Collection

2024 ASEE-GSW

Authors

Adam Weaver, Baylor University; Joseph Anthony Donndelinger, Baylor University

Paper ID #44710The Impacts of Reflective Writing on Peer Evaluations in EngineeringDesign CoursesMr. Adam Weaver, Baylor University Mr. Adam Weaver joined the Baylor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering with over 15 years of experience in industry and government service. He served in the Active Duty Air Force as an engineer for over eight years, specializing in test and evaluation of avionics, guidance/navigation, and space systems. After his time in the military, he worked as a Propulsion Test and Integration Engineer with Space Exploration Technologies as well as multiple positions with L3Harris

Conference Session

Track 1: Technical Session 6: stEm PEER Academy: the Power of Human Capital

Collection

2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Jennifer Ocif Love, Northeastern University; Claire Duggan, Northeastern University; Elizabeth H. Blume, Northeastern University Engineering PLUS Alliance

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity

Paper ID #40759stEm PEER Academy: the Power of Human CapitalDr. Jennifer Ocif Love, Northeastern University Dr. Jennifer Love is a full-time faculty member of Northeastern University’s College of Engineering, most recently in the First Year Engineering program. She is currently the Associate Director for the Center for STEM Education. She has a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (1993), a Master of Science in Biomedical Engineering from The University of Iowa (1997) and a Doctorate in Education from Northeastern University (2022) where she recently completed her

Collection

ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Spring Conference

Authors

Royce A Francis, The George Washington University; James P Ferguson, The George Washington University

Paper ID #45014Exploring the role of engineering judgment in engineering educationthrough writing praxis in a 3rd year systems engineeringwriting-in-the-disciplines [WID] courseDr. Royce A Francis, The George Washington University Dr. Royce Francis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Management and Sys- tems Engineering [EMSE] at the George Washington University. At George Washington, Dr. Francis’s engineering education research explores the relationships between professional identity formation and engineering judgment. His other research interests include infrastructure resilience and risk assessment

Collection

2023 PSW

Authors

Helen Choi

maintain quality control over instruction and to better understand andrespond quickly to graduate students' needs and preferences, the Hub's co-directorslimited the delivery of tutoring instruction to themselves. Both instructors are full-timeteaching faculty in the technical communication program housed within the engineeringschool, and both have decades of teaching graduate-level academic communication inspecific fields, including engineering, law, and international relations.This type of instructional delivery bypasses some of the questions encountered by someuniversity writing centers such as the efficacy of peer or undergraduate tutors [3], aswell whether tutors should be generalists or specialists within students' fields. Astechnical

Collection

2024 South East Section Meeting

Authors

Brian Aufderheide, Hampton University; LaNika M. Barnes, Albemarle County Public Schools (Charlottesville, Virginia); Otsebele E Nare, Hampton University; Garrick E. Louis, University of Virginia; Daniel Webster Fairley II, 100 Black Men of Central Virginia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Paper ID #40935Ethics Case Study Project: Broadening STEM Participation by NormalizingImmersion of Diverse Groups in Peer to Near Peer CollaborationsDr. Brian Aufderheide, Hampton University Dr. Brian Aufderheide is Associate Professor in Chemical Engineering at Hampton University. He com- pleted his PhD in Chemical Engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. His areas of expertise are in advanced control, design, and modeling of biomedical, chemical and biological processes.LaNika M. Barnes, Albemarle County Public Schools (Charlottesville, Virginia) LaNika Barnes, a certified High School Science and Equity Resource

Collection

2024 South East Section Meeting

Authors

John W. Brocato, University of Georgia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

continues the conversation begun in the first meeting and introduces the course’smajor writing assignment, the Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP). Thisassignment requires students to craft a specific plan for their college careers and beyond, a planthat in its final form may be a written paper, a narrated presentation (PowerPoint, etc.), or amultimedia work of some sort. Students also submit multiple drafts and participate in a guidedpeer review of each other’s work. The third engineering-communication class meeting reviewsprevious strategies and guidelines along with some of the common issues arising out of the firstdrafts and peer reviews, after which students have one more week before submitting their finaldrafts. Although the

Collection

2024 South East Section Meeting

Authors

Larisa Olesova, University of Florida; Ayesha Sadaf, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Ioulia Rytikova, George Mason University; Mihai Boicu, George Mason University; Harry J Foxwell, George Mason University

STEM and non-STEM graduate students when they participated in inquiry-based learning, such as peer reviewactivities and case-based learning. Two hundred and twenty-four graduate students from threeuniversities in the USA participated in the study where STEM graduate students were fromengineering and non-STEM graduate students were from Education. Data were collected througha shared metacognition questionnaire online survey. The results revealed that both STEM andnon-STEM students had high perception of metacognition when they participated in the inquiry-based courses. Additionally, while STEM students considered the value of peer feedback toparticipate in the research-based activities, non-STEM students attended to the ideas of othersduring

Collection

2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Calvin Cuddy; Jessica Deters

Online Resources Supplemental Instruction Peer-assisted Labs Homework HelpStudy Groups Writing Assignments Recitation Course Material Comparison”. Some topics maynot be fully represented, as this review is not intended to be fully comprehensive but rather toprovide an overview of different intervention styles and their effectiveness. Articles wereselected for inclusion based on their relevance to the research question.General FindingsOverall, there are many effective ways to improve student success/outcomes in statics. Throughthis literature review, we found that there is no “perfect” solution, and that students and faculty atdifferent institutions respond differently to different interventions. Therefore, an idealintervention would involve

Collection

2024 ASEE PSW Conference

Authors

Mandeep Singh Basson, University of California, Davis; Colleen Elizabeth Bronner, University of California, Davis

01 Cultural adjustment to academia writing styles and academic expectations. understanding of their own cultural identities, biases, and Lack of knowledge and fear of offending cultural norms leads to miscommunication or no assumptions through reflective exercises, fostering increased self- 02 Issues with social integration communication between peers

Collection

2024 ASEE North East Section

Authors

Djedjiga Belfadel, Fairfield University; Isaac Macwan, Fairfield University; Naser Haghbin, Fairfield University; John F Drazan, Fairfield University

. Students were required to use several library resources. They referenced journal articles, technical books, and internet sources, and were required to demonstrate proper technical citation using the IEEE citation style. For most students, this was their first experience with technical writing. They quickly realized that it was different from the writing they had done before in high school English, history, and other non-technical courses. Furthermore, they went through a writing revision process in which their paper went through three iterations of review: self, peer, and instructor review. All reviews were done prior to the final grading of the paper. Individual Oral Presentation: The second project, early

Collection

2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference

Authors

Bilquis Ferdousi, Eastern Michigan University

andresponses to their peers were graded with feedback following the formative assessment method.This helped students improve their discussion posts and responses in the next discussion topics.The impact of applying formative and summative e-assessment practices in the active learningenvironment was demonstrated in this case. Students who tried to improve their writing skillsfollowing feedback provided by the instructor in the SpeedGrader in Canvas learningmanagement systems were successful in achieving planned learning objectives. Rather thanoveremphasizing summative assessments, more emphasis was given to formative assessmentpractices. It has been found that combining summative assessments and formative assessmentpractices, with more emphasis on

Collection

2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference

Authors

Mary M McCall M.A., University of Detroit Mercy; Nassif E Rayess, University of Detroit Mercy

Paper ID #44620Developing Teamwork Skills Across the Mechanical Engineering CurriculumMs. Mary M McCall M.A., University of Detroit Mercy I taught Technical Writing and Business Communication at the university and community college level for more than 30 years before retiring in May 2023. My current focus at Detroit Mercy continues to be the Embedded Technical Writing Program for Mechanical Engineering, now in its seventh year.Dr. Nassif E Rayess, University of Detroit Mercy Nassif Rayess is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at University of Detroit Mercy. He was part of the efforts to introduce entrepreneurially

Collection

ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Spring Conference

Authors

Bradley J. Sottile, The Pennsylvania State University; Arun Srivats Mohan, Pennsylvania State University; Frank Christopher Barber

) – collaborated to develop a micro-credential on professional ethics for PennState’s College of Engineering. The micro-credential is targeted towards engineering students asearly as their first year of post-secondary study. The draft micro-credential notably includedseveral historical case studies – notably, the Boeing 737 Max crash, the Space Shuttle Challengerexplosion, Apple intellectual property misappropriation, the Volkswagen diesel emissionsscandal, and the Ford Explorer and Firestone tire tread separation incident – with additionalfurther modern cases inspired by recent engineering industry events. In this work, our qualitativeimpressions on the micro-credential development process originated via memo-writing (Saldana,2012), were further

Collection

2024 South East Section Meeting

Authors

Showkat J. Chowdhury, Alabama A&M University; Xiang Zhao, Alabama A&M University; Tamara Chowdhury, Alabama A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

rate, and graduation time needed are significantly better compared totheir peers. This study shows that, the scholarships and various academic supports provided tothe talented but financially needy minority students had significant impact on student success,retention, and graduation.1. IntroductionIn an increasingly competitive and technology driven global economy, the future prosperity ofU.S. to succeed depends in a large measure on a STEM educated workforce. During the nextdecade, U.S. demand for scientists and engineers is expected to increase four times compared toother occupations [1],[2]. Yet, only 32% of undergraduates in the U.S. receive their degrees inSTEM while the corresponding figures for Japan, China, and Germany are 55%, 59

Collection

2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference

Authors

Chan-Jin Chung, Lawrence Technological University; Joshua E Siegel, Michigan State University; Mark Wilson, Michigan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

publishingconcepts, mentored in designing and testing hypotheses, and then involved in two challengesrelated to self-driving and networked vehicles. Two teams of 4 designed, implemented, testedvarious self-drive and V2X algorithms using real vehicles on a test course, analyzed/evaluatedtest results, wrote technical reports, and delivered presentations. After the summer program wasover, the technical reports were published in peer reviewed conferences and journals.Survey results show that students attained significant & real-world computer science skills inautonomous vehicle development leveraging real vehicles available. The programs alsoProceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section ConferenceCopyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

Track 7: Technical Session 2: Lessons Learned from Development of an Elective Undergraduate Course on DEI in STEM

Collection

2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Leigh S McCue, George Mason University; Christopher Alexander Carr, George Mason University; Kevin William Kuck, George Mason University; Dhiambi Otete; Violet Veronika Reges

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity

artificial intelligence titled ”Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Double- Edged Sword,” which was given at the World Engineering Education Forum & Global Engineering Dean’s Council in October 2023. His work demonstrates his keen interest in cutting-edge technology, engineering solutions, and a passion for DEI topics. In addition to his academic pursuits, Kevin has gained valuable experience through various internships and work roles. He served as a Mechanical Engineering Intern at Jacobs, where he contributed to HVAC and MEP design projects, created energy models using HAP, and performed essential calculations for mechanical equipment selection. His involvement in report writing summarizing ultrasonic pipe testing

Collection

2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference

Authors

Claudio Freitas, Purdue University Fort Wayne

Tagged Topics

Diversity

pedagogy in FYE.Introduction According to Chatman [1-Pg. 19], narrative is essentially a way of organizing text. Thenarrative structure must be brought to life through various forms: in writing, as seen in storiesand events; through spoken words and acting, as in plays and films; in drawings, comic strips,and actions; and even in music. Recognizing its potential to convey stories, scholars begun toexplore narrative as a powerful tool to enhance teaching and learning experience. The applicationof narrative pedagogies, also called story-based pedagogies, spans extensive research over thelast decades [2], [3], [4]. While recent studies still explore the potential of narrative an storytelling ineducation [5], [6], [7], little is known is terms

Collection

2024 ASEE PSW Conference

Authors

Karl Benjamin Ernsberger, Graduation Solutions, LLC

, prebuilt virtual labs and quizzes asthe most common methods of content delivery [2],[3] 1. All of these, unless specificallyprescribed, don’t encourage the remote learner to connect with or collaborate with other students.When communication is a required component of a course, it often consists of shallow, teacher-mandated standards of communication with little student benefit other than attempting to helpstudents connect or provide unmotivated peer review, which doesn’t often lead to genuinediscussion. When learning is checked through standardized quizzing and lists, there is also a highrisk of cheating, where students can share answers or find them online during a testing session,which further reduces the authenticity of the learning and

Conference Session

Track 2: Technical Session 1: An ecological belonging intervention for equity: Impacts to date and promising directions

Collection

2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Allison Godwin, Cornell University; Linda DeAngelo, University of Pittsburgh; Eric Trevor McChesney, University of Pittsburgh; Erica McGreevy, University of Pittsburgh; Gerard Dorvè-Lewis, University of Pittsburgh; Anne-Ketura Elie, University of Pittsburgh; Kevin Jay Kaufman-Ortiz, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Georgia Institute of Technology; Heather Lee Perkins, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Charlie Díaz, University of Pittsburgh; Kevin R. Binning

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity

outcomes.“I think there's less than a 1,000 Black students on campus and I think in my class, like my year inchemical engineering, there's maybe five or six other Black students that at least I've seen or talked to inany way…I have never felt any malicious intent towards me at this institution purely because I amBlack, but I have had experiences where I’ve had to deal with ignorance from my white peers. And Iknow that it happened just because they have never met a Black person before. So, there's always thisfeeling that just knowing that the way I've maybe talked to someone in my family, I can't talk to a peerabout like a complex engineering process. I can't necessarily just talk how I would to anyone about that,like in the same way that I’d talk

Collection

2024 ASEE North East Section

Authors

Susannah GAL, Wentworth Institute of Technology

class. I gathered this insight as part of a class titled “Teaching ofBiology”, BIOL 400 at Penn State Harrisburg, which had 17 upper-level students registered inSpring 2020. For the initial several weeks, we discussed as a class student-centered approachesto teaching including using case studies, peer review of writing, and interactive questions duringclass. Students picked one past class that they particularly enjoyed and interviewed the facultymember to ask about how they prepared for the class and about their strategies for supportingstudents’ learning. The students shared the creative strategies with the whole group and later, thenew approaches they suggested based on their collective learning in this course. As part of thisprocess, the

Collection

2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Kaycie Lane; Logan Perry

students in Lincoln felt more confident post-activities than Omahain general, possibly due in part to in-person interactions with these students. There was moredialogue between the Lincoln section and Omaha section due to the distance learning interactionpresent on the day of the dialogue, a factor which may have influenced the “confidence” answersto the post-survey questions. In addition, peer review sessions generated alternative solutionsthat a group may not have thought of initially. A previous study from quantum engineering sawa similar improvement in paper writing as a result of peer review activities, showing there areexamples of beneficial peer-review activities generating positive impacts in engineeringeducation[17] and more broadly in

Collection

2024 ASEE PSW Conference

Authors

Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University; John Misasi PhD, Western Washington University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Engineering & Design department at WWU has spent considerableeffort focused on supporting students with the goal of improving student sense of belonging andcreating inclusive and equitable learning environments. Efforts have included updating the firstyear curriculum to incorporate social justice [6], starting a peer mentor program focused onstudent engagement and belonging [7] [8] [9], integrating inclusive practices into thedepartmental makerspace [10] [11], creating a summer bridge program for engineering students[12], hosting events designed to increase belonging and engagement [8] [13], conductingresearch on impacts of curricular and co-curricular changes on belonging and identity [14] [15][16], and offering undergraduate research

Collection

2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference

Authors

Nicholas Brown, Western Michigan University; Johan Fanas Rojas, Western Michigan University; Alyssa K. Moon, Western Michigan University; Ali Alhawiti, Western Michigan University; Pritesh Yashaswi Patil, Western Michigan University; Parth Kadav, Western Michigan University; Kira Hamelink, Western Michigan University; Wendy R. Swalla, Western Michigan University; Zachary D. Asher, Western Michigan University

offering.Specifically how the course was intentionally developed to include practical applications ofindustry-standard writing and to center student learning with regular feedback and practice. Next,we break down the core concepts for autonomous vehicle engineering across engineering andcomputer science disciplines. We address the issue of prerequisites and how the class conceptswere ultimately organized and how existing university research and computer labs were utilized.Lastly, we also discuss group dynamics and techniques for ensuring course project teams havediverse majors. Our results section is primarily composed of survey results from our third courseoffering. We show the evolution of skills from the mechanical engineering students and thecomputer

Collection

2022 CIEC

Authors

MADDUMAGE KARUNARATNE; Christopher Gabany

’ problem-solving skills to the higher level are some of the advantages of producing monthly progressreports. These activities may be more relevant in research and innovative groups than inmanufacturing organizations. Project report writing targeting various readers is emphasized inthe phrase “Excellent verbal and writing skills to communicate effectively with clients, fieldengineers, peers, and management”, which is seen in many requests this department receivesfrom industry, seeking graduates in EE and COE for employment.While monthly reports enhance students’ writing skills, they may reveal or avoid hidden agendasor collusion between a faculty and a project group. Advisors cannot unilaterally allow students toalter target functionality of

Collection

2024 ASEE-GSW

Authors

Jennifer A Cross, Texas Tech University; Md Rashedul Hasan, Texas Tech University; Diego Alejandro Polanco-Lahoz, Texas Tech University; Mario G. Beruvides P.E., Texas Tech University; Kelli Cargile Cook, Texas Tech University; Jason Tham, Texas Tech University

University. He is author of Design Thinking in Technical Communication (2021 Routledge) and co-author of UX Writing (2024 Routledge), Writing to Learn in Teams (2023 Parlor Press), Designing Technical and Pro- fessional Communication (2021 Routledge), and Collaborative Writing Playbook (2021 Parlor Press). He has also edited the collection Keywords in Design Thinking (2022 University Press of Colorado). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Session XXXX From Conventional Wisdom to Evidence-Based Practice: Validation of Programmatic Design

Conference Session

Track 5: Technical Session 8: Interactive Session: Exploring Scripts of Whiteness in Engineering

Collection

2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

R. Jamaal Downey; Joel Alejandro Mejia, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Gordon D Hoople, University of San Diego; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity

? 12● Ask for people’s definition of Whiteness. Write answers on whiteboard. Then provide some/all of the definition below: ○ Whiteness: A false ideal, historical mechanism of power, and privileged social position that benefits white people (DuBois, 1999); a social concept that has “historically stratified and partitioned the world according to skin color” (Leonardo, 2002, p. 32); a (dominating) worldview and discourse; a racial category and socially constructed identity supported by hegemonic and flexible material practices and institutions (Leonardo, 2004); an epistemology (DuBois, 1999; hooks, 1992; Mills,1997; Leonardo, 2009) characterized by

Collection

2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference

Authors

Craig J. Gunn, Michigan State University

Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824There are many things that a university must focus on when deciding on what to teach ourincoming and ongoing students. For engineering we hope that during their first years on campusstudents become acquainted with ethics, writing, speaking, and all the “soft skills” associatedwith the more liberal side of the institution. Many people do not realize that our students willsink or swim with their ability to function in a society that does not contain 100% engineers. Butthat is of little concern to many who simply say that controls, fluids, thermal sciences, and themany other engineering topics are the

Collection

2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Sara E. Wilson

focus fromoutcome to process was accomplished using in person grading where students were expected todescribe their code and any challenges they faced writing the code. Students were then askedquestions to help them reflect on their code and on their understanding of new concepts.Examination of midterm exam grades found a slight improve in scores with the implementation ofin person grading.KeywordsArtificial Intelligence, Assessment, ProgrammingIntroductionGenerative artificial intelligence (AI) has been the talk of the universities since the advent ofChatGPT in November 2022. The development of generative adversarial networks, transformers,and large language models in the last decade has allowed the creation of generative AI capable ofwriting

Collection

2024 ASEE PSW Conference

Authors

Claire Rogers, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Cecilia La Place, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University

project/teamassignment. This was to help guide students in answering the questions. Table I. ChatGPT Interview Protocol Interview Sections Questions Overview of ChatGPT 1. What are your general views on ChatGPT? 2. Have you used it in a class besides EGR 304 (Embedded Systems Design Project)? a. If so, what did it help you accomplish? 3. Have you seen your peers use ChatGPT? a. What did they use it for? Classroom ChatGPT Next, let’s talk about a [classroom, homework, coding] assignment

Conference Session

Track 8: Technical Session 1: Logic Models: How this tool can help you make the case for your DEI programs

Collection

2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Erin Carll, University of Washington; Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity

preparation for engineering courseworkand help them to develop a community of peers that can support each otherboth socially and academically in their transition to college. You might also have afurther layer of DEI-focused intention built into your program. Because there’sfrequently a strong correlation between race and first gen status, it could be thatyou’re also intending to improve diversity in engineering by providing a strongstart for students from racially/ethnically minoritized groups. If that’s the case,racial equity in the effect of the program might also be identified as an importantoutcome. A logic model provides a quick reference for charting theseconnections between a program’s activities and its intended outcomes