work is part of a larger study exploring the experiences of rural engineering students. Inaddition to investigating the motivations behind rural students’ decisions to pursue engineering,the study explored the formation of engineering identity and barriers rural students face whileentering an engineering community of practice [20]. A sample of the questions developed tospecifically probe the research question of this paper is as follows: • Why did you choose to attend college? • Why did you choose this university? • Why did you choose an engineering major? • What motivates you? • After graduation, do you plan to return to your rural community? Why or why not?Data AnalysisInterviews were recorded and transcribed by a
media forums to elicit narratives of graduate engineering student attrition. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(1), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20299Berdanier, C. G., & Zerbe, E. (2018). Quantitative Investigation of Engineering Graduate Student Conceptions and Processes of Academic Writing. 2018 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), 138–145.Council of Graduate Schools. (2007). Ph.D. Completion and Attrition: Analysis of Baseline Program Data from the Ph.D. Completion Project.Cruz, J. M., Artiles, M. S., Lee-Tomas, G., Matusovich, H. M., & Adams, S. G. (2018). The Dissertation Institute: Evaluation of a Doctoral Student Writing Workshop. 2018 IEEE
project that aligns with their topical area of interest, current skill level, andsought area of growth. The Lab engages students from first year to master’s level in varyingcapacities. Students may volunteer on a project as a trial, join in the context of a researchfellowship, or receive compensation for their efforts in the form of monetary payment, as aresearch assistant, or academic credit. They may also work on projects that have been adapted tosenior design engineering projects. Importantly, the Lab aims to meet the needs of the studentsand support their educational goals above the work product. Industry mentors, selected by thepartner organization, will consult directly with the student team and faculty mentor(s) on aregular basis
Illinois.Wright College’s student success rates measured by completion have been strong and improvingrelative to other national urban community colleges, but are below state and national averages.In 2015 the college piloted a selective guaranteed admission program, Engineering Pathways (EP),to one of the nation’s top engineering schools (The Grainger College of Engineering at theUniversity of Illinois Urbana Champaign, UIUC). Initial results for the small first-year cohort werevery positive: 89% transfer rate and all students who transferred to UIUC graduated. Theprogram’s initial success rested on a) cohort model with a small number of students and strongcontrols; b) co-branding that attracted local students interested in pursuing engineering at UIUCwho
. In developing the intervention activities, the investigative team consideredbest practices from a large body of literature on improving the retention and graduation rates ofunderrepresented minority students in STEM to address the following research question:Research Question. Does peer-led team learning through recitation labs in engineering coursesincrease students’ mathematics confidence, mathematics efficacy, engineering identity, andpersistence in engineering pathways?The team constructed the activities based on studies that highlighted the need for active andcollaborative learning environments to engage underrepresented minorities, specifically femalestudents, in engineering fields. These activities had high indicators for support to
methodologicalinsights on how to examine the research questions addressed in this proposal. We will build on these initialfindings to create surveys, revise interview protocols, collect larger-scale quantitative and qualitative data,design an intervention, and assess the effectiveness of the intervention. ReferencesAmerican Society for Engineering Education. (2019). Longitudinal retention and time-to-graduation report [Data file]. http://www.asee.orgAndres, L., & Carpenter, S. (1997). Today's higher education students: Issues of admission, retention, transfer, and attrition in relation to changing student demographics. Centre for Policy Studies in Education, University of British
(9% to 15%) and were enrolled in lessadvanced math classes than their counterparts [26]. Latinx students and other racial minoritizedgroups (e.g., students who are Black, Native American) remain underrepresented in engineering[27] and have lower persistence and graduation rates [28].Previous studies on ME OnlineIn 2018, a brief survey was administered to 340 mechanical engineering students at Cal PolyPomona as part of a pilot study to investigate the impact of ME Online [1]. The vast majority ofstudents felt the video library made a positive impact on their education and helped their gradesin at least one course. However, the survey did not explore the socio-emotional impact of thevideo library on students nor obtain specific recommendations
. Web: IGI Global, 2012, pp. 1–26.[6] G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, “What is backward design?,” in Understanding by Design., 1st editio., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall, 2001, pp. 7–19.[7] U. of F. Heavener School of Business, “Business Administration | General Studies | BABA.” [Online]. Available: https://catalog.ufl.edu/UGRD/colleges- schools/UGBUS/BAG_BABA/#academiclearningcompacttext.[8] U. of F. Fisher School of Accounting, “Accounting.” [Online]. Available: https://catalog.ufl.edu/UGRD/colleges-schools/UGACT/ACT_BSAC/#academiclearningcompacttext.[9] C. Atman, R. Adams, and M. Cardella, “Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners,” J
) has thehighest impact to students’ grade outcomes, retention and graduation rates, as well as their senseof connection, belonging and positive experience in their first year. This complete research paperexamines the quantitative and qualitative impact of intentionally creating small,registration-based cohorts of students to regularly attend SI sessions, implemented at ouruniversity in a first year engineering course in fall 2020. Our results indicate that (as in othersemesters), students who attended SI sessions had statistically significant higher course GPAsthan those who did not attend, but an added benefit was that almost 40% of students in the courseregularly attended SI this fall, compared to previous fall semesters where only 12-22
student studying Industrial and Systems Engineering at The Ohio State University. In addition to working on undergraduate research in the Department of Engineering Education she is an Undergraduate Teaching Assistant for the Fundamentals of Engineering program for first-year engineering students.Amy Kramer P.E., Ohio State University Amy Kramer is a graduate student and research associate at The Ohio State University in the Engineering Education Department. She earned a B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineering from The Ohio State Univer- sity in 2010 and 2013, respectively. Most recently she worked as a structural engineering consultant in Columbus, OH where she specialized in the design of reinforced concrete and steel
situated in the Engineering for US All (e4usa): A National Pilot Programfor High School Engineering Course and Database program, a new pre-college engineeringinitiative funded in 2018 by the National Science Foundation. The program aims to demystifyengineering for all high school students as an avenue to engineering literacy and a means ofenhancing potential engineering pathways [17]. The e4usa course was intentionally designed tobe inclusive by providing engineering design experiences relating to student fields of interest inlocal and global contexts. The course objectives are broken down into four major threads andwoven through seven units. The four threads include: a) discovery of the discipline ofengineering and engineering identity, b
concept maps from the pre-classactivities or create new ones, allowing the instructors to evaluate knowledge gained and/orperception changes.Research Approach and ParticipantsIn the fall of 2020, two of the authors incorporated the newly-created module on the Impacts ofCOVID-19 on Transportation Systems and Stakeholders in their classes. The students involvedin this study included 11 students (2 undergraduate seniors and nine graduate master’s students)from Southern Methodist University (SMU), a medium-sized private research university. Bothundergraduate students were enrolled in the bachelor of science program in civil andenvironmental engineering. Master's degree students were enrolled in various degree programs,including the master of science
better understanding of therelationship between CSE, beliefs about creativity, and the lived experiences of undergraduatewomen engineering majors will lead to strategies for educational reform that will benefit allstudents, increase pathways for female students into the engineering major, and contribute to thesuccess of women engineering. Methodology and Instrument A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was used for this study [30]. This two-phase methodology was best suited to this research because synthesis of the quantitative surveywith the themes discovered from the qualitative data analysis lead to answers to the researchquestions. In this sequential explanatory design, the quantitative survey
onintroducing students to engineering, the focus of such interventions and studies has shifted toconstructs that researchers believe will be better predictors of students choosing to pursueengineering as a college major and/or career (Hynes et al., 2017). Those include identity,perceptions of engineering, attitudes and beliefs toward engineering, self-efficacy in engineering,and interest in engineering. One factor that has been consistently cited among those conductingresearch and evaluation of such programs is students’ perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs towardengineering (Hynes et al., 2017). There have been mixed results with respect to the extent towhich in-school and out-of-school engineering programs are able to increase students’perceptions
Paper ID #33951Understanding Gen Z’s Declining Engagement with WE@RIT, a Woman inEngineering ProgramMs. Kathrine Ehrlich-Scheffer, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Kathy has served as Director of Women in Engineering at RIT (WE@RIT) since 2015, and brings a rich array of life experiences to the position. After graduating with a bachelor’s degree in Public Affairs from a women’s college where she learned first-hand the value of a female-centric support network, Kathy made her way to Silicon Valley. There she studied CMOS Mask Layout Design which eventually led her to a position in IT for a semiconductor IP start-up
responses from a range of computer science students from first year tograduate students. It should be mentioned that our study is not intended to be a completeformal quantitative investigation. Validation of the results with larger studies may berequired.The total number of raw data responses from all three institutions was 815. After cleaning theraw data to remove responses without signed consent, the total number of responses was 782.The full set of questions that were asked is included in Appendix A.Opinions of the respondents regarding the questions on search engine results and algorithm biaswere recorded in the form of a 7-point Likert scale ranging from “Strongly disagree” to“Strongly agree”. A sampling issue with the respondents was that
—orbelieves, as we do—that all of the EOP competencies are important for students toexperience by the time they graduate, it behooves us to think about how to deliver thesecompetencies across a curriculum.The engineering curriculum in which this study occurred is designed to provide at least onePjBL class each semester. We envision a delivery of different subsets of the EOP frameworkcompetencies across the project-spine to ensure meaningful engagement is achieved for allcompetencies. This approach allows for at least two synergistic pedagogical and researchopportunities: 1) emphasizing a different subset of EOP competencies in different PjBLcourses allows students to see the interdependencies between those competencies in moredepth; and 2) spreading
Paper ID #32977Integration of Ethics-Focused Modules into the Steps of the EngineeringDesign ProcessMs. Jessica R. Edelson, Duke University Jessica is senior Robertson Scholar at Duke University pursuing a double major in Political Science and Visual and Media Studies, with a certificate in Information Science.Micalyn Struble, Duke University Micalyn is a third-year student at Duke University, majoring in Public Policy and minoring in Computer Science. She views this project as a chance to ingrain ethical thinking into engineering, in the hopes that many ethical dilemmas of the past can be confidently handled in the
example, the effect of a global experience, and • papers about courses designed for non-engineering student groups.A few of the papers in our study were not returned by the title search described above, but cameto our attention in other ways, such as work on research projects other than this one. In our preliminary analysis of the papers, we focused on evidence in the categoriesarticulated by the various stakeholder groups we analyzed above: • an integrated view that does not separate communication from engineering work • understanding communication as both a distinctive field of expertise and an interdisciplinary enterprise • designing curricula, not just courses • recognizing various degrees and modes of
(Table 4), as it required too much interpretation by theobserver to score it consistently; this reduced the number of items to 13.Step 4: Second pilot, review, and revisions.After a year of developing the protocol items and item levels, the coding team (composed of fourgraduate students and two post-doctoral researchers) participated in intensive training with thePIs on using the STEM-OP. Part of this was done as two new post-doctoral researchers and onenew graduate student replaced graduating members of our project team. This training was alsointended to help all of us further refine our own understanding of the 13 items to improve ourability to score reliably. The training included various iterations of (1) collectively watching avideo and
-teacher-student-interaction- education-essay.php (accessed Mar. 04, 2021).[26] W. M. K. Trochim, “Research Methods Knowledge Base,” 2020. https://conjointly.com/kb/ (accessed Mar. 04, 2021).[27] J. W. Creswell, Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2014.[28] L. D. Schroeder, D. L. Sjoquist, and P. E. Stephan, Understanding Regression Analysis: An Introductory Guide. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2017.[29]. H. Murzi, T. Martin, M. Paretti, and L. McNair, “Work In Progress: A pilot study of the dimensions of disciplinary culture among engineering students,” Frontiers In Education (FIE
from FIU.Dr. Monique S. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, designs research focused on broadening par- ticipation in computer science through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and disciplinary identity; 2) discipline-based education research (with a focus on computer science and computer engineering courses) in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women (specifically Black and His- panic women) in computer-related engineering fields.Prof. Zahra Hazari, Florida International University Zahra Hazari is an Associate Professor
teaching practices, and the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Dr. Matthew Charles GrahamMadison E. Andrews, University of Texas at Austin Madison Andrews is a STEM Education doctoral student, Mechanical Engineering master’s student, and graduate research assistant for the Center for Engineering Education at the University of Texas at Austin. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University in 2017.Dr. Jenefer Husman, University of Oregon Jenefer Husman received a doctoral degree
Education, 2021 Cultural dimensions in academic disciplines, a comparison between Ecuador and the United States of AmericaAbstractBroadening participation in engineering has been part of the engineering education researchagenda for years. We argue that if we can understand the traits of the different dimensions ofculture in engineering, we can identify potential solutions to broaden participation. In this study,we are comparing how engineering students from Ecuador and the United States characterizetheir culture orientation based on Hofstede´s cultural dimensions theory. Data were collectedwith engineering students at major polytechnic universities in Ecuador and the United States.The survey was translated into Spanish for the
. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Lee, “Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 139–151, Apr. 2006.[25] J. W. T. Kan and J. S. Gero, Quantitative methods for studying design protocols. Springer, 2017.[26] A. Kirn and L. Benson, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Problem Solving and Their Future,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 87–112, Jan. 2018.[27] A. F. McKenna, “An investigation of adaptive expertise and transfer of design process knowledge,” J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME, vol. 129, no. 7, pp. 730–734, Jul. 2007.[28] R. M. Marra, B. Palmer, and T. A. Litzinger, “The Effects of a First-Year Engineering Design Course on
Paper ID #33791Professional Development of Secondary School STEM Educators inSub-Saharan Africa: A Systematized Literature ReviewMr. Moses Olayemi, Purdue University, West Lafayette Moses Olayemi is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He is passionate about the professional development of STEM educators as change agents in the educational landscape of Sub-Saharan Africa. He aspired to leverage research-based empirical evidence to influence education policies.Mr. Collins N. Vaye, Florida International University Collins N. Vaye is a first-generation graduate student and a
implementation of the solution(s); 3)Collection of data on the feasibility of implementing the solution(s) in typical delivery settingsby intended users; and 4) Conducting a pilot study to examine the promise of generating theintended outcomes [12].Description of Study Site and ParticipantsThe data presented in this paper were collected from five regional community college partnerswhose primary emphasis is on 2-year degrees and workforce certificates, in addition to limitedBachelor’s degrees in nursing, secondary education, and business. The missions of these statecolleges is to support the needs of the local community and prepare students for workplacesuccess.Pre-Research ActivitiesThe research team conducted a comprehensive literature review in the
Paper ID #32306Cracks in the Foundation: Issues with Diversity and the Hiring Processin Computing FieldsStephanie J. Lunn, Florida International University Stephanie Lunn is presently a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Computing and Information Sciences at Florida International University (FIU). Her research interests span the fields of Computing and Engineer- ing Education, Human Computer Interaction, Data Science, and Machine Learning. Previously, Stephanie received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Neuroscience from the University of Miami, in addition to B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science from FIU.Dr. Monique S
Paper ID #33704Research-practitioner Partnerships Supported by the Computer Science forAll Program: A Systematic EvaluationRahman AdekunleMr. John Kofi Eshirow Jr., University of Virginia John Eshirow is a first-generation fourth-year student at the University of Virginia majoring in Systems Engineering with a concentration in Economic Systems and a minor in Engineering Business. Originally from the Bronx, he grew to have a passion for understanding and developing the intersection of business, engineering, and technology. In the future, John hopes to be an investor and strategic advisor to companies whose mission is
migrators faced the sameproblems as students who dropped out of STEM majors (leavers) but chose another STEMmajor. A qualitative study [15] on students migrating to industrial engineering (IE) showedthat students left their initial engineering major because of negative experiences with facultyand classes, very low interaction with faculty, and change in career goals to an industrialengineer. The other studies which have researched migrators are quantitative [10, 13] anddescribe metrics such as major stickiness (percentage of students that enroll and subsequentlygraduate in a major) and odds of graduation in the major. Quantitative studies into whystudents drop a major cannot provide the rich description obtained from a qualitative studythat is