LIFE AFTER TENURE: LEADERSHIP ROLES IN ACADEMIADonna Reese, Mississippi State University Donna S. Reese. Professor Reese is currently the Associate Dean for Academics and Administration for the James Worth Bagley College of Engineering at Mississippi State University and a Professor of Computer Science and Engineering. She has been on the faculty at MSU since 1989. She may be reached via email at dreese@engr.msstate.edu.Priscilla Nelson, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Priscilla Nelson. Dr. Nelson is Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and International Program Director, and former Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs, at the New
formatting of media renderingbased on required features.Literature ReviewComputer assisted instructions appeared as early as in the 1980’s. In 1987, in the paper titled“Computers and Training: Allies or Enemies?” 4, Patricia Galagan stated that technologiesremained in the developing stage at that time. Although some people had realized that computertechnologies would have positive impact on providing learning services, it took time to improvesoftware packages such as the human-machine interface and response time, so that users couldcontrol them easily and become more productive. With technology constantly advancing, articlesdiscussing library web instruction design began emerging. In 1999, in the paper “TransportingGood Library Instruction Practices
Engineering collection.AcknowledgmentThe Center for Sustainable Engineering is funded by NSF Grant DUE-0442618, and by EPAGrant Agreement X3-83235101. Although work in the Center has been funded in part by the Page 14.1183.4EPA, this paper has not been subjected to the Agency’s peer and policy review and thereforedoes not necessarily reflect the views of the agency, and no official endorsement should beinferred.Literature Cited:1. C.I. Davidson; C.T. Hendrickson; H.S. Matthews; M.W. Bridges; B.R. Allenby; J.C. Crittenden; Y. Chen;E. Williams; D.T. Allen; C.F. Murphy, S. Austin, Adding Sustainability to the Engineer’s Toolbox: A Challenge
successful strategies employed to overcome challenges and obstaclesare included. Each partnership's description includes sample student product(s) and conveyshow other partnerships may emulate the project.One proposal winner was chosen by a panel of reviewers at each of the following levels: pre-school or elementary school; middle school; high school. The three winning abstracts have beenused to create a conference paper for this session. PRE-SCHOOL / ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WINNERPartnership to Improve Student Achievement through Real World Learning inEngineering, Science, Mathematics and TechnologyDan Fagan, Wallace Primary School, Hoboken, NJCarol Shields, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJProgram Overview & Partnership
, 2002.8. Das, B., Kassimali, A., Sami, S., “Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics,” Burr Ridge, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1994,p. 57. Page 14.908.9
manufacturer. Thefinal phase linked the first two by requiring the students to construct an assembly line for theirassembly kits based upon principles they observed during the factory tours.In this paper, the design concept for the program is detailed and results gathered from pre andpost program surveys are presented.IntroductionOver the last two decades, the United States economy has transformed from one based onmanufacturing to one based on service. Manufacturing companies and jobs have beenoutsourced beginning with an exodus to Mexico in the 1980’s and China since. Numerous mediasources have proclaimed that manufacturing in the United States is dead and nearingextinction[2,5].The supposition that manufacturing will soon be extinct in the United
Equations of regions 8. Classic examples of visualizations and Euler’s constant 9. ConclusionAll the operations described in the paper can be verified easily by using a graphing utility. Theword curve will be used to mean the graphs of piece-wise differentiable functions includingstraight lines and also finitely multi-valued functions.1. IntroductionIn engineering colleges during the 1950’s, a student had to become acquainted with all kinds ofvisual constructs that were needed to solve problems of design. Oscilloscopes displayed voltagetime signals; spectrum analyzers displayed signal Fourier components and curve tracersdisplayed diode and transistor characteristics. In addition, students contemplated such wonderfulmathematical
or ECET programs, courseassessment is well established. The program faculty will be working with ASME and PMMI inhopes that program criteria for Mechatronics Engineering Technology can be established,although the program can be accredited under the general criteria until then.Bibliography1. Package Printing website, http://www.packageprinting.com/article/41000-41999/41602.html, December 1, 20062. Brad Kelly, “Keeping a Lid on Costs: Container industry seeks efficiency amid rising energy, supply prices,” Investor’s Business Daily, March 10, 2008 Monday National Edition Page 14.82.63. Reilly, S. “Pick 6, US Packaging Shipments
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.8 Dettman, Matthew, Effective, Efficient, Direct Assessment of Programmatic Outcomes, Proceedings of the 2005American Society for Engineering Educators Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.9 Hadim, Hamid, Kishore Pochiraju, Costas Chassapis, David Vaccari, Keith Sheppard, and George Korfiatis,Mechanical Engineering Program Assessment in the Schaefer School of Engineering at Stevens Institute ofTechnology, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Educators Annual Conference &Exposition, 2005.10 Verma, S., Matrix Based Approach to Assessment of an Educational Program along ABET Criteria, Proceedingsof the 2005 American Society for Engineering
outcomesassessment improved significantly as compared to the previous years. The new approachseems to enhance student understanding of the subject matter and motivates them toutilize the materials knowledge for product and process design tasks during rest of theirengineering degree curriculum.References 1. G. Sullivan: Introductory Materials Science: A Solid Modeling Approach, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2005 2. Palmer M. A., Pearson R. E., and Wynne K. J.: Applied Materials Science – A Fundamental Course for Engineers, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2002 3. Tse O. K., Burnside S. D., Rodeghiero E. D., Smith J. A., Beecroft L. L., and Giannelis E. P.: Materials by Design: an Introductory Website for Materials Science
Learning. New York: Jossey-Bass Publishing.5. Prince, M., (2004). “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231; Wankat, P., and Oreovicz, F., (2006). “A Push for Participation,” ASEE Prism, 15(5), 39.6. Williams, Bard. Educators' Podcast Guide. Eugene, Oregon: ISTE, 2007.7. Cohen, E.G. (1994). Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.8. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). “Pedagogies of Engagement:Classroom-Based Practices,” Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87-100;.9. Laeser, M., Moskal, B. M., Knecht, R., & Lasich, D. (2003). Engineering Design: Examining
, S. J. (2007). Second Change, Not Second Class. A Blueprint for Community CollegeTransfer. Change, September/October, 30-45.4. National Academy of Engineering and the National Research Council of the NationalAcademies. 2005. Enhancing the Community College Pathway to Engineering Careers.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Page 14.43.7