. Similarly, Olds & Miller [18] examined thecumulative GPAs of multiple student cohorts, but the analysis compared students across groups (thosewho participated in an integrated curriculum intervention and a control) rather than studying the shifts andtrajectories of students’ GPAs without intervention.In this work, we seek to fill this gap by studying students’ GPA over time. By doing so, we may betterunderstand how GPA functions more generally before attempting to pinpoint specific factors thatinfluence GPA positively or negatively. Based on the evidence emphasizing the importance of grades andGPA as a research tool and as an influential aspect of students’ academic lives and overall wellbeing, wealso seek to share the tools of our analysis
Design Competition in China and included industrialmachines such as machining centers or rubbish cleaning machines.The MOSS SystemThe objective of the MOSS system is “to impart intuitive understanding of complex systems anddesign principles” according to its maker – Modular Robotics. [14][15][16] Children are exposedto “mechanical construction, basic circuitry, kinematic motion, robotics, software integration,and programming” through modular robot design and construction. [17] It is an interesting toolfor creative robot building and understanding modular robots. [14][15][16] A variety of blocksare available including the ones for power/light sources, control, and sensing (Table 1, Figure 1and 2) as well as structural MOSS blocks, power/data
University. She focused on integrated STEM curriculum development as part of an NSF STEM+C grant as a Postdoctoral Research Assistant through INSPIRE in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University Her current research interests focus on early P-12 engineering education and identity development.Jacqueline Gartner, Campbell University Jacqueline Gartner is an Assistant Professor at Campbell University in the School of Engineering, which offers a broad BS in engineering with concentrations in chemical and mechanical.Dr. Michele Miller, Campbell University Dr. Michele Miller is a Professor and Associate Dean at Campbell University. Prior to joining Campbell in 2017, she was a professor of mechanical engineering
programming. Her research and evaluation has focused on educational programs, outreach and collective impact activities that foster inclusion and equity in computing and engineering. College student development and faculty career development are central themes across her body of work, which focuses on focus on capacity building in research and evaluation, organizational change in STEM education, and integration of computing into pedagogy.Dr. David K. Pugalee, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. David Pugalee is a full professor and Director of the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. Dr. Pugalee has published works on STEM teaching and learning
in both the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment and the Division of Educational Leadership and Innovation at Arizona State University. She has a Ph.D. in Educational Technology, postgraduate training in Computer Systems Engineering, and many years of experience teaching and developing curriculum in various learning environments. She has taught technology integration and teacher training to undergrad- uate and graduate students at Arizona State University, students at the K-12 level locally and abroad, and various workshops and modules in business and industry. Dr. Larson is experienced in the application of instructional design, delivery, evaluation, and specializes in eLearning
. This essentially divided the students into two groups—synchronousand asynchronous. Students expressed both appreciation for an in-person experience but also thechallenges of engaging with their peers across multiple platforms. For winter 2021, we are onlyoffering the course in an online synchronous format. While it’s helpful to have everyone on thesame platform, we are looking forward to a return to an in-person environment in fall 2021.Another takeaway from student input and our own reflection on the course has been to includemore direct engagement with the competencies. For winter 2021, we have integrated more directwork with the competency rubrics such as working directly with the reflection prompts.A third takeaway were ideas to help
, 3D printing, Arduino electronics, introductory programming), and the last sixweeks students work in multidisciplinary teams to design and build functional prototypes of aproduct to help society. At the end of the semester, teams create formal engineering designreports and give presentations of their functional prototypes.This work focuses on one of the technical skills aspects of the course, the Arduino-based sensorand actuator kits and related curriculum. Each student in the course purchases an Arduino starterset as the course “textbook” for individual ownership and more personalized experimentation inlearning about common engineering sensors and actuators. In parallel to the physical Arduinokits, the course recently introduced the use of
offering features such as chat rooms and direct messaging, to encourage discussions and interactions in the class. Slack provides more instant communication and is also more mobile-friendly than email communication.4) Adjust the term project so that students could choose to do a group project or an individual project. The requirements of additional hardware components for the project were minimized. The project assessment focused more on unit testing and system integration with some level of simulation instead of full hardware integration. The final presentation of the project was changed from in-person oral presentation format to virtual format. Each project group was required to make a 10-minute video of their project presentation
following: the most salient/beneficial aspects of the program, the impactof the LLL program on graduates’ attitudes and behaviors, the perceived value of the LLLprogram among alumni, and the key learning from the program that continues to shape graduates'leadership today.Through the survey, we sought to identify which parts of the curriculum the graduates view asmost influential in their leadership development.a. Self-awareness through various assessment instrumentsb. Consciously creating a clear vision for one’s future through a leading and learning planc. Using action learning strategies for testing one’s abilities centered on an action learning projectd. Gaining more clarity about what “leadership” really is, what it looks like, and the
2016 and is an Assistant Professor-Educator in Biomedical Engineering and the Undergraduate Program Director in Biomedical Engineering. Before joining the University of Cincinnati, she was an Assistant Professor in Chemical and Biomedical Engi- neering at Syracuse University for two years. She teaches a variety of biomedical engineering courses from the first year to the fifth year in the curriculum, including CAD, electric circuits, and sensing and measurement. Her educational research interests include the use of teaching technologies and student engagement in learning. Her Ph.D. and Masters in Biomedical Engineering were granted from Vanderbilt University where she completed a certificate in college teaching. She
their interactionswithin teams so that they can improve the overall well-being of the team.ConclusionThis pilot project developed a preliminary approach to evaluate teamwork and leadership withinthe Civil Engineering, and Construction Engineering and Management curriculum using an SLR,peer-evaluation, and psychological safety (PS) survey. Through the project we evaluated thestudents' ability to effectively perform within a group on a few team assignments. They eachprovided artifacts directly aligned to SO 5: provided leadership, created a collaborative andinclusive environment, established goals, planned tasks, and met objectives.Based on the SLR and the peer-evaluation, students’ notion of leadership was closely tied to therole of a leader. In
Engineering Department, North Dakota State University (NDSU). He also served as the Chair of Civil Engineering Department, NDSU from 2010 to 2013. Prior to NDSU, he was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering, Polytechnic University, New York from 1999 to 2002. He received his Bachelor of Engineering in Environmental Engineering from Chiang Mai University, Thailand in 1990, M.S. in Agricultural Engineering from University of Hawaii in 1993, and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) in 1997. In 1998, he was a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the Institute of Environment, UCLA. Eakalak has published more than 135 refereed journal articles. He was awarded a CAREER
, no. 2, 590-598. 2018[14] L. J. Hirshfield & D. Chachra, D. “Comparing the impact of project experiences across the engineering curriculum,” International Journal of Research in Education and Science, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 468-487. 2019.[15] N. Genco, K. Hölttä‐Otto, & C. C. Seepersad, “An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of undergraduate engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 60-81. 2012.[16] R. J. Morocz, B. Levy, C. Forest, R. L. Nagel, W. C. Newsletter, K. G. Talley, & J. S. Linsey, Relating student participation in university maker spaces to their engineering design self-efficacy: the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, June 14-17
Management Review, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 212-218, doi: 10.1109/EMR.2020.2990115. 2020.[12] Axios Events, "The future of transportation in the era of COVID-19," Aug. 28, 2020.Online. Available: https://www.axios.com/axios-event-future-transportation-f12e504d-09da- 4ba9-8f27-b7bbbcd2bce3.html [Accessed March 6, 2021].[13] M. Besterfield-Sacre, J. Gerchak, M. Lyons, L. Shuman, and H. Wolfe, "Scoring concept maps: An integrated rubric for assessing engineering education," J. Engineering Education, 93 (2), 105–115. 2004.[14] R. Valdes-Vasquez, and L. Klotz, "Incorporating the social dimension of sustainability into civil engineering education," J. Prof. Issues in Eng. Educ. Pract., 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943
problem.”[12] The method has found “widespread use in engineering…curriculums” [11]. The problem-based learning (PBL) model for this course integratesmathematics, economics, accounting, finance, communications, project management, andengineering technology instruction around a core of industry-related problems. [10] A uniqueaspect of this method is the use of curriculum materials to simulate professional practice andworkplace scenarios. [11] The course material notes that civil engineering (CE) problems requirestudents to grasp two aspects of CE practice, theory and procedure. A student may understandthe theory behind an application like economic equivalence, standard costing, or learning curvesbut applying that theoretical knowledge to solving a
in an era of digital transformation. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Bringing together engineering and management students for project-based Globalldeathon. Towards to Next-Gen Design Thinking methodology.IntroductionNowadays, we face a remarkable number of issues to be resolved as the world changestowards a post-COVID-19 future and an important range of opportunities to developnew approaches, expand new industries, and establish new realities. Seeking toaddress the issue of the changing post- COVID world disasters with very seriousconsequences, world-leading German academic institution, together with the marketleader in enterprise application software and
seven Information Technology textbooks, over 100 peer reviewed journal articles and conference papers, and she gave numerous presen- tations at national and international professional events in USA, Canada, England, France, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Germany and Romania. She is the founder director of the Auburn University Educational and Assistive Technology Laboratory (LEAT), Co-PI of NSF EEC ”RFE Design and Development: Framing Engineering as Community Activism for Values-Driven Engineeringan”, Co-PI of NSF CISE ”EAGER: An Accessible Coding Curriculum for Engaging Underserved Students with Special Needs in Afterschool Programs”, institutional partner of AccessComputing (http://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/), Ac
, setexpectations, and build awareness of the importance and relevance of equity and inclusion totheir academic and professional careers. By incorporating elements of equity, inclusion, anddiversity into the orientation curriculum, institutions can work to develop norms related tostudent interaction focused on tolerance, support, and cultural appreciation. These types ofactivities and connections, especially when completed early in the academic experience, areinstrumental in the development of students’ sense of belonging [35]. In addition, Tinto [13]found that social connection and integration with campus community can result in increasedretention rates and attributed that to feelings of connection and belonging to the institution.Using freshman
providing enough graduates with an appropriate background to work inthese areas. It may stem from the fact that wireless communications, DSP, and SDR are alltopics traditionally taught at the graduate level within Electrical and Computer Engineering(ECE). Thus, the majority of persons with the requisite knowledge and interest will be ECE MSand PhD graduates. While many ECE graduate level students are strong coders, softwaredevelopment skills are not the primary focus of traditional ECE programs, at least whencompared to that of a typical Computer Science (CS) curriculum. This results in a small pool ofcandidates for positions in wireless communications and SDR, made up of MS and PhDs in ECEwho happened to focus within the area of wireless
leadership development, performance management, competency development and people analytics. She integrates her research in Engineering Education with prior background in Human Resource Management and Engineering to understand better ways to develop STEM workforce both in universities and companies.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S
Paper ID #33466Development of the Fit of Personal Interests and Perceptions ofEngineering Survey (F-PIPES) Instrument (Fundamental)Dr. Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Morgan Hynes is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity and Director of the FACE Lab research group at Purdue. In his research, Hynes explores the use of engineering to integrate academic subjects in K-12 classrooms. Specific research interests include design metacognition among learners of all ages; the knowledge base for teaching K-12 STEM through engi- neering; the relationships
/19378620902786499.[7] K. A. Neeley, C. D. Wylie, and B. Seabrook. “In Search of Integration : Mapping ConceptualEfforts to Apply STS to Engineering Education,” presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition , Tampa, Florida. pp. 11, 2019.[8] S. B. Pritchard, Confluence: The Nature of Technology and the Remaking of the Rhone.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.[9] N. Starosielski, The Undersea Network. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2015.[10] A. Carse, Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.[11] T. Mitchell, Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. University of CaliforniaPress, 2002.[12] S. B. Pritchard,“ Toward an Environmental History of Technology
everyone, even though everything in the society pressures you into sameness – it is a handicap in the end. A handicap to live without knowing the struggle of difference – in all of its pain, its fear, its celebration, its compassion [2].”AbstractThis is an archival record of a proposed panel discussion for the 2021 ASEE Annual Conferenceand Exposition. It reflects a year-long conversation between the six co-authors. Panel attendeeswill be invited to join and expand upon that conversation. Further analyses and integration areplanned after the conference when we will have the benefit of other panel attendees’ commentsand their own narratives.Under ideal circumstances, engineering cultures in academia and industry bring out the best
: So I think in a lot of ways that's…the complexity of the soft [professional] skills. And it's funny when we talk about soft skills. We don't mean that they're lesser than hard [technical] skills. It's that they're less definable.While Dr. James acknowledged the importance of teaching professional skills, he faceddifficulties in integrating these skills into the classroom because of their complexity and lack ofclarity. Due to the perceived challenges of including professional skills in the curriculum, out-of-class activities were offered as an important complement.Faculty members believed that students with experience outside the classroom are betterprepared for their careers through the acquisition of professional skills
Director of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) at ASU. Through the GCSP, Amy aims to prepare students to become globally and socially aware engineers who will lead future efforts to solve the world’s biggest challenges. Amy also helps new schools to develop GCSPs as part of the GCSP Network New Programs committee. She is also actively involved in the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), focused on students’ development of entrepreneurial mindset through GCSP and curriculum. Amy received the 2019 KEEN Rising Star award for her efforts in encouraging students to develop an entrepreneurial mindset. Amy has contributed to the development of a new hands-on
Northern University and her M.Ed. in curriculum and instruction from University of Cincinnati. Her research area of interest is creating a more equitable learning environment for underrepresented populations of students in the STEM fields.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She earned her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Ohio State and earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on the intersection between motivation and identity of undergraduate and graduate students, first-year engineering programs, mixed methods research
program.Ms. Mia Ko, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Mia is a 4th year undergraduate student studying Bioengineering with a minor in Material Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. On campus, she actively participates as an Engineering Ambassador: encouraging younger students’ interest in STEM related fields while changing the definition and conversation of what it means to be an engineer. Her research interests include motivation and STEM curriculum development and evaluation. She is very excited to be a part of this community and hopes to spark the interest of engineering education research within her peer groups and to return to education after industry experience.Balsam
Networking Networking Women community since 2010, serving as mentor, fellowship co-chair, and workshop co-chair She was co-chair of the board of Networking Networking Women from 2016-2018.Prof. Alark Joshi, University of San Francisco Alark Joshi is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of San Francisco. He was a co-PI on the IDoCode project at Boise State University that provided teacher train- ing, curriculum development, and policy changes in the State Board of Education in the state of Idaho. Currently, he is a co-PI on the S-STEM proposal focused on engaging students in the local community to enable successful outcomes for them with respect to increased self-identity, better
mission of the program is “to prepare technically-orientedmanagerial professionals and leaders for business, industry, government, and education byarticulating and integrating competencies in Renewable Energy.” The program preparesgraduates for jobs in the fields of energy and renewable energy systems as well as regulatory andgovernmental agencies. To meet the demand for well-rounded graduates who are knowledgeablein both technical and economic aspects of renewable energy systems, an interdisciplinarycurriculum was developed, consisting of a multitude of selected courses from across theuniversity. In 2018, the name of the program was revised to the “Sustainable and RenewableEnergy” program to reflect the increasingly broad array of energy
new objectives and adisappointing level of learning of polymer processes. Student evaluations of the fourcomponents of the module will be used to target improvement efforts.IntroductionThe mechanical engineering students at Campbell University are required to take amanufacturing engineering course in the senior year. The course introduces students to a widevariety of manufacturing processes. It stresses the mechanics of how the processes work, theirapplications, their capabilities and limitations, and product design considerations. Becausemanufacturing decisions are an integral part of the project development process, this course is anideal place to integrate an authentic learning experience that involves additional learningobjectives such as