museum in Binghamton, NY,commissioned an outdoor sculpture from a local sculptor, Yvonne Hobbs. In conjunction withthe Mechanical Engineering Department at Binghamton University, funding was receivedthrough a grant from the Marilyn Gaddis Rose and Stephen David Ross University andCommunity Projects Fund. Mechanical engineering students performed the work as part of theirengineering design course, as well as assisted students from the Art Department of BinghamtonUniversity with the fabrication. The mechanical engineering students were selected for theproject because they were familiar with the computer-aided engineering tools Pro/EngineerTMand Pro/MechanicaTM. These software tools were used to perform the design of the frameworkfor the sculpture
used for allmonitoring and shall be collected during the first six hours of the storm event discharge. Eachsample collected shall be analyzed for twelve water quality parameters. Because all twelvewater quality parameters could not be easily done in the University of Hartford EnvironmentalEngineering Laboratory (e.g., oil and grease) and that the student engineering project should gobeyond only collecting and analyzing water samples, it was decided that the student projectwould supplement the data collected by a consultant that would specifically meet therequirement of the general permit. With this in mind, the objectives of the student project wereto: • Design and construct an automatic mechanical stormwater sampler • Collect and
professors. Most people will be Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright c 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationquite happy to see someone else follow a code of behavior. But keep in mind that these are onlyhabits for such students. The students are not actively participating in their own learning process.Because university rewards learning, students who rigidly follow these kinds of imaginary ruleswill find themselves unrewarded for their efforts. They will not be successful in university andthey will not understand why. This in turn leads to frustration which does not, in fact, make theprofessor’s job any easier or more enjoyable.If I want to, then
an engineering department. Interestingly, it is Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationnot unusual for authors of papers on the teaching of mechanics in engineering educationto refer to the history of how the teaching of the subject developed over the centuriessince Newton and Euler published their general laws of motion (for a recent example, seeKraige [9]). However, this rich research literature on student learning of dynamics has yetto significantly influence either the presentation of the subject in textbooks or the emphasisand pedagogy used in the classroom. For the most part, the teaching of
Using Technology for Concepts Learning and Rapid Feedback in Statics John C. Chen,* Jennifer A. Kadlowec,* and Dexter C. Whittinghill Departments of *Mechanical Engineering and Mathematics Rowan University, Glassboro, NJAbstractIn this project our goal is to improve student learning in the foundation mechanics course Staticsas well as improve knowledge retention (durability) and knowledge application in a differentenvironment (transferability). We aim to do this by providing rapid feedback to students of theirunderstanding of key concepts and skills being presented. The feedback system acts as the focalpoint and catalyst to encourage students to assist each other in correcting
courses in advance. A third suggestion would be to make the timebetween observations consistent. To do this, a formal research design needs to developed. A finallimitation is the amount of time needed to increase the sample. Since the study is longitudinal,more observations of professors are needed across several institutions.References1. Harris, AH and Cox, MF. Developing an Observation System to Capture InstructionalDifferences in Engineering Classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education 92: 329-336, 2003.2. Bransford, J.D. Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, Page 10.167.5and school. Washington, DC
Session 1442 Informal Graphics for Conceptual Design Richard Devon, Sven Bilén, Andras Gordon, and Hien Nguyen Engineering Design Program School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs Penn State UniversityAbstractEngineers who work in innovative design spaces have very different CAD and graphics needsthan those who work in more conventional design spaces. We propose to develop ideas aboutthe graphical communication needs for conceptual design. This paper will illustrate what wemean by describing a few new methods such as
processwith their first hands-on design experience. In particular, this article features ET 200,“Graphic Communications,” a three-credit course taken by all students in the StructuralDesign and Construction Engineering Technology Program, generally during the fallsemester of their junior year. The course content is conventional and develops basicskills in the student aimed at reading and interpreting commercial and residentialconstruction drawings. For most students, ET 200 is their first engineering course withthe potential for a design component. These design projects presented in this paper weredeveloped and implemented with specific objectives in mind: • To stimulate interest in engineering and design; • To provide the
to explore engineering challenges in the classroom.Much of teaching is focused on the knowledge and comprehension levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy.When the focus changes from teaching to learning then the outcome expected is raised to theapplication, analysis, synthesis and evaluation levels of Bloom’s taxonomy. Reality learningenables and challenges students to work on higher levels of Bloom’s taxonomy. The goal ofreality learning is to engage students’ minds using tools and processes including generatinginformation that they may combine in new ways to produce new output.Blackboard software is used to free up class time. Much of the knowledge and comprehensionareas are done using technology. This frees class time for reality learning. Students
learningthat can be returned to the classroom. There has been a steady accumulation of designoptimization, refinement, and test data that can also be returned. It takes a concerted effort,however, to do so, as documentation and presentation of the laboratory experience was probablythe last thing on the mind of those students who were focused on completion of their team’scompetition aircraft.Current and Future DevelopmentA complete survey of laboratory experiments conducted over the past several years, and apreliminary review of the design-build-fly projects has revealed a host of experiments that can beintroduced into fundamental aerospace engineering classes. It is the intention that theseexperiments be documented and presented to the instructors of
American Society for Engineering Educations Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”References1. R.M. Felder, “The Intellectual Development of Science and Engineering Students. Part 1: Models and Changes,” Journal of Engineering Education, 93(4), 269-277 (Oct 2004).2. B.M. Kroll, Teaching Hearts and Minds: College Students Reflect on the Vietnam War in Literature, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press (1992).3. D. Vernier, “Data Collection with Computers and Handhelds,” Catalog for Vernier Software & Technology, 2- 5 (2004).4. National Science Education Standards, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington DC
simulation, and to Professor RobertLinsenmeier of Northwestern University for his valuable insights on module design.References1. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Eds: Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R..National Academy Press (Washington; 1999).2. Gunter, H.E., Bonventre, J.V., D’Avila, M.A., Sadeghpour, S., Vijaykumar, R. (2003), “Education Innovation inPhysiology” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Nashville, TN,June 22-25, 2003BiographiesHEATHER E. GUNTER received her Ph.D. in Medical Engineering from the Harvard Division of Engineering andApplied Sciences and the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology in 2003 and expects to receiveher M.D. from Harvard
SESSION 944 Integration of Active Learning Exercises into a Course on Probability and Statistics Douglas Tougaw Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Valparaiso University 1. Introduction The benefits of active and cooperative learning exercises have been promoted in workshops, education journals, and entire scholarly monographs.1-8 In particular, the benefits of these teaching methods have been studied and endorsed in recent years,9-12 including publication of results that show these methods to increase the effectiveness of teaching and the retention of the material by the
had their minds already made up about what they’re going to do. They wouldn’t listen to us.” • An engineering student: “Those business students are hard to work with. Marketing students said we’d never be able to sell it. Two days later our instructor found something like it selling for 40 bucks. The accountants said our idea was no good – too complicated. We worked okay with the electronics guys.” • An electronics student: “I kind of understand the CAD students, but I don’t know what those business students are thinking with. Instead of worrying about whether we can do it or if it will work, they just think about price and the schedule
Program Evaluation Aligned With the CDIO Standards Doris R. Brodeur and Edward F. Crawley Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAbstractThe CDIO Initiative is a collaboration of engineering programs at universities in morethan eight countries in North America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia.Collaborators have developed a set of twelve standards that characterize CDIO programsand provide the basis for program evaluation. This standards-based program evaluationextends the evaluative criteria of ABET's EC2000 and other outcomes-based approaches.Evidence of overall program value is collected from multiple sources, using bothquantitative and qualitative methods. Evidence and results
Session XXXX Board Notes and Questioning: Two Time-Tested Techniques for Effective Teaching Allen C. Estes, Ronald W. Welch, Fred Meyer United States Military AcademyAbstractThe ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education) Teaching Workshop is celebrating itsseventh anniversary this year. So far, 171 schools have participated and this long runningAmerican Society of Civil Engineering program has produced 307 graduates. Last year, theUnited Engineering Foundation provided funding to expand the program to include electrical,chemical, and mechanical engineers
significant problems have arisen. Companies have spentmillions of human activity hours, have required a lot of resources and have created products withno value at all. Managers have made a countless number of costly mistakes which may haverequired rectification. Factories have had a great deal of products that were neither needed norappreciated by the customer and this situation has resulted in overstock of inventories. All theseproblems can be summarized in one word: Waste, what the Japanese manufacturers refer to as“muda.” For many years, there were several attempts to decrease this “muda.” The mostsignificant among these techniques are “lean thinking.” With lean thinking, demand is anticipated and it is the engine that moves the
UniversityProcess Control School of Chemical Engineering and BioengineeringFall, 2004 Richard L. Zollars Semester Tuning ProjectOver the latter portion of the semester you are going to be asked to tune a controller tomeet certain specifications for a heat exchanger that is located in Chattanooga, TN. Theschematic for this system is shown below. To assist you you will be given a contact for another engineering student at theUniversity of Tennessee, Chattanooga. That person will conduct the tests you requestaccording to your instructions.The first task is to determine the dynamics for this system. Keep in mind that the systemmay be idle when the
Group had in mind a written format. However with a strong backgroundin video production, and a vision shared with others such as D.A. Rodgers [1] regarding theability of video to enhance the learning experience, the author felt that video was an appropriatemedium. This was reinforced by previous experience using video material produced by thirdparties [2] to take students on a virtual tour of silicon foundries and also by producing videos for Page 10.1048.1PSpice instruction. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for
will present an overview of the freshmanseminar Women in Technology: Exploring the Possibilities, developed as the result of thispartnership. We will discuss the results of a survey of students’ attitudes and beliefs aboutwomen in technology-related disciplines, administered before and after each semester of theseminar; compare the preliminary results from those surveys to the same survey administered toa control group; and offer recommendations for strategies aimed at retaining women students intechnology and engineering.IntroductionA variety of programs have succeeded in attracting more women into the fields of science,engineering, and technology over the past two decades. Many of these women are now in highlyvisible positions. However
students as a framework for their learning, it wasespecially necessary for the internal students as many of the issues covered were new tothem. The journal articles presented different viewpoints of the same topic each week,requiring the students to not only read what the articles were saying, but to critically analysethem to create a single picture in their mind of the issue. The journal articles chosen were allrelevant to the students’ professional development, and tried to engage the students with theliterature as a professional engineer would. It also provided a real life context for theirlearning, as well as trying to develop within the students an appreciation for andunderstanding of lifelong learning.The in class discussions of the journal
Development of an Acquisition Management Course Jason Wolter, M.S., Roger Burk, Ph.D., Bob Foote, Ph.D., Niki Goerger, Ph.D., Willie McFadden, Ph.D., Timothy E. Trainor, Ph.D. United States Military AcademyAbstract In response to external feedback and a continual desire to increase the diversity andapplicability of the curriculum for our students, the Engineering Management Program at USMAwill offer an acquisition systems management course for the first time in Spring 2005. Thiscourse will provide graduates with relevant skills related to the acquisition goals of strategicallymanaging, planning, and implementing acquisition programs and reforms. Topics will
Session 2745 ExCEEd Impact on a New Professor David P. Devine Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne Abstract The purpose of this paper is to present quantitative information and qualitative remarks regarding the impact of the ExCEEd Teaching Workshop (ETW) on an assistant professor of civil engineering technology at a regional campus of a large state university system in the Midwest. The participant attended the ETW during the summer between the first and second years of a tenure eligible appointment. Features of the ETW were adapted to the participant ’s teaching immediately
learning styles of engineering students, particularly those whoselearning style is often at odds with the traditional engineering curriculum. Continued research onthe connections between learning styles and student success in engineering curricula arewarranted.ReferencesBransford, J., Brown, A., and Cocking, R, (1999). How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School,Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press,Bransford, J., Brophy, S. & Williams, S. When Computer Technologies Meet the Learning Sciences: Issues andOpportunities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 59-84, (2000).Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.Dunn, R. and Dunn, K. (1984). Ten ways to make the classroom a
difficult to identify these students informally, research is emerging thatdeals with gifted students (generally those with an IQ of 140 or higher) who can also havelearning problems. So a very strong mind can have “disconnects” that interfere with learning inthe classroom. As these students move from high schools to college or from high school to jobto college, discrepancies widen between expected and actual performance. These students mayimpress teachers with very outstanding abilities, but contradict that the image with poorperformance in other areas. Often they do excellent lab work but do not do as well in theclassroom portion of an engineering course. And it’s in the academic, not in job performancethat these students find problems. Granted
A COMBINED RESEARCH AND CURRICULUM PROGRAM IN SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR COMMUNICATIONS* Andreas Spanias, Venkatraman Atti, Cihan Tepedelenlioglu, Antonia Papandreou-Suppappola, and Tolga Duman Department of Electrical Engineering, Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-5706, USA. e-mail: [spanias, atti, cihan, papandreou, and duman]@asu.edu Abstract This paper describes a combined curriculum and research program that aims to provide scientificand investigative experiences to undergraduate (UG) students by
be used later in new course offerings. This paper describes some research work that was conducted by undergraduatemechanical engineering students at the University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez during the past threeyears. The general research topics were heat transfer in open-cell aluminum foam andmicroprocessor control. The students’ attitude, professionalism, independence, work habits, andintelligence ranged from average to outstanding. The upper-echelon students produced highenough quality work for presentation in engineering conferences and, with some extra input fromthe faculty, in engineering journals. The students were listed as co-authors in all publications.Three of the best students gave presentations of the results in four
Introducing ChE Sophomores to Measurement System Analysis and Analysis of Variance through Experiential Learning Milo D. Koretsky Department of Chemical Engineering Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331-2702AbstractMeasurement System Analysis provides a formal method to evaluate the accuracy and precisionof a measurement gauge. Although it is an important topic, it is typically omitted in introductorystatistics classes, and often only receives cursory coverage in lab. This paper describes how thistopic is introduced through experiential learning to ChE sophomores at Oregon State
Session 3532 Implementation and Effectiveness of the Integrated Signals and Systems Laboratory Michael F. Anderson, Lance C. Pérez, Jerald L. Varner Clarke College/ University of Nebraska, LincolnIntroductionOver the past three years, the Department of Electrical Engineering at the University ofNebraska, Lincoln (UNL) has implemented an Integrated Signals and Systems Laboratory(ISSL) in its undergraduate curriculum. The laboratory experience uses a common experimentalplatform, the Telecommunications Instructional Modeling System (TIMS), in a sequence of fourcourses at the junior and
need to keep in mind that the students are under an inflexible deadline. Page 10.292.2 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationTeaming and Project ManagementABET 2000 requires that senior capstone design experiences build on knowledge gained fromearlier courses and this section shows how this is being accomplished at Rose-Hulman.Mechanical engineering students are introduced to basic teaming and project management skillsin their Freshmen Design course. Team training and project management