(Areas a and b: weeks 1-2) using an applet. The applet accepts an ASCII character as This Lab is divided into two parts, OSI and TCP/IP. input and draws the Fourier distribution for the periodicThe first part focuses on students' ability to accomplish decomposition of the character. For example if characterthe following tasks: ‘A’ is input, the applet will draw the distribution for the • Name the seven layers of the OSI model in order periodic bit pattern “01000001”, since ASCII for ‘A’ is using a mnemonic Ox41. A sample of output is shown in Figure 1. The • Describe the characteristic, functions and keywords
. Standards can even take the effect of law if they appear, for example, in building codes.Cities and municipalities in the south adopt the building codes developed and published bySBCCI almost universally. Many engineering students receive the B. S. degree with little or no exposure toengineering standards. This deficiency can easily be corrected by introducing standards (orportions) during appropriate sections of conventional technical courses or laboratories. Forexample, the author has required laboratory students to perform portions of the performance testsfor audible back up alarms used on some construction equipment (SAE standard). Note thatOSHA requires these alarms on certain equipment. As a minimum, students should be madeaware of the
Applications,” SAE Proceedings Sensors Expo, Detroit, 329-335 (1997).5. L. Wang, S.A. Akbar, A. Soliman and G. Rizzoni, " Ceramic Sensors for Automotive Exhaust Monitoring," 30th ISATA Conf. Proceedings, paper # 97EN050, June 16-19, Florence, Italy (1997).6. C. Ciobanu, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, and B. R. Patton, "Numerical Calculation of Electrical Conductivity of Porous Electroceramics," J. Electroceram. 3[1], 15 (1999). Page 5.52.87. B. Chwieroth, B.R. Patton and Y. Wang, "Conduction and Gas Surface Reaction Modeling in TiO2-x CO Gas Sensors", submitted to J. Electroceram. (1998).8. S.A. Akbar, P.K. Dutta and M.J. Madou, “Novel
courses is a B (3.01) – the same as that of the boys (3.02), according to CollegeBoard11. Girls take 34% of the tests in AP physics and make up 42% of the APChemistry test-takers11. And in 1997 women represented 43% of those enrolling inmedical schools. Similar strides for minority students have not been attained11. Page 5.177.3Realizing that information technology is a primary tool for engineers, it is concerning thatgirls make up a small percentage of computer science classes and children’s softwareprograms often reinforce gender bias and stereotypical gender roles. Girls consistentlyrate themselves significantly lower than boys on computer ability and
) (b) skills and will aid them in their future graduate education. Figure 4. Ultrasound results.The students also decided that the strain gages did not fully meet their research goal ofdetermining where the maximum stresses occurred in the foot. Realizing this, they decided toutilize another technique that they learned in their EM 460 class: photoelasticity. With the helpof another instructor, they were able to prepare a photoelastic coating for the bottom of the foot.They were then able to learn yet another experimental technique which would not have normallybeen included in their undergraduate
been fewopportunities to build work relationships between area studies librarians and engineeringlibrarians.Bibliography 1 Shuman, L., B. Bidanda, K. Thomes, L. Feick. 2005. “The global and societal challenge – an innovative approach 2 Grandin, J. M., N. Hedderich. 2009. "Intercultural Competence in Engineering: Global Competence for Engineers"in: Darla Deardorff (ed.). The SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Competence, pp. 362-373 3 Parkinson, A. 2009. “The Rationale for Developing Global Competence”. Online Journal for Global EngineeringEducation 4 (2). Retrieved December 28, 2011 from http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol4/iss2
during the semester. It is a well enrolled classwith an average enrollment of 45 to 50 students. It requires thermodynamics and fluidmechanics as prerequisites and heat transfer as a co-requisite. The course learning objectivesthat specially deal with geothermal energy are: a. Students are able to understand the nature of the earth as an energy source or sink. b. Students are able to understand and evaluate different types of geothermal energy systems. c. Students are able to calculate the performance of geothermal energy systems. d. Students are able to design a geothermal energy system.The paper continues with a review of underground heat pump technology. The project statementis then presented, including the grading rubric and results
to find out (a) how they defined computers and (b) their love-hate relationship withcomputers. This survey was developed by Morse and Daiute8 and was field-tested by thisresearcher9 in a previous study. The second survey was a revised version of Oetting’s ComputerAnxiety Scale [COMPAS]10. These two computer surveys were given to control for anyvariability in the computer anxiety and/or attitudes of the two treatment groups.Table 3. Pre- and posttest scores for students taking the class Student Group Pre-test Unit 1 Post-test Unit 1 Pre-test Unit 2 Post-test Unit 2 Score Percent Score Percent Score Percent Score Percent Correct Correct
, Charlotte,North Carolina, June 20-23, 19997. C. Traver, J. Gajjar, B. Macherone, “Introducing Freshmen to Engineering Design: WeatherStation Project,” To be presented at the 2000 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, ST.Louis. Missouri, June 2000.JAGDISH GAJJARJagdish Gajjar is a Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at UnionCollege, Schenectady, New York. He teaches data communications, analog and digital design, digitalcontrol systems, microprocessor applications. His research interests are power systems communications,coding theory, instrumentation and distributed controls. He received a B. E. (Elec.) in 1960 and a B. E.(Mech) in 1961, both with honors from Bombay University in India, an M.E.E. from the
, reversibility B. Equipment: portable-power motorized telescope drive; Measure power, time Discussion/Analysis: conversion of 12 volt DC to 120 volt AC efficiency, practical energy capacity, portability issues C. Equipment: Energy-storage devices (propane tank, battery, compressed air tank, spring, capacitor, water jug) Discussion/Analysis: suitability of each form for various tasks, environmental issues#2 SOME MORE ASPECTS OF WORK & HEAT (3 different stations) A. Equipment: dead weight tester and Bourdon Tube pressure gauge Page 4.258.6 Measure: mass, gauge P, atmospheric P
laboratories for cybersecurity. Sensors, 2020. 20(11): p. 3011.8. Vigna, G., Teaching hands-on network security: Testbeds and live exercises. Journal of information warfare, 2003. 2(3): p. 8-24.9. Li, C., et al. BAC: Bandwidth-aware compression for efficient live migration of virtual machines. in IEEE INFOCOM 2017-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. 2017. IEEE.10. Helali, L. and M.N. Omri, A survey of data center consolidation in cloud computing systems. Computer Science Review, 2021. 39: p. 100366.11. Li, B., B. Li, and F. Liu, Cloud and data center performance [Guest Editorial]. IEEE Network, 2013. 27(4): p. 6-7.12. Topham, L., et al., Cyber security teaching and learning laboratories
information with the faculty to encouragefaculty to accommodate dominate learning styles. (Narayanan, 2007). Boylan is also of theopinion that students learn best when they have a visual representation and can manipulateobjects associated with the concepts.(Appalachian State University’s NCDE: National Center forDevelopmental Education)Implementation and Assessment The procedure used by the author is outlined in Appendix A. The author hassuccessfully utilized this very same procedure to conduct assessment in many other courses. Hehas reported this in his previous ASEE Conference proceedings and presentations. The rubrics used was obtained from Washington State University. This rubric has beenreproduced in Appendix B. Rubrics offer help
(basketball goal) This example introduced the students to eccentric loading problems and how they createmultiple stresses. The instructor began by showing a two minute YouTube video showing aseries of NBA slam dunks. A class discussion was then initiated discussing what types ofstresses the basketball support structure was subjected to. Calculations were then presented for Page 15.1015.5axial and bending stress at two different points (A and B below) for a very simplified model of abasketball goal as shown in figure 1 with equations 11-13. A follow-up discussion was alsofacilitated reminding the students of the difference between static and
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Prefilter + Plant r c (s) e System gain: v b(s) y2 G pf = r 1/100 G= d (s) a(s) - Dynamic return path c y (s) G fb
argument scaffolding helps learnersidentify what action will be carried out to solve the problem. For example, for the problem“Determine the Baseline Selenium Status in Human Subjects”.1. Determine a method. Rather than asking novices to generate original solutions, weprovide them four plausible options from which they choose.1.) It has been determined that you will be using nuclear activation analysis (NAA) todetermine the selenium level in a biological monitor. From the following choices, which doyou think is best suited to measure the selenium level in a biological monitor? A. Prompt Nuclear Activation Analysis (PGNAA) B. Delayed Nuclear Activation Analysis (DGNAA) C. Instrumental Nuclear Activation Analysis
purchase orders for equipment, construction ofthe system, testing of the system, initial draft of the project report, etc. This will emphasize tothe students the limited time available for the various items, and hopefully prod the m to keepmoving. B. Interactions Between Faculty, Students, and Lab TechniciansAlthough the objective is certainly to have the students work with minimal supervision, it isdefinitely necessary to keep track of the students' progress or lack thereof. Weekly written andoral progress reports are necessary, and the professor should not hesitate to take a more activerole in project direction if he/she sees that students are proceeding too slowly or haveencountered major obstacles. It may be necessary at certain times
, vol. 56, no. S1, p. 215–242, 2018.[5] A. C. T. Davis K. A., "Exploring differences in perceived innovative thinking skills between first year and upperclassmen engineers.," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Erie, PA, 2016.[6] D. &. J. D. &. K. M. J. &. A. C. &. B. R. &. C. J. &. F.-S. T. &. P. M. &. V. N. Wilson, "The Link between Cocurricular Activities and Academic Engagement in Engineering Education," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20057, 2014.[7] B. J. a. J. B. Main, "Investigating Factors that Inform Engineering Students' Choice of Extracurricular Activities," in ASEE 2022 Annual Conference, Minneapolis, 2022.[8] K. C. H. P. K. G. S. S. S
engineeringmechanics. The data on each mechanics topic (statics, dynamics, mechanics of solids, civil engineeringmaterials and fluid mechanics) was further refined to show whether the courses were required or elective,the number of credits, number of lecture hours, number of laboratory hours, and whether or not the coursewas administered by the civil engineering department. The committee was particularly interested incurricula that combined courses or had other innovative features.Schools As indicated earlier, 50 schools were included in the survey. Forty-five of the schools either (a)grant a BSCE or BCE degree or (b) grant a BSE degree and are ABET-accredited in civil engineering.The other five schools grant BSE or similar degrees with concentrations in
funded by the National Science Foundation (DUE-0737277).References1. http://www.nsf.gov2. http://www.engineeringk12.org/Engineering_in_the_K-12_Classroom.pdf3. Jahan, K., Hesketh, R. P., Schmalzel, J. L. and Marchese, A. J. (2001). Design and Research Across the Curriculum: The Rowan Engineering Clinics. International Conference on Engineering Education. August, 6 – 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway4. Harvey, R., Johnson, F., Marchese, A. J., Newell, J. A., Ramachandran, R. P., and Sukumaran, B. (1999). Improving the Engineering and Writing Interface: An Assessment of a Team-Taught Integrated Course. ASEE Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO.5. R.P. Hesketh, S. Farrell, and C.S. Slater, An Inductive Approach to Teaching Courses in
funded by the National Science Foundation (DUE-0737277).References1. http://www.nsf.gov2. http://www.engineeringk12.org/Engineering_in_the_K-12_Classroom.pdf3. Jahan, K., Hesketh, R. P., Schmalzel, J. L. and Marchese, A. J. (2001). Design and Research Across the Curriculum: The Rowan Engineering Clinics. International Conference on Engineering Education. August, 6 – 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway4. Harvey, R., Johnson, F., Marchese, A. J., Newell, J. A., Ramachandran, R. P., and Sukumaran, B. (1999). Improving the Engineering and Writing Interface: An Assessment of a Team-Taught Integrated Course. ASEE Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO.5. R.P. Hesketh, S. Farrell, and C.S. Slater, An Inductive Approach to Teaching Courses in
vibration results in air instead of species. fabrication flow. VI. VELOCITY VECTOR IN ANSYSThe flow velocity vector plot of the micro-fluid along MEMSmixer without perturbing the interface by resonant beam isshown in Figure4.7. Two species go into the inlet with aspecific speed and they slow down in the chamber. As we see,the two fluidics diffuse in the chamber but do not meettogether until near the outlet. The velocity is almost zero nearthe sides of the chamber because of the resistance. REFERENCES [1] Kamholz, A. E., Weigl, B. H., Finlayson, B. A. & Yager
Engineering and New Product Development, Prentice Hall, 2001.6. Singh, V., Walter, B., Krager, J., Putnam, N., Koraishy, B., Wood. K., Jensen, D. “Design for Transformation: Theory, Method and Application”, Proceedings of the IDETC/CIE 2007, ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, September, Las Vegas, NV, 2007.7. Linsey, J., Wood, K., and Markman, A., 2008, “Increasing Innovation: Presentation and Evaluation of the WordTree Design-by-Analogy Method,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, New York, NY, 2008.8. Jensen, D. J., Weaver, J., Wood, K. L., Linsey, J., and Wood, J., “Techniques to Enhance
Paper ID #11183Preliminary Evaluation of a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU)Program: A Methodology for Examining Student OutcomesD. Jake Follmer, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park D. Jake Follmer is a doctoral candidate in educational psychology at The Pennsylvania State University. His interests are in issues related to learning, assessment, and program evaluation.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkDr. Esther W Gomez, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Esther Gomez is an assistant professor in the Departments of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at the
. Figure 3. A Conceptual Map of the Major Sources of Engineering Knowledge Figure 4 shows that the higher education learning goals for engineering, as outlined by theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), align with the transdisciplinarymodel presented above in Figure 3. The engineering learning goals for modern day engineeringas listed by ABET32 are: A. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering B. An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data C
scanning provides much faster inspection speedwithout the need to move the transducer and can also be used to produce a top-view (C-scan)image of a large area by moving a transducer doing raster scanning. Figure 4(b) depicts thefocusing operation. The focal law attached to each diagram tells the pulsing time delay for eachelement. It can be seen that different focusing depth corresponds to a different focal law.Figure 4(c) illustrates the steering operation which allows a single transducer to scan multipleangles compared to the single angle solution for the conventional ultrasonic technology. Moreimportantly, the capability of steering the beam for reaching limited-access regions within acomponent is extremely valuable for the inspection of parts
for the needed preparation, aninterview can be conducted live or asynchronously, through video or face-to-face, and the subjectmatter can span any assessment topic the professor seeks to capture (see Appendix B for additionalcontent). In project-based learning courses, progress interviews can serve as a mechanism forstudents to make guided partial progress, reiterate their process to affirm correctness of theirapproach, solicit feedback in a low-stakes assignment and in advance of grading of the majorproject assignment, and request input from the professor. An ePortfolio is another element usefulin the hybrid project-based course as a tool to perform assessment, moderate progress, andencourage creative thinking. In some cases, very similar to
education has been widely noted. Thishas been driven by the need to develop a wide range of skills such as innovativeness, creativity,and problem-solving in engineering students to succeed in today’s technology-driven economy.Increasingly, graduates are expected to adapt their complex problem-solving skills to align withthe modern-day multidisciplinary practice of engineering [1], know how to integrate theirscience and technical training to enhance industrial practice [2], and successfully navigate futurechallenges through continued innovation [1]. As noted by Torres, Velez-Arocho, and Pabon [3],“The contemporary engineer must be able to (a) effectively communicate orally as well as [in]writing, (b) be capable of working in multidisciplinary teams
2018.[15] G. Hoople, A. Choi-Fitzpatrick, and E. Reddy, “Educating Changemakers: Cross Disciplinary Collaboration Between a School of Engineering and a School of Peace,” in Proc. of the Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference Proceedings, San Jose, CA, October 2018.[16] B. Przestrzelski, E. Reddy, and S. M. Lord, “Integrating Social with Technical: “Bring in your Trash” module for a Materials Science Class,” in Proc. of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, June 2018.[17] B. Przestrzelski, E. Reddy, and S. M. Lord, “Mission Possible: Blending the social and technical through an innovative biodesign challenge module for a materials science class,” in
Synthesized Engineering/Humanistic Inquiry, 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.6. American Library Association, Center for the Future of Libraries, accessed at http://www.ilovelibraries.org/librariestransform/trends on January 11, 20177. Ali, P.J., Cooke, M., Culpepper, M.L., Forest, C.R., Hartmann, B., Kohn, M., and Wilczynski, V. (2016, November), The Value of Campus Collaboration for Higher Education Makerspaces, International Symposium on Academic Makerspaces 2016, Cambridge, Massachusetts.8. Barrett, T. W., Pizzico, M. C., Levy, B., Nagel, R. L., Linsey, J. S., Talley, K. G., Forest, C. R., and Newstetter, W. C. (2015, June), A Review of University Maker Spaces, 2015 ASEE Annual Conference
relationship between structure andcomplexity in successful PBL implementations. They argued that good PBL problems should be(a) open-ended and ill-defined; (b) of challenging complexity, engaging, and adapted to priorlearning of students; and (c) realistic. Pedagogical introduction of problem-based learning is credited to the medicalcommunity (Savin-Baden & Howell, 2004), and has been recognized for “inducing revolutionaryundergraduate medical reform” (Maudsley, (1999). With a seemingly parallel objective over amulti-year period, the National Science Foundation has continued to appeal to researchers torevolutionize engineering education (National Science Foundation, 2014, 2018). As PBL has become more widespread, several changes have