Ethical Reasoning Process (CAER) Workshops [40], students appliedanticipatory ethical reasoning using two of the eight key ethical questions, which are organizedby topics such as empathy, fairness, responsibility, character, outcomes, and others [41]. TheCAER approach differs from the way in which engineering students traditionally engage withtraditional professional ethics based on industry standards, honest reporting of data, cost benefittradeoffs, and analysis of case studies when standards or professional codes of practice wereviolated [39].From the above-described body of literature about work-based forms of experiential learning,self-efficacy, STIR, and anticipatory ethical reasoning, a new conceptual framework forSocioTechnical Learning
effectively.To respond to these weaknesses, it becomes vital to find an equilibrium between AIincorporation and traditional pedagogical approaches, advocate for conscientious AI utilization,and stimulate dialogues concerning the roles and boundaries of AI in the educational sphere.Moreover, fostering awareness among educators and students regarding the potential for biasesand ethical considerations when engaging with AI tools is of utmost importance. In conclusion,while this AI has undeniable advantages in assisting students in computer classes, dependence onChat GPT has a significant impact on the development of critical thinking skills, which mayrequire a supplemental approach to its use in computer learning, with a carefully selectedquestion to
community engagement (e.g., likes) and interaction features (e.g., “stitch”) uniqueto this platform [29].To protect autonomy and equality of individuals, we designed our research following the InternetResearch: Ethical Guidelines 3.0 [64] when centering neurodivergent voices on the internet usingperson-centered research methods. We collected publicly available content only (not private) andstored the data in a secure Box folder. To protect the identity of the creators, we also usedpseudonyms for each content creator and blurred out faces and usernames on shared screenshots.We will delete all content on Box at the end of the analysis providing a deidentified dataset to theinstitution’s digital commons for study replication.4.2. Data Collection and
, encouraged students to takeresponsibility for their learning by including them in course decisions, provided room forstudents to make mistakes without penalization, and fostered a collaborative community ofscholars. Furthermore, the curriculum focused on my decentering westernization, facilitatingcritical thought about engineering ethics and how race and class issues intertwine withthermodynamics, dismantling false notions of objectivity in engineering, and exploring historicaland philosophical dimensions of thermodynamics [14]. These pedagogical techniquesempowered students to develop authority in an environment that is commonly controlled by theinstructor and to critically analyze and counter dominant narratives and ways of knowing inengineering
often identify their work as rational, beyond emotion, and engineering is oftencharacterized as purely scientific, involving technical solutions to real world problems” [13].Consequently, in the code of ethics for the National Society of Professional Engineers’ (NSPE)[14] or Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) [15], there is no mention ofemotions, what to do with emotions, how to take an emotional pulse of both teachers andstudents, how both positive and negative affect outcomes, nor how to engage with the emotionsof society within engineering. The lack of acknowledging emotions, much less the pervasive ways that unchecked emotionsdominate our ability to both learn and teach, is unfortunate at best because “it is hard to
, and society’senergy problems [11], [12]. Polmear et al. proposed an in-class intervention they call a “micro-insertion” of ethics and societal impacts [13]. In this study, students explored a hydraulicfracturing micro-insertion in three different courses. They found that facilitating self-guidedand/or collaborative learning, exploring engineering in the societal context, and creating acomfortable environment were important to students. Polmear et al. make a strong argument thatincluding technical content in preexisting technical courses makes efficient use of availablecredit hours, while engaging students with engineering ethics [13]. Electric circuits is typically the first course electrical engineering (EE) students take intheir
address both the ABET Student Outcomes and the “leakypipeline” issue, Penn State’s College of Engineering 2020-2025 Strategic Plan identified theintegration of ethics, inclusivity, and sustainability into undergraduate programs throughout thecollege as one of its primary unit objectives [11]. This emphasis updates and directlyimplements Penn State’s 2016-2020 University-wide Strategic Plan, which clearly highlightsdiversity as one of its core foundations [12]. In the Aerospace Engineering Department, seniorundergraduate capstone courses offer ideal conditions for exploring, learning about, andpracticing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion (DEI) skills that promote inclusive and collaborativeclimates since these classes are team-based experiential
ethics were positively impacted [12].The third model for developing students’ non-technical skills is requiring stand-alone courses orworkshops that are integrated into the curriculum. For example, one study [13] demonstrated theeffectiveness of integrating teamwork and soft skill-focused workshops into a manufacturingsystems course. These students showed improved team performance after going through a “softskills” workshop. Another study investigated “soft-skill” focused single class sessions withinengineering courses and found an increased ability for students to utilize soft skills [14]. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceRooted in
in both written and oral forms.The development of these skills has the indirect effect of increasing student confidence, improving criticalthinking and problem-solving abilities, and enhancing both verbal and written communication skills. Inaddition to providing a meaningful research experience, the site includes a variety of enrichment andprofessional development activities that allows students to better appreciate the inherent complexities ofurban engineering and to explore the broader social and political implications of their work.Enrichment activities include an ethics workshop, a seminar series on urbanism, a reading group, andfield trips focused on urban policy and managing the urban infrastructure.REU program efficacy can be framed
alerting the committee to additional challenges: • Students are hindered by not having a strong knowledge of computer programming before entering their upper level courses. • Engineering Ethics is typically a senior-year course taken while students are focused on their job search and is administered via the Philosophy department. As seniors, students apply their efforts to courses in their field of study and explore employment opportunities; thus, there is concern that integration of engineering ethics into student psyches is not occurring effectively.“The committee came forward in March 2017 with recommendations, which were immediatelyfast-tracked to support a fall 2018 rollout: • The first semester
displayspecific traits and perform a multitude of other indispensable activities including ethical andprofessional behavior, resilience, clear communication, change management, risk-taking, teambuilding, conflict management, and decision-making [7,8]. The criticality of these issues andpotential ways to expose students to such skill sets has been encouraged by the publication of aSpecial Issue on Engineering Education: Beyond Technical Skills [7]. ABET also indicates theneed for such skill development via Criterion 3 where students must display the ability tofunction on multidisciplinary teams, understand professional and ethical responsibility,communicate effectively, and understand the impact of engineering solutions in a context thatincludes global
the discipline and get them more comfortable with asking for help earlyand often. We have done similar activities with study sessions and visiting professors that haveshown an improvement in students asking for help on technical problems. We hope this willproduce similar results with writing.In addition to the discussion, students are required to write two papers during the secondsemester. The first is an individual paper on ethics, and the second is a team technical report ontheir engineering design project. For the ethics paper, students select an event in history wherepossible unethical decisions were made. As a pair, they research the topic, being sure to answer aset of five questions, present the topic in class any way they would like
these goals, the new curriculum introduces students to a range of goodresearch practices in Engineering. The planned content includes: 1) conducting research, including how research groups are organized, problem identification and solution, connecting innovative ideas from disparate fields, laboratory safety and procedures, data management; 2) communicating research, including literature review, manuscript preparation, grant writing, or oral communication; 3) other critical skills or considerations in conducting research, including collaborative skills, tool use, ethical and responsible conduct of research, the importance of diversity, equity and inclusion in research. The
tank lab (demo) Fully documented, individual Preparation of pump curves lab (virtual) Fully documented, individual Ethics exercise and discussion, CATME evaluations Ethics paragraph/evaluation ABET exercise QuizLab 2 was operated as a hybrid class. All drill (lecture) sessions, including the safety training,were conducted remotely. Lab sessions (four sessions per student) were conducted in person.Students had the option to opt out of in-person classes – in this case the labs consisted ofcalculations, reports, and presentations based upon experimental data provided by the instructor.Video presentations of the labs were used as training tools for in-person students or as
that “[i]mplementation is notan all-or-none construct but exists in degrees along a continuum, from 0% to 100%” (Durlak, p.7). Nevertheless, quantifying the quality and dosage of implementation can be difficult, andresearch literature on the subject is sparse. Barry and Ohland assessed the extent to whichcoverage of the ABET ethics student outcome criterion (3f: an understanding of professional andethical responsibility) in coursework affected students’ scores on the National Council ofExaminers for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) Fundamentals of Engineering (FE)Examination. Determining the dosage of ethics coursework was done through faculty interviews.The researchers found a relationship between coursework and the exam outcomes, but
courses as early as their first quarter on campus: GraphicalCommunications in the fall quarter; Computer Applications and GIS in the winter quarter; andEngineering Surveying I, Engineering Statics, and Introduction to Design in the spring quarter.Three of the four courses are oriented towards civil engineering technology. The fourth course,Introduction to Design, has been developed to provide the students with a real, open-ended, civilengineering design experience in their freshman year. Along with the design experience providedin the course, students also learn skills outside of design, including time management, reportwriting, teamwork, client relations, and ethics. This paper examines how Covey’s The SevenHabits of Highly Effective People
educational courses.Albert Cruz, National University Albert Cruz has had long-time careers in both income taxes and technology. He held a position as Tax Analyst Programmer at Intuit Inc for 11 years- working on the popular TurboTax and ProSeries software programs. Mr. Cruz holds a B.S.B. degree in Information Systems, and an M.B.A. in Technology Management, both from the University of Phoenix. He also holds an M.A. in Human Behavior from National University where he is now a member of the Associate Faculty at the School of Engineering and Technology. He teaches both online and onsite courses in computer ethics, information systems, and information technology
Criterion 4, producing a product for thebetterment of the community, promoting university goodwill and instilling an ethic of publicservice in the student. In practice, however, poor project selection and poor conceptualdevelopment of service learning activities will negate any of the positive attributes listed above.In fact, the difficulty in creating meaningful service learning projects for the capstone designcourses has limited their use. Fewer than 30% of the 477 campuses that responded to the CampusCompact survey on service learning have used service learning projects as culminating designexperiences in all disciplines. The statistics for engineering disciplines is even lower. In light ofthe proposed “Body of Knowledge” for civil engineering
Environmental Engineering Design Course ExperienceCourse Motivation and ObjectiveEvery year, the instructors of the senior design course for Civil and Environmental Engineeringdevelop course materials and projects to illustrate the various professional life aspects ofpracticing engineers, including successful project proposal writing, development of statusreports, and final project delivery, analysis of ethics issues, and economics. The students areexpected to work in multi-disciplinary teams to successfully complete a civil/environmentalproject need. Defining the technology opportunity space, a compelling practical need, and aproject that capitalizes on the backgrounds of students in structures and materials, construction
. Engage in an ethical decision-making process, given some engineering situation. 6. Identify the ethical, environmental and global and societal impacts of engineering practice. 7. Design technical/professional communications. 8. Deliver well-structured, technically sound oral and written communication. 9. Evaluate and effectively construct arguments, using technical content at the first-year level.The technical component of the course varies by section, with some sections being very specificto a given major, such as the “Mechanics and Materials for the Design of Biomedical Devicesand Orthopedic Implants.” Others, such as ours, are broader in
is like an industry run by professionals for making professionals. Professionalethics is embedded in the working environment of this lab. The students become moreprofessional as they the semester moves on as can be seen from Figure 10. Professional Ethics, Fall 2007 10 Team 1 Team 3 Mean Survey Score 8 Team 4 6 Team 6
experts also identified topics that may or may not be appropriate for core knowledgein a geotechnical BOK, or that may be suitable for recommended study even if they maybe excluded from the core courses. These were the “differences” topics identified earlier.The following identifies these topics in no particular order, based on the interviews:≠ LRFD of geotechnical systems≠ Machine foundations≠ Engineering economics for geotechnical investigation, design and construction≠ Advanced testing (triaxial, controlled strain consol., flex. wall perm., etc.)≠ Advanced field testing (geophysical, dilatometer, pressuremeter)≠ Engineering management≠ Liability and loss prevention≠ Ethics≠ Geomorphology related to engineering behavior
scheduling of theproject.Criterion 3b: Demonstrate the ability to design and conduct experiments as well as analyze andinterpret data.This criterion is met with the data collection and analysis that was required as part of the sitesurvey as mentioned above. In addition, the team’s research and analysis of alternate bridgedesigns also demonstrates their skills for this criterion.Criterion 3c and 3e: Criterion 3c requires students to demonstrate the ability to design a system,component or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability.Criterion 3e requires students to demonstrate the ability to identify, formulate, and
problems in this particularsituation. For the present purpose, an online survey was implemented during a five-month periodfrom the middle of February until June 2007. It covered 16 Australian universities that offeredaccredited BSE programs in Australian universities and was undertaken after being successfullysubjected to the required ethical review process (see the form in the Appendix below). Obtainingthe relevant information from these universities began with emails being sent to the respectiveBSE coordinators requesting details of their Software V&V courses and the lecturers involved. Afollow-up phone call was made if a coordinator did not reply. Once such information wasobtained, an email was sent to all the lecturers nominated to invite
this end, we gathered andanalyzed student reflections on their learning experiences in a collaborative engineering projectbetween the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the University of KwaZulu-Natal inSouth Africa.BackgroundThe Association of American Colleges and Universities’ LEAP (Liberal Education forAmerica’s Promise) initiative (2007) emphasizes global awareness and experience within its foursets of Essential Learning Outcomes that are critical for preparing university students for thetwenty-first century. The “personal and social responsibility” domain includes:• Civic knowledge and engagement—local and global• Intercultural knowledge and competence• Ethical reasoning and action• Foundations and skills for lifelong
policy analyst.6) Students will have an introductory level of knowledge of two popular policy analysis tools: cost benefit analysis, risk analysis.7) Students will gain an appreciation for the complexities, uncertainties, and the role of the public/values/engineering ethics as they apply to decision-making for a variety of technological policy issues.8) Students will practice verbal, written, graphical, and teamwork skills with special Page 11.121.2 emphasis on the verbal communication of technical information.Unfortunately, a text on engineering and public policy is not available. Therefore, the mainresources
skills [8], [9]. Beyond practical skills gained, co-curricular programs have the potential to improveengineering education by enhancing students’ leadership, ethical training, professional skills, anda variety of social-psychological traits [9]–[13]. Finelli et al. [11] explain how the engineeringprofession requires engineers to understand and incorporate many ethical standards into theirwork, but most engineering curricula do not formally teach ethics. Co-curricular activities havethe capacity to allow for students to learn and understand ethical issues outside of the classroom[11]. Athreya and Kalkhoff [10] describe a program that helps students grow as engineers bylearning about leadership. Even though the program is not directly
, often having additional life responsibilities such as supporting a family andfull-time employment which may lead to different study habits and priorities than their youngercivilian counterparts. Panelists also describe SVSMs as having stronger work ethic anddiscipline which they attribute to years of military service and the additional life experiencescommensurate with that service. The theme of fitting in included descriptions of very earlychallenges integrating into the higher education culture which participants attributed toadditional burdens navigating convoluted veteran registration, “paperwork” processes whichseemed contrary to how, “the military flows”. Coming from a military academy undergraduateeducation, one participant with graduate
gettinginvolved with other traditional students. Finding ways to unite this group of students both in andout of the classroom can be a challenge1. Veteran and active duty students have persistence andmental toughness for academic work stemming from their goal oriented work ethic in themilitary. Some of these veterans and active duty students initially entered college after highschool, performed poorly due to the lack of mental toughness and persistence, and then enteredthe military. As students who are now traditionally older and more cognitively developed, theyare better equipped to scaffold more traditional students through complicated problems andinteractions. In addition, their world experience provides a different and critically broadexperience
development with a specific focus on professional development, ethics, and coaching.Valerie N. Streets, University of Tulsa Valerie N. Streets is a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the University of Tulsa. She received her Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from Old Dominion University in 2016. Her research focuses on underrepresented groups and the professional development of the STEM workforce.Ms. Alison J. Kerr, University of Tulsa Alison Kerr is a graduate student at The University of Tulsa. She is pursuing a doctoral degree in Industrial-Organizational Psychology. Her research interests include training development and evaluation as explored across a variety of academic disciplines and organizational