Engineering a Bridge Across Cultures: Insights to Support Dialogue with Engineering Professionals on Ethical and Social Design Considerations

Tiffany Smith; Zachary T. G. Pirtle

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Portland, Oregon
Publication Date: June 23, 2024
Start Date: June 23, 2024
End Date: July 12, 2024
Conference Session: Engineering, Ethics, and Community Engagement
Tagged Divisions: Community Engagement Division (COMMENG) and Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/47270

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Tiffany Smith NASA

visit author page

Tiffany Smith serves as NASA’s Chief Knowledge Officer (CKO) and Director of the Office of the Chief Engineer’s Academy of Program/Project and Engineering Leadership (APPEL). Ms. Smith is responsible for managing NASA’s APPEL Knowledge Services learning and development program, providing strategic communications and continuous learning to project management and systems engineering personnel, and overseeing knowledge services across the agency in collaboration with the NASA Center and Mission Directorate knowledge community. In this capacity, she leads efforts to ensure that the agency’s technical workforce has access to the critical knowledge needed for mission success. Ms. Smith’s research and professional experience is centered in knowledge management, digital collaboration, and social epistemology.

visit author page

biography

Zachary T. G. Pirtle NASA

visit author page

Dr. Zachary Pirtle serves as a senior policy analyst (detailee) for NASA's Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy at NASA Headquarters in Washington, DC. He was the study lead for the NASA Artemis and Ethics workshop and ensuing 2023 report. He also serves as an engineer and program executive in NASA's Science Mission Directorate supporting lunar discovery and exploration. His academic publications include work in engineering ethics, science policy, and systems engineering, and he has served as an adjunct professor for the graduate level introduction to systems engineering at George Washington University, infusing sociotechnical concepts into the class.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Engineering leaders grapple with ethical quandaries at all stages of their career: depending on their level of authority and responsibility, they may be willing to engage differently with ethical concepts and the implications of ethical decision-making. In April 2023, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) hosted the Artemis and Ethics workshop at NASA headquarters, inviting 55 participants from a wide range of scholarly disciplines to participate in a dialogue on ethical considerations for Artemis and the Moon to Mars initiative. At this event, participants identified a set of challenges in engaging the ethical and social implications of these missions. This paper seeks to further explore those concepts from the workshop report and provide insights on how to discuss the design implications of engineering leadership decisions and to elicit meaningful engagement on these topics. The first element that this paper seeks to explore is the variety of interpretations when engineering professionals encounter the concepts outlined in the report. For instance, engineering ethics may be a standard course requirement for engineering students in 2023, but generational diversity in the engineering workforce means that many engineering professionals may not have been recently – if ever – exposed to these concepts. In addition, ethics for government employees tend to be closely associated conceptually with legal constraints, such as conflicts of interest or procurement, and employees are expected to participate in these topics by means of compliance rather than dialogue. The second element is to demonstrate how engineering ethics can be aligned to organizational values to support engagement. At NASA, values are readily present and reinforced across all levels of the workforce. To connect these concepts, we will describe how concepts of care can be applied to support engagement with engineering professionals. While ethics are often treated as matters of concern, elevating ethical concepts to matters of care reinforces the human dimension and human implications of engineering decisions. Lessons on these concepts have been learned and relearned through tragedy, but they can also be reinforced by identifying design elements that support the engineer’s role as caretaker instead of purely as creator. This analysis should inform future research and educational approaches and help ethics and social science researchers to engage NASA engineering and project leaders in constructive dialogue.

Citation
Format

Smith, T., & Pirtle, Z. T. G. (2024, June), Engineering a Bridge Across Cultures: Insights to Support Dialogue with Engineering Professionals on Ethical and Social Design Considerations Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/47270

TY - CPAPER
AB - Engineering leaders grapple with ethical quandaries at all stages of their career: depending on their level of authority and responsibility, they may be willing to engage differently with ethical concepts and the implications of ethical decision-making. In April 2023, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) hosted the Artemis and Ethics workshop at NASA headquarters, inviting 55 participants from a wide range of scholarly disciplines to participate in a dialogue on ethical considerations for Artemis and the Moon to Mars initiative. At this event, participants identified a set of challenges in engaging the ethical and social implications of these missions.
This paper seeks to further explore those concepts from the workshop report and provide insights on how to discuss the design implications of engineering leadership decisions and to elicit meaningful engagement on these topics. The first element that this paper seeks to explore is the variety of interpretations when engineering professionals encounter the concepts outlined in the report. For instance, engineering ethics may be a standard course requirement for engineering students in 2023, but generational diversity in the engineering workforce means that many engineering professionals may not have been recently – if ever – exposed to these concepts. In addition, ethics for government employees tend to be closely associated conceptually with legal constraints, such as conflicts of interest or procurement, and employees are expected to participate in these topics by means of compliance rather than dialogue. The second element is to demonstrate how engineering ethics can be aligned to organizational values to support engagement. At NASA, values are readily present and reinforced across all levels of the workforce. To connect these concepts, we will describe how concepts of care can be applied to support engagement with engineering professionals. While ethics are often treated as matters of concern, elevating ethical concepts to matters of care reinforces the human dimension and human implications of engineering decisions. Lessons on these concepts have been learned and relearned through tragedy, but they can also be reinforced by identifying design elements that support the engineer’s role as caretaker instead of purely as creator. This analysis should inform future research and educational approaches and help ethics and social science researchers to engage NASA engineering and project leaders in constructive dialogue.
AU - Tiffany Smith
AU - Zachary T. G. Pirtle
CY - Portland, Oregon
DA - 2024/06/23
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Engineering a Bridge Across Cultures: Insights to Support Dialogue with Engineering Professionals on Ethical and Social Design Considerations
UR - https://peer.asee.org/47270
ER -