Asee peer logo

Board 333: Metacognitive Intervention to Improve Problem-Solving Skills in First-Year Engineering Students

Download Paper |

Conference

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 23, 2024

Start Date

June 23, 2024

End Date

June 26, 2024

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Topic

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Page Count

12

DOI

10.18260/1-2--46914

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/46914

Download Count

55

Paper Authors

biography

Lizzie Santiago West Virginia University

visit author page

Lizzie Y. Santiago, Ph.D., is a Teaching Professor and Director of the Fundamentals of Engineering Program in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University. She holds a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering and completed postdoctoral trainings in Molecular Neurosciences and Neural Tissue Engineering.

visit author page

author page

Daniel Augusto Kestering West Virginia University Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0009-0000-0790-8861

biography

Anika Coolbaugh Pirkey West Virginia University Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0002-5349-3561

visit author page

Anika Pirkey is currently a Teaching Assistant Professor with the Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at West Virginia University (WVU). Her dissertation research focused on increasing retention rates of non-calculus ready first year engineering students by improving their problem solving, critical thinking, and self-regulated learning skills in mathematics. Additional ASEE publications to which she has contributed include "Identifying Deficiencies in Engineering Problem-solving Skills" and "Introducing First Year Engineering Students to Engineering Reasoning" presented at the Annual ASEE Conferences in 2020 and 2017 respectively.

visit author page

biography

D. Jake Follmer West Virginia University

visit author page

Dr. Jake Follmer is an Assistant Professor (Educational Psychology) in the College of Applied Human Sciences at West Virginia University. He teaches courses related to quantitative methods, applied statistical analysis, and self-regulated learning. His research examines methods of promoting learning strategy use and success among students traditionally underrepresented in postsecondary education.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

To be successful in engineering, students must develop strong problem solving skills. Problem solving skills are normally promoted using cognitive strategies that help students focus on relevant information associated with the problem, identify the structure of the problem, and to solve the problem. However, cognitive strategies are not sufficient to ensure that students become good at solving problems. Cognitive strategies must be paired with metacognitive strategies to promote strong problem solving skills.

Metacognition refers to the processes used to plan, monitor, and assess understanding and performance. Zimmerman’s self-regulated learning (SRL) model is used as a framework in this study to understand self-regulation and metacognitive monitoring. Metacognitive monitoring is a metacognitive strategy that helps students plan, monitor, and modify their problem solving approach.

This work-in-progress paper summarizes a current project in which students enrolled in a first-year engineering program at a mid-Atlantic land grant institution completed an intervention to improve their metacognitive monitoring during problem solving. Seventy engineering students (experimental group) enrolled in college algebra during their first semester at the institution were co-enrolled in an Introduction to Engineering Reasoning course. The intervention was designed to promote students’ metacognitive monitoring and reflection during problem solving and provided repeated applied practice using and improving their metacognitive strategies. To understand the effects of the intervention, we assessed students’ pre-course and post-course metacognitive awareness and monitoring accuracy. We also examined students’ current and subsequent course grades in the mathematics and engineering course sequence. We compared these outcomes with both a comparison group consisting of students enrolled in the Introduction to Engineering Reasoning course but not completing the intervention (n=35) and a matched control group of students not completing the introductory course.

This paper will summarize the implementation of the metacognitive intervention and the results of the implementation of this work in terms of 1) changes in students’ metacognitive monitoring and their problem solving skills across the course and 2) differences in post-course metacognitive and problem-solving skills based on condition. We will use this to support implications for the design and implementation of targeted self-regulated learning interventions for first-year and underrepresented students in engineering.

Santiago, L., & Kestering, D. A., & Pirkey, A. C., & Follmer, D. J. (2024, June), Board 333: Metacognitive Intervention to Improve Problem-Solving Skills in First-Year Engineering Students Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--46914

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015