? What are some potential concerns? (c) What simple design changes could you make, and what performance tradeoffs would result?Lab survey questionsPlease complete this survey after you have submitted your lab report. Participation in this survey will earn you 1point towards your lab report score. As you answer the questions, reflect on all aspects of the lab activity.Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with these statements based on your most recent labexperience in this course:Scale: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly agree 1. I am in control of setting the goals for this lab activity. 2. I am in control of choosing the appropriate analysis tools to evaluate experimental data. 3. I have the
the possibilities that surround me, and along with them…beauty.Circling a new role, now not who I am but what I do, yet more than that.A minister, literally, to be a servant, one who serves, reflecting my values unveiled and embraced.Circling fluidly between identities and roles grounded in who I am, a leader, a husband, a father, a teacher, a student, still…a servant.My eyes gazing outward, not on a goal nor an identity, external or internal, but anchored to a purpose found within myself yet beyond myself, to live for others, to serve humanity, particularly the “least of these.”Crashing into labels and stereotypes, Slowly circling, while negotiating the
- academia collaborations in software engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 2016. 79: p. 106-127.[8]. Weagle, D., D.B. Ortendahl, and A. Ahern P.E., Universities and Industries: A Proactive Partnership Shaping the Future of Work, in 126th ASEE National Conference. 2019: Tampa, FL.[9] Harrisberger, L., Experiential Learning in Engineering Education. 1976.[10] Banks, S., et al., Focus on EMPLOYABILITY SKILLS for STEM Workers - Points To Experiential Learning, S.I.T. Force, Editor. 2015, STEMconnector: Washington, D.C.[11] Moon, J.A., A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. 2004: Psychology Press.[12]. Hauhart, R.C. and J.E
) decreasing over time (c) staying about the same (d) unsure.”Questions 10 and 11 of the Qualtrics Survey were more reflective in nature than the previousnine questions. While the previous questions took a data-based route, these two questions wereimportant to understand how institutions and ARL libraries were supporting the needs ofstandards acquisitions. Question 10 asked if librarians felt that institutions understood the needsfor standards access, while question 11 asked if library administration understood the needs forstandards access. In figure 8, both questions show their results in a bar-chart form with 49% ofrespondents marking that they felt their institution understood the need to standards access and46% of respondents marking that they
well as thediscussion that occurred as the participants discussed each action research presentation.Additionally, some participants submitted a final report using a template provided by NationalAlliance for Partnerships in Equity, where participants shared information on their actionresearch issue, strategies applied, number of students reached, results, reflections, goals for nextyear, and other additional information (see Figure 2 in Appendix A). Additional data have beencollected throughout the project that will provide added content for analysis in the future,especially as it relates to the findings from this preliminary study. These data include student andschool team surveys, focus group interviews, and artifact collection and review
#1926330. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.7. REFERENCES[1] “Code of Ethics | National Society of Professional Engineers.” https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics (accessed Apr. 19, 2021).[2] D.-L. Stewart, “Racially Minoritized Students at U.S. Four-Year Institutions,” J. Negro Educ., vol. 82, pp. 184–197, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.7709/jnegroeducation.82.2.0184.[3] M. T. Williams, “Microaggressions: Clarification, Evidence, and Impact,” Perspect. Psychol. Sci., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3–26, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1745691619827499.[4] E. A. Cech, “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering
∗ (11) ME,z ∗ ∗ We now have to evaluate whether the ARCs ME,x and ME,z are required for static equilibrium. From Table 2, since we currently have as many equations as unknowns, the ARCs will be needed for static equilibrium and thus, should be treated as needed reaction couple, as reflected in the final equations/unknowns Table 3. Table 3 Final equations/unknowns table for Example 1 Equations Unknowns (7) RE,x (8) RA,z (9) RE,z
reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.18. Wenger, Etienne, Richard A. McDermott, and William Snyder (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
as reflect on progress and achievements for the atto-grid project.IntroductionToday, the global pandemic has affected and impacted professionals and students by hinderingthem from safely working together at an office, facility, or school. Because of this, manyprofessionals must work at home where electricity or internet connectivity issues may be moreprevalent than at their typical office. To address the need for a resilient power source for at-homeoffices, the team developed the atto-grid – a resilient power system that uses distributed powersources to safely and effectively power a typical at-home office load.The team designed the atto-grid for a senior design capstone project that complied withrequirements set by faculty, as well as
multidisciplinary introduction to engineering course, a unique introduction to engineering MOOC, and another MOOC focused on exploring global challenges from an interdisciplinary perspective. She is interested in curricular and co-curricular experiences that broaden students’ perspectives and enhance student learning, and values students’ use of Digital Portfo- lios to reflect on and showcase their accomplishments. Amy earned her Master’s degree in Biomedical Engineering from Arizona State University (ASU), and is currently pursuing her PhD in Engineering Education Systems and Design.Mr. Keirien Taylor, Arizona State University, UOEEE Keirien Taylor is a research assistant at Arizona State University’s Office of Evaluations and
included a design sprint topractice design thinking, an introduction to the team’s selected focus area (presented by subjectmatter experts), and then proceeded with design thinking activities, further defining needs andinterests within the focus areas, ideating and then prototyping solutions, and developing actionplans. The curriculum included community-led, hands-on and practical exploration, ideation,prototyping, feedback and reflection sessions that resulted in a conceptual design conceived bythe community team.4.3. Symposium MethodologyOrganizing TeamThe organizing team for this symposium included several members of the IUDC, each of whomis a principal author of this work: 3 professors (Marcel Castro, Electrical Engineering;Christopher
, rather than having to immediately solvein a more “public” fashion. Also, candidates may prefer explaining problems with a pencil on thepaper or on a computer using an integrated development environment. Next, they suggested usingproblems actually encountered at the company, since many puzzles are not reflective of real-worldsituations. Such tasks are seen as giving an unfair advantage to candidates just out of school.Finally, they propose problem solving “as colleagues, not as examiners” a recommendation whichhighlights that rather than an intense interrogation the process should be balanced, and shouldinvolve working together to solve issues, and that this could even be accomplished with other“potential teammates.”In addition to the two
in shifting student bias towards inclusion in the three interventions. The mostpromising approach is student-led, where senior students worked to change the student culturedirectly.Introduction and BackgroundImproving diversity in STEM fields is an important goal and has been widely studied. It is well-known that students and professionals in STEM careers in the USA do not reflect the generalpopulation of the country [1]. For example, white men make up 31.6% of the general populationwhile they make up 51% of scientists and engineers. Black men make up 6% of the populationand 3% of the STEM workforce. The percentage of non-white and non-Asian people in the USAis 31.3% while the percentage of this sub-population working in STEM is just 12%. In
futureimprovement of the UIC model adopted in the IAPhD Project.Regional and national R&D in high-level talent training in JapanJapan’s UIC supporting initiatives reflected the importance of small firms in R&D. Thecountry’s UICs did not develop as rapidly as those of the U.S. and other European countries,possibly due to the lack of funding for small firms with R&D energy [13]-[14]. Since smallfirms usually face resource constraints [15], innovation initiatives constantly monitor theirperformance to provide the necessary support [16]. It is suggested that small firms benefit fromUIC regarding its characteristics related to practical goals and productization [17]. Japan hasalso emphasized on high-level talent training to stimulate both national
, several ofour middle years major-required courses, and a new third-year course designed for students whoexpect to graduate within the next year [29]. The first-year course introduces students toprinciples of reflection as a building block of SDL, in addition to design thinking, and thebiomedical engineering (BME) field. In the middle years’ courses, students engage in signaturelearning experiences that foster their entrepreneurial mindset and encourage them to integratewhat they are learning with some of their prior extra- and co-curricular experiences. In their thirdyear, students complete a new, major-required course entitled The Art of Telling Your Story thatacts as a type of capstone experience in this vertically integrated curriculum.The
. The earlier in their education engineers are exposed to the layers ofabstraction associated with the leaps from experiment to project and product, the more theywill be able to advance not only their own craft, but the field altogether. The stakeholders whobenefit from a self-reflective engineering force will live comfortably and sustainably, so longas engineers are equipped to recognize all the abstract constraints they face in the design oftheir processes and products.Frameworks like Engineering for One Planet help offset the simple unfathomability ofchallenges on time scales incomprehensible to engineers and their stakeholders today. EOP inparticular takes advantage of the logical conclusion of engineering fields undergoing‘expansive
guide students to an appropriateproblem-solving strategy, encouraging discussion and peer instruction. Though some SRSs allowfor direct numerical response, Plickers questions are limited to multiply choice numerical answeroptions. Peer Instruction provides an opportunity for stronger students to encourage and guideothers to the correct answer. To the degree the Peer Instruction pedagogy is used, students aregiven a great deal of autonomy over a good grade as they experience relatedness and developtheir personal competence.Student PerspectivesThe authors have been collecting student survey data (often using Plickers) from 2016 to 2021.The following data reflect survey results from over 700 students in 38 course sections taught bythree faculty
study must be viewed along with the threats tovalidity that are inherent in all studies based on retrospective survey questions. We do not knowhow students interpreted the survey questions, nor how accurately their responses match theirtrue feelings. Multiple questions related to when they started college which was 12 weeks tothree years prior to taking the survey. We fully understand that their responses might have beeninfluenced by their experiences and might not reflect what they were truly looking forward to orconcerned about when they first started college. When reviewing the comparisons between thefirst-year students and upper-level students, one must also consider that students who weredismissed from the college of engineering due to
choose which motivation assignments or quizzes they complete out of a pool of Class assignments and quizzes format More hands on/lab-based classes Encourage students to have their cameras on during were better than turning them more class into theory-based classes Zoom fatigue- students get burnt out fasterSome papers we reviewed noted a negative parallel between the emergency online learning shiftand student motivation levels that our research also reflected. As stated by Vielma and Brey [3],students who faced self-motivation issues typically were affected by one or more of thefollowing
Fall 2020 semester Shared Assignments: Learning Shared Objectives: Rubric: Background Research Paper 4, 5 Yes Midterm Presentation “Pitch” 3, 4, 5 Yes Ethics Reading/Reflection 7 No Participatory Design: Problem 1, 3 Yes identification Participatory Design: Decision Matrix 2, 3,6 No Final 5-min video presentation 3, 5 NoFall 2020 Course SpecificsIn the Fall of 2020, 139 first-year and transfer students registered for EID101. The percentageof students
survey. Most of them are from Texas. Our next study willcertainly sample a large number of participants that better represent the population of the USA inthe warehousing and industrial distribution industry. For example, we could choose some areasin the country that have the greatest number of warehousing and distribution centers. These areashave vastly different cultures and environments. This way, the results of the study would includea better reflection of how the future of work would impact varying cultures, thus providing abetter insight into how employees and managers would be willing to accept the changes neededto incorporate new technologies into the work environment.References:[1] S. S. Bhattacharyya and S. Nair, "Explicating the
disciplines as we havenoted earlier in case of Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Benjamin Franklin and others. In aninterdisciplinary project, participants work jointly to address a common problem applying theirown disciplinary perspective. Transdisciplinarity is achieved when participants from differentfield jointly develop and use a unified and holistic concept, theories and methodology for aunique problem. Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinary reflect a continuum of increasing levels ofinvolvement by multiple disciplines [6]. Interdisciplinarity will be used here in a general sense toinclude inter, multi, and transdisciplinarity (see Figure 2). 4
engineering population of the United States. While the institutionsused in this study share common matriculation practices, all institutions of the same type are notnecessarily identical to each other. For example, some institutions offer majors not availableelsewhere and some may have enrollment criteria for specific engineering majors that exceed therequirements for engineering at large.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) underGrant No. 1545667. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] A. Theiss, J. E. Robertson, R. L. Kajfez, K. M. Kecskemety, and
years compared to earlier years as reflected in the sample data shownin Table 3, and we believe this is largely due to increased faculty engagement and positivityrelated to EML. Table 3 Average Student Ratings Related to E-learning Modules Question 2015* (n = 98) Fall 2020* (n = 133) The instructor reinforced what you learned in the e-learning 3.58 3.95 module through an assignment or a project The assignment or the project was effective in reinforcing 3.44 3.91 what you learned
faculty: “I think maybe like a Best Practices Guide for students taking online classes would bebeneficial, how to effectively manage one’s time since I think time management is really key. It'skey in any situation, especially for incoming students, not quite knowing how is college differentthan high school. Managing their time would be giving student a lot more freedom. So, I thinkimplementing Best Practices Guide, strategies for time management, as well as setting outschedules would give them ample opportunity for breaks as it hard for students to sit in front of acomputer all day long” (Research Participant 5)Conclusion & future work In this study, multiple common themes reflected faculty perceptions of studentexperiences and
’ professional development and thedevelopment of a community project, critical indicators, including student end-of-semestersurvey, reflection items, and the success of the implementation of the semester communityproject present evidence of the effectiveness of the model for this program. Specifically, end-of-semester survey results indicate positive trends concerning understanding, applying, anddescribing the Foundry overall. Additionally, presentations indicate a level of understanding ofthe Foundry as all community event designs were required to integrate the model as part of theirplanning and implementation. In terms of retention and engagement, end-of-semester surveyresults indicate that the majority of the students in the program will persist in
factors might have influenced their decision. The intent was to better understandhow students, who are uncertain about their choice of major at the start of the fall semester, cometo a decision about which major to declare. And why some students who are more confident oftheir intended major at the start of the semester end up changing their intended major. Theprimary question being asked is: What can the 1st-year engineering program do to better aid students in their choice of major?An estimated 40% of entering 1st-year engineering students are uncertain about their choice ofmajor [1]. This was reflected in the number of 1st-year students at Binghamton University asreported in a survey they were given in
).[26] V. Venkatesh, S. A. Brown, and H. Bala, "Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information System.," MIS Q., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 21–54, Mar. 2013.[27] M. Friedman, "Use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance.," J. Am. Stat. Assoc., vol. 32, no. 200, pp. 675–701, Dec. 1937.[28] J. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, "Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study.," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 626–659, Oct. 2013.[29] J. Saldaña, The coding manual for qualitative researchers., 3rd ed. SAGE, 2015.[30] H. W. Marsh and R. G. Craven, "Reciprocal Effects of Self