, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com
, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Presentacion Rivera-Reyes is currently a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. He formerly held a position of teaching assistant in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. He also held a position as Professor of Telecommunication Engineering at Technological University of Honduras teaching courses of Transmission System to senior students. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Na- tional Autonomous University of Honduras. He has experience in the telecommunication industry where he worked as a Project Manager developing solutions of high-speed transmission
assessment and evaluation of engi- neering education research projects and initiatives. She has most recently worked for Walgreens as a Sr. Data Analyst and General Motors/Delphi Automotive as a Sr. Applications Programmer and Manufactur- ing Quality Engineer. She received her PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and her MS in Mechanical Engineering from Case Western while working for Delphi. She completed her postdoctoral studies in engineering education at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Clark has published articles in the Journal of Engineering Education, Advances in Engineering Education, and Risk Analysis.Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh Scott C. Streiner is a full-time
obtain feedback on the design of each lab, which will be used to improve the lab design. Wedeploy the labs to cloud computing and a number of related courses such as distributed computingsystems, computer networking, operating systems, databases, and mobile computing.The third stage is evaluation, in which we evaluate how effective our approach is in enhancingstudent learning in cloud computing education. However, this project does not focus on developingnovel evaluation tools. We will use existing tools and processes for evaluation. An advisorycommittee oversees the evaluation procedure. Lab Development Lab Deployment Evaluation - Lab description - Implementation and
department. In this role he has led department-wide changes in curriculum with emphasis on project- and lab-based instruction and learning. His research interests are in the areas of engineering education, semiconductor device characterization, design and simulation, signal integrity and THz sensors. He is a member of IEEE and ASEE.Mr. Phillip Wong, Portland State University Phillip Wong received an M.S. degree in electrical engineering from Carnegie Mellon University in 1990. Since then, he has been with Portland State University, Oregon, USA, where he is currently the ECE Lab Coordinator and an instructor. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Exploring Proficiency Testing
dataset for this paper comes from the MOOCKnowledge project data collection,which provides an opportunity to work with real-world data from hundreds of people. K-Means and SOM algorithms are performed with a subset of participants' features as inputdata. The clustering evaluation, meanwhile, is achieved with a selection of indices, an intra-cluster measure and an overall quality criterion for K-Means, and two measures related totopological ordering for SOM.The comparison of internal structure of both clustering (set of profiles) shows that there aresimilarities between them on the one hand and some pinpointed differences that can not beevaluated in advance without the opinion of an expert familiarized with the specifications ofthe MOOC on the
program.Prof. Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and
, and emotional intelligence emerge.1. Introduction1.1 Teamwork in Engineering EducationEffective teamwork is a common theme in engineering education. Teamwork skills frequentlyrank at the top of desired engineering skills lists, along with analysis, problem solving, design,and communication,3 and the ability to work well in teams appears in the current and proposedfuture set of ABET Student Outcomes for programs accredited by the Engineering AccreditationCommission.4 Team projects are a hallmark of engineering curricula, especially in laboratorycourses and capstone design courses. Many engineering educators discuss strategies for teachingteamwork skills to their students, especially through collaborative and cooperative learningapproaches.5
but not solarge as to invalidate the tools. Steps should be considered to educate students about potentialbias.IntroductionTeamwork is an integral part of Engineering and Engineering Education.1 Well-designed groupand team projects can help students gain valuable teaming skills, and accrediting bodies requirethese skills of engineering graduates.2,3 But teamwork is not without its problems. Social loafingand “I better do it myself, if I want an A” syndrome are part of many peoples experiences withgroup and teamwork.4 A well-designed peer evaluation process can improve the studentexperience and lead to more powerful learning outcomes.Peer evaluation can be used to foster a better team experience and to equitably recognizeindividual student’s
Paper ID #12684General Engineering Plus: Creating Community in a Flexible yet TechnicalEngineering DegreeDr. Malinda S. Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder Malinda Zarske is the Engineering Master Teacher for the General Engineering Plus program at the Uni- versity of Colorado Boulder. A former high school and middle school science and math teacher, she has advanced degrees in teaching secondary science from the Johns Hopkins University and in civil engi- neering from CU-Boulder. Dr. Zarske teaches engineering design in First-Year Engineering Projects and Engineering Projects for the Community, a sophomore-level course
round of tenredesign projects involving a range of arts and sciences courses undertaken by schools including Page 26.853.2 1Penn State, University of Central Florida (UCF), Wisconsin-Madison, and Virginia Tech, five ofthe ten projects reported improved learning outcomes, four reported equivalent achievement, andone was not conclusive. Some of the improvement techniques included computer-basedassessment and feedback, online student discussion groups and learning communities, computer-lab group work (with faculty present) in lieu of a lecture, and online, self-paced interactivetutorials with
interest in socio-scientific issues, and how they saw the role ofethical reasoning in their future profession as an engineer.Brief field notes taken after each interview helped in the preliminary data selection. Two of theinterviewed students, Tom (a junior-year engineering major) and Matt (a junior-year computerscience major), talked about weaponized drones as part of their interview. They had writtenabout this topic in their sophomore year as part of a capstone research project in the STSprogram. Besides the thematic congruence, another thing that caught our attention was that bothstudents regarded drone warfare to have negative consequences but, to different degrees, wantedto absolve the designing engineers of bearing responsibility.One of us
and the necessity of scaffolding forsupporting collaborative learning. Page 26.901.2 In STEM field, Soundarajan proposed the Peer Instruction for online collaborativelearning, in which students were assigned different roles in different tasks7. Bohorquez andToft-Nielsen integrated collaborative learning in specific course instruction and revealed theeffectiveness of problem-oriented method and collaborative learning in biomedical engineeringeducation8. Dong and Guo developed and adopted the Collaborative Project-based LearningModel to promote students’ collaborative learning in computer-networking curriculum, andclaimed the improvement in
physical projects (manually made or 3-D printed) simulating an ancient device of their choice.Results from student and peer evaluations are consistently favorable.I. Introduction How many people know that the first 3-D image in the history of humankind was created34,000 years ago by a ‘paleoengineer’ on the rock ceiling of a cave in Italy? How many of usknow that about 12,000 years ago, hafted tools contributed to the discovery of farming on amajor scale, allowing ancient ‘agricultural engineers’ to invent more effective farming tools?What about 10,000 years ago, when Mesolithic ‘mechanical engineers’ were able to createhypermicroliths (extremely small stone tools) with skills comparable to present-day diamondcutters, except without a
, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics.Major Daniel J. Fox, U.S. Military Academy MAJ Dan Fox is an Instructor in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the United States
has a heavyemphasis on theory and mathematical modeling as opposed to a more practice based curricula,which was the standard engineering education approach until the modern approach gained favorin a shift that occurred between 1935 and 1965.6 As a result of this shift, many engineeringstudents do not spend much of their time engaged in actual design and build processes until latein their degree program.7Maker spaces have an opportunity to revolutionize the current system by providing an extra-curricular means for students to engage in more hands-on projects and develop a large range ofthe skills that are currently being underdeveloped. Maker spaces go beyond the traditionalmachine shop environment familiar to the undergraduate curriculum
Leadership Program (GEL) is to “create an elite cadre ofengineering leaders with exceptional abilities to lead engineering teams by providing purpose,direction and motivation to influence others to achieve collective goals.”In prior papersi an overview of the complete structure of GEL has been described, including theassessment of industry’s need for improvement in engineering leadership and the current impactand consequences of poorly led engineering projects. A representative syllabus and approach tothe engineering, product development, technical and scientific content was also presented.Further, the global risk to the competitiveness of companies if this need is not addressed waspresented in 2012ii.The following sections describe themes that the
the first African American to earn promotion and win tenure in the Vanderbilt University School of Engineering. Currently, he serves as Associate Chair of the EECS De- partment. He also serves as the Director of Undergraduate Studies for both electrical engineering and computer engineering. Dr. Robinson leads the Security And Fault Tolerance (SAF-T) Research Group at Vanderbilt University, whose mission is to conduct transformational research that addresses the reliability and security of computing systems. Dr. Robinson’s major honors include selection for a National Science Foundation (NSF) Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program Award and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA
paper describes the survey results.Engineering students and faculty members in the audience were asked about theirperceptions of the educational value of the competition for both the competitors and theaudience members. They were also asked about their perceptions of the personalcharacteristics of the competitors. As this research project was funded through anInstructional Enhancement Grant, the goal was to examine the perceived educationalvalue of Idol. This examination aims to help identify ways learning and teaching are –and can be further – enhanced through Idol.Overall, the results of the survey pointed to an overwhelmingly positive response to thepresentation competition and the educational value it provides. The engineering studentsand
unexplored3,4,5. This paper addresses this literature gap and aims to broaden theconceptualization of engineering identity by studying the development of engineering identity ofLatina/o undergraduates from their perspective and experiences. The forecasted growth of Latinas/os in the United States has encouraged a range ofinstitutions to assess how this shift in population will affect various programs of study especiallythose in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) where Latinas/os arecurrently underrepresented. In engineering, the number of Latina/o students enrolling hasincreased since the 1990s and it is projected to continue to increase, though not at the same rateas the Latina/o population growth. Engineering is one
on federal and industry funded projects totaling over $20M. Page 26.964.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Comparative Analysis of Information Sharing and Access to Engineering Education Research DataAbstract The rapid growth of engineering education as a field of rigorous research has resulted inan explosion of available data and research results. There are numerous research efforts currentlyunderway that gather data on a variety of topics that have the potential to help us betterunderstand how students learn engineering. However, there are
had not been recognized.It was not until the advent of USAF Project RAMCAD during 1986-88, with TRW and VirginiaTech as partners, that the need to rigorously evaluate design alternatives was specified as adeliverable. During the conduct of this research, system parameters were partitioned formallyinto design dependent and design independent subsets. The result was a Design EvaluationFunction of the form E = f (X; Yd, Yi), shown last in Figure 2.Although too late for the First Edition in 1981, all subsequent editions of Systems Engineeringand Analysis by Blanchard and Fabrycky incorporated the DDP concept for system designevaluation.1 Also, an added notion was adopted demonstrating that equivalence must beemployed within each alternative
production and retention of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) talent is currently a major threat to the country2. In fact, to address heightened concern regarding the United States’ global position, several national efforts have been implemented to increase the number and diversity of students pursuing degrees and entering STEM careers. In 2012, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology announced that by 2022, the country would need 1 million more STEM professionals than projected to be produced18. One critical asset to reaching this capacity lies in the cultivation of competent, adaptable engineers prepared
qualitatively extended to the selection ofengineering projects. Nevertheless, such a presentation fails a common engineering test, “Howam I going to use this?”We suggest that the important role of diversification in reducing risk merits coverage inengineering economy courses. Students should consider this in planning their investments forretirement, home purchases, and educating their children. Firms should consider this in selectingprojects for investments. Governments should consider this when promoting economicdevelopment.The material presented here was developed to achieve better results in both our engineering andbusiness classrooms. This paper is a text version of what we presented to students for the first
tinkering mayinteract with students’ emotional experiences. We suggest that regardless of whether or notstudents can complete a design goal, tinkering can help students engage in productivedisciplinary practices.Classroom BackgroundWe designed and ran a project-based instructional module within Summer Girls, a day-camp forhigh school students hosted by the University of Maryland. The module was piloted in Summer2013, and small modifications were made and implemented in Summer 2014. As part of theprogram, students learned to program Arduino (microcontroller) controlled robot-tanks(henceforth, Arduino-bot). Roughly 1-2 hours per day were dedicated to Arduino activities,while the rest of the time was spent on modern physics lectures, lab tours, and
Sales and Branch Management, and Transportation Logistics. His research interests include improvement of supply chain efficiency through the application of technology and best practices for logistics and in- ventory management. Dr. Angolia is highly engaged with regional and national companies in recruiting students from ECU for both internships and full time positions. In addition to a PhD from Indiana State, he holds a Master of Engineering degree from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and professional certifica- tions of CPIM and CSCP from APICS, The Association for Operations Management, and a PMP from the Project Management Institute. Dr. Angolia also conducts consulting projects and professional develop- ment
Page 26.1273.3 (2)A graphical depiction of the projectile trajectory with the geometric configuration of the velocityvector v and the local path angle at a representative instant in time is provided in Fig. 1. Theelapsed time of the projectile motion, as measured from the projection instant, is denoted by t .A free-body diagram indicating the forces acting on the projectile is also displayed in Fig. 1.Next, it is useful to introduce the tangential and normal basis vectors T and N , respectively: v v T ; T( ) cos i sin j
profession, yet it israrely included in sophomore and junior level courses. Reflecting on our own prior efforts todevelop writing assignments for such courses, we became curious about the extent to which themost popular engineering textbooks include writing prompts and related writing activities. Thisquestion seemed particularly important given that textbooks often play critical roles inengineering curricula and courses. Textbooks often influence how courses are structured, andreading assignments and homework problems are frequently assigned directly from textbooks.In this project, we systematically searched for and analyzed writing-based problems in sixpopular fluid mechanics textbooks, with a focus on chapters with similar technical content
CoursesAn important component of the PS course, whether part of a LC or not, is a group project inwhich students create a story that they later implement as a video game prototype using Alice,developing their computer programming concepts and skills along the way. We believe that oneof the reasons why students perform better in sections of the PS course linked to a LC is becausethe narrative skills learned in the EG1 course allows them to create more engaging stories whichthey then implement as a computer program using Alice. Students taking a PS course not linkedto a LC may not be taking EG1 in the same semester, they may have forgotten about thenarrative and writing skills learned in EG1, or the EG1 instructor teaching the course may notemphasize
added benefit of borrowing demosfrom different research labs is that the high school students are exposed to the breadth oftechnologies that are being developed across the country. Additionally, some manufacturers andfaculty have donated materials to be consumed during the hands-on activity. An added advantageof using faculty donated materials is that it stimulates investment in the project, whichencourages faculty and their graduate students to invest time volunteering to support theworkshop.Volunteer support is recruited through several different approaches. Six to ten graduate studentvolunteers are required to lead various activities throughout the workshop. Several monthsbefore the conference, conference organizers suggest individual