Asee peer logo

Advancing Peer Observation Processes: Progress, Lessons, and Faculty Development

Download Paper |

Conference

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 23, 2024

Start Date

June 23, 2024

End Date

July 12, 2024

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 10

Tagged Division

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/46527

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Nyna Jaye DeWitt University of Georgia

visit author page

Nyna, born and raised in Durham, North Carolina, obtained her Bachelor’s degree in General Engineering with a concentration in Biomedical Engineering in 2022 from Wake Forest University. Following her undergraduate degree, she received her Master’s degree in Biomedical Engineering with a focus in Immunoengineering from Johns Hopkins University. Nyna has a strong interest in increasing diversity in biomedical engineering spaces and she intends to research this by focusing on inclusive classroom spaces and diversifying research models.

visit author page

biography

Animesh Paul University of Georgia

visit author page

Animesh (He/They), originally from India, is currently a Ph.D. candidate at the Engineering Education Transformations Institute, University of Georgia. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Technology, specializing in Electronics and Electrical Engineering from KIIT University. His research focuses on the complexities of the school-to-work transition, through an asset-based perspective. He is dedicated to promoting inclusive engineering programs, motivated by his strong commitment to equity and social justice. Through his research and advocacy efforts, he strives to remove barriers and create environments where every individual's voice is respected.

visit author page

biography

John Ray Morelock University of Georgia Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0001-8043-5060

visit author page

Dr. Morelock is an Assistant Professor of Practice with an emphasis on engineering education research, and the Associate Director of Educational Innovation and Impact for UGA's Engineering Education Transformations Institute (EETI). In addition to coordinating EETI’s faculty development programming, Dr. Morelock conducts research on institutional change via faculty development, with an emphasis on innovative ways to cultivate and evaluate supportive teaching and learning networks in engineering departments and colleges. He received his doctoral degree in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where he was a recipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. His dissertation studied the teaching practices of engineering instructors during game-based learning activities, and how these practices affected student motivation.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

This work-in-progress paper discusses progress and lessons learned for an in-process adoption of peer observation processes in one unit of a College of Engineering. The University Department and Leadership Teams for Action (DeLTA), is an NSF-funded grant with the objective of advancing STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) programs at the University. Through this grant, The College of Engineering was placed on an Instructional Action Team (IAT) where they worked to target three areas: Self-Assessment to Enhance Student Engagement, Faculty Peer Observation to Enhance Teaching, and Enhancing Assessment Through the Use of Test Blueprints [source]. From the target areas, faculty peer observation has been identified as an area that would be further implemented into specific disciplines at the University’s College of Engineering, and therefore would need additional documentation. Student evaluations have been used to provide feedback to instructors on instructional methods and classroom structure. While this approach has been widely used, it is considered an insufficient approach to development instructional improvement due to the lack of knowledge students have on teaching techniques along with other biases [source]. To address this issue, peer observations are being introduced to provide instructors with feedback from other qualified faculty that can give a more insightful assessment of their teaching.

This study centers on the faculty development process involving peer observation and the lessons learned from the inception to the project's current phase—the finalization of the DeLTA project and initiation of discipline-level adaptation of peer observation procedures. We discuss efforts from DeLTA project teams to develop and pilot teaching-method-specific peer observations protocols, and ongoing progress of a committee to meet leadership’s charge in one unit in the University’s College of Engineering to adopt peer observations more broadly. The overarching project will be a collaborative effort involving the College of Engineering faculty involved in DeLTA and a committee of faculty members from a College of Engineering unit to improve teaching and learning practices. Future observations will consist of attending committee meetings and drawing from existing peer observation models and instruments provided from the home University and other comparable institutions.

This paper will serve as a guiding document for developing and executing a peer observation faculty development model. This is an overview of the process that was used to develop peer observation protocols at the College level, and it has been charged to a committee to develop the protocol at a departmental level.

DeWitt, N. J., & Paul, A., & Morelock, J. R. (2024, June), Advancing Peer Observation Processes: Progress, Lessons, and Faculty Development Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/46527

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015