so I did not understand what the code was doing. I learned a little about the topics they were meant to teach about, but that was from reading the lab instructions, not from actually doing the lab. I found the MyDAQ mostly uninterested because I don't really plan on using anything like that in my discipline of engineering. I felt as though it was geared more towards electrical engineers and computer science/engineering majors. I didn't really like using a breadboard to make a circuit. Part of that was due to my limited understanding of circuits and how breadboards work. The hardware labs were difficult because they required teamwork which is hard to do with code. The number of hardware
lot outof it.6. Reflective discussionWe think the project could be further improved from several aspects. • The battery provided to the students were several years old, and some of them did not hold a charge well. As a result, the battery caused the Raspberry Pi and the ultrasonic sensors to behave erratically. One team actually did not do well in the Bocce game, due to a battery issue discovered right before the competition. In the future, we plan to provide new batteries to the students. It may also be a good idea to use a dedicated battery to power the Raspberry Pi. • Although the project stimulated student enthusiasm through the competition and has practical implications, we did not encourage the
is an interesting result of several reasonable decisions during the video creation, andwill be kept in mind for future recorded lectures. Additionally, a possible solution to this problemwould be to provide outlined notes that would help students who would like to stay engaged bywriting things down while maintaining the pace of the videos.Student feedback indicated a positive opinion of in-class activities as opposed to video lectures, asreported in previous studies [3], but it is not possible in this paper to separate the effects of one orthe other. In fact, the planned in-class problem-based activities would not be possible without thepre-recorded video lectures.ConclusionsResults from this study indicate that this initial implementation
difficulties in learning the material, and that instructional methods that are effectivewith one group are not necessarily effective with the other. Seeing this as an opportunity toimprove our teaching and the educational achievement of all our students, we developed aninitial research plan with the following hypothesis: • Given our specific instructional methods, the difference in the learning processes of the two groups of students is due, at least in part, to their different national origins, educational experience, expectations, outlook, etc. (loosely referred to as “culture”), and not only due to their age or other differences. • We should use the theory of preconceptions in education to obtain an initial
inaugural five faculty at each institution to register and use the tool receive alifetime basic version of the software for free. Outside of that, the basic version described in thispaper is currently $1 per student per course, following a two-term free trial for all new users. Anupgraded complete version that includes AI grading assistance and support for gradingprogramming assignments is priced at $3 per student per course. There are also team-teachingand institutional plans available.References[1] A. W. Chickering and Z. F. Gamson, "Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education," AAHE bulletin, vol. 3, p. 7, 1987.[2] A. N. Kluger and A. DeNisi, "Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged
Paper ID #22215Improving Spatial Visualization Abilities Using 3D Printed BlocksMrs. Vanessa LeBow, University of Arkansas Vanessa LeBow is an undergraduate civil engineering student at the University of Arkansas. Her area of focus is geotechnical engineering. As a part of her undergraduate honors thesis, she is investigating the use of 3D printed aids to improve spatial visual retention. She plans to pursue a M.S. in civil engineering at the University of Arkansas in Fall 2018.Dr. Michelle L. Bernhardt-Barry, University of Arkansas Dr. Bernhardt-Barry is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of
student groups were never profitable but were able to reduce their losses significantly inthe second round. In the second round, it was observed that many of the students had learned thevalue of planning, forecasting, and managing risk when determining the size and source ofinventory replenishment orders. To this end, they applied logic and math in an effort to improvetheir decision-making. For example, one team purchased their entire inventory from California inthe first round, which helped them reduce their total material cost. However, the late arrival ofthe shipment in the third week prevented them from satisfying customer demand in weeks oneand two. As a result, at the end of the week five, the team was left with a large amount of
planning, coordinating and organizing ability In order to receive accreditation from the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET), an engineering or engineering technology program “must havedocumented student outcomes that prepare graduates to attain the program educational objectives[3].” Highlighted below are several outcomes provided by ABET [3] for accrediting engineeringtechnology programs. Interestingly, and not surprisingly, these student outcomes are similar tothe attributes specified as desirable by employers. an ability to select and apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of the discipline to broadly-defined engineering technology activities an ability to select and apply a
techniques committed to by students.Thermodynamics 1. Preview-read-review 42.9% 2. Use the intense study cycle for Practice Problems 71.4% 3. Chapter or concept mapping 19.0% 4. Practice teaching the material 61.9% 5. Flashcards 9.5% 6. Other 9.5%The two students who marked “Other” described their plans as
with the ECSU AA site in the planning, design andimplementation of the NASA inspired curriculum. Parents/Guardians were provided STEMskills to engage them in supporting their children’s learning at home.Program Delivery and ActivitiesStudent Participation:The outreach and intervention initiative in this project targeted middle and high school students,especially from underrepresented background within the 21 county school districts. This regionis by far one of the most economically disadvantaged, underserved, and rural communities in thestate and nation. In order to meet our targets, ECSU AA site established partnership with schooldistricts, STEM-focused schools, and NC Math and Science Education Network (NC-MSEN)program on campus. Using this
-known within the ASEE community that hosts Lean LaunchPad® Instructorcourses, describes the approach the following way: It emphasizes experiential learning, a flipped classroom and immediate feedback as a way to engage students with real world entrepreneurship. Students learn by proposing and immediately testing hypotheses. They get out of the classroom and talk to customers, partners and competitors and encounter the chaos and uncertainty of commercializing innovations and creating new ventures…students will do, rather than plan to do. Unlike many approaches to entrepreneurship education, Lean LaunchPad® does not rely on static case studies or fixed models; it challenges students to create their
course? Y/N 4. What tasks or problems are planned for the students to work on? (Open-ended) 5. Anything else worth noting about the context? (Open-ended)In-Class Notes 1. Were the learning outcomes communicated to students? Y/N 2. How many students were present at the beginning of class? (Open-ended) 3. Notes (Open-ended)Post-Observation Notes 1. Did the task and talk align with the learning outcomes? Y/N 2. Were the learning outcomes assessed? Y/N 3. What proportion of students engaged in the task or activities? < 25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, 76-100%) 4. Notes on the overall class (Open-ended) Appendix B – ELCOT Quantitative Codes
-freshman undergraduate student in one of the designated student areasmentioned above.Which student did you meet? (full name, correct spelling) _____________________________________When did he/she first enroll here? ________________________________________________________Which classes is he/she taking this term? (names of classes, not numbers) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The ASCE student chapter is hoping to plan some new events this year. The club officers have requestedthat you suggest an event that you would like the ASCE to hold.Extra Credit
consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social,environmental, and economic factors” [1].Teamwork: Students work in pairs often comprised of students from two different engineeringmajors. This mix of majors is an early effort to facilitate their ability to function effectively onmultidisciplinary teams. The student survey indicates that more than 75% of students felt that theexperience improved their teamwork skills and confidence. These results support the programrequirement to assess ABET student outcome 5, “an ability to function effectively on a teamwhose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment,establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives” [1].Communication
). Students use knowledge of MATLAB taught in the lectureportion of the course to design a game. Students choose one or more games from a provided listto design or invent their own. Each game carried a point value and students could exceed thepoint requirements for extra credit. Students then conducted two user interviews to determinerequirements for the game and created a team working agreement. Before coding began, studentscreated a flowchart, algorithm, or pseudocode draft. Students then coded their chosen game(s).Additionally, students created a project notebook including a project schedule, business plan,advertisement, and project pitch video. Software documentation was also prepared including auser manual. Students were given multiple class
University in Iran, Tehran. He has been official Technical Teacher at Ministry of Education in Iran from 2007 to 2018, and received many certificate in education such as Educational Planning, Developing Research Report, and Understanding School Culture. During these years, he has taught construction courses in several technical schools. Mr. Beigpourian currently works in the CATME project, which is NSF funding project, on optimizing team- work skills and assessing the quality of Peer Evaluations. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Analyzing Changes in the Individual Dimensions of a Behaviorally Anchored Scale for TeamworkAbstract
to allow students to directly generate diagrams and receivefeedback are also needed to more fully realize the potential of automated assessment to improvesystems thinking. Additional testing is planned with both engineering students enrolled inintroduction to engineering and non-engineers in a general education engineering literacy course.References 1. “Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering (TUEE) Phase I: Synthesizing and Integrating Industry Perspectives,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2013. http://tuee.asee.org/phase- i/report/ 2. G. Pearson and A. T. Young, Ed., Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More about Technology, Washington, DC: National Academies Press
write a proposal detailing a plan to solve an engineering challenge 3. I am confident in my ability to give a presentation to my peers on a technical subject 4. I am effective at describing non-technical topics in a written format 5. I can create videos (in contrast to traditional written homework or presentations) to answer homework questions or present ideas to others 6. I can confidently utilize computer programming to solve engineering problemsThe results for these questions are provided in Table 1. An independent t-test was used todetermine the statistical significance of improvements in the survey responses across thesemester [8]. In addition, the end
Examples LSS projects Non-LSS projects Reduction in the average time and variability for: Design of a house in a box for humanitarian aid Inter-hospital patient transfers Redesign of a truck shelving interface Emergency department (ED) and Intense Development of a linear programming model to Care Unit (ICU) patient transfers enhance the capacity planning system in a manufacturing company Pre-operative process for total joint Design of an advertising system for commercial replacements
spaceshad a positive impact on many attributes vital to engineering, such as design and analyticalabilities, design self-efficacy, communication skills, management skills, and working effectivelyas a team [6], [8], [9], [10].About the MakerspaceThe makerspace being studied is relatively new, having only opened in 2016. The space isapproximately 1700 sq. ft. and is divided into several distinct areas. The front of the room closeto the entrance has a dual-function whiteboard/table, a couch, and a 60” monitor. It is setup formeetings, training for new users, lectures, planning, and if desired, relaxing. The middle of theroom has several large tables and is designed for testing out ideas and assembling small tomedium sized projects. The area can also
strategic plan for economic development: Rural priority [Online]. Available: http://www.floridajobs.org/REDI/EFI_2006- 08_RuralStrategicPlanofWork.pdf.[32] U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2015). Rural America at a glance. 2015 edition [Online]. Available: http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/1952235/eib145.pdf.[33] D. Pahuja, M. A. Mardis, and F. R. Jones, "What is advanced manufacturing? Exploring the topography of a technical field," presented at the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) 126th Conference and Exposition, June 16-19, 2019, Tampa, FL, In press.[34] S. H. Oh, M. A. Mardis, and F. R. Jones, "Analyzing three competency models of advanced manufacturing," presented at the American
local industry people whose feedback on implementation of surfacefinish standards in undergraduate and graduate programs will be sought.Table 1. Evaluation Plan for the Module on Surface finishPerformance Objectives Evaluation Instrument Performance Criteria ResultsNumber of courses using Syllabus Minimum two courses 3 coursesSurface Finish Standards in curriculumDiversity of SDO’s in Syllabus Minimum two SDO’s ASME, ISOprogramNumber of students in Enrollment 25 Per Semester More than 50 Senior UGcourses More than 30 GradsBreadth and
action plan, including thedelegation of responsibilities where possible.Reflections primarily revolved around themes consistent with the insights gathered from facultymembers. Most consultation hours were spent discussing strategies, providing suggestions, andgiving feedback on specific course materials. Faculty who sought out multiple follow-upmeetings were more likely to ask for in-depth feedback on their course materials andorganization. Those who did not engage in follow-up consultations tended to be more focusedon clarifying the expectations and steps needed for completion of the FIOT, rather than ondiscussions about the course itself.Consultations with faculty entirely new to either online teaching in general or to WPI werelonger in length
that led to their evaluation to the rest of the class. For most students this was the onlyrequired library session in the first year; library collaboration with other core courses was moresporadic at the time. Following this initial one-shot session, few students followed up withlibrarians later in the semester to discuss the sources or research for their design project.Late in 2016, the teaching and library team determined the current lesson plan wasn’t the mosteffective way to convey content or effectively support students’ work on their projects. While theactivity was helpful, faculty felt it became repetitive for students after the first 2-3 teams haddiscussed their assigned article and website. A one-shot session wasn’t the best use of
modules developed through thisresearch are interactive and require student exploration. They, along with other learningactivities could easily be used to encourage a more active classroom.As Finite Element Analysis is taught concurrently with Machine Design II at University, studentswere learning to use ANSYS software and the FEA theory simultaneously with machine designcontent. Students stated that the FEA activities helped them understand the machine designcontent much better than just performing book problems. However, due to sequencing in the twocourses, many students also found performing the FEA analyses to be beyond their abilities.Future plans for this research include sequencing the FEA and Machine Design courses to allowbetter synergy
more in tune with a student’s costs needs. There are institutions that do paygreater attention to the student’s financial needs and take that into consideration when theyaccept the student. These institutions have more planning, support, and aid available for theirstudents [9].One of the responses to the lack of state funding is to increase tuition. For universities, this is oneof the methods in which the gap between costs and funding are covered. However, one of theconcerns with this is that when the economy is performing poorly, universities typically receivelower funding. The increase in tuition is generally concurrent with an increase in unemployment.Many of these unemployed employees enroll into higher education institutions [3]. The
change over time during undergraduate formation?For the full project, we plan to interview at least 40 first-year and senior engineering students.This paper describes our initial step of validating our interview protocol through a set of pilotinterviews. We have done another round of interviews to validate and/or revise the protocolfurther. We included senior students in the second round of pilot interviews to ensure that thisprotocol is valid for the proposed cross-sectional study involving students at both the beginningand end of their undergraduate engineering education.Theoretical FrameworkA person’s beliefs about intelligence can be implicit, strong, and deeply-held. Mindset is aframework developed by Carol Dweck (Dweck, 2006)that
components will enable a wide range ofcolleges and universities to train the next generation of nanotechnology engineers.AcknowledgementsThis project is supported by the National Science Foundation through the ATE program, AwardNo. ATE 1700695. Any opinions, findings, and recommendations expressed in this paper arethose of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References 1. Poole, Charles P., and Frank J. Owens, “Introduction to Nanotechnology”, Wiley, 2003. 2. R. Feynman,”There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom”, Engineering and Science, 23(5): 22-36, 1960. 3. Mongillo, John, “Nanotechnology 101”, Greenwood Press, 2007. 4. The National Nanotechnology Initiative – Strategic Plan, December
feedback to correct mistakes.If CS 1 only has MSPs, when will students learn to write larger programs? Our thoughts: ● Majors will learn to write larger programs in CS 2. ● Non-majors, if they need to program in their careers, are more likely to have to write programs similar to the MSPs, like writing a small add-on function for a statistical analysis tool, for google docs, for a database query, etc. If they need to write more substantial programs, they will probably take a CS 2 class (or more). ● With the above said, we note that we intentionally ran the experiment in a more “extreme” manner, to see what effect would occur. Going forward, our instructors plan to give one large assignment mid-quarter and one
textbooks include: Engineering Ethics:Concepts and Cases (Charles E. Harris, Michael S. Pritchard, Michael J. Rabins),Engineering Ethics (Charles B. Fleddermann), Ethics in Engineering (Mike W. Martin,Roland Schinzinger), and three Chinese textbooks include: Engineering Ethics(YongqiangZhang), Engineering Ethics(Song Zhang), Engineering Ethics(Zhengfeng Li, HangqingCong, Qian Wang, etc.) All of them are classic and commonly used. In addition, the threeChinese textbooks are marked as classic textbook or “Nationally Planned Textbook” on theircovers. The three selected American textbooks with more than 3 editions have been translatedinto Chinese and other foreign languages. The common use and wide spread also reflect theglobalization to some