differentstages of the product life cycle [10]. There are two LCA standards created by the Internationalorganization for Standardization (ISO) –ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 [11]. According to the ISOstandards on LCA, it can assist in decision making in industry, government, or non-governmentorganizations e.g., strategic planning, priority setting, product, and process design or redesign.LCA is also important for the selection of relevant indicators of environmental performance andeven in marketing from the perspective of the eco-labeling scheme or environmental productdeclarations.Clearly, the field of sustainability analysis and LCA plays a critical role in identifying theopportunities to improve the environmental aspects of products and services at various
sufficient preparation. In order tolearn and retain ways of continuously gaining knowledge across disciplines, students must alsopractice processes of self-regulating their own ways of learning. In the context of atransdisciplinary design education course, we used in-class critique as a type of metacognitioninstruction. Through thematic coding of student reflective writings, this qualitative study revealspatterns of metacognition that emerged as student teams identified problem spaces, conductedproblem framing research, and proposed solutions. Results indicated that while some studentswere prompted by the critiques to advance in cycles of metacognitive Knowledge andRegulation, the metacognitive action of planning was largely overlooked
modules with faculty and administrators at institutions in andoutside of the NAE Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) network. As of February 2021,these materials have been accessed by 91 users (i.e., faculty, administrators, etc.) frominstitutions and organizations across the world.Two survey instruments were administered to registered users of the online platform tounderstand the motivations behind users’ interest in and use of the modules, how they are usingand/or planning to use the modules, how the materials impacted the users’ courses and students,and the effectiveness of these modules and the online sharing platform. Follow up interviewswere conducted with 5 users to better understand their challenges and successes in using thecourse
Bachelor of Science inEngineering Technology (BSET) program at a higher education institution that has previouslygranted Bachelor of Science in Engineering degrees. The new degree program was launched inAutumn 2020 at the regional campuses of The Ohio State University, which have traditionallybeen feeder campuses.To prepare for a new and effective degree program, an assessment team was formed. Thecommittee was charged to develop a plan for program assessment by following the criteriadefined by the Engineering and Technology Accreditation Commission (ETAC) of theAccreditation board of Engineering and Technology (ABET). Team members collaborated withfaculty and administrators to gather information about the curriculum and developed a plan ofaction
summarize complex studenttrajectory data across time.Summer Program EffortsCISTAR has run three programs for high school and undergraduate students over the past fouryears. In the first two years of the Center, the programs were offered in-person at PurdueUniversity. In year three of the Center, the COVID-19 global pandemic shifted plans (describedin more detail below). Plans for the upcoming fourth year of programs include mostly virtualofferings of the programs at all five sites of the Center.During the third year of the Center (2020), the plans and strategies of the EWD pillar weresubstantially impacted by the COVID-19 global pandemic. Summer program efforts werechanged to a virtual program or postponed due to university restrictions for on
Education, 2021 Continuous Improvement in Academic Computing Programs is Rarely ComprehensiveAbstractRapid advancements in computing require academic computing departments to continuallyimprove. According to the literature, many of those departments claim to have institutedcomprehensive Continuous Improvement (CI) plans by building their own or using externallydeveloped tools to handle the process. This paper provides an exhaustive examination of the“comprehensiveness” of those comprehensive CI plans in the current literature and whether allcomponents of CI (360-CI) are addressed. We identify eight unique CI components, but we donot find any documentation of implementing all of them in a single program. The
planned interventions was puton hold indefinitely.Introduction/BackgroundSeveral definitions and descriptions of the term “troubleshooting” have been presented inliterature. An example of this is in [1], which defined troubleshooting as a common form ofproblem solving that requires an individual to diagnose faulty systems and take direct, correctiveaction to eliminate any faults in order to return the systems to their normal states. Another is in[2], which described troubleshooting as a task that deals with problem-solving skills that arespecific to a domain such as computer programming, engineering, biology, medicine, orpsychology. Furthermore, the author described the task of troubleshooting as locating theproblem or malfunction in a system
needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors. ● ABET Student Outcome 3: an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. ● ABET Student Outcome 4: an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. ● ABET Student Outcome 5: an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet
activities, iv) Family Caféevents, and v) Summer workshop for STEM teachers.i) NASA-STEM content developmentThe NASA STEM contents were first identified based on the existing lesson plans adopted inparticipating schools in Broward and Palm Beach Counties in Florida. Then, the NASA STEMcontents were embedded into the NGSSS based on the lesson plans and instructional calendar.The methodology adopted for NASA-STEM content development is shown in Figure 1. Thevarious steps were: i) Review and analyze the existing curriculum followed by the schools andwork closely with the STEM teachers to identify available time-slots to introduce NASA-STEMcontent to their existing lesson plans; ii) Download the NASA’s STEM content for Grades 6, 8,11-12 from the NASA
also a broad experience in the glass industry, specifically in fabrication of automotive safety glass. He worked for Vitro Glass Company for more than 19 years where he held different positions such as Process Engineer, Materials Planning and Logistics Manager, Production Superintendent, Manufacturing Engineer and Glass Technologist. During his time in the company, he co-authored two patents related to glass fabrication and glass coatings pro- cessing. Dr. Gonzalez is a Six-Sigma Black Belt and has participated in numerous process improvement projects. He has been trained as well in the Methodology of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) that he applied to solve complex problems. In the manufacturing operations field
began working with Dr. Brobst on research related to this projectin 2019.This summary gives a short overview of the program and reports on student demographics, butfocuses primarily on the research, including both the design and findings so far. This summarycloses with a brief discussion of plans for the future. Further details will be provided in the fullposter presentation.OverviewThe CS/M Scholars Program supports WWU students majoring in math or computer sciencewith scholarships averaging about $4500 per year, renewable for up to four years, and variouscurricular and co-curricular activities. Students are recruited from WWU’s applicant pool whilethey are still in high school. Typically, ten to fifteen new CS/M Scholars are recruited for
Virginia University Dr. Pyrialakou is an Assistant Professor at the Wadsworth Department of Civil and Environmental En- gineering at West Virginia University. She received her Diploma in Civil Engineering from the National Technical University of Athens, Greece, in 2011 and in 2016 she earned a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Pyrialakou’s expertise and interests involve the use of statistical, econometric, spa- tial, and economic analysis tools in the broader research area of transportation planning and evaluation of transportation systems. She started working in the area of engineering education at Purdue University when she taught Introduction to Transportation Engineering in spring 2016. She
Design and the Arts at Arizona State University. Alrajhi also serves as a teaching assistant in the College of Architecture and Planning at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. In 2015, he received a Bachelor’s degree in Architecture (BArch) from Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. Pursuing his long-term goals, Alrajhi obtained a full scholarship to continue graduate studies in the United States. He earned a Master’s degree in Architecture (MArch) from Arizona State University in 2020. Generally, Alrajhi’s ar- eas of interest are architectural education, learning environments, design thinking, and curriculum design.Dr. Brian Carl Nelson, Arizona State University Brian C. Nelson is a professor of educational technology with
-to-face mentoring activities during the COVID-19outbreak were mainly replaced by video conferencing and emailing. Our structural equationmodeling (SEM) results indicated that e-mentoring inputs (i.e., e-mentoring attitude andindividual development plan) and processes (i.e., e-mentoring frequency, perceived instrumentalsupport, and perceived psychosocial support) are positively associated with mentoringsatisfaction, which in turn positively predicts student academic, career, and mental healthoutcomes. The findings also revealed that mentoring experience, academic progress, career self-belief, and mental health of underrepresented groups—females, lower socioeconomic status(SES) students, and students with disabilities—were disproportionately
-world projects, and 4. propose a continuous improvement plan for the course sequence.Course Development HistoryThe global capstone course sequence was created to give students an engineering experience in a real-world, global development context. This was first offered in the 2015-2016 academic year as a projectoption in a traditional civil engineering capstone (CE Capstone) course sequence for students interestedin working on a humanitarian engineering project. The initial project was a water supply, treatment anddistribution project in collaboration with a rural community in Tanzania. Due to the growth in popularityof the Tanzania project and minor differences in course deliverables that created student confusion, aseparate section
toapplications that go beyond the traditional oil refining and catalysis emphases typically discussedin the introductory “Applications in Chemical Engineering” course. We developed a low-cost,modified fidget spinner that introduces students to blood separation principles. On each arm of thespinner, there exists a see-through chamber filled with fluid and microbeads at various ratios,which simulates the effect of hematocrit, or red blood cell fraction, on settling velocities andterminal position—phenomena that are utilized to enhance blood separation efficiencies. Due toCOVID-19, we plan to implement this device by mailing fidget spinner kits with a complementaryworksheet to the students to conduct observational experiments at home in the spring
the impact of changes in the curriculum on attitudes and identity development. Theproject team plans to implement all the synergistic approach components during the Fall 2021and Spring 2022 semesters. With the full implementations, the research team will be able toanalyze each element's impact, redesign and enact again.During the Fall 2020 semester, the project team reached out to industry mentors, and manyindustry mentors graciously agreed to volunteer for the project. Even though other mentors werewilling to volunteer for the project, the project team chose two industry mentors to work onindustry-relevant problem designs due to time constraints. Industry mentors, course instructorand the project team met and brainstormed the design criteria
evolved into during the pilot phase. By describing in detail ourprocess, we aim to provide a flexible guide by which other units might adapt and develop similarprograms to help faculty enhance their teaching. We show that program success—as far as wecan see it in these early stages—is characterized by a focus on understanding stakeholder—especially instructor—needs around teaching, embracing a process that distributes power andleadership throughout planning and decision-making, investing organizational support throughtime and money, and assessing progress and goals regularly.To do this, we first situate our peer review of teaching program within the broader context of ourdepartment’s formation and existing models for evaluation of teaching. We
(IPSCAI) program has been proposed [20],[21]. The program is basedon the Super Collaborative Graduate School Program but focusing on local UICs. Duringdoctoral study, students are employed and paid by participating companies. The governmentplanned to provide financial support to participating universities and companies. Although theprogram is still in the planning stage, it is expected to stimulate local business development.Japan has established programs for high-level talent training and is tracking the impact of theseprograms to improve the prospects for young researchers. In addition, the Japan NationalInstitute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTP) has established the Japan GraduatesDatabase (JGRAD) [22]. By tracking PhD human resources
Paper ID #32288Instrumentation for Evaluating Design-learning and Instruction WithinCourses and Across ProgramsSteven Santana, Harvey Mudd College American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Instrumentation for evaluating design learning and instruction within courses and across programsIntroductionThis work-in-progress (WIP) paper communicates the initial planning and design ofinstrumentation, deployed through action research, to assess students’ growth in designlearning and their belonging and identity in engineering. The ultimate goal of the datagenerated through this
of professional valuesand attitudes). According to Eaton et al. [1], some teaching activities in the online environmenthave “the potentials to cultivate deeper learning experiences, but they can fail to do so ifactivities are not designed and implemented properly.” The rapid switch to online instruction inMarch 2020 did not allow faculty members to train, plan and reflect upon the best teachingmodes for online instruction, unless they had previously taught an online class. Therefore, aswith many other researchers, we consider the Spring semester to be an example of remotelearning rather than planned online learning [3].In October 2020, the Chronicle of Higher Education conducted a survey among faculty membersin US institutions to gain
fixture with installed strain gage.The second project uses condition monitoring applied to bearing vibration as a means forexposing students to data acquisition and accelerometers. Students develop a simple LabView VIto collect data with an NI myRIO. Next, students implement a more complex VI that is providedby the instructor. The students calibrate the accelerometer and collect data from a bearing blockwhile the motor spins. Students use FFT to make a judgement as to whether or not the bearing isdamaged.Self-Directed Team ProjectThis self-directed team project is structured to assist students with problem formulation. Theproject plan is as follows: individual curiosity identification, individual curiosities shared withteam, team project proposal
east)Figure 1: Pictures of the bridge.Figure 2 shows the schematic of the bridge presenting the plan view, elevation, and a typicalcross section of the superstructure. The bridge has three continuous spans, 67-ft at both endspans, and 112-ft at central span. The transversal section shows five steel beams receiving a 7.5-in slab with a sidewalk at the east side and safety rails at each edge.Figure 3 shows the elevation of the steel beam and details of the splice, studs, and supports. Thebeams are continuous with variable cross section and symmetric with respect to the bridgecenterline. Close to the ends, the section is W36x135; at the supports the section is W36x230with a cover plate of 10”x7/8” welded at top and bottom flanges; the central
slightlymore value in the synchronous class meeting (81.8% rated it extremely or very valuable) than inthe asynchronous module (72.8% extremely or very valuable). Students also made suggestionsfor improvements, such as providing more time for in-class assessment items to provide morehands-on search practice, which they found engaging, and to account for technical issues thatslowed them down, such as Internet lag and navigating multiple windows.Other lessons learned include planning for the significant time and effort it takes to redesign aworkshop for a new delivery mode, to simplify implementation wherever possible, and thatengagement needs to be much more intentional in the online environment. Overall, given thelimited timeframe in which to redesign
mechanics, sustainable infrastructure development, and material model development. He had been actively involved in planning, designing, supervising, and constructing many civil engineering projects, such as roads, storm drain systems, a $70 million water supply scheme which is comprised of treatment works, hydraulic mains, access roads, and auxiliary civil works. He had developed and opti- mized many highway design schemes and models. For example, his portfolio includes a cost-effective pavement design procedure based on a mechanistic approach, in contrast to popular empirical procedures. In addition, he had been equally engaged in the study of capacity loss and maintenance implications of local and state roads (a World
Shape detection [9] 2 2 4 Face recognition [10] 2 3 5 Image/Video processing 15 Text detection [11] 2 1 3 Object tracking [12, 13] 3 0 3 Table 2: Count of groups by project topics.2.3.1 Assigned Project LabBefore starting the assigned project, students submit a proposal outlining the work to perform. Inthe proposals, students should 1) review the chosen papers and summarize the algorithms to beimplemented, 2) develop a testing and validation plan for Python
, and mathematics (STEM) classrooms. We designedan instructional development workshop to motivate STEM instructors to use active learning andto adopt evidence-based strategies to reduce student resistance to active learning. Our study is arandomized control trial (RCT) to investigate the impact of this workshop intervention on STEMinstructors’ attitudes and behavior. To measure this, we plan to survey both instructors and theirstudents, before and after the workshop. To prepare for our RCT, we developed surveyinstruments, assessed pilot offerings of our workshop, and investigated student resistance toactive learning in classes of workshop participants. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we delayed our RCT study and temporarilyshifted
: Circuitry and Sensory Substitution Curriculum UnitTime: Two weeks Lessons: 4 Grades: 10-12 Focus: Physics/Cambridge IGCSE PhysicsIn this unit, physics students extend their knowledge of basic electric circuits by studying the function and use of more complex components [1, 2]. Students are introduced to basic neuroscience principles and use these concepts to design, build, and optimize a prototype of a sensory-substitution device on circuit boards. They present their models on a scientific poster. https://centerforneurotech.uw.edu/education-k-12-lesson- plans/circuitry-and
Robotics and Advanced ManufacturingAbstractThis paper presents the curriculum, courses, laboratory modules and other student-centricactivities for a new Robotics Engineering Technology baccalaureate degree program which iscurrently being developed at Miami University. The new program consists of theory andlaboratory courses on industrial robotics, advanced manufacturing and automation systems, to bedelivered in a mixed format to support workforce development in the Southwest Ohio region. Inthis paper, we present the curriculum, course structure and planned evaluation methods of thenew RET program and discuss the challenges and opportunities that motivated us to develop theprogram.1. IntroductionRecent advances in robotics and automation have
Engineering Education, 2021 ENGAGE: Co-Curricular Engagement for Transfer Students This paper is a working research project that examines the rates at which engineering andcomputer science transfer students engage in extra-curricular and co-curricular activities. In thispaper, we describe our current intentions and future plans for this study, as well as providing datafrom our most recent baseline survey, with hopes of soliciting feedback from the engineering andcomputer science community. This research is part of a National Science Foundation (NSF)funded transfer student success program that provides scholarships, strength-based training andmentorship to transfer students over the course of two years at two local