Minneapolis, MN
August 23, 2022
June 26, 2022
June 29, 2022
15
10.18260/1-2--40731
https://peer.asee.org/40731
563
Tripp Shealy is an Associate Professor in the Charles E. Via, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech. His research works to understand how engineers think about and apply principles of sustainability during the design and construction process of infrastructure. He also studies how engineers perceive climate change and how these perceptions shape their design decisions. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses on sustainable engineering design, human behavior and infrastructure systems, and adaptive reuse.
PhD student at Virginia Tech. Working with Dr. Tripp Shealy. Passionate about human performance and wellbeing in the built environment.
The research presented in this paper tested whether drawing concept maps changes how engineering students construct design problem statements and whether these differences are observable in their brains. The process of identifying and constructing problem statements is a critical step in engineering design. Concept mapping has the potential to expand the problem space that students explore through the attention given to the relationship between concepts. It helps integrate existing knowledge in new ways. Engineering students (n=66) were asked to construct a problem statement to improve mobility on campus. Half of these students were randomly chosen to first receive instructions about how to develop a concept map and were asked to draw a concept map about mobility systems on campus. The semantic similarity of concepts in the students’ problem statements, the length of their problem statements, and their neurocognition when developing their statements were measured. The results indicated that students who were asked to first draw concept maps produced a more diverse problem statement with less semantically similar words. The students who first developed concept maps also produce significantly longer problem statements. Concept mapping changed students’ neurocognition. The students who used concept mapping elicited less cognitive activation in their left prefrontal cortex (PFC) and more concentrated activation in their right PFC. The right PFC is generally associated with divergent thinking and the left PFC is generally associated with convergent and analytical thinking. These results provide new insight into how educational interventions, like concept mapping, can change students’ cognition and neurocognition. Better understanding how concept maps, and other tools, help students approach complex problems and the associated changes that occur in their brain can lay the groundwork for novel advances in engineering education that support new tools and pedagogy development for design.
Shealy, T., & Gero, J., & Ignacio Jr., P. (2022, August), How the use of concept maps changes students’ minds and brains Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--40731
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015