to develop a strategic plan ´ Learn how you can connect with the WCEC This is how strategic planning is supposed to work...good job! [I appreciated] the connectivity with so many professionals across multiple industries and being able to work together on a Lots of time to talk through action
. Utilize data (IPEDS, etc) to inform broadening participation efforts for women and BIPOC engineering students. Engage in models, interventions and evidence-based practices that have been proven to support engineering degree attainment for women and BIPOC students at community colleges, public and private institutions. Build partnerships to engage stakeholders at their institution, in their region, and nationwide. Develop an Action Plan to implement at their institution (or with otherinstitutions) during the 2-year professional development period. 6To date, 65 people (faculty, professional staff, postdocs) have applied over the 2years. 40 were invited to
is to assist WE@RIT in planning and implementingevents for current students. Sometimes these events are social in nature, such as ourmonthly pop-up lounge series or Stress Relief Extravaganza before finals, andsometimes they are more professional/academic in nature, such as resume reviews,corporate visits and alumnae panels to name just a few. Their scope does not includeNew Student programming or K-12 outreach.The Good:The Leadership Board has overall been a positive change for WE@RIT. Having studentvoice involved in event planning has meant greater buy-in for events over time, andnew events taking place because of the fresh perspectives brought by an ever-rotating membership. Having the Board also allows me as a Director to utilize
working time relating to Criterion 5Activity 3:Criterion 5 (Curriculum)How will your institutionensure students obtainawareness of diversity,equity, and inclusion forprofessional success?The last day of theSummit, teams did aspeed networkingevent.• Two 45-minute rotations.• Presented their plans on each criteria to 2 other teams• Heard the plans for each criteria from the other teamsA 2023 ASEE papersummarized theevaluation and findingsfrom the Summit.• Overall, the Summit went extremely well.• Participants enjoyed discussing the topics with individuals from other institutions.• Major concerns included: • Faculty buy-in • Lack of time/money • Leadership support • Strategizing DEI Curriculum • Faculty Training• The
Head of Undergraduate Studies and Service in the Nuclear Engineering department at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Her research interests expand on past work in nuclear system monitoring and prognostics to incorporate system monitoring and remaining useful life estimates into risk assessment, operations and maintenance planning, and optimal control algorithms.Dr. Anahita Khojandi, University of Tennessee at Knoxville Anahita Khojandi is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering and the director for the Reliability and Maintainability Engineering program at University of Tennessee- Knoxville. She received her Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from University of Pittsburgh. Her
research projects designed to increase women’s participation in post-secondary com- puting programs. This includes working with faculty and staff from a variety of collegiate computing ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #36431 programs to facilitate their local implementation of evidence-based recruitment and retention strategies and translating these successes into resources accessible to post-secondary computing programs on a na- tionwide scale. She also engages in project management and strategic planning for the Extension Services Program. Prior to joining NCWIT, Jamie
● Project Context ● Problem Context ● Developing the Situational Judgement Inventory (SJI) ● SJI Pilot Results ● Moving Forward 2In order to fully contextualize our SJI instrument, we will first provide backgroundinformation related to our research team, project context, and education plan. Thenwe will explain our process for developing the SJI and talk through some of ourpreliminary findings
minutes total1) Introductions and expectations – 5 minutes2) Climate – 10 minutes3) Change theory – 5 minutes4) What we are doing – 10 minutes5) Levels of leadership/connection – 10 minutes6) Creating an action plan – 10 minutes 2Current Climate Source: add 3While members of the audience may be familiar with this graphic, we do not think itcan be overshared! This is one of the most powerful tools to answer, “why should Icare?” Generation Z has a much higher rate of LGBTQIA+ identification than anyprevious generation. This is having a profound
. Due to time constraints, the module had to betrimmed to only 15 minutes. This haste was reflected in the feedback from students, described inmore detail in the Results and Discussion section below. As a result of this feedback, DEIinstruction was tied to ABET SO 5 as part of the program’s continuous improvement plan. Tyingthis instruction to student outcome assessment does two important things: 1) it makes DEI inengineering a permanent feature in the program so that all students see the content and 2) it willbe assessed and improved upon each year as a part of ongoing improvements to the institution’sengineering program.In 2020, the DEI instructor was again the course instructor, and the module extended over aperiod of three days. The
” refers to the hiring of multiple candidates within the collegeusing a single, broadly defined search criterion [1]. The cluster hire conducted in Academic Year2020-2021 was the first of its kind in the College of Engineering and Applied Science andnominally sought applicants from any rank and any discipline housed within our college.Another unique facet of the search was its being aimed at prospective faculty whose experienceand plans for teaching, research, and service aligned with creating a more inclusive academicculture of excellence in engineering and computer science. We operationalized the search to hirefaculty who could support our institution’s plan for inclusive excellence [10] by evaluatingfaculty candidates’ demonstrated knowledge
graduate degrees in Aerospace Engineering from Georgia Tech (PhD) and Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia (UVa). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 From website to work environment: Exploring minority undergraduate engineering students’ conceptualizations of engineering careers at national laboratoriesAbstract Within engineering education, there have been rising calls for more research on thetransitional period students face leading up to graduation (e.g., post-graduation planning) andmoving into the next phase of their career. This study seeks to complement existing research byexploring the experience of students as they seek to make sense of engineering career
skills of Self-Advocacy within the client/student structure was found to help minoritizedstudents reach academic success. This practice has been used extensively within the learning disability (LD) communities to helpstudents advocate for themselves in the creation and implementation of their IndividualEducational Plans (IEPs). A comprehensive review of evidence-based practices for teaching self-advocacy within the LD communities found that there are three critical factors that, whencombined result in increased academic success: empowerment or a sense of agency (havingcontrol over decisions and life events), strong self-awareness (knowing what is right for oneselfand setting goals based on this criteria), and social justice (knowing how to
Special Assistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation in the College of Engineering. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering educa- tion can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, and considers the intersection between policy and organizational contexts. Knight currently serves as the co-Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Engineering Education.Dr. Tremayne O’Brian Waller, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Tremayne O. Waller is the Director of Graduate Student Programs at Virginia Tech. Dr. Waller facilitates the recruitment, retention, and success of graduate scholars with a focus on those from backgrounds his- torically
American, 15% Latinx/Hispanic, 59% female, 43% did not identify a person in their immediate family who attended college 2 undergraduate courses + 1 student service group involved in the design and programming 15 local teacher partners directly involved in the design (many more involved with implementation) 5 culminating events 600 student in-person event in summer 2022 750 student on-campus event planned for 2023
Paper ID #35557Combining Forces: Putting Equity to WorkDr. Fatima Alleyne, University of California, Berkeley Fatima Alleyne, Ph.D., is the director of Community Engagement and Inclusive Practices in the College of Engineering at UC Berkeley. She brings her passion and love for science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) and education into her work to develop programs that promote equity; foster a positive, inclusive culture; and increase access and opportunities to those who have historically been underrep- resented in STEM. She also leads a strategic planning and data-driven process to guide programs and
Graduate Teaching Assistant and a Graduate Research Assistant.Dr. Tremayne O’Brian Waller, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Tremayne O. Waller (Ph.D., Virginia Tech) is the Director of Graduate Student Programs at Virginia Tech in the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED). Dr. Waller is responsible for developing and implementing evidence-based strategic priorities for recruiting and retention of underrep- resented students in College of Engineering graduate programs. He is working with faculty, staff and students to implement a strategic plan for graduate student success. Dr. Waller was the Interim Director for the Office of Academic Diversity Initiatives (OADI) and Director
= January-April before May 1 Deposit Deadline▪Emails, targeted newsletters, student written postcards, student phone calls, info sessions, campus visits▪YouTube channel playlist Application▪Online via Qualtrics▪Short answer or video uploads to ‘essay’ type questions 1)Tell us why you feel you are a good candidate for membership into the LLC 2)Talk about your commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion and what you can bring to the community 3)Describe your current academic interests and how you plan to explore those interests at the university next year Selection▪Application review & selection happens after the enrollment deposit deadline (May 2-15)▪Inform students before New Student
and part of Sisters in STEM. Finally, we willend the paper with a set of recommendations for future leaders and young STEMinists looking tomake a difference.So let’s get started and learn more about the initiative we founded, ran, and learned from –Sisters in STEM. The Sisters in STEM (SIS) program was launched in fall of 2018 as a response to theunexpected cancellation of an annual Girl Power event hosted by a local community college.Three young women leaders in FRC Robotics approached Saguaro High School’s leadershipwith a plan: Create a separate event, encompassing all STEM disciplines, to provide an outreachvenue for young girls in the Scottsdale and surrounding regions. With 3 weeks to plan, thefounders developed a suite of age
STEM outreach project at Daniel Hale Elementary School which provides civil engineering lesson plans, afterschool programs, family work- shops and field trips. Prof. Villatoro is the Project Director for the Peer Advisement program sponsored by Perkins and designed to increase retention of females across the School of Technology and Design. American c Society for Engineering Education, 202212PPA is a grant funded program at New York City College of Technology (City Tech)committed to increasing enrollment and retention of female and nontraditionalstudents in engineering technology programs. PPA provides a successful model formentoring, recruiting and retaining a diverse
. 2In 2015 the President of Florida Atlantic University (FAU) identified diversity as one ofthe University’s platforms in the “Strategic Plan for the Race to Excellence” for FloridaAtlantic University. The University Diversity Council was thereafter established toidentify, promote, and build institutional cross-cultural competencies.In 2016, FAU received federal designation as a Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI) as itsenrollment of full-time Hispanic undergraduate students reached 25%. At the sametime, FAU and the College of Engineering and Computer Science were awarded a TitleIII STEM Articulation grant from the US Department of Education. This grant whichserves as a STEM pipeline is in collaboration with two local state colleges
(Hughes, 2018) that shows LGBQ (just sexual identityminorities) students are less likely to be retained in STEM related fields.We will expand more on the national climate and challenges in asecond presentation, "Creating buy-in from key constituencies for supportingLGBTQIA+ engineering students." At this point, we will let audience members knowthat if they cannot attend that presentation, we will be happy to provide them withmore information/slides from that presentation. We plan to upload a final set ofslides and/or a PDF to a website with QR code at the end of the presentation thatparticipants can utilize. 4Background Source: Erin A. Cech and
communities 4 Figure 1. Theory of Change adapted from Henderson et al Prescribed Intended Outcome Emergent OverviewWHY... • are we developing a menu of inclusive practices? • are we focusing on learning communities?HOW... • were the LCs created? • do we plan to develop a menu of inclusive practices? • do we plan to evaluate the effectiveness of the LC's?WHAT... • do we hope to achieve? 5 Why develop a menu of inclusive practices
1C o N E C D 2 0 2 4Abstract Highlights • Institutions often fail to implement or replicate the ecosystems of support for graduate students in engineering and computing disciplines that exists at the undergraduate level. • The College of Engineering, Computing, and Applied Sciences (CECAS) at Clemson University has implemented several programmatic initiatives since 2018 to support the recruitment, retention, and matriculation of BIPOC, women, and domestic graduate students. • Featured initiatives include and Inclusive Excellence Strategic Plan, STEM ALL IN, ASPIRE Peer Mentors, and the Future Scholars Academy. 2C o N E C D
beneficial because they help you:-make strategic decisions, plan programming, and identify gaps in the programming,-clarify and quickly communicate your plan,-demonstrate to stakeholders you have thought things through, and-make the case for funding. 4When working in the area of DEI in particular, developing a clear plan for yourinitiative and identifying intended outcomes can hold you accountable to yourvision for change and help you demonstrate that you’re doing what you hoped.For example, say you have a Bridge program for first generation students inengineering. Hopefully you have an intention behind this program, likely toimprove students self-efficacy and/or
frompartner schools, who embarked on a dual enrollment program. The program adopted a holisticapproach, combining interactive activities to foster a college-bound mindset while enablingstudents to earn high school and college credits. Throughout their participation, students receivedcomprehensive support services, encompassing academic advising, tutoring, and social support.ROPES outlined several vital objectives, including promoting student success and enhancingworkforce readiness, engaging students in experiential activities, providing customizable careerexploration plans, and integrating social and emotional learning strategies.The program closely aligns with Rowan University's commitment to accessibility, affordability,and the state plan's
praxis a realcomponent in our course design process. The course ran as asuccessful pilot in spring 2021 with 11 students.[SLIDE 7]In summer 2021, GEER worked with CEED to support a virtualcampus for 105 high school girls from North Africa, the Middle Eastand Central Asia as part of the TechGirls program funded by theU.S. State Department and administered by Legacy International,a third party non-profit organization.This began out of systematic strategic planning around seekingexternal grants for online learning between CEED and GEER. Weessentially began exploring how to pilot online learning activitiesthat would be cohort-based and delivered as modules in theCanvas LMS (spring 2021) around a small grant proposal. Whilethat external grant was not
, etc..), specific to regional landscapes;3) building partnerships & engagement with stakeholders;4) planning, implementing, assessing & scaling the PEER’s “Implementation”project.This interactive map (click on the image or link) exhibits all 15 institutionsrepresented by 17 stEm PEERs in the inaugural 2022 cohort. This map will beupdated with future cohorts and regional hub partners to illustrate the far-reachingspan of this alliance network as it grows and expands. Satellite map view has beenchanged to white background for better accessibility to all viewers.https://tinyurl.com/stEmPEERacademyMAPDemographics of 17 PEERsHigh relative % of black & hispanic PEERs.High % of women vs men.Majority are public institutions plus several
education, with specific attention to first-generation college students, low-income and immigrant populations. He loves running, books, anime, traveling, and food, especially when he gets to do it in the company of his husband Tommy and those he meets along the way!Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Special Assistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation in the College of Engineering. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering educa- tion can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, and considers the
the experience of Black engineering students? Respond at poll below. PollEv.com/rarejusticeHere, we’ll open with an interactive activity. This will be an opportunity to help theaudience become familiar with the types of activities adopted by the center toinstigate thought, dialogue, reflection and vision forward. This activity and theresulting conversation will not last more than 5 minutes of the session. 2 Session Plan § Role call & kickoff activity
Paper ID #36421External review letters for promotion and tenure decisions atresearch-intensive institutions: An analysis of the content of templateletters for bias and recommendations for inclusive languageProf. Cinzia Cervato, Iowa State University Cinzia Cervato is the lead PI of the NSF-funded ADVANCE Midwest Partnership project and Morrill Professor of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences. She has served as a faculty fellow for early career and term faculty in the Office of the Provost and faculty fellow for strategic planning in the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences. She earned a doctor of geology degree from the