teachers.Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Michigan. He received his Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2014, after which he served as a postdoctoral research fellow at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. Aaron also obtained a master’s degree from MIT in 2010 and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan in 2008, both in aerospace engineering.Dr. Timothy G. Chambers, University of Michigan Dr. Chambers is the instructional laboratory supervisor and instructor for advanced lab courses in Mate- rials Science & Engineering at the University of
“Industry” (n = 328)Theme Example ResponsesGeneral industry “I really want to work in the automobile industry.” “I would like to take my engineering skills as well as my interest in the food industry to either starting or getting involved with a brewery or other major company in the food and beverage industry.”Motivation “I would like to work in the prosthetic limb industry. I would like to work with a company that improves the design and efficiency of this technology. It is something that I am very passionate about, and would like to expand my learning in that subject
academic editing.Tori Bailey, Stanford University Tori Bailey is a Ph.D. student at the Center for Design Research in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Stanford University. Her research interests include academic and professional identity development of engineering students, academic advising of engineering students, history of engineering education in the U.S., and the organization of engineering education programs. Ms. Bailey received a Bachelor's Degree in Mathematics from Spelman College and a Bachelor's Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology where she was a NASA Women in Science and Engineering Scholar. She also holds a Master's Degree in
., University of North Carolina, Charlotte Patricia A. Tolley, Ph.D., P.E., is Associate Dean for undergraduate experiences in the Lee College of En- gineering at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. Her responsibilities include the introductory en- gineering and engineering technology courses, a large freshman residential learning community and peer retention program, a junior/senior multidisciplinary professional development course, student leadership academy, employer relations and industry-sponsored senior design, and ABET and SACS accreditation. Her research focuses on engineering education research using quantitative methodologies.Dr. Kimberly Warren, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Kimberly Warren is
–1006, Apr. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218763587.[10] American Society for Engineering Education, “Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2019,” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC, 2020. Accessed: Apr. 28, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ira.asee.org/wp- content/uploads/2021/02/Engineering-by-the-Numbers-FINAL-2021.pdf[11] M. Gasman, T.-H. Nguyen, C. F. Conrad, T. Lundberg, and F. Commodore, “Black male success in STEM: A case study of Morehouse College.,” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 181–200, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000013.[12] J. A. Henderson et al., “Circle of success—An interpretative
University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her research is focused on the STEM career pipeline, especially related to engi- neering, engineering education and the molecular biosciences. In addition to her work in education re- search, she is also the Director of scientific courses at the BioPharmaceutical Technology Center Institute in Madison, WI, where she coordinates curricula in the area of molecular biology.Christine G. Nicometo, University of Wisconsin, Madison Christine G. Nicometo is an associate faculty associate in the Engineering Professional Development (EPD) Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Within EPD, she teaches technical commu- nication courses in three programs: Technical Communication Certificate
Paper ID #41880Focus group analysis of engineering Collaborative Online International Learning(COIL+) compared to short-term study abroad programsJoshua E. Katz, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Joshua E. Katz is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, DELTA program, at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where his research centers on collaborative learning in engineering education and other STEM disciplines. He obtained his B.S. in Technology and Engineering Education in 2019 and his M.S. in STEM Education and Leadership in 2021, both from Illinois State University
providing: 3) an oral explanation of howthe evidence supports the assertion, and 4) an oral transition to the next assertion. In the caseapproach, Assertion-Evidence is extended directly to the structure of argumentative paragraphs witheach of the four components represented as discrete, sequential sentences in a paragraph.Students are asked to select a topic of interest that is intrinsic to the course content, e.g. the ethicalimplications of new technologies on engineering practice. Ultimately, the student will produce a 1-page written argument in support of a rhetorical goal related to their topic. Before they start draftingtheir written argument, students prepare and deliver a 2-minute presentation in 2 slides using theAssertion-Evidence
Paper ID #13394Design and Implementation of an Inexpensive Laboratory for Providing Hands-On Design Prototyping and Manufacturing Experiences to Engineering Stu-dentsMr. Jeremy John Vaillant, University of Massachusetts Lowell department of Mechanical Engineering Ph. D candidate with a Masters in Mechanical Engineering with a Design and Manufacturing Concentra- tion who develops CNC technology for academic research and education. He also designs experimental hardware, electronics and software coding to automate mechanical systems.Dr. Christopher J Hansen, University of Massachusetts, LowellProf. Stephen Johnston, University of
. Students were asked questions aboutthese feelings regarding each step of the engineering design process as well as open-endedquestions inquiring about feelings towards the project.BackgroundEngineering and technology fields encompass complex problem-solving skills and one’s abilityin executing different ways of thinking when applying them to projects and tasks. Theengineering design process itself instills problem-solving and real-world skill sets for those whowish to pursue these topics professionally. Developing these skills has been successful throughthe measurement of self-efficacy in first-year engineering courses and programs. Several studiesinvestigate engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning which target strategies to
Group.Dr. Octavio Mattasoglio Neto Neto Undergraduate in Physics (1983), master in Science (1989) and phd at Education (1998) all of them from Universidade de S˜ao Paulo. Professor of Physics at Mau´a Institute of Technology, since 1994 and President of Teacher’s Academy of the same Institute, ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Elaboration of a Contextualized Event for teaching eigenvalues and eigenvectors in the Control and Automation Engineering programIntroductionResearch in Mathematics Education, for example, [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] have explored thesubject of Linear Algebra
Paper ID #37534Long-Term Impact of COVID-19 on the First-YearEngineering Experience at a Mid-Sized Teaching FocusedUniversityBrian Dick Brian Dick chairs the Physics, Engineering, and Astronomy department at Vancouver Island University, and coordinates its Engineering Transfer program. He believes strongly in enabling equitable access to engineering education, and led work to develop the Common First-Year Engineering Curriculum in British Columbia. He is also passionate about enriching program curriculum with intercultural experiences and student engagement as global citizens. Brian has led intercultural projects
justice. Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, and Society, No. 7. Morgan and Claypool.[11] Shadle, S. E., Marker, A., & Earl, B. (2017). Faculty drivers and barriers: Laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(8), 1-13.[12] Mitchell, L. D., Parlamis, J. D., & Claiborne, S. A. (2015). Overcoming faculty avoidance of online education: From resistance to support to active participation. Journal of Management Education, 39(3), 350–371.[13] Watty, K., McKey, J., & Ngo, L. (2016). Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistant to new educational technologies in higher education. Journal of Accounting
. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, J. B. Main, and M. M. Camacho, “Exploring the experiences of first-generation student veterans in engineering,” presented at the CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference, Crystal City, Virginia, Crystal City, Virginia: American Society for Engineering Education, 2018.[8] R. A. Cooper, M. Goldberg, M. Milleville, and R. Williams, “The Experiential Learning for Veterans in Assistive Technology and Engineering (ELeVATE) program,” J. Mil. Veteran Fam. Health, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 96–100, 2016.[9] M. M. Camacho, S. M. Lord, C. Mobley, J. B. Main, and C. E. Brawner, “Transitions of Student Military Veterans into Engineering Education,” Soc. Sci., vol. 10
. Assistant, “Stress and Anxiety Among First Year and Final Year Engineering Students,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Education & Technology (IJARET), vol. 17, no. 4, 2016, [Online]. Available: www.ijaret.com[22] R. A. Streveler, K. A. Smith, and M. Pilotte, “Aligning Course Content, Assessment, and Delivery,” in Outcome-Based Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2012, pp. 1–26. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-1809-1.ch001.[23] S. P. Brophy, “Developing Flexibly Adaptive Skills through Progressive Design Challenges,” in ASEE 123rd Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016.[24] NASA, “NASA Engineering Design Challenges,” 2008. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023. [Online
With Gender, STEM Majors, and Gifted Program Membership,” Gifted Child Quarterly, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 313–327, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0016986217722614.[30] T. Papakonstantinou, K. Charlton-Robb, R. D. Reina, and G. Rayner, “Providing research- focused work-integrated learning for high achieving science undergraduates,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 59–73, 2013.[31] P. Wilhelm, “Fostering Quality of Reflection in First-Year Honours Students in a Bachelor Engineering Program Technology, Liberal Arts & Science (ATLAS),” Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, vol. 21, no. 16, 2021.[32] W. E. Lee III, “Humanities Awareness: A Comparison Between Honors Program and
America and Africa). In contrastto Europe, Asian countries had more images depicting technology, innovation, and big brandnames. One program website highlighted a university in an Asian country as having “nurturednumerous high impact alumni, including 7 prime ministers and many CEOs for household namessuch as Sony, Honda, Toshiba, Samsung, Nintendo.” Programs to Europe and Asia depictedstudents posing with prominent and touristy structures or architecture like the Sydney OperaHouse, London Bridge, Tokyo Skytree, and the Great Wall of China; whereas, images for LatinAmerica and Africa did not have a stereotypical reflection of engineering. For example, an imageof a program to Africa shows smiling engineering students in the company of local
various research and development projects in industry and academia for more than 15 years.Dr. Pezhman Hassanpour P.E., Gannon University Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, University of Toronto, 2008 M.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 2004 B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering, University of Tehran, 2002Dr. Saeed Tiari, Gannon University Dr. Saeed Tiari is an Associate Professor in the Biomedical, Industrial and Systems Engineering Depart- ment at Gannon University. Prior to joining Gannon University in 2016, Dr. Tiari obtained his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Temple University. His main research interests include bioheat trans- fer, biofluid mechanics, heat transfer and thermal energy
Xinrui (Rose) Xu graduated from the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She currently works at the Engineering Education Research Center of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Prior to her current role, she used to serve as a senior career consultant at the Purdue University Center for Career Opportunities. She received a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering and a Master’s degree in counseling and counselor education. Her research interests include student career development and pathways, student major choice, diversity in engineering, and student mental health.Dr. Douglas B. Samuel, Purdue University, West Lafayette My research focuses on the development of dimensional trait models of
Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[4] Y. Pearson Weatherton, R. D. Mayes, and C. Villanueva-Perez, "Barriers to persistence for engineering students with disabilities," in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017.[5] A. E. Slaton, "Body? What body? Considering ability and disability in STEM disciplines," in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013.[6] A. Lee, "Students with disabilities choosing science technology engineering and math (STEM) majors in postsecondary institutions
Journal of Mathematical Educationin Science and Technology, Vol. 46, no. 1, 2015.Tyson W. Modeling engineering degree attainment using high school and college physics andcalculus course taking and achievement. Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 100, no. 4,2011.Veenstra CP, Dey EL, and Herrin GD. A model for freshman engineering retention. Advances inEngineering Education. Winter 2009.Strayhorn TL. Modeling the determinants of college readiness for historically underrepresentedstudents at 4-year colleges and universities: a national investigation. American BehavioralScientist. Vol. 58(8), 2014.Haag, S., Hubele, N., Garcia, A., & McBeath, K. (2007). Engineering undergraduate attrition andcontributing factors. International Journal of
Paper ID #25410Why Do Students Leave? An Investigation Into Why Well-Supported Stu-dents Leave a First-Year Engineering ProgramDr. Melissa Lynn Morris, West Virginia University Melissa Morris is currently a Teaching Associate Professor for the Freshman Engineering Program, in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University (WVU). She graduated Summa cum Laude with a BSME in 2006, earned a MSME in 2008, and completed her doctorate in mechanical engineering in 2011, all from WVU. At WVU, she has previously served as the Undergraduate and Outreach Advisor for the Mechanical
Ph.D. in Political Science from Duke University in 2004. Research methods, technology and project management are central to his work, along with substantive interest in social capital, organizational politics and collective decision-making. The CSR recently completed data collection for the Kent County Congregations Study, a mixed-mode survey of the leaders of 583 local religious congregations. Page 13.522.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Engineer ing Student Retention: Development of a Validated, Quantitative Instr ument for Explor ing the Role of Per sonal and
Paper ID #25374The Impact of Course Transformation on Student Learning and Success inFundamental Electrical Engineering/Computer Science CoursesDr. David O. Johnson, University of Kansas David O. Johnson is a Lecturer in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science department at the Uni- versity of Kansas in Lawrence, KS, USA. He received his BSEE and MSEE from Kansas State University and his PhD in Computer Science from the University of Kansas. Prior to two post-doctoral research appointments at the Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands and in the Applied Linguis- tics Speech Laboratory at Northern
Transformations Institute (EETI) in the College of Engineering. The Engineering Education Transformations Institute at UGA is an innovative approach that fuses high quality engineering education research with systematic educational innovation to transform the educational practices and cultures of engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collab- orative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic interdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineering, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research
(science, technology, engineering and math) education, co-curricular and experiential learning, and the equity and accessibility of education.Prof. Chirag Variawa, University of Toronto Prof. Chirag Variawa is the Director, First Year Curriculum, and Assistant Professor, Teaching-stream, at the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto. He received his Ph.D. from the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, and his B.A.Sc. in Materials Science Engineering, both from the University of Toronto. His multidisciplinary teaching and research bring together Engi- neering Education and Industrial Engineering to identify and mitigate learning barriers for diverse student populations
organizations as a technology manager, then management consultant with KPMG. Changing careers, Mark led student services initiatives in two of Canada’s largest universities, now teaches a for-credit career management course at University of Toronto and applies system thinking and engineering problem solving to create scalable, gamified and evidence-based career management tools. Mark hosts the Career Buzz radio show and podcast where he’s interviewed hundreds of guests about insights and turning points in their career stories.Prof. Jason H. Anderson, University of Toronto Jason Anderson (http://janders.eecg.toronto.edu/) is Professor and Associate Chair, Research, with the Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering Design Self-Efficacy and Project-Based Learning: How Does Active Learning Influence Student Attitudes and Beliefs?IntroductionThis work-in-progress research paper seeks to understand how active learning influences studentattitudes and beliefs to aid in addressing calls for one-million new STEM graduates in the nextdecade1. With 40% of students currently completing STEM majors, the aim is to increase degreecompletion to at least 50% by 2022 through
Paper ID #15981Special Interest Section of a Core Mechanical Engineering Course – Bioma-terial Emphasis of an Introduction to Materials CourseDr. Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton Dr. Margaret Pinnell is the Associate Dean for Faculty and Staff Development in the school of engineering and associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Dayton. She teaches undergraduate and graduate materials related courses including Introduction to Ma- terials, Materials Laboratory, Engineering Innovation, Biomaterials and Engineering Design and Appro- priate Technology (ETHOS). She
identified for improvement were in the development of new design projects with system integration requirements, applications of new technologies, and enhanced communication skills through teamwork. At the beginning of 2006, the Dean’s office established the Clark School Keystone Academy of Distinguished Professors to recognize those educators who have made significant contributions to the undergraduate education in engineering, and to provide these faculty members with the support necessary to continue to make contributions to the undergraduate curriculum. The mission was clear: to revive the infrastructure of freshman and sophomore engineering courses with a focus on engineering design. To ensure the success of this new initiative, the