cognitive profile of the student cohorts which reflects negatively on thestudents’ achievement and performance, especially in engineering. In addition to this, themajority of the engineering faculty had never gone through a formal training in teaching andlearning pedagogy. Therefore, faculty will mainly rely on the only two teaching approaches theyknow; 1) they will either teach in the same way that they were taught or 2) they will teach in thesame way they learn the best. These two teaching approaches are not the most effective; in fact,they are among the most ineffective approaches due to the inherent gap in the learning stylesbetween the new generation students and the faculty. With the increase in the diversity amongfaculty (more international
. Page 20.13.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Education Without Borders: Exploring the Achievement of ABET Learning Outcomes through Engineers Without Borders-USAIntroductionEngineers of the future will be expected to obtain more skills, knowledge, and abilities in theireducation than ever before. Reports continue to expand lists of expected skills to include notonly technical skills, but also professional, management, leadership, interdisciplinary, and globalskills (e.g 1–4). At the same time, undergraduate engineering programs are hard-pressed to fitadditional credits in already overcrowded curricula. Within these constraints, extracurricularengineering activities have alleviated
environments in two upper level subjects. The goals are to help to develop global engineering competencies and experience, and appreciation for the importance of these skills for future working life. The two courses focus on working in an international context, where the complex demands associated with completing a systems design and implementation task on time are combined with factors such as time-zone differences, the challenges of working in a foreign language, and cultural differences in terms of work culture and community. 1. IntroductionDevelopment of competencies in teamwork, cultural awareness, professional communication are well established goals
, Brazil,and the United States using social media and email. This paper focuses on a single case studywith embedded units of Junior Enterprise in multiple countries. The authors founded the firstJunior Enterprise in the United States and will, for readability, write this paper in third person.A case study is an empirical inquiry that inspects an experience within its real life context,particularly when the experience and its context are not mutually exclusive, according to Yin.8 Inthe case of Junior Enterprise, the authors sought to conduct an in-depth investigation as adescriptive case study which allowed them to gather data from a variety of sources anddetermine its convergence.1 For this qualitative research, a case study was used because it
Japan to initiate Japanese 27-Nov-13 3-Dec-13 students into Indian culture and collecting requirements for portal Discussion of the Portal Requirements between the 7-Dec-13 14-Dec-13 Indian faculty and the Indian students Portal Development - interaction between students over 15-Dec-13 25-Feb-14 internet First Version sent over the Internet 13-Feb-14 13-Feb-14 Japanese Team in India to test the built portal and 27-Feb-14 4-Mar-14 suggest enhancements Table 1: Project Activities and their scheduleThe project started in the month of November with an Indian faculty visiting Japan to initiate theJapanese students into Indian culture and collect
year and rate them using an internallygenerated evaluation form, with rubrics and calibration. Included in that evaluation are theappropriate ABET criteria including the difficult criteria: global/societal impacts, communicationskills, contemporary issues, and life-long learning. Global project results historically alwaysachieve higher ratings than on-campus projects. A typical result is shown in Table 1 for the non-technical abilities that may be problematic to achieve in traditional coursework. Page 20.34.5 Table 1: Average Scores for On-Campus and Off-Campus Cohorts Relative to Some Accreditation
Office in São Paulo, which could provide on-the-ground support for the course. Page 21.66.2The first SEAS/Poli-USP Collaborative Field Course was held in Brazil in January 2010, and ithas been offered each successive year on a different topic related to environmental engineering(see Table 1 and reference 4). While the course was initially developed as an internationalexperience for Harvard students, the value of alternating the location between Brazil and theUnited States quickly became apparent. In January 2012, the course was held in the UnitedStates for the first time, and the new idea of seeking out student carry-over from year-to-yearwas
LearningAbstractMichigan Technological University’s Pavlis Institute for Global Technological Leadership wasinitiated in 2005 to provide MTU students with international leadership skills throughcoursework and a student-led intensive international experience. The Pavlis certificate programrequires 25 semester hours of coursework with 13 semesters in the summer (nine hours areallocated to the five week in country experience) between the student’s junior and senior years.The additional hours are focused on preparing them to lead, work, and communicate effectivelywith one another and with their in-country contacts. The major differences between the Pavlisprogram and other intensive programs that prepare global engineers are threefold: 1. The Pavlis teams (typically
convened a task force to develop a set of Global CompetencyOutcomes (GCOs). In 2010, the task force report was delivered and approved by the Provost andthe Board, and the resulting framework for development, improvement, and evaluation of study Page 21.19.3abroad experiences has been widely adopted as the set of "best practices" at our university,although they are not specifically calibrated for engineering students9. In brief, the resultingGCOs focus on five broad educational outcomes falling into four basic classes (knowledge, skill,attitude about self and culture, and action): 1. Students apply their knowledge to create a global frame of
diverging (Figure 1).People may also have their strengths best represented on the extreme ends of the perception orprocessing axis, rather than in one of the quadrants. In these cases, the learning style is defined as“balanced-processing” (balanced between reflective observation and active experimentation) or“balanced-perception” (balanced between abstract conceptualization and concrete experience).According to early reports by Kolb, young children show an even balance of all learning styles,but move towards more abstract thinking as they grow older [14]. A recent study found that one-third of adults were converging, another third were assimilating, 20% were accommodating, andless than 10% were divergent [25].Beckman and Barry [4] have found Kolb
requiredeveloping a comprehensive, uniform approach to STEM internationalization at the institutionallevel. In this paper, we discuss our development of the Global Science and Engineering Program(GSEP), a broad internationalization initiative uniformly spanning all engineering, math, andnatural science programs offered at Northern Arizona University. To help pave the way forothers, we pay particular attention to critical GSEP design features and rationale.1.0 IntroductionGlobalization has been the predominant economic theme for the past decade, leading to broadglobal distribution of research, design, and production teams and facilities spanning the fullspectrum of science and engineering disciplines [1]. Modern STEM graduates will be expectedto communicate
Distance6. Indeed, the end to end information bandwidth of the 445km long WiLDNet is estimated to be between 1 and 3 Mbs, a bandwidth much greater than thatnecessary for transmitting patient information and logistical telephone calls between the healthposts, but one too small to transmit full internet service to all those on the network. The NapoNetproject focuses on developing, implementing and evaluating bandwidth efficient methods forbringing communication services to those who live in the villages along the network. The NapoNet Project was initiated in February of 2009. The project was suggested toNapoNet team members by faculty members of the University of Amazon of Iquitos, Peru, andpublic health and government officials of the State
been around for nearly four decades; there was noagreement on its objective definition. It was only in 2002, when Lamont Adams put forth 10 factorscalling them "Ten Commandments of Egoless Programming” that a step was taken in this direction 15.These factors, as given in Table 1, seem to have found wide conceptual acceptance. We decided to makeuse of them to get a measure of "egoless behavior".Any approach to develop egoless software engineers inherently implies the development of egolessbehavior. Hence, the factors would ideally fall into two categories – first the generic factors thatcorrelate to an egoless individual and second coding factors that would correlate to an egoless developer.Considering this, the factors in Table 1 after a group
infrastructure and gain strategic insights into current global business challenges, best business practices, emerging business trends, and development of new awareness to make informed decisionsThe ICIC has a unique organization structure that motivated participants and created effectivesynergies between educators, professionals, elected officials, and government officials fromaround the world. Initially, areas of geographic proximity around the globe were defined andpotential participants were identified to form local ICIC committees. A total number of 350decision makers participated not only in the conference but also six executive summits involvingglobal problems of common interest. Figure 1 shows a map of the world identifying the
America and the United States: 100,000 U.S. students studying inLatin America and 100,000 Latin American students studying in the United States. The overallpurpose of the initiative is to promote increased intercultural understanding and prosperitythroughout the Western Hemisphere so that people from across the region may work togethermore effectively to address global challenges that connect us in important ways, especially:“citizen security, economic opportunity, social inclusion and environmental sustainability.”1 Inthe words of President Obama: “Because when we study together, and we learn together, wework together, and we prosper together.”2With the President’s focus on promoting student mobility in order to focus specifically onaddressing
classrooms and Engineering Departments at US Universities Maya A. Trotz1, Joniqua Howard1, Helen Muga2, Ken Thomas3, Sheena Francis4, Jeanese Badenock5 1 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, 2Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mount Union, 3The Honors College & Biosystem Engineering Department, Auburn University, 4Department of Biology, University of the Technology, Jamaica, 5 Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of the West
American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Page 20.40.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Using Social Media to Create a Global Community of Sustainability-Engaged StudentsINTRODUCTIONPrograms that enable engineering students to study outside of the United States have beeneffectively integrated with engineering education (1). These programs are exposing students toglobal concepts of sustainability (2). They are also helping students develop core competenciesin engineering, while simultaneously building higher cognitive levels in some
Domestic Undergraduate Research Experiences1. IntroductionThis paper presents the results of a study that examines how international and domesticundergraduate research experiences affect the intercultural maturity of students in science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. This question is timely given theincreasingly multinational nature of research collaborations. In its 2014 Science Indicators, theNational Science Foundation (NSF) reported that 35% of U.S. articles published in 2012 wereinternationally coauthored, up from 32% in 2010, with U.S.-Japan coauthored papers comprising7% of this total. Internationally coauthored papers in science and engineering now comprise one-fourth of all papers worldwide.1 The percentage of U.S