. In order to break down thefaculty/staff/student barrier, each student finds professors and staff members whose interests alignwith their passions. Experienced entrepreneurs, serving as “Entrepreneurs or Innovators InResidence” to the college play a key role, enabling fellows to see the links between their academicpursuits and their entrepreneurial passions. This personal coaching has been extremely effectiveover the first three years of the fellowship program, kick-starting students into high levels ofengagement and ownership in charting their path. Students also meet with entrepreneurial peerleaders (typically junior or senior level undergraduate fellows) regularly to help navigate collegelife.During the winter interim, fellows start an
for many years. The introductory ethics lecture explaining the major western ethicalphilosophies [6] has long included a discussion of the ideas of John Rawls and his argument thatany just decision requires the decision-maker to adopt a “veil of ignorance” in order to morefairly distribute the benefits and burdens of our choices. The recommended accompanyingmaterials feature an Oxford lecture by Michael Sandel [7], star philosophy professor of HarvardUniversity’s immensely popular “Justice” course [8] and author of the book Justice: What’s theRight Thing to Do? [9] However, despite the strong personal and professional commitments ofour faculty to social justice and to diversity and inclusion efforts, the standardized NHVmaterials had
effective articulation of the benefits to students andfaculty members are essential to getting faculty members to engage in multidisciplinarycollaboration [8]. Without these, faculty members may likely remain in their silos [8]. Therefore,experiences gained from multidisciplinary collaborations such as the Stitt Scholars Program mustbe shared among the broader academic community. The following section presents the maincomponents of the Stitt Scholars Program at the University of Dayton.3. The Stitt Scholars ProgramThe Stitt Scholars Program at the University of Dayton was instituted with a generous donationfrom an engineering technology alumnus who wanted students from the School of Engineering(SoE) to deeply engage with students from different
at Birmingham (UAB) organized its first Materials Camp for high school students,based loosely on the model followed by ASM Education Foundation-supported camps. Selectedfrom nearly sixty applicants, twenty-four students from more than twenty area high schools tookpart, making it a wide-reaching outreach program. Throughout the 3.5 day non-residentialprogram, participants worked with department faculty and graduate students to explore the fieldof materials science and engineering (MSE), the possibilities available at this university, and theopportunities available for MSE graduates. Students also worked in teams to design and buildmodel rockets from high-tech composite materials, which were launched on the last day. Thelogistics of
curriculum. Three case studies were developed todescribe the effect of the course on four categories that emerged from the data -Reflections onPractice, Changes in Practice, Intentions to Change Practice, and Change in Knowledge.DesignThe study was a component of a graduate course in science education supported by a NSFBridging Engineering and Education grant. Created and taught by a team of faculty fromeducation and engineering, the course was a follow up to a previous “bridging” course and wasdesigned to address students’ expressed need for a greater emphasis on integrating DET into theK-12 curriculum. The class met weekly in an industrial engineering lab with access to a widerange of materials, tools, and technical assistance. The course
degree-holders is a process that depends upon the students, educators, and themeans by which students are educated. The students are a vital portion of the raw materials tothis process and issues that affect their quantity and quality also affect the resulting number ofdegree-holders. Studying this process in order to identify significant factors that affect theproduction of degree-holders could provide a guide towards improving the process. Amethodology to test the effect of these factors could aid in designing an intervention program toencourage and assist more students in pursuing a college degree in STEM.Developing such a methodology starts with examining the work of education researchers whohave explored the motivations of students and the
skills necessary for “career-ready” graduates [2] [3] [4], they areincreasingly including more than just technical know-how, with emphases on critical thinking,problem solving, collaboration, and communication among others. In addition to providingstudents a strong technical foundation, the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Waterloohas taken a two-pronged approach to providing students this important training: mandatory co-operative work terms, which have been present since the University’s inception; and morerecently, using industry-driven design problems as a base to provide students with formativepractice of these skills in the Engineering Ideas Clinic, which will be the focus of this paper.Jonassen, in his typology of problems [5
meeting in anopen engineering graduate space, “a faculty member confronted [her] twice, threatening to callsecurity the second time because he felt like [she] was loitering and did not belong”. “Feelinguncomfortable and unsafe”, Marvilous reluctantly left the open space. And her luck with herlabmates was no better. While working on a paper with two white womxn, she asked them aquestion about the coding process after noticing some discrepancies in the data. Shocked thatMarvilous, a Black womxn, had asked them about the coding process, they started crying andtold her research advisor. Marvilous, sharing this story with a friend, said: “I guess one of them coded some data a certain way and named it. I can't even remember what the name
students may beemployed, to work on developing the products.Rehab-IDEAS is currently developing three of the designs from Capstone that have beenpatented. One is a beach and rough terrain platform that allows a person in a power wheelchairto explore rough terrain. Another is a mechanism that takes a backpack or briefcase from theside of a power wheelchair to the back of the chair. This is helpful, because with the backpackon the side of the chair, it can’t fit through doors. The third is a folding writing table forwheelchairs. This would make it much easier for students to take notes and to eat lunch.This company gets start-up financing, and some of the student teams have received royaltychecks. This is a great “postscript” to an exciting Capstone
, Godfrey [9] cites many studies andpapers that describe and examine how engineering education culture contributes to resistance tochange in engineering programs with respect to: ● the participation of women (Dryburgh, 1999; Hacker, 1983; Lewis et al., 1998; Tonso, 1996b) ● culture as gendered (Cronin and Roger, 1999; Lewis et al., 1998; Tonso, 1996b) ● culture as an agent in student attrition (Courter, Millar and Lyons, 1998) ● student engagement and enculturation (Ambrose, 1998; Lattuca, Terenzini &Volkwein, 2006) ● the development of engineering identity (Dryburgh, 1999; Stevens et al., 2008; Tonso, 2006) ● faculty cultures (McKenna, Hutchinson, and Trautvetter, 2008) ● campus cultures (Tonso, 2006
) and Centers(offering co- or extra-curricular activities) [6]–[8]. Particularly noteworthy is the growth overthe last 20 years in the number of programs and centers and the growth in faculty support andinvolvement in such Programs and Centers [9].Efforts to integrate entrepreneurial skills into existing engineering courses have been notable.For instance, Schar et al. [10] introduced a series of case studies in an introductory mechanicscourse, under the label of Scenario Based Learning. These case studies challenged students toapply their mechanics-based analysis skills to support product decisions involving businesselements. Woodcock et al. [11] explored how an engineering capstone design course couldhelp students learn entrepreneurial skills
are noteworthy: the group whose members strove to drive globalimpact had the greatest positional authority and were all white men; the group whose proudmoments involved mobilizing and empowering others included an over-representation ofwomen; and the two groups whose proud moments involved limited structural interdependence,were more racially minoritized and internationally trained than the full sample. The first twotrends reflect gendered patterns of privilege while the first and third reflect the normative powerof white privilege and domestic graduate advantage in engineering organizations and Canadiansociety.DiscussionWhat did senior engineers learn from these proud moments in the context of their careers? First,they gained socio-technical
engineering programs in the nation, we are building an innovative program aligned with the university mission of Pro Humanitate (For Humanity). We are committed to educating the whole person and the whole engineer with fearlessness and virtuous character. With inclusion being a core value, our engineering team represents 60% female engineering faculty and 40% female students, plus 20% of students from ethnic minority groups. Prior to joining Wake Forest University, Olga served as a Program Director at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education and founding faculty of the Department of Engineering at James Madison University. As a 2009 NSF CAREER Awardee, her expertise and interests focus on
. Page 26.87.10 a career in computing attending graduate school other/undecided such as a non-computing career, part-time graduate studies, or an entrepreneurial activityA number of self-assessment and psychometric questionnaires such as the Myers-Briggs TypeIndicator are used in the course to help students better recognize their talent and interest areas.Students are also encouraged to join various professional societies such as IEEE or ACM to stayinformed with the latest state of the computer technology and a possible means for networkingwith their peers. Other activities that could help their careers such as attending various job fairs,graduate school forums, internship at local industry and devoting their
and environmental conditions as theyrelate to women in male-dominated fields will be examined briefly in this literature review. Taking an individualistic approach, Eccles’ (1994)17 Expectancy-Value Model ofAchievement suggests that academic and occupation related decisions are guided by one’sexpectations for success and the value one places on a particular activity. Research has shownthat women are less inclined to pursue male-dominated careers because they perceive thoseoccupations to be misaligned with their values18–20. Frome, et al. (2007)18 found that, 82% oftheir study participants with male-dominated career aspirations in their senior year of high schoolchose to change their career aspirations to either a gender neutral or female
Boulder. He co-directs Project EPIC, an NSF-funded project since 2009 that investigates how members of the public make use of social media during times of mass emergency. Professor Anderson leads the design and implementation of a large-scale data collection and analysis system for that project. Prof. Anderson was a participant in the first cohort of the NCWIT Pacesetters program, a program de- signed to recruit more women to the field of computer science and encourage them to pursue their careers in technology. As part of his Pacesetters efforts, Prof. Anderson led the charge to create a new BA in CS degree at CU that allows students in Arts and Sciences to earn a degree in computer science. This new degree
1. Briefly, the centerpiece of the program is our quarterly Success inSTEM seminar, which students take every quarter for their first two years at University ofWashington Tacoma. Through these weekly sessions, students connect with each other and withtheir faculty cohort mentor, learning to support each other through challenging times,developing a growth mindset towards their academic journey, understanding barriers that leadto equity gaps in STEM such as stereotype threat and imposter syndrome, and building a senseof belonging and self-efficacy. The seminar allows participants to explore co-curricularopportunities (e.g., student clubs), campus resources such as disability services and financial aidoffices, and career preparation, while
WSU.Under my direction, the Faculty Senate has made important gains in issues that directlyaffect faculty, such as improved rights for temporary faculty, working on securing payincreases, and promoting interdisciplinary work.Equally, my success as an activist was predicated on the backbone of my engineeringeducation, which taught me critical thinking and problem deconstruction skills that I useto this day. While I don’t advocate that everyone pursue the dominant role that socialactivism has played in my life – the personal toll exacted can be painful— I do believethat my career demonstrates that a more well-rounded engineering citizenry has theability to affect public policy for the public good. In fact, the many nights that I spentplowing through
Learning Center, she coordinates professional development experiences for graduate students, staff, and faculty. She has been involved with several NSF proposals to date. First, as a member of the management team for the NSF Center for Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), Courter is responsible with a multi-disciplinary team for developing and teaching a course for graduate students on teaching science and engineering. Second, as a member of the management team for the Foundation Coalition at UW-Madison, she has completed an on-line professional development program for twenty faculty from ten institutions. Third, NSF Award: $1,099,560 for the period September 1, 1999
peer reviewed conference proceedings articles in these areas. He has B.S. in ME, and both M.S. and Ph.D. in IE. He is a member of ASEE, INFORMS, and a senior member of IIE.Dr. Norma Perez, Houston Community College Dr. Perez is currently the Associate Vice Chancellor of Curriculum and Learning Initiatives at Houston Community College (HCC). She has served in various positions during her thirty years of service to HCC, such as Executive Dean, Dean of Health Sciences, and Director of Institutional Assessments. Dr. Perez was instrumental in working with faculty to create the first student success course for the Health Sciences students to impact the success rate of these students. Dr. Perez also worked with faculty and
decisions as wellas inclusion of the person or communities that will potentially be impacted by their work.To introduce the concepts of Design Justice in their courses, faculty members can start by readingthe Design Justice book [4], which contains many examples throughout the text. A case studycould be a good starting point, especially one that students can easily relate to. For example, thecase about the Spirometer, a device used to measure lung capacity. This was invented at a timewhen it was believed that race determined lung capacity, so the device was built with a racecorrection factor. When employers were sued for asbestos related lung-diseases caused due tolong exposure, Black employees would have to demonstrate worse lung function than
interest, retention, and achievement of girls and womenin science, math, and engineering.16 An ASU faculty member from the College of Education(COE), whose primary research focuses on issues of gender, science, and science teaching,conducted this session. The engineering faculty also included information on gender equity ineach of their workshops.The professor from the COE focused primarily on appropriate pedagogy and curriculummaterials for the gender-inclusive classroom. Participants explored and critiqued websites forequity resources. Middle school educators were given additional information on the differentialtreatment of girls and boys in mathematics. Discussions offered more on the current literature onthe causes and correlation of girls
, dispositions, and worldviews. His dissertation focuses on conceptualizations, the importance of, and methods to teach empathy to engineering students. He is currently the Education Di- rector for Engineers for a Sustainable World, an assistant editor for Engineering Studies, and a member of the ASEE Committee on Sustainability, Subcommittee on Formal Education.Ms. Sarah Aileen Brownell, Rochester Institute of Technology Sarah Brownell is a Lecturer in Design Development and Manufacturing for the Kate Gleason College of Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. She works extensively with students in the mul- tidisciplinary engineering capstone design course and other project based elective courses, incorporating
technology the six levels can be collapsed into athree stage process that somewhat mimics the progression students go through in highereducation: First we teach them how to Calculate; Second we teach them how to use theircalculations to Analyze; and Third we teach them how to Design. Having only three levels iseasier to remember and use in creating course materials.Engineering Technology program classes in the freshman and sophomore years often emphasizethe Calculate aspect as the students are still building their foundation of knowledge and tools.Senior level courses should be emphasizing the aspect of Design and decision making to preparethem for this final level before they graduate. In the middle is an often overlooked aspect thatbridges the gap
.Carolyn Parker, George Washington University Carolyn Parker is an Assistant Professor and lead faculty member to the Secondary Education Program in the Graduate School of Education and Human Development at the George Washington University. She holds a BS in Biology, MA in Teaching and PhD in Curriculum Instruction and Science Education. Dr. Parker’s research interests are in the achievement of women and underrepresented groups in science/technology.John Raczek, University of Maryland John W. Raczek is a Web Developer in the Office of Medical Education at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. His work focuses on developing software systems for education with an emphasis on
are willing to offer service-learning in their required courses to meet the goal of oneS-L course every semester for every student? (2) Will a significant number of studentsbe open to doing S-L projects? The SLICE program is a work in progress; however,there are some results so far to address these questions.Approaches, Methods, and ResultsThe approaches and methods to develop the project and answer these questions aredescribed below.FacultyME faculty were recruited via personal contacts and through workshops offered in thesummer and fall of 2004. All engineering faculty were invited. The summer workshopwas an all day affair with presentations by Dwight Giles as well as community partnersand breakout discussions. The second workshop was about
directly from a source other than the narrative provided (for example, from an emailor personal notes).In the collaborative narrative, we bold the barriers and opportunities that emerged from ourresearch. We also list these findings in Table 2 for easy reference.Creating the AssignmentIn summer 2018, four faculty members of our research group (three of the intervention courseinstructors (Professors A, B, and C) and the project lead (Professor D)) and an undergraduateresearcher (Student B) met for a half-day workshop to craft the first assignment that would beimplemented across our three courses.Table 2: Barriers and opportunities for sociotechnical integration. Barrier Opportunity Diverse
asbeing for people who are “clever, bright, reserved, socially clumsy” or unlike ordinary people[1], and incompatible with non-masculine identities [1]. Undergraduate students without muchexposure to alternatives to these stereotypes may not envision themselves as being able to orwanting to do research. At the same time, research experiences may be the most accessibleduring an undergraduate degree at a research institution. Explicitly exposing students to research,especially students who feel they do not fit the cultural stereotype, may be a step to ultimatelyincrease diversity among graduate students and faculty members in engineering. In addition,many positions in industry require research thinking – exposing students to research maystrengthen
Paper ID #21534Advanced Manufacturing Research Experiences for High School Teachers:Effects on Perception and Understanding of ManufacturingMr. Debapriyo Paul, Texas A&M University Debapriyo Paul is a graduate student at Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. He is pursuing a Master’s degree in Industrial Engineering with a focus in statistics and data sciences. He is currently working as a research assistant in the Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Department.Dr. Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University Dr. Bimal Nepal is an assistant professor in the Industrial Distribution Program at Texas
engineering degree will guarantee me a job when I graduate. ● A faculty member, advisor, teaching assistant or other university affiliated person has encouraged and/or inspired me to study engineering. ● A non-university affiliated mentor has encouraged and/or inspired me to study engineering. ● A mentor has introduced me to people and opportunities in engineering. ● I feel good when I am doing engineering. ● I like to build stuff. ● Engineering skills can be used for the good of society. ● I think engineering is interesting. ● I like to figure out how things work. 6. Select an answer that best describes your opinion about each of the following statements.(For each of the items below, survey