. Page 15.291.10AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by a National Science Foundation grant no. 0935211. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Rampersad, H.K., Integrated and simultaneous design for robotic assembly, Chichester, England: Wiley, 1994.2. Hsieh, S. (2005). "Automated Manufacturing System Integration Education: Current Status and Future Directions," Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR. Page 15.291.11
) distributedhandouts of Linksman’s characterizations and recommendations for each super link.Also in this study, (5) students were shown previous student projects submitted in the earlierMATH 131 courses to introduce each new topic visually and (6) were required to complete amuch more comprehensive project component (hence the term Project-Directed Mathematics).The authors discovered that students’ documented super links did not confirm the previousassumption, that most designstudents by nature would be visual 2 0 0 6 - 2 0 0 7 M ATH 1 3 1 St u d e n t s' Le a r n in g Pr e f e r e n ce sor tactile right-brained learners, thus ( n = 37
were selected: The Journal of EngineeringEducation, Advances in Engineering Education, and the International Journal of EngineeringEducation. These journals were selected for their engineering education specific audience andfull article content availability online. Selection criteria for the articles included theclassification of the article as “mixed methods” by the author(s) or by the specific mention ofqualitative and quantitative data collection in the abstract. Following an initial review of thearticles in each publication, the sample (nine articles) was insufficient to fully characterize mixedmethods research in the field. In light of this an internet search was conducted for additionalengineering education research articles featuring a
is hoped that the results of this study will support this statement andwill demonstrate the need and value of engineering education as a way to facilitate studentachievement of 21st century skills in classroom settings.References1 Macalalag, A.Z., Lowes, S., Tirthali, D., McKay, M., & McGrath, E. (2010). Teacher Professional Development inGrades 3-5: Fostering Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering. American Societyfor Engineering Education Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, June 20102 National Academy of Engineering. (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status andImproving the Prospect. Washington D.C.: The National Academies
learning when compared to a controlgroup of students who performed the actual experiment. In the early 2000’s, Klahr1,2 published aseries of studies involving K-12 students that indicated that student experiential learning usingsimulations was comparable to learning using actual hands-on experiments. At about the sametime, several including one of the authors3,4,5 wrote describing the use of Internet-basedsimulations in undergraduate engineering laboratories.On line simulations are relevant to chemical engineering community and are used, in ourcurriculum, to train students in process control and top prepare students for complex laboratoryexperiments in distillation. These experiments, however, used early versions of Java™ abd weremuch simpler to
of hydro-statics to estimate the buoyancy force ofeach balloon. Empty balloon mass measurements were taken during recitation and guidancein creating their models was provided. Week 13 was a holiday for lecture, but groups metand worked together on their project that week. Week 14’s lecture continued mathematicalmodeling and both lab and recitation were entirely devoted to in-class group work for thefinal project. Week 15’s recitation class was devoted to each group taking photographs of thetarget area using their timer and chosen set of balloons. Week 16’s lecture showed them how Page 22.149.13Figure 7: area ∼ 906f t2
completion, a variety of timeline and calendar formats are possible) iii) Personnel (complete C.V.’s for the team) iv) Facilities (essential information such as square footage, availability of adequate utilities, code and safety specifications, possibly including a floorplan or photos)The students were given the task of preparing proposals for further work or equipmentimprovements (or both) based on the results they obtained for the fourth experiment. Page 22.157.7ConclusionsThe use of alternative ways of reporting laboratory data allowed the students to develop skill-setsin written, oral, and visual communication. The
and Environmental Engineering, and the Engineering Studies Program. Her research focuses on decision-making for environmental and infrastructure systems. Dr. Jones received a BS Civil Engineering from Columbia University, and a PhD Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University. She is a licensed professional engineer in several states.Christopher Ruebeck, Lafayette College CHRISTOPHER S. RUEBECK is an Associate Professor in the Economics Department at Lafayette College, teaching in the areas of industrial organization, marketing research, introductory Principles and Microeconomics courses, as well as simulation and evolutionary game theory. Dr. Ruebeck holds the
. Page 15.1151.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Survival Tips from the Trenches Susan A. Lantz, Ph.D.; Trine University; Adrienne R. Minerick, Ph.D., Michigan Technological University; Donna S. Reese, Ph.D., Mississippi State University; Beena Sukumaran, Ph.D., Rowan University Abstract: Panel Discussion: Four women in academia---one with 5-10 years of experience, two with 10-20 years of experience, and one with 20-plus years experience---will offer advice, suggestions, and discuss tips and techniques that worked (or did not work) for them. The panelists include a woman who left academia
25.Retrieved from http://www.webology.ir/2006/v3n2/a25.html6. Maness, J. M. (2006). An evaluation of library instruction delivered to engineering students using streamingvideo. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, (48), 6-6. Retrieved fromhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=22189393&site=ehost-live7. Michel, J. P., Hurst, S., & Revelle, A. (2009). Vodcasting, iTunes U, and faculty collaboration. ElectronicJournal of Academic & Special Librarianship, 10(1), 6-6. Retrieved fromhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lxh&AN=41534766&site=ehost-live8. Osif, B.A., and DeSantis, S.M. (2005). Engineering resources tutorial [Video tutorial]. Penn State
%)Teaching course(s) 83 (28.8%) 75 (90.4%) Although this seemingly high number of available opportunities appears to contradict theidea that doctoral students are not getting adequate preparation for teaching careers, it isimportant to note that a very small percentage of grad students participate in such programs.One of the authors of this paper with experience with teaching certificate programs and coursesat three separate universities estimates that less than 5% of the graduate students at anyuniversity participate in such opportunities, suggesting that these programs are a good first stepbut need to become integral to graduate education to really make a difference. In addition, thePFF
, “Mathematics counts,” Tech. Rep., London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1993.3. M. S. E. Board and N. R. Council, “Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education,” Tech. Rep., Washington, DC, 1989.4. Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, 1989.5. Professional Standards for teaching mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, 1991.6. Assessment standards for school mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, 1995.7. Principles and Standards for School
(2008). Development for the other 80%: engineering hope, Journal forAustralasian Engineering Education, 14(1): 1-12.[6] Bielefeldt, A.R., B. Amadei and R. Sandekian (2008). Community service attitudes of engineeringstudents engaged in service learning projects, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Paper AC 2008-2430.[7] Paterson, K.G., A.R. Bielefeldt, and C.W Swan (2010). Measuring the Impacts of Project-Based ServiceLearning in Engineering Education. Lulu, 80 pp.[8] Gelmon, S.B., B.A. Holland, A. Driscoll, A. Spring, and S. Kerrigan (2001). Assessing service-learningand civic engagement. Campus Compact. 154 pp.[9] Burack, C., J. Duffy, A, Melchior, E. Morgan (2008). Engineering Faculty
for increasing underrepresented groups in thesustainable biomaterials manufacturing engineering program each semester. Based on thefindings of these evaluations each semester, the curricula materials and outreach activities will bemodified to increase the impact and effectiveness this approach. Page 15.724.6Bibliography 1) The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century," National Academy of Engineering. 2004 2) Archel M. A. Ambrosio, Harry R. Allcock, Dhirendra S. Katti, Cato T. Laurencin, Degradable polyphosphazene/poly([alpha]-hydroxyester) blends: degradation studies, Biomaterials, Volume 23, Issue 7
. The physical properties of the accelerometer included sensitivity of102 mv/(m/s^2), a frequency range of 0 to 100 Hz, and a 10 Hz phase response of under 3°1.The accelerometer contains a voltage regulator integrated within its structure. This allows forexternal power to be supplied by any source within the 10 to 30 VDC excitation range. Thechange is capacitance is detected by a capacitance bridge where each arm of the bridge functionsas a capacitance divider. The outputs of the bridge are then amplitude modulated signals that aredirectly proportional to the changes in capacitance. A series of diodes and capacitors within theaccelerometer are used to demodulate the signals which are then summed, amplified, and filteredto provide a voltage
. Alvarado, “Power engineering technology: a new program targeted at the nuclear power industry,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2008.2. L. Parker, M. Holt, “Nuclear Power: Outlook for New U.S. Reactors,” CRS Report for Congress, March 2007.3. R. Mott, Applied Fluid Mechanics, 6th edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2006.4. Y. Cengel, M. Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 6th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2008.5. D. Kaminski, M. K. Jensen, Introduction to Thermal and Fluids Engineering, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2005.6. F. P. Incropera, D. P. DeWitt, T. L. Bergman, A. S. Lavine, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 6th edition, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2007.7
, different norms of junior high, senior high,vocational and college male and female students from 2003 academic year were set up to serveas an objective comparison purpose. The creditability and validity contents of the local studentswere used as the norms, and the creditability were found to be high. The re-test creditability wasbetween 0.78~0.92, and the validity was between 0.64~0.85. The four factors and 15 traits of LAI scale include5: (1) Introversion and extraversion personalities: 1. General activity (G), 2. Ascendancy (A), 3. Page 15.1239.4 Social extraversion (S), 4. Thinking extraversion (T), 5. Rhathymia (R
various branch conditions listed in Table 4. The signal name “NATT” is the acronym for“next address if the test result is true” and serves as the target of a branch action, so that a branchis performed by loading the NATT value into the address counter. Address Microstore Test NATT EnA EnD EnL EnN SelMux SelALU KVal Wr 2 4 1 2 1 1 2 2 8 1 Kval Wr ’0’ I0 S ’1’ I1 Data path control signals Cflag I2 Mux Zflag I3
there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 2Presenter Name(s):1) Last Collins First Julian Affiliation Montana State University2) Last Lucier First Julie Affiliation Frenchtown, Montana School District3) Last First AffiliationContact Person’s Name: Julie LucierContact Person’s Email: julie.lucier@ftsd.orgContact Person’s Phone: 218-290-4117 Page 18.1.2Contact Person’s Alternate Phone:2015-ASEE-K12-Proposal-Form-1.docx Page 1 of 6
. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 1Presenter Name(s):1) Last Kennedy First Katheryn Affiliation Stevens Institute of Technology, CIESEContact Person’s Name: Katheryn KennedyContact Person’s Email: Katheryn.Kennedy@stevens.eduContact Person’s Phone: 201-216-5443Contact Person’s Alternate Phone: Page 18.2.22015-ASEE-K12-Proposal-Form MM edits Page 1 of 6
. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 1Presenter Name(s):1) Last: Haas First: Thomas Affiliation: University of Cincinnati CEEMS & Norwood HighSchool2) Last First Affiliation3) Last First AffiliationContact Person’s Name: Thomas HaasContact Person’s Email: haas.t@norwoodschools.org Page 18.3.2Contact Person’s Phone: 513-252-4207Contact Person’s
of acceptance status by March 14. Late submissions will not be accepted. Advanced Workshop Registration will open December 6, 2013. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 3Presenter Name(s):1) Last Dean First Melissa Affiliation Mobile Area Education Foundation2) Last Duke First Judy Affiliation Mobile Area Education Foundation3) Last Johnson First Tami Affiliation Mobile Area
, 2013. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 1Presenter Name(s):1) Last Pollock First Meagan Affiliation National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity2) Last First Affiliation3) Last First AffiliationContact Person’s Name: Meagan PollockContact Person’s Email: mpollock@napequity.orgContact Person’s Phone: 5127390774
. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 2Presenter Name(s):1) Last: Farmer First: Cheryl Affiliation: The University of Texas at Austin2) Last Leslie First Arnie Affiliation Tesla STEM High School, Lake WashingtonContact Person’s Name: Cheryl FarmerContact Person’s Email: cheryl.farmer@mail.utexas.eduContact Person’s Phone: 512-471-6196Contact Person’s Alternate Phone: n/a
. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: ThreePresenter Name(s):1) Last Cady First Beth Affiliation National Academy of Engineering2) Last Pearson First Greg Affiliation National Academy of Engineering3) Last Sneider First Cary Affiliation Portland State UniversityContact Person’s Name: Beth CadyContact Person’s Email: ecady@nae.eduContact Person’s Phone: 202-334-2064
, 2013. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 2Presenter Name(s):1) Last Burnham First Greg Affiliation Allen High School2) Last Burnham First Kenyan Affiliation Texas Tech University/Frito Lay3) Last Burnham First Stephanie Affiliation Plano Academy High SchoolContact Person’s Name: Greg BurnhamContact Person’s Email: greg_burnham@allenisd.orgContact Person’s Phone: 806 392-6516
name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 2Presenter Name(s):1) Last McMahon First Ann Affiliation Pacific Science Center2) Last Clark Blickenstaff First Jacob Affiliation Pacific Science Center3) Last First AffiliationContact Person’s Name: Ann P. McMahonContact Person’s Email: amcmahon@pacsci.orgContact Person’s Phone: 2064433641 Page 18.27.2Contact Person’s Alternate Phone: 3149569331WA
INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 1Presenter Name(s):1) Lang Laura Sauk Prairie High School2) Last First Affiliation3) Last First AffiliationContact Person’s Name: Laura LangContact Person’s Email: laura.lang@saukprairieschools.orgContact Person’s Phone: (608) 963-6850 Page 18.28.2Contact Person’s Alternate Phone: (608) 643-59262015-ASEE-K12
last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating with co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 2Presenter Name(s):1) Last Gaedicke First Cristian Affiliation California State University, East Bay2) Last Motavalli First Saeid Affiliation California State University, East BayContact Person’s Name: Cristian GaedickeContact Person’s Email: cristian.gaedicke@csueastbay.eduContact Person’s Phone: 217-417-5039 Page 18.25.22015-ASEE-K12-Proposal-Form_v04 jh edits
Presenters will be notified of acceptance status by March 14. Late submissions will not be accepted. Advanced Workshop Registration will open December 6, 2013. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 1Presenter Name(s):1) Last Kaiser First Ann Affiliation ProjectEngin LLC2) Last First Affiliation3) Last First AffiliationContact Person’s Name: Ann KaiserContact