Conference Session

The 2017 Zone Best Paper Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eileen Haase Ph.D., Johns Hopkins University; Harry R. Goldberg, Johns Hopkins University

Tagged Topics

Council of Sections

No. 1, 9-20 http://www.lifescied.org/content/6/1/9.full.pdf+html (3) Tyler E. Mains, Joseph Cofrancesco Jr. MD, MPH, FACP, Stephen M. Milner, MB. BS. DSc, FACS, Nina G. Shah MS, Harry Goldberg, PhD. (2015) “Do questions help? The Impact of Audience Response Systems on Medical Student Learning”. Postgraduate Medical Journal. (4) Michaelsen, L.K., Watson, W.E., Cragin, J.P., and Fink, L.D. (1982) “Team-based learning: A potential solution to the problems of large classes”. Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 7(4): 18-33 (5) Richardson Lab, Kinemage http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu/ (6) B. Alberts, D. Bray, A. Johnson, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, P. Walter (2009) Essential

Conference Session

The 2017 Zone Best Paper Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd Easton, Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Council of Sections

Table 1: Simplex Tableau 1 The teacher begins by asking student, “What is the current solution?” The studentresponds, “I have no clue.” The student is then asked, “Which columns form the identitymatrix?” The response may still be clueless. The teacher reminds the student that an identitycolumn is a column with all zeros and only a single 1. The student can then say that the identitycolumns are z, s1 and s2. The student is questioned regarding the current solution. The studentshould be able to recall that the values of these variables are the right hand side (RHS). Thus, z =0, s1 = 6, s2 = 4 and all other variables are nonbasic and have a value of 0, x1 = x2 = 0. Student B is asked, “What is the next step?” Most likely the student

Conference Session

The 2017 Zone Best Paper Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sean St. Clair, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Council of Sections

classroomsetting.InstructorsThree different instructors taught the six sections of statics that participated in this study. Toreduce the possibility of an instructor-related bias, a guest lecturer was used. Furthermore, thethree instructors each completed a widely-used Teaching Goals Inventory (TGI) to determine ifthere were significant differences between their approaches to teaching statics. Cluster scores forthe TGI were compared using the non-parametric, bivariate correlation using Spearman’s rhothat revealed significant correlations between all pairs of instructors: Instructors A and B(ρ=.975, p, accessed Feb. 2016.19. St.Clair, S.W. & N.C. Baker, N.C. “Pedagogy and Technology in Statics,” Proceedings of the 2003 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual