Asee peer logo

The neurocognition of engineering students designing: A preliminary study exploring problem framing and the use of concept mapping

Download Paper |

Conference

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Minneapolis, MN

Publication Date

August 23, 2022

Start Date

June 26, 2022

End Date

June 29, 2022

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Page Count

11

DOI

10.18260/1-2--42009

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/42009

Download Count

307

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Tripp Shealy Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

visit author page

Tripp Shealy is an Associate Professor in the Charles E. Via, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech. His research works to understand how engineers think about and apply principles of sustainability during the design and construction process of infrastructure. He also studies how engineers perceive climate change and how these perceptions shape their design decisions. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses on sustainable engineering design, human behavior and infrastructure systems, and adaptive reuse.

visit author page

author page

John Gero University of North Carolina at Charlotte

biography

Paulo Ignacio Jr. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

visit author page

PhD student at Virginia Tech. Working with Dr. Tripp Shealy. Passionate about human performance and wellbeing in the built environment.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Neuroimaging provides a relatively new approach for advancing engineering education by exploring changes in neurocognition from educational interventions. The purpose of the research described in this paper is to present the results of a preliminary study that measured students’ neurocognition while concept mapping. Engineering design is an iterative process of exploring both the problem and solution spaces. To aid students in exploring these spaces, half of the 66 engineering students who participated in the study were first asked to develop a concept map and then construct a design problem statement. The concept mapping activity significantly reduced neurocognitive activation in the students’ left prefrontal cortex (PFC) compared to students who did not receive this intervention when constructing their problem statement. The sub-region in the left PFC that elicited less activation is generally associated with analytical judgment and goal-directed planning. The group of students who completed the concept mapping activity had greater focused neurocognitive activation in their right PFC. The right PFC is often associated with divergent thinking and ill-structured representation. Patterns of functional connectivity across students’ PFC also differed between the groups. The concept mapping activity reduced the network density in students’ PFC. Lower network density is one measure of lower cognitive effort. These results provide new insight into the neurocognition of engineering students when designing and how educational interventions can change engineering students’ neurocognition. A better understanding of how interventions like concept mapping shape students’ neurocognition, and how this relates to learning, can lay the groundwork for novel advances in engineering education that support new tools and pedagogy for engineering design.

Shealy, T., & Gero, J., & Ignacio Jr., P. (2022, August), The neurocognition of engineering students designing: A preliminary study exploring problem framing and the use of concept mapping Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--42009

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015