: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3443621.[6] Menekse, M. (2023), Envisioning the future of learning and teaching engineering in theartificial intelligence era: Opportunities and challenges. J Eng Educ, 112:578-582. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20539[7] J. Tharmaseelan, K. Manathunga, S. Reyal, D. Kasthurirathna and T. Thurairasa, "Revisit ofautomated marking techniques for programming assignments", IEEE Global EngineeringEducation Conference EDUCON, vol. 2021-April, 2021
”, which providesnot only an excellent pedagogy resources to educate next generation of engineers on conceptsrelated Industry 4.0., also an outstanding research infrastructure for Smart Manufacturing.AcknowledgementThis work was supported by a subaward from GENEDGE through the Department of Energy GrantNo. DE-MS0000029. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the DOE andGENEDGE.Reference[1] MTConnect® Standard Part 1 - Overview and Protocol, Version 1.3.0, 2014[2] MTConnect®Standard Part 2 –Device Information Model, Version 1.3.1, 2015[3] https://pypi.org/project/requests/[4] https://pypi.org/project/xmltodict/[5] https://pypi.org
://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630763[2] S.M. James and S. R. Singer, "From the NSF: The National Science Foundation’s investments in broadening participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education through research and capacity building," CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 15, no. 3, article fe7, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0059[3] National Science Board (NSB), National Science Foundation, Higher Education in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Indicators 2024 (Indicators 2024), NSB- 2023-32, Alexandria, VA, 2023. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb202332/[4] E. Seymour and A.-B. Hunter (Eds.), Talking About Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and
] National Research Council, Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States, TheNational Academies Press, 2013. doi: 10.17226/18290.[11] C. Xie, P. Song, and H. Hu, "Measuring Teacher Leadership in Different Domains ofPractice: Development and Validation of the Teacher Leadership Scale," Asia-Pac. Educ. Res.,vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 409–419, 2021. doi: 10.1007/S40299-020-00527-9.[12] K. N. Hayes, C. S. Lee, R. DiStefano, D. O’Connor, and J. C. Seitz, "Measuring ScienceInstructional Practice: A Survey Tool for the Age of NGSS," J. Sci. Teach. Educ., vol. 27, no. 2,pp. 137–164, 2016. doi: 10.1007/S10972-016-9448-5.
material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] W. C. Lee, J. L. Hall, M. Josiam, and C. M. Pee, “(Un)equal demands and opportunities: Conceptualizing student navigation in undergraduate engineering programs,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 112, no. 4, p. jee.20543, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20543.[2] M. Ong, N. Jaumot-Pascual, and L. T. Ko, “Research literature on women of color in undergraduate engineering education: A systematic thematic synthesis,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 581–615, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20345.[3] J. M. Smith and J. C. Lucena, “How Do I Show Them I’m More Than A Person Who Can Lift Heavy Things?’ The Funds Of Knowledge Of Low
necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] G. Miller, H.M. Jerónimo, Q. Zhu, Editors’ Introduction to Thinking through Science andTechnology: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics in an Engineered World, edited by Miller,Jerónimo, and Zhu, 1–10. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2023.[2] C.E. Harris, S. Pritchard, J. Ray, E.E. Eanglehardt, M.J. Rabins, Engineering Ethics – Conceptsand Cases, Sixth Edition, Cengage, Boston, MA, USA, 2019.[3] S.J. Bird, A. Briggle, “Research Ethics.” Ethics, Science, Technology, and Engineering: AGlobal Resource, edited by J. B. Holbrook, 2nd ed., vol. 3, Macmillan Reference USA, 2015, pp.584-592.[4] D.H. Guston, T. Kowall, “Research Integrity.” Ethics, Science, Technology, and
recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.We would like to thank all of the student co-creators in the Fall 2023 and Spring 2025 pilotsemesters for their support and continued feedback. We would also like to extend our gratitudeand thanks to the Iron Range Engineering Program at Minnesota State Mankato. Thank you tothe administrators, faculty, staff, and students who met with our team and shared theirexperiences.References[1] Elizabethtown News. https://news.etown.edu/index.php/2022/09/07/elizabethtown-college- awarded-1-2-million-grant-for-center-for-sustainability-and-equity-in-engineering/ (Accessed Dec. 15, 2024). 2022.[2] K. M. DeGoede, B
, groups may welcome and enable criticalconversations, which could result in more inclusive teams and diversity of thought andinnovation AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNumbers 2346868 and 2144698. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation. We would like to express gratitude to the research groups whoparticipated in this study and for their willingness to open their meetings to us and providefeedback on the initial drafts of this paper. Finally, we would like to thank the members of theENLITE
Native Americans pursuing careers in STEM: ‘You don’t just take,you give something back,’” Intersections, Vol. 3, no. 1, Art. 4, 2019. [4] C. Bartlett, M. Marshall, and A. Marshall, “Two-eyed seeing and other lessonslearned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstreamknowledges and ways of knowing,” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Vol. 2, pp.331-340, 2012. [5] L. A. Broadhead, and S. Howard, “Confronting the contradictions between Westernand Indigenous science: A critical perspective on Two-Eyed Seeing,” AlterNative, Vol. 17, no. 1,pp. 111-119, 2021. [6] D. Harper, “Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation,” Visual Studies, Vol.17, no. 1, pp. 13-26, 2002. [7] N
Conference & Exposition, pp. 23-1045. 2013.[4] Jaksic, Nebojsa I. "New Inexpensive 3-D Printers Open Doors to Novel Experiential Learning Practices in Engineering Education." In 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 24-932. 2014.[5] Meyers, Kerry L., Andrew S. Morgan, and Brett P. Conner. "3D printing to introduce design in a cornerstone project." Global Journal of Engineering Education 18, no. 1 (2016).
] Microsoft. https://code.visualstudio.com, 2024. [Accessed 12-11-2024]. [2] “C Programming - The State of Developer Ecosystem in 2021 Infographic — jetbrains.com.” https://www.jetbrains.com/lp/devecosystem-2021/c/. [Accessed 09-15-2024]. [3] J. Tan, Y. Chen, and S. Jiao, “Visual studio code in introductory computer science course: An experience report,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10174, 2023. [4] Apple. https://developer.apple.com/xcode/, 2024. [Accessed 12-11-2024]. [5] JetBrains. https://www.jetbrains.com/clion/, 2024. [Accessed 12-02-2024]. [6] xyBooks. https://www.zybooks.com/catalog/zylabs-programming/, 2024. [Accessed 01-01-2025]. [7] C. Y. D. Leung, J. Mazzone, E. Kazakou, C. Gordon, A. D. Edgcomb, and Y. Rajasekhar, “A
for the students, the department opted to discontinue that project, or something like it,as a capstone option during the 2024-2025 academic year.Closing Comment:This is just the second year of the year-long capstone experience within the USAFA civilengineering program, and we are optimistic that the program will be able to continue to offerresearch-centric projects as one of the options. The author is also hopeful this case study will beuseful for other programs if they are considering the incorporation of research-centric projectsinto their culminating design experience.References[1] Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2024-2025Accreditation Cycle, ABET, Inc., Baltimore, MD.[2] S. Howe and J
: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179.[5] M. F. Shahzad, S. Xu, and I. Javed, "ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: the role of trust as a cornerstone," International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 46, 2024/07/31 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00478-x.[6] M. Borrego, M. J. Foster, and J. E. Froyd, "Systematic Literature Reviews in Engineering Education and Other Developing Interdisciplinary Fields," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 45-76, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20038.[7] I. Osunbunmi and N. Fang, "Work in Progress: An Early Look Into the Systematic Review of Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education," in 2022
assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term, Routledge, 2007. [2] S. Gulati, K. Bhandari, and P. Mathur, "Program evaluation in higher education: A systematic review", in Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, vol. 32, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1-24. [3] J. Hattie and H. Timperley, "The power of feedback", in Review of Educational Research, vol. 77, no. 1, 2007, pp. 81-112. [4] Yale University, Peer review of teaching, Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning. [Online]. Available: https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/Peer-Rev-Teaching [5] D. Kember, and D. Y. P. Leung, "Examining the reliability and validity of the
hierarchicalmicroaggressions found in the 5 interviews are summarized in Table 1, with a letter assigned toeach interviewee. In-depth stories from each of these interviewees are shared below. Each storyrepresents one of the five participants. The author bolded some words in the off-set quotes todraw attention to particular phrases.Table 1. Types of hierarchical microaggressions [5],[12] described in the 5 interviews Type of Hierarchical Microaggression Position(s) when experienced Interviewees Devalue research ideas or work (deprofessionalization) Assistant Prof D, E Disproportionate amount of service work Adjunct, Assistant Prof C, D (deprofessionalization) Provide unclear
thecourses are offered again, ensuring that the courses remain effective and aligned with theevolving needs of the students. This review will involve analysis of student performance dataand student feedback from both semesters to identify key areas for improvement andachievement of course-specific learning outcomes.References1. Pisano, S., & Ma, H., & Fulgham, B., & Guadagni, G., & Morris, D. D., & Abramenko, M. (2018, June), Redesigning the Calculus Curriculum for Engineering Students Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--309222. Gawarecki, L., & Dong, Y., & Rablau, G. (2018, June), Redesigned Application-oriented Integral Calculus Curriculum
coherence. Future work will include gathering andanalysing student feedback, refining materials based on recommendations, planning a morerigorous study comparing OER-using sections with textbook using sections, and expanding thepilot to additional departments to expand on annual student savings.6. EthicsAs confirmed by the UBC Behavioural Research Ethics Board (BREB) office, the work isconsidered “Quality Improvement and Assurance and Program Evaluation”, which under Article2.5 of the Tri Council Policy Statement is exempt from institutional ethics review requirements.This work therefore does not require ethics review for its performance or dissemination.7. References[1] T. R. Etmannski, S. Song, J. Sandhu, L. Kim, & A. Wang, “Online Open
sampleBackground sections responding to the following problem statement: The McDonnell Douglas DC-10's outward-opening cargo door has a faulty locking mechanism that, upon failure, causes the door to open and the plane to explosively decompress. The project sponsor, a representative of McDonnell Douglas, has asked the design team to redesign the aft cargo door to prevent accidental opening during flight.Each background section was written with the aid of ChatGPT to simulate problems withrhetorical appropriateness and formatting and organization observed in students’ backgroundresearch sections in previous semesters. For example, the technical writing coordinator promptedChatGPT to write a background research section focused on types of cargo doors
exploration of theimpact of teaching practices on problem-solving in mathematics and engineering is plannedfor future research.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 2110769 under the Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) program at Level2. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material arethose of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] A. Febrian and O. Lawanto, “Do Computer Science Students Understand Their Programming Task? –A Case Study of Solving the Josephus Variant Problem,” Int. Educ. Stud., vol. 11, no. 12, 2018.[2] T. Garcia, and R. R. Pintrich
. R. Posselt. Equity in science: Representation, culture, and the dynamics of change in graduate education. Stanford University Press, 2020.[15] B. Oakley, R. M. Felder, R. Brent, and I. Elhajj. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2 (1), 9–34.[16] D. R. Bacon, K. A. Stewart, and W. S Silver. (1999). Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make the difference. Journal of Management Education, 23(5), 467-488.[17] R. Decker, (1995). Management team formation for large scale simulations. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference (Vol. 22).[18] M. L
Conferences, Jun. 2024, p. 47796. doi: 10.18260/1-2--47796.[12] H. Halaburda, J. Prince, D. Daniel Sokol, and F. Zhu, “The business revolution: Economy‐wide impacts of artificial intelligence and digital platforms,” Economics Manag Strategy, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 269–275, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1111/jems.12581.[13] J. Tu, “Learn to Speak Like A Native: AI-powered Chatbot Simulating Natural Conversation for Language Tutoring,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1693, no. 1, p. 012216, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1693/1/012216.[14] C.-Y. Chang, S. Kuo, and G.-H. Hwang, “Chatbot-facilitated Nursing Education: Incorporating a Knowledge-Based Chatbot System into a Nursing Training Program,” Educational Technology &
Materials, Project Management, and Construction EducationDr. Mohsen Garshasby, Mississippi State University Mohsen Garshasby is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Building Construction Science at Mississippi State University. Dr. Garshasby is an architect, researcher, and educator who currently teaches collaborative studio(s) and environmental building systems within the College of Architecture, Art and Design at Mississippi State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025The Impact of NACE Competency Integration on Students’Perceived Career Readiness in Construction Management Education Mohsen Goodarzi1, Tamer Breakah2, and Mohsen Garshasby3 1
-basedlearning for engineering education: Theory and practice,” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 5,no. 3, pp. 345–358, 2000. doi: 10.1080/713699144.[8] J. Bakken and E. Andersson-Bakken, “The textbook task as a genre,” Journal of CurriculumStudies, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 729–748, 2021. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2021.1929499.[9] Ford, L. P., & Aurand, G. A., & Barr, C., & Bowman, F., & Ramsurn, H., & Brennan, J., &Carter, T. L., & Dahm, K. D., & Landherr, L., & Silverstein, D. L., & Thiel, S. W., & Vaughen,B. K., & Vogel, T. J. “The 2023 Timepoint in the Development of Process Safety Education,”Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--46573 Chemical Engineering Education Journal, vol. 59, no. 1,pp. 2-12, 2025. [Online
-319-91152-6_12[3] M. Ma, A. Oikonomou, L. Jain, “Serious Games and Edutainment Applications” Springer, 2011, ISBN: 978-1447121602 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262546013_Serious_Games_and_Edutainment_A pplications[4] D. Dicheva, C. Dichev, G. Agre, G. Angelova, “Gamification in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study” Educational Technology & Society, 2015, 18 (3), 75–88.[5] S. McGuire, “Teach Students How to Learn” Routledge, 2015, ISBN: 978-1620363164[6] J. MacArthur, “A groundbreaking study shows kids learn better on paper, not screens. Now what?”. https://amp.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2024/jan/17/kids-reading-better-paper-vs- screen[7] P. Armstrong, “Bloom’s Taxonomy”. Vanderbilt University Center for
being more deeply rooted than others.The feedback in Samples 1, 3, and 5, with scores ranging from 3.80 to 4.90, is somewhatrooted in the drafts, with some different limitations. Sample 1’s feedback engages with thecontent by mentioning the author’s name, career goal, and resources, yet overlooks revisionsand omits comments on some headings. The feedback in Samples 3 and 5 incorrectlycomments on the need for headings already present, with Sample 5 repeatedly making thiserror and generating feedback despite no revisions. In addition, Sample 2, which has thelowest score in this category (2.33), indicates that the feedback is inconsistently rootedbecause it does not mention the author’s name and fails to comment on missing headings, yetit
participation? How does this vary by unit of analysis from individuals to departments to engineering colleges and institutions?These research questions will be evaluated in a variety of ways, including administratorinterviews, faculty focus groups, and meeting notes/journal analysis. Additionally, deans and/orrepresentatives from 20+ schools across the US have agreed to serve on an Evaluation Board tohelp evaluate project goals.Acknowledgements and DisclaimerThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNos. 2044199 and 2417098). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National
participants’ social networks aroundteaching and learning. We will also identify how these different roles relate to the 5C Model ofCapacity. Finally, we will conduct a third batch of interviews to bring in perspectives not yetrepresented in our data (e.g., staff and graduate students that contribute to student success.)Insights from these interviews will allow us to draft a SNA instrument that enables the project’sremaining two phases of work.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2315532. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National
literate engineer: Infusing information literacy skills throughout an engineering curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL: ASEE, 2006.[6] T. Andrews and R. Patil, “Information literacy for first-year students: an embedded curriculum approach,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 253– 259, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1080/03043790701276205.[7] A. J. Carroll, S. J. Hallman, K. A. Umstead, J. McCall, and A. J. DiMeo, “Using information literacy to teach medical entrepreneurship and health care economics,” jmla, vol. 107, no. 2, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.577.[8] J. M. Williamson, N. Rice, C. Tenopir, J. Kaufman, C. J
, 2024.[6] E. J. Kameenui and D. W. Carnine, Effective Teaching Strategies That Accommodate Diverse Learners. Des Moines, IA: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1998.[7] K. T. Lindner and S. Schwab, “Differentiation and individualisation in inclusive education: A systematic review and narrative synthesis,” International Journal of Inclusive Education, pp. 1–21, 2020.[8] K. J. Topping, “Trends in peer learning,” Educational Psychology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 631– 645, 2005.