waste casks.The effectiveness of this collaborative module in promoting cross-disciplinary learning wasassessed through an analysis of student responses to an anonymous survey. The results show thatthe module was effective in (a) teaching students the fundamental principles of diffusion, (b)fostering peer-to-peer teaching and learning, and (c) emphasizing the importance of teamworkand problem-solving across disciplines. The results also indicate that students developed abroader view regarding the applicability of their knowledge beyond their own disciplinaryboundaries. Given its universality, this materials-focused teaching module has the potential toserve as an effective model to foster interdisciplinary teaching and learning between
and 0 ftlb at 113 degrees for Nylon rope. The relationship shown inFigure 10 was used to drive the computer model. As may be noted this is almost linear. Figure 10 Moment applied to the arm by a nylon rope bundle as a function of the angle of the throwing arm.Dynamic Analysis Figure 11 The Sling (P) and throwing arm (L).The dynamic components of the Onager as determined by the students are shown in Figure 11.The equations derived by the students, to describe the positions and motion of these components, Page 26.70.11are as follows:Position of center mass of the arm xB = B cos θB
Paper ID #13461A Hybrid Flipped Classroom Approach to Teaching Power Electronics Courseto Electrical Engineering StudentsDr. Hayrettin B Karayaka, Western Carolina University Bora Karayaka is an Engineering faculty at Kimmel School, Western Carolina University. He has worked as a Senior Engineer for smart grid and wireless communication industries for over ten years. He is currently responsible for teaching electric power engineering courses in the department. Dr. Karayaka’s research interests include power engineering education, ocean wave energy harvesting, identification, modeling and control for electrical machines and
. 2. In this work, the optimizationalgorithm for design team selection includes an objective that maximizes the diversity of theMBTI characteristics of the team, while incentivizing the selection of a leader (or leaders) oneach team. A leader is considered to be either: a) A single student with an MBTI personality type that includes EN (Extroverted INtuitor), corresponding to a leadership score of 1; or b) Two students, each with an MBTI personality type that includes IN (Introverted INtuitor) and EF (Extroverted Feeler), corresponding to a leadership score of 0.1 and 0.9, respectively.An EN personality is generally creative, social, and logical, and capable of seeing “the bigpicture” 11– all traits that make strong
Paper ID #13604Creating a Pipeline into Biomedical EngineeringMrs. Courtney Lambeth, NC A&T State University Mrs. Lambeth serves as the Educational Assessment and Administrative Coordinator for the Engineering Research Center for Revolutionizing Metallic Biomaterials at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University in Greensboro, North Carolina.Dr. Matthew B. A. McCullough, North Carolina A&T State University An assistant professor in the department of Chemical, Biological, and Bioengineering, he has his B.S. in Industrial Engineering from North Carolina A&T and his Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering
Paper ID #12025A Robotics-Focused Instructional Framework for Design-Based Research inMiddle School ClassroomsMr. Matthew Moorhead, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering Matthew Moorhead received his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno, in 2014. He is currently pursuing a M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, where he is a teaching fellow in their GK-12 program. Matthew also conducts research in the Mechatronics and Controls Laboratory with an interest in robotics and controls.Dr. Jennifer B Listman, NYU Polytechnic School of
Paper ID #11800The Influence of Racial and Mathematical Identities on African AmericanMale Engineering Transfer StudentsMrs. Olgha B Davis, North Carolina State University Olgha B. Davis is currently a doctoral candidate at the department of Leadership, Policy, and Adult and Higher Education at North Carolina State University. She obtained her Bachelor’s degree in Biomedical Engineering from Boston University and worked in industry for 7 years prior to returning to graduate school. She earned her Master’s degree in Biomedical Engineering from North Carolina State University and the University of Chapel Hill. Ms. Davis
Paper ID #13963Identifying Best Practices of Logistics & Transportation Graduate EducationDr. MD B. Sarder, University of Southern Mississippi Dr. Sarder is an associate professor and program coordinator of the industrial engineering technology program at the University of Southern Mississippi (USM). He is also an assistant director of the center for logistics, trade and transportation. At the USM, he revamped his program by developing as many as fourteen new courses, implementing hands on experience in courses, and delivering online courses for distant students. Dr. Sarder is very active in engineering and technology
Paper ID #12695Institutional Transformation Guided by a Multi-Frame Organizational Anal-ysis ApproachProf. Margaret B. Bailey P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Margaret Bailey, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology. Dr. Bailey teaches courses and conducts re- search related to Thermodynamics, engineering and public policy, engineering education, and gender in engineering and science. She is the co-author on an engineering textbook, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, which is used worldwide in
retaining underrepresented minorities and women in STEM. Prior to Purdue, she spent time in industry holding technical and operations-based roles and has experience with informal STEM community and outreach projects. She holds a BS degree in Industrial Technology and a MS degree in Engineering Management.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education
a “flipped” classroom. It is the author’s belief that any instructor should becomfortable and confident in the structure of the course in order to successfully deliver thenecessary knowledge to students.Bibliography1. Bishop, Jacob Lowell and Verleger, Matthew A, “The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research,” 2013 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, 2013.2. Papadopoulos, Christopher and Santiago Roman, Aidsa, “Implementing an Inverted Classroom Model in Engineering Statics: Initial Results,” 2010 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Louisville, KY, 2010.3. Swithenbank, Susan B. and DeNucci, Thomas William, “Using a “Flipped Classroom” Model in Undergraduate Newtonian Dynamics,” 2014 ASEE Annual Conference
and Professional Communication, both from NMSU. She is currently a Ph.D. student in the NMSU Rhetoric and Professional Communication program.Dr. Ricardo B. Jacquez, New Mexico State University Ricardo B. Jacquez, Ph.D, PE, is Regents Professor of Civil Engineering and Dean of Engineering at New Mexico State University. For the past 21 years he has served as the principal investigator and project director for the Louis Stokes New Mexico Alliance for Minority Participation. Page 26.1576.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015The Summer Undergraduate Research Bridge
participants achieve program outcomes.In this paper, we provide an overview of RSAP and share a logic model for the program. Usingthis information, we propose a refined, more in-depth RSAP evaluation plan to assess studentlearning and program outcomes. This plan can serve as a model for other internationalengineering education programs that seek to demonstrate value. Page 26.1348.10References1. Johri, A., & Jesiek, B. K. (2014). Global and international issues in engineering education. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), CHEER: Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research New York, New York: Cambridge University Press.2
Paper ID #11616Characterizing Student Music Preference and Engineering Major ChoiceMr. Frank Blubaugh, Purdue University Frank Blubaugh is a graduating senior in Multidisciplinary Engineering at Purdue University. He has a diverse academic background in acoustical engineering, education, and music performance.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate
Paper ID #12619Incorporating Training In Research & Research Methods into the Under-graduate Curriculum in Engineering and Engineering Technology-(E&ET).Dr. Cyril B OKHIO, Kennesaw State University Cyril B. Okhio is a Faculty at the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering & Engineering Tech- nology, Kennesaw State University and an Adjunct Professor at Clark Atlanta University’s Dual Degree Engineering Program. He earned his B.S. (Engineering) and Ph.D. (Mechanical Engineering) degrees from, and was an (Science and Engineering Research Council) SERC Post-Doctoral Research Fellow at the University of London
the ground up. Therewere not any instructions for step-by-step as a team we had to figure out everything thatneeded to be accomplished to get the best results. I have also learnt how to interact andplan meetings with Industry. This has helped to get a perspective on working for city. 3. How has this experience a. Increased my curiosity or awareness about the new content of issuesThis has increased my awareness on everything behind the scenes in making a cityfunction as a whole with our tax dollars. You do not really think about what happenswith you flush the toilet and where it goes, until you get to see the facility and the processit goes through to be cleaned and put back into a river or lake. b. Aroused me to seek more
?: A Case Study of the New Start Summer Program.” Research in Higher Education, 2013: 431-498.14. Garcia, L.D. and C.C. Paz, “Evaluation of Summer Bridge Programs.” About Campus. 2009: 30-32.15. Kezar, Adrianna. “Summer Bridge Programs: Supporting All Students.” ERIC Digest. 2001: 1-7.16. Doerr, Helen M, Jonas B Arleback, and AnnMarie H O'Neill. "An Integrated Modeling Approach to a Summer Bridge Course." ASEE. 2012. 5236.17. Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1995). The Seven Principles in Action: Improving Undergraduate Education. Anker Publishing Co.18. Levin, M., & Levin, J. (1991). A critical examination of academic retention programs for at-risk minority college students. Journal of College Student Development , 323-334.19
Engineering. Orlando, FL: ASCE; 2014.38. Shneiderman B. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: , IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, 1996. Proceedings. 1996.39. Ware C. Information visualization: perception for design. Third edition. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann; 2013.40. Chang H, Kang S, Chen P. Systematic procedure of determining an ideal color scheme on 4D models. Adv Eng Inform 2009.41. Unity - Game engine, tools and multiplatform . 2014 Available from: http://unity3d.com/unity42. BIM - Work Flows. 2015 Available from: http://bim.wikispaces.com/Work+Flows43. NGUI: Next-Gen UI kit » Tasharen Entertainment . 2014 Available from: http://www.tasharen.com/?page_id=140
whole is anessential part of their research. At the end of the semester, students communicate their results inthe following forms: (1) abstract, (2) technical report, and (3) oral presentation supported bymulti-media materials. A check list and grading criteria were developed that includes all theelements of the DoM.After completing the course, twenty-one students have demonstrated success in obtainingfunding and/or creating formal work products. Table 1 summarizes their accomplishments whichconsist of a collection of grants/industry stipends, published papers30-39, presentations at aUniversity research showcase, and software releases. The most notable results came fromstudents A, B, G, and H who had multiple work products. The remainder
nearshore coastal areas and tsunamiinundation.The Mission of the Coastal Engineering concentration is to “provide engineers with graduateeducation in the specialized field of coastal engineering, including knowledge, skills and abilitiesto address coastal engineering challenges arising from coastal natural disasters.” ProgramObjectives are: a. Provide students an understanding of the fundamental coastal engineering knowledge and principles necessary to address engineering challenges in a coastal environment, especially those arising from coastal natural disasters, b. Provide graduate course work and research programs in coastal engineering, and c. Enable students to achieve enhanced professional development and to appreciate the
6 considers the intellectual virtues.[20] For a discussion of philosophical questions about Techne see Ch 5 of Mitcham, C (1994) Thinking through Technology.The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. See also Cuomo, S (2007) Technology andCulture in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.[21] Heywood, J (2005). Engineering Education. Research and development in Curriculum and Instruction. Hoboken, NJ.IEEE/Wiley. See preface.[22] c.f. National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying, http://ncees.org/licensure/[23] Kallenberg, B. J (2013). By Design. Ethics, Theology and the Practice of Engineering. Cambridge, UK. James Clark &Co.[24] For
staff and teachers, and served as museum liaison to UT Austin’s Science and Engineering departments and the local STEM professional community. She received training in inquiry-based learning from the Institute for Inquiry at the Exploratorium in San Francisco, CA. She is currently the Education Director for Phoenix Arising Aviation Academy and the Program Director for STEM Education programs with iFLY.Mr. Stuart B Wallock Stuart Wallock has spent the last 20 years involved with the convergence of technology, ecommerce, media and entertainment industries in various online and retail capacities. He holds a BA in Liberal Arts from UT Austin. Stuart joined SkyVenture/iFLY Indoor Skydiving from Dell, Inc., in October of
Paper ID #12734Academic Outcomes of Cooperative Education ParticipationNichole Ramirez, Purdue University Nichole Ramirez is a graduate student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in aerospace engineering from The University of Alabama and her M.S. in aviation and aerospace management from Purdue University. She is a former recipient of the Purdue Doctoral Fellowship. In addition to cooperative education research, she is also interested in studying student choice and migration engineering and technology.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main
Paper ID #12468Sharing the Full Range of Leadership in Student Teams: Developing an In-strumentLt. Col. Brian J. Novoselich, Virginia Tech Brian Novoselich is an active duty Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army and currently a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His is a former assistant profes- sor at the United States Military Academy. His research interests include capstone design teaching and assessment, undergraduate engineering student leadership development, and social network analysis.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education David Knight
Paper ID #11339Measuring Engineering Students’ Ability to Thrive in Diverse and Global En-vironmentsDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Matilde L. Sanchez-Pena, Purdue University Matilde Sanchez-Pena is a first year PhD student in the Engineering Education program at Purdue Uni- versity. Her research interests are global
- Type C Type E Options description posing Derivative Type A - Type F information: (rate of change) Function Type B Type D - (magnitude)For each of the seven Types of items, there is an extra feature that allows a new rating accordingto three types of contexts where the information has to be stated. It could be the real environmentof Motion Context (MC) that has been studied in class through SimCalc, or it could be anotherreal magnitude involved in Other Context (OC), or it
line between right and wrong is unclear b. Reflect a potential scenario in which an engineer could find themselves c. Be “discussed” in context of the cannons of the code of engineering ethics2. Broad Impacts a. Involve several thoughtful, realistic such as environmental, economic, societal, relationships, medical, etc. b. Consider if the impacts are short or long-term c. Consider both positive and negative impacts3. Engineering as a profession a. Involve a branch, application, or industry of the engineering profession b. Be creative about what an engineer might be like in the future (socially), or what a non- stereotypical engineer might be/ have been
administration of the persistence in engineering survey. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 371-395. 7. Lichtenstein, G., Loshbaugh, H. G., Claar, B., Chen, H. L., Jackson, K., & Sheppard, S. D. (2009). An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision making among undergraduate engineering majors. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 227-234. 8. Committee on the National Aerospace Initiative, Air Force Science and Technology Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. (2004). Evaluation of the National Aerospace Initiative. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 9. Weigel, A. (2010). “Survey of aerospace student attitudes.” Retrieved February 20, 2011
“Critical Engineering Challenges”, I thinkit is problems in today’s society. I thought I would be working in a team of 3-4, working onsome sort of project that saves gas. I thought I would be doing lots of planning & engr. des.work.”Q2. Confidence and Success.A2. “Having an idea that I will be working on a motorcycle mademe a little scared due to my lack of motorcycle knowledge. I felt that I wouldn’t be THAT greatat building/machining b/c I’ve done only a little work with mechanical engineering. I did havesome confidence because I helped build a tricycle in engr. des. when I originally had no tricycleknowledge. I had about 50% confidence.”Q3. Faculty Mentoring. A3. “Initially, I thought I would be spending all my time with theresearch advisor
gates, b) using a 16 to 1 Multiplexer(MUX), and c) employing an 8 to 1 MUX. Each part was worth 5 points. The mean score onthis section 12.5 out of 15 points, while the median was 13.75. As the class average was above80%, we can consider this result to indicate satisfactory proficiency overall. A second example(1P) involves the behavior of a sequential logic element: the JK flip-flop (FF). Given a diagramof the JK FF with a negative-edge triggered clock input, and a timing diagram showing the pulsetrain waveforms for the clock, J and K inputs, the student was to predict the output of the JK FF.On this item, students scored an average of 4.35 out of 5 points. Again, the average above 80%appears to indicate satisfactory proficiency.Circuits 2